Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | jerzeeg  | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 13:44 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
* I meant a photo, not screenshot 
And please see another photo:
|
|
 |
| Author: | jerzeeg | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 13:42 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WEYLAND_YUTANI writes:
| | Hi jerzeeg,
Each collectable minifigure leaflet has an unique number. On the backside of
the leaflet at one of the corners there is a small red or black circle with a
white dot inside containing the number of that particular collectable minifigure.
Note: The unique numbering of the minifigs in the catalog is not the same
as the unique leaflet numbering.
Example: catalog set number col12-2 (Hun-Warrior) has number 8 on leaflet.
|
Hi Yutani,
thank you for the answer! Anyway it seems it does not apply everytime. In example
for HP there is unluckily nothing like that :/
Leaflets from different bags have all the same number in both the top-right corner
(as on screenshot) or the bottom left corner.
Please see the screenshots:
|
|
|
| Author: | WEYLAND_YUTANI | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 12:55 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Hi jerzeeg,
Each collectable minifigure leaflet has an unique number. On the backside of
the leaflet at one of the corners there is a small red or black circle with a
white dot inside containing the number of that particular collectable minifigure.
Note: The unique numbering of the minifigs in the catalog is not the same
as the unique leaflet numbering.
Example: catalog set number col12-2 (Hun-Warrior) has number 8 on leaflet.
|
|
| Author: | bricks2you | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 12:22 | | Subject: | Re: 32064 variations | | Viewed: | 68 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| There is also a variation that has a 32064 opening on 1 side and a 32064b on
the other.
In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| | [p=32064c]
Clearly distinguished by the bottom of the brick
[p=32064b]
Is this only a "b" variant if it has the 'thin' corner guides seen from
both faces?
Is this any of these that is not a "b" or "c" based on the above?
OR
Is the distinguishing factor the complete circle support on the inside?
|
|
|
| Author: | jerzeeg | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 10:15 | | Subject: | collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 110 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 13, 2019 17:33 | | Subject: | Re: sh289 Robin Cape | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
| | The one you've linked to has a starched cape.
In Catalog, axaday writes:
| |
The cape from this Robin matches the cut of the brand new Robin, but if I had
to guess that one looks like starched fabric. The new one is spongy, stretchable.
Can anyone check?
|
|
Thanks!
|
| Author: | swoosh_factor | | Posted: | Jul 13, 2019 16:30 | | Subject: | Re: sh289 Robin Cape | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| The one you've linked to has a starched cape.
In Catalog, axaday writes:
| |
The cape from this Robin matches the cut of the brand new Robin, but if I had
to guess that one looks like starched fabric. The new one is spongy, stretchable.
Can anyone check?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 13, 2019 15:20 | | Subject: | sh289 Robin Cape | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
The cape from this Robin matches the cut of the brand new Robin, but if I had
to guess that one looks like starched fabric. The new one is spongy, stretchable.
Can anyone check?
|
| Author: | TorontoLego | | Posted: | Jul 13, 2019 13:42 | | Subject: | 32064 variations | | Viewed: | 94 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| [p=32064c]
Clearly distinguished by the bottom of the brick
[p=32064b]
Is this only a "b" variant if it has the 'thin' corner guides seen from
both faces?
Is this any of these that is not a "b" or "c" based on the above?
OR
Is the distinguishing factor the complete circle support on the inside?
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 12:53 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | I agree. Most customers buying new parts expect me to take the new parts as supplied
by LEGO and send those. They do not expect me to assemble them. But I cannot
sell the parts that LEGO supplied here, I have to sell either a combination of
them or pull them apart. There is no option to sell it as it was originally supplied.
|
My first reply to you was just an answer to your question. I do not agree with
the inconsistency, also, but I am not a catalog associate yet who can do anything
about it. I would be happy to have Marek add it to the Catalog Roadmap for consideration
of being worked on, but it would be rather low on the priority list. Although,
it would not be a big issue to tackle, so could be done rather quickly.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | 62Bricks | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 10:21 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | It is what lego supplied. It has two arms, just no robot arm / claw extension.
I don't know if there is a market for it, as it cannot be sold that way.
|
Isn't what Lego supplies what is in the picture, just not all put together?
You just said it has two arms, but it doesn't unless you are counting the
unattached robot arm and claw. The catalog picture for a minifigure shows the
minifigure assembled. Most catalog pictures for sets show the set assembled.
But your customers are not expecting you to take what Lego supplied and assemble
it for them like the picture.
| | And there are plenty of listings for torsos without arms, whether there is a
market for them or not. They all get catalogued even though this is not how lego
supply them. Yet these pieces don't get listed as they are supplied - but
do get catalogued if you either add another part or remove some parts.
|
Yes, there are listings for EVERY torso with arms. While Lego never supplied
them with no arms and the market for unattached torsos varies greaty among them,
the point of having every torso in the catalog is that every torso is a discrete
Lego element. The catalog tries to contain every discrete Lego element, but
has always been cautious about having listings for combinations of pieces. A
full minifig, yes. Some big figs and brickbuilt animals now, yes. Combined
turntables that sometimes came assembled in sets, yes. Some combinations that
are hard to take back apart without damage, yes. But some minifig parts in an
obviously incomplete assembly because Lego supplied them? I don't see the
point and it opens a giant can of worms. Did you know that through the 80s and
90s, minifig torsos usually came with their heads attached? Should we have a
listing for each of those head/torso combinations because Lego supplied them
that way? Does anyone really want a head and torso with no hat or legs? Or
a torso with 1 arm and 1 hand? I doubt it unless the price is very low.
|
I think the "can of worms" is when BL makes exceptions based on precedent in
one case, but ignores precedent in other cases. The squishy definition of what
merits a separate entry in the catalog is part of what has led to issues like
this.
There may indeed be people who want to buy the torso/head assemblies from the
older sets, and there would be no harm in adding them to the catalog and including
them in inventories. But an exception has been made. We are told that some assemblies
need to be deleted from the catalog because they were never packaged that way,
yet some assemblies that were issued as new are not? Why is that?
Well, it isn't based on what people want, obviously. The market for 1x1 round
plates on the sprue is tiny compared to that for the individual plates, yet that
is the part inventoried in sets where it appeared. The market for the 1x4 hinge
assembly is many times larger than the market for the individual pieces, yet
the assembly is marked for deletion.
Consistent application of a set of simple guidelines would eliminate a lot of
these issues. In the past - and even now - it seems when faced with conflicts
like this the admins have chosen to add complexity rather than opt for simplicity.
Either way is going to result in apparent inconsistencies, but the way that requires
the least amount of waffling and explanation is preferable, in my opinion.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 09:26 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | You just said it has two arms, but it doesn't unless you are counting the
unattached robot arm and claw.
|
I make that two arms.
| | The catalog picture for a minifigure shows the
minifigure assembled. Most catalog pictures for sets show the set assembled.
But your customers are not expecting you to take what Lego supplied and assemble
it for them like the picture.
|
I agree. Most customers buying new parts expect me to take the new parts as supplied
by LEGO and send those. They do not expect me to assemble them. But I cannot
sell the parts that LEGO supplied here, I have to sell either a combination of
them or pull them apart. There is no option to sell it as it was originally supplied.
It is the inconsistency that is a problem. Going back to the sprues, LEGO did
not intend them to be used according to the pictures of the sets. But BL catalogues
these parts as coming on a sprue. They are listed as coming that way in the set,
whether or not all the parts are needed. There is an option to sell the parts
connected to a sprue (or in a bag) as supplied or sell the parts individually.
Whereas here, they are not listed as they come in the set. There is no option
to sell the parts as supplied.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 09:06 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | It is what lego supplied. It has two arms, just no robot arm / claw extension.
I don't know if there is a market for it, as it cannot be sold that way.
|
Isn't what Lego supplies what is in the picture, just not all put together?
You just said it has two arms, but it doesn't unless you are counting the
unattached robot arm and claw. The catalog picture for a minifigure shows the
minifigure assembled. Most catalog pictures for sets show the set assembled.
But your customers are not expecting you to take what Lego supplied and assemble
it for them like the picture.
| | And there are plenty of listings for torsos without arms, whether there is a
market for them or not. They all get catalogued even though this is not how lego
supply them. Yet these pieces don't get listed as they are supplied - but
do get catalogued if you either add another part or remove some parts.
|
Yes, there are listings for EVERY torso with arms. While Lego never supplied
them with no arms and the market for unattached torsos varies greaty among them,
the point of having every torso in the catalog is that every torso is a discrete
Lego element. The catalog tries to contain every discrete Lego element, but
has always been cautious about having listings for combinations of pieces. A
full minifig, yes. Some big figs and brickbuilt animals now, yes. Combined
turntables that sometimes came assembled in sets, yes. Some combinations that
are hard to take back apart without damage, yes. But some minifig parts in an
obviously incomplete assembly because Lego supplied them? I don't see the
point and it opens a giant can of worms. Did you know that through the 80s and
90s, minifig torsos usually came with their heads attached? Should we have a
listing for each of those head/torso combinations because Lego supplied them
that way? Does anyone really want a head and torso with no hat or legs? Or
a torso with 1 arm and 1 hand? I doubt it unless the price is very low.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 08:44 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | Because at Bricklink you cannot sell the torso assembly as it is supplied by
LEGO. There is not a catalogue entry for the torso, arm and hand and robot arm
without the claw, as supplied by LEGO. To match the catalogue entry, you need
to add the robot arm.
|
Do you really want to sell a torso with 1 arm? Is there is a market for that?
|
It is what lego supplied. It has two arms, just no robot arm / claw extension.
I don't know if there is a market for it, as it cannot be sold that way.
And there are plenty of listings for torsos without arms, whether there is a
market for them or not. They all get catalogued even though this is not how lego
supply them. Yet these pieces don't get listed as they are supplied - but
do get catalogued if you either add another part or remove some parts.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 08:12 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | Because at Bricklink you cannot sell the torso assembly as it is supplied by
LEGO. There is not a catalogue entry for the torso, arm and hand and robot arm
without the claw, as supplied by LEGO. To match the catalogue entry, you need
to add the robot arm.
|
Do you really want to sell a torso with 1 arm? Is there is a market for that?
| | It implies you have to either add the arm to the torso, or bag them separately
to keep them together, or store them unattached but need to remember to add the
robot arm, and hope the buyer finds the robot arm before complaining that it
is missing the arm.
|
If you attach the arm one time, it is still new according to the rules. That
option is on the table. Bagging them separately and together are both on the
table, together being probably preferable if you are afraid the buyer will not
find the arm.
|
|
| Author: | 62Bricks | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 07:41 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Precedence.
All of the other torsos that use
are handled the same way.
|
OK, so it's historical. Will this ever be changed to reflect what is actually
received in a set rather than what is needed for a set, like the debate about
the sprued parts now being the whole sprue rather than the required parts only?
If parting these out it is necessary to assemble them, and I don't want to
assemble them if they later become the individual parts.
|
Please don't assemble ANY of the minifig parts if you are selling it to me.
Why would this imply that anyone wanted you to do that?
|
Because at Bricklink you cannot sell the torso assembly as it is supplied by
LEGO. There is not a catalogue entry for the torso, arm and hand and robot arm
without the claw, as supplied by LEGO. To match the catalogue entry, you need
to add the robot arm.
It implies you have to either add the arm to the torso, or bag them separately
to keep them together, or store them unattached but need to remember to add the
robot arm, and hope the buyer finds the robot arm before complaining that it
is missing the arm.
|
Another illustrative example of why the "consistency" approach doesn't work.
In cases like this, the admins have to choose which practice to be "consistent"
with, which creates inconsistency.
The way to avoid it is to have guidelines that are as simple as possible. "Define
parts based on how they are found in a sealed set" is one simple guideline. If
we always follow that guideline, then the set inventories take care of themselves
and parting out new sets works. If we make an exception, then make more exceptions
because of that first exception, then ultimately ignore the guideline because
"That's they way we've always done it," the guideline has lost its meaning.
When faced with a dilemma like this partly-assembled torso, the decision should
be made in favor of the more basic principle, not later exceptions.
I think it is clear that many of the inconsistencies in the catalog are the result
of implementing ever-more complicated "rules" that are put in place to handle
exceptions rather than basing decisions on a few simple guidelines.
It should surprise nobody that people attracted to Lego are also really into
elaborate systems, but the secret to Lego's success as a system is that it
is not elaborate. Just a few rules create a very flexible system.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 06:56 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Precedence.
All of the other torsos that use
are handled the same way.
|
OK, so it's historical. Will this ever be changed to reflect what is actually
received in a set rather than what is needed for a set, like the debate about
the sprued parts now being the whole sprue rather than the required parts only?
If parting these out it is necessary to assemble them, and I don't want to
assemble them if they later become the individual parts.
|
Please don't assemble ANY of the minifig parts if you are selling it to me.
Why would this imply that anyone wanted you to do that?
|
Because at Bricklink you cannot sell the torso assembly as it is supplied by
LEGO. There is not a catalogue entry for the torso, arm and hand and robot arm
without the claw, as supplied by LEGO. To match the catalogue entry, you need
to add the robot arm.
It implies you have to either add the arm to the torso, or bag them separately
to keep them together, or store them unattached but need to remember to add the
robot arm, and hope the buyer finds the robot arm before complaining that it
is missing the arm.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 05:45 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Precedence.
All of the other torsos that use
are handled the same way.
|
OK, so it's historical. Will this ever be changed to reflect what is actually
received in a set rather than what is needed for a set, like the debate about
the sprued parts now being the whole sprue rather than the required parts only?
If parting these out it is necessary to assemble them, and I don't want to
assemble them if they later become the individual parts.
|
Please don't assemble ANY of the minifig parts if you are selling it to me.
Why would this imply that anyone wanted you to do that?
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 05:28 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | Precedence.
All of the other torsos that use
are handled the same way.
|
OK, so it's historical. Will this ever be changed to reflect what is actually
received in a set rather than what is needed for a set, like the debate about
the sprued parts now being the whole sprue rather than the required parts only?
If parting these out it is necessary to assemble them, and I don't want to
assemble them if they later become the individual parts.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 05:12 | | Subject: | Re: Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This part is listed as
I have opened seven of the CMF versions and they do not come like this in the
set. The torso comes without the robot arm attached. Is there are reason having
only the assembly in the inventory, and not having it how it actually comes in
the CMF set?
|
Precedence.
All of the other torsos that use
are handled the same way.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=62691&in=P
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 9, 2019 04:48 | | Subject: | Benny's torso 973pb1652c02 | | Viewed: | 82 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| This part is listed as
I have opened seven of the CMF versions and they do not come like this in the
set. The torso comes without the robot arm attached. Is there are reason having
only the assembly in the inventory, and not having it how it actually comes in
the CMF set?
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jul 7, 2019 13:11 | | Subject: | Re: help identify this transformer part? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, blackballoon writes:
| | i saw several similar transformer entries in the catalog but could not figure
out which one to list this as. Can someone kindly help to identify it?
|
I agree with the other poster, this looks like the ones I have for my 9v trains.
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 7, 2019 08:07 | | Subject: | Re: help identify this transformer part? | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, blackballoon writes:
| | i saw several similar transformer entries in the catalog but could not figure
out which one to list this as. Can someone kindly help to identify it?
|
My guess is this one:
LEGO used several brands for those transformers.
|
| Author: | blackballoon | | Posted: | Jul 6, 2019 23:19 | | Subject: | help identify this transformer part? | | Viewed: | 107 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| i saw several similar transformer entries in the catalog but could not figure
out which one to list this as. Can someone kindly help to identify it?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 6, 2019 21:35 | | Subject: | Re: Question For Someone with Underminer Minifies | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| |
wears this cape
I am usually a fan of dynamically posed catalog pics, but this time I just can't
tell if this piece is the same cut as a new piece that I need to get into the
catalog. Can someone tell me if the attached pic is the same shape?
|
Seriously, how does autocorrect think that minifies is a word more than minifig
is?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 6, 2019 21:33 | | Subject: | Question For Someone with Underminer Minifies | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
wears this cape
I am usually a fan of dynamically posed catalog pics, but this time I just can't
tell if this piece is the same cut as a new piece that I need to get into the
catalog. Can someone tell me if the attached pic is the same shape?
|
|
|
|
| Author: | samsam2 | | Posted: | Jul 6, 2019 12:28 | | Subject: | Stickered Assembly numbering BA77pb01 | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Not sure if sequence number for multiple stickered assembly parts from same set
should increment the 'pb01' to 'pb02' rather than from BA76pb01
to BA77pb01. The part I'm questioning is [p=BA77pb01] and if it should actually
become [p=BA76pb02]
|
|
| Author: | bb1429717 | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 19:19 | | Subject: | 700e H Baseplate? | | Viewed: | 104 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| In the catalog I see there are a few varients of the 700e early baseplate, but
I recently ran across a couple with numbers that werent in the catolog. They
are most similar to the 700eD plates, but to have different featured like the
shape of the cross supports where they cross, and are marked '700 e H'
on the bottom.
Should The 700e H varient be added and/or does anyone know anything about this
baseplate? (sorry I'm very new here or I would attempt to add it myself)
|
|
|
| Author: | mr.misior | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 18:37 | | Subject: | Re: holographic tile ID please | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, mr.misior writes:
| | could someone please tell me which set this belongs to.
the face is holographic and only visible at certain angle.
|
|
thank you!
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 18:17 | | Subject: | Re: holographic tile ID please | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mr.misior writes:
| | could someone please tell me which set this belongs to.
the face is holographic and only visible at certain angle.
|
|
| Author: | mr.misior | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 18:14 | | Subject: | holographic tile ID please | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| could someone please tell me which set this belongs to.
the face is holographic and only visible at certain angle.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 07:04 | | Subject: | Brand filters (again!) | | Viewed: | 153 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| The AFOL sets are not real LEGO sets, right?
Have they been catalogued incorrectly or are the filters not working correctly?
|
|
| Author: | Emperor_Penguin | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2019 14:58 | | Subject: | Remake the Hero Factory categories? | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Right now for the Hero Factory theme, there are 3 categories (Heroes,Villains,Vehicles).
I was wondering if each release wave theme could get its own sub-category (Breakout,
Brain Attack, Invasion from below, ETC...)
I can use the catalog add/change feature, just wondering if it should be done
first.
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2019 11:37 | | Subject: | Re: brown rotating box with part # 5483 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, clearingtoys writes:
| | In Catalog, dakotakidsshop writes:
| | looking for help figuring out what this is and what it is used for. part # non
it 5483 but dont seem to yield any results when searching that #.
|
Part 48316c01 from Set 4756
|
|
|
| Author: | dakotakidsshop | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2019 11:18 | | Subject: | brown rotating box with part # 5483 | | Viewed: | 91 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| looking for help figuring out what this is and what it is used for. part # non
it 5483 but dont seem to yield any results when searching that #.
|
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2019 10:14 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
My dog, Chili, looks like just Dobby, so this is naturally going to be his new
nickname.
"The flesh Yoda is a bit Spicy"
I loooove it.
|
Chili dog.... I would call his leash the cheese whip lol
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 21:55 | | Subject: | Re: Does 970653-1 come apart? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| |
I got two of these in a set that will need its inventory updated. But I am trying
to figure it out. The part is inventoried but it doesn’t really look playable.
I gave it a soft tug to see if it was just clutched and I don’t think it is.
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 17:16 | | Subject: | Does 970653-1 come apart? | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| [p=970653-1]
I got two of these in a set that will need its inventory updated. But I am trying
to figure it out. The part is inventoried but it doesn’t really look playable.
I gave it a soft tug to see if it was just clutched and I don’t think it is.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 14:17 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
It’s as Michael (Hurt) posted, with missing print. I don’t think it’s “worn off”
too clean. It's not uncommon with earlier Lego modified heads produced in
China. It seems their QC was not on par with other production sites of TLG
-Cory
|
I've noticed their ink often doesn't take to their bendy heads. 9 years
of bustling between bricks and it's gone completely. If you look at the listings,
you'll see it's a common issue.
|
Whoa! That house elf appears to have suffered a stroke.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 14:09 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
My dog, Chili, looks like just Dobby, so this is naturally going to be his new
nickname.
"The flesh Yoda is a bit Spicy"
I loooove it.
|
Pics! Gotta have Chili pics!
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 13:40 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
My dog, Chili, looks like just Dobby, so this is naturally going to be his new
nickname.
"The flesh Yoda is a bit Spicy"
I loooove it.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 12:46 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
It’s as Michael (Hurt) posted, with missing print. I don’t think it’s “worn off”
too clean. It's not uncommon with earlier Lego modified heads produced in
China. It seems their QC was not on par with other production sites of TLG
-Cory
|
I've noticed their ink often doesn't take to their bendy heads. 9 years
of bustling between bricks and it's gone completely. If you look at the listings,
you'll see it's a common issue.
|
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 11:55 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
It’s as Michael (Hurt) posted, with missing print. I don’t think it’s “worn off”
too clean. It's not uncommon with earlier Lego modified heads produced in
China. It seems their QC was not on par with other production sites of TLG
-Cory
|
|
| Author: | ForTheGirls | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 10:59 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
| |
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
|
No, no eyeballs showing, just the lids. Thank you.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:49 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
1181
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
Thank you for your reply. The problem with my yoda is it has closed eyes. The
part you referenced has open eyes.
|
It's this one 100%. Almost all listings mention the eyes, or lack of
|
|
| Author: | Hurt | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:46 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Could also be this one (also because your picture looks more "Light Flesh" than
"Tan", but with the color on the eyes worn off:
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
1181
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
Thank you for your reply. The problem with my yoda is it has closed eyes. The
part you referenced has open eyes.
|
|
|
| Author: | ForTheGirls | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:35 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
1181
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
Thank you for your reply. The problem with my yoda is it has closed eyes. The
part you referenced has open eyes.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:24 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
| Author: | swoosh_factor | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 08:54 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
|
| Author: | ForTheGirls | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 08:44 | | Subject: | Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 197 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog. |
|
| Author: | Brick_Qc | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2019 20:00 | | Subject: | How many polybags in a 4561 set ? | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi, I just got a new opened 4561 with sealed polybags and I'd like to know
if it's complete. I have 8 polybags with pictures and one without containing
1x16 bricks.
TIA
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 04:58 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him  ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
I'd suggest it again, but seeing as I have done it once and it got done and
then changed back again later I don't see the point of going round in circles.
It should really drop the "The" as well - we don't have The Butcher, The
Plumber, etc.
|
So I've change it to be the same as minifig entry, but you know in the future
a new admin can change it back again 
|
Thanks, hopefully the dual name will stay. I know people use both.
Thanks also for correcting the spelling of ANTON'S tile.
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 03:48 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
Bricklink own parts list has the wrong part number. They have the left door not
the right door
JXC123. John
|
https://www.bricklink.com/CatalogItemInv.asp?S=6699-1
I see the right door in the inventory there.
|
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 01:42 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
Bricklink own parts list has the wrong part number. They have the left door not
the right door
JXC123. John
|
https://www.bricklink.com/CatalogItemInv.asp?S=6699-1
I see the right door in the inventory there.
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 01:29 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
Bricklink own parts list has the wrong part number. They have the left door not
the right door
JXC123. John
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 01:26 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 16:00 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
I'd suggest it again, but seeing as I have done it once and it got done and
then changed back again later I don't see the point of going round in circles.
It should really drop the "The" as well - we don't have The Butcher, The
Plumber, etc.
|
So I've change it to be the same as minifig entry, but you know in the future
a new admin can change it back again
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 15:25 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
I'd suggest it again, but seeing as I have done it once and it got done and
then changed back again later I don't see the point of going round in circles.
It should really drop the "The" as well - we don't have The Butcher, The
Plumber, etc.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 15:14 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 14:52 | | Subject: | col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
And on their webpages, LEGO refer to it as ACTOR. If it can have only one name,
then surely it should be the LEGO one.
https://www.lego.com/en-gb/themes/minifigures/products/lego-minifigures-8833
|
|
|
| Author: | Fynbos | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 11:13 | | Subject: | Cookie Cutters - bought in Billund - 853890 | | Viewed: | 124 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
I am unable to find in this catalogue the item I just bought in Billund:
5 cookie cuttters, LEGO 853890, item 6255877, EAN 673419306935.
Am I searching wrong or is this not yet listed here?
Thanks
Florian
|
|
| Author: | randyipp | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 00:34 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 00:18 | | Subject: | Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2019 04:19 | | Subject: | Re: New part that doesn't exist without printing | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | There's a new part I want to add to the catalog, and so far it only exists
with a printing on it. Is the proper procedure to add a sort of "placeholder"
entry for the actual new mold/part that has no printing, and then add the new
printed part that I have? I will upload a photo of the printed version I have,
but of course, cannot for the base part.
Thanks,
David
|
I believe you can only submit the printed part, as that is what exists.
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Jun 17, 2019 20:35 | | Subject: | New part that doesn't exist without printing | | Viewed: | 107 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| There's a new part I want to add to the catalog, and so far it only exists
with a printing on it. Is the proper procedure to add a sort of "placeholder"
entry for the actual new mold/part that has no printing, and then add the new
printed part that I have? I will upload a photo of the printed version I have,
but of course, cannot for the base part.
Thanks,
David
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 17:07 | | Subject: | Re: Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| |
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
See
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?S=7735-1
Marek,
Each of these trains would then need 12 counterparts for each door.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 16:36 | | Subject: | Re: Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| |
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
Yes
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 16:32 | | Subject: | Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
| Author: | run4ever | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 10:08 | | Subject: | Re: help to find a item | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In Catalog, run4ever writes:
| | Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
Thanks so much!!!
|
| Author: | brickconnector | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 06:58 | | Subject: | Re: How to add instruction weight? | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | Thank you, I could not have found it without help |
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 04:56 | | Subject: | Re: How to add instruction weight? | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, brickconnector writes:
| | I cannot add the weight of instruction book 8307-1. (177 grams). If I go to https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
which category should I choose?
Set | Part | Minifig | Book | Gear | Catalog
Whichever I choose it doesn't work.
|
Category sets https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S in the top
field ("item no") enter the set number and enter the weight in grams in the field
"Change weight of instructions to."
|
|
| Author: | brickconnector | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 03:47 | | Subject: | How to add instruction weight? | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I cannot add the weight of instruction book 8307-1. (177 grams). If I go to https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
which category should I choose?
Set | Part | Minifig | Book | Gear | Catalog
Whichever I choose it doesn't work.
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2019 14:33 | | Subject: | Re: help to find a item | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, run4ever writes:
| | Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
| Author: | run4ever | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2019 14:32 | | Subject: | help to find a item | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 18:46 | | Subject: | Re: adding something to the catalog | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, samsam2 writes:
| | Darn, I was about to help add these parts to the catalog, but the stickers are
not correct....
In Catalog, mjsheller writes:
| | Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
They were added but I rejected them due to this reason, stickers are wrongly
applied.
|
|
| Author: | samsam2 | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 18:37 | | Subject: | Re: adding something to the catalog | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Darn, I was about to help add these parts to the catalog, but the stickers are
not correct....
In Catalog, mjsheller writes:
| | Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 12:51 | | Subject: | Re: parts | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mikemuscar writes:
| | help I'm looking for parts. 1 what Lego digital designer calls mini alien
pet. 2 what Lego digital designer calls shell morning star. dose anyone
have this parts or know wat set they are in. also where if anywhere I can find
them in the studio program.
|
In LDD, look at the Part # / Design ID in the status line. Use that as a search
term. To catch patterned or composite parts, add a star.
“MINI ALIEN PET” = 95204, a search for “95204*” gives:
“SHELL - MORNING STAR” = 54177, a search for “54177” gives:
If you want both, add them in a Wanted List and then you can search stores (
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/buy.page ).
|
|
| Author: | mikemuscar | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 11:42 | | Subject: | parts | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| help I'm looking for parts. 1 what Lego digital designer calls mini alien
pet. 2 what Lego digital designer calls shell morning star. dose anyone
have this parts or know wat set they are in. also where if anywhere I can find
them in the studio program.
|
|
| Author: | mjsheller | | Posted: | Jun 9, 2019 14:57 | | Subject: | adding something to the catalog | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 13:20 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | Thanks each!
I didn't realize they HAD been added, as I kept searching for the numbers
I had given them as I made the addition form. I didn't know that the "approver"
would change them. That's good though!
|
They were needed a correction as they weren't properly numbered
| |
Miles (C0lsanders_)
In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
|
|
| Author: | C0lsanders_ | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 13:18 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thanks each!
I didn't realize they HAD been added, as I kept searching for the numbers
I had given them as I made the addition form. I didn't know that the "approver"
would change them. That's good though!
Miles (C0lsanders_)
In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
It depends if pending item is problematic or not.
| | And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
|
No messages are sended when item is approved. Correspondence with submitter is
only with problematic items (somtimes, firstly a note is added to pending item
in such cases - in item name like in this one for example [p=15068pb169x]) or
when they are rejected.
That is why submitters should check they "My activity page"
https://www.bricklink.com/myActivity.asp
or this page, section "My Additions Pending Approval:"
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp
Pending items can bee seen also here
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPend.asp
You should check also this page where new additions to the catalog are showed
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?
Check this help page also
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2482
There are also answers to questions about pending items.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 10:07 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
They were already approved on Monday if you're talking about these two.
[p=3068bpb1232]
[p=3068bpb1233]
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 09:19 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
I've requested two changes to listings in the past, both were approved really
quickly but I didn't get a message. If you click on "My Activity" from your
profile, you can see the requests you've made and how many have been approved.
|
|
| Author: | C0lsanders_ | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 08:50 | | Subject: | First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 165 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 11:26 | | Subject: | Re: 62436c01pb01 - year released | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, aladar123 writes:
| | Hi,
I just have a 62436c01pb01 in my hands also its pair and both have 2006 as the
year on them. Do I have a different part or the catalog needs an update?
Thanks,
Tamas
|
The year on the part is the copyright year. The year in the Bricklink catalog
is when it was first included in a set. This is often a year later because of
the time it takes to design and then produce parts.
|
| Author: | mokibricks | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 10:11 | | Subject: | 62436c01pb01 - year released | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
I just have a 62436c01pb01 in my hands also its pair and both have 2006 as the
year on them. Do I have a different part or the catalog needs an update?
Thanks,
Tamas
|
|
| Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:33 | | Subject: | Re: Magnetic Dooku | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
Thanks for the quick response. I'll keep him as a desk decoration or make
a custom listing or something.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:19 | | Subject: | Re: Magnetic Dooku | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, novabrick writes:
| | Hi Guys.
We have a Count Dooku Clonewars figure
on a magnet from
It's only missing the lightsaber.
However different to the listing the minifig is permanently glued to the base
+ Torso to the Legs. Basically only Head arms and cape are removable.
|
| | Is there
a plan to include these glued Magnetfigs in the catalog?
|
No
| | Or is only the complete
set considered sellable.
Also there maybe should be added a notice to those sets in regards of being glued
or with lose minifigs.
Regards
Christian
novabrick-team
|
Here you have very good summarizing article about them
http://thebrickblogger.com/2011/06/glued-and-non-glued-lego-magnets/
|
|
| Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:12 | | Subject: | Magnetic Dooku | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi Guys.
We have a Count Dooku Clonewars figure
on a magnet from
It's only missing the lightsaber.
However different to the listing the minifig is permanently glued to the base
+ Torso to the Legs. Basically only Head arms and cape are removable. Is there
a plan to include these glued Magnetfigs in the catalog? Or is only the complete
set considered sellable.
Also there maybe should be added a notice to those sets in regards of being glued
or with lose minifigs.
Regards
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| Author: | Classicsmiley | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 22:55 | | Subject: | Re: 11650c01 Vehicle Base sub-components | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| | I was wondering if anyone has attempted/managed to separate the joined sub-components
that make up this assembly. As far as I can tell on mine, doing this would cause
damage. I'm curious to know what the 'rivet-like' pins on the bottom
look like separated and whether they could serve another useful purpose on their
own. I would hazard a guess that it is stud diameter for a length of one plate-thickness
with a bar-size (or similar) hole in the center on the inside.
I presume there is no LEGO-published part number for the pin alone.
|
* | | 11650c01 Vehicle, Base 5 x 10 x 2 1/2 with Mudguards and 6 x 2 Recessed Center with 3 Holes with (Same Color) Wheels Holders Attached
Parts: Vehicle, Base |
|
|
| Author: | clrv4000 | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 22:49 | | Subject: | 11650c01 Vehicle Base sub-components | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I was wondering if anyone has attempted/managed to separate the joined sub-components
that make up this assembly. As far as I can tell on mine, doing this would cause
damage. I'm curious to know what the 'rivet-like' pins on the bottom
look like separated and whether they could serve another useful purpose on their
own. I would hazard a guess that it is stud diameter for a length of one plate-thickness
with a bar-size (or similar) hole in the center on the inside.
I presume there is no LEGO-published part number for the pin alone.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:45 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 109 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location:  USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
 |
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
I've changed the catalog note for both entries. See if that sounds better
to you.
|
|
| Author: | maninblack | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:42 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
Many years ago I managed to speak directly with a Lego engineer. I reported it
to Admin and for some time the description of the conversation was shown in the
Additional Notes for the part.
The slot is NOT intentional but is more a problem with the design of the part.
Whether a slot forms or not is down, mainly, to the age of the mold.
A redesign is not possible and it is considered to be such a minor flaw that
keeping things as they are is better than scrapping the part altogether.
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:27 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
|
| Author: | WhiteHorseMatt | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 06:30 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 05:26 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
|
| Author: | seymour3113 | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 04:30 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thank You
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Czech Republic, Moravskoslezský Kraj
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador
United Kingdom, England
Switzerland, Vaud
)
)
)
)
)
)
United Kingdom, Wales
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
)
)
Austria, Wien
Australia, New South Wales
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie
Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen
)
)
Denmark
Italy, Toscana
)
)
