Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies We have a new Inventories Admin! - Admin_Russell | Dear BrickLink members, We are very pleased to announce that we are adding member Maggiec to the Community Expert Program. She is being appointed as a BrickLink Inventories Administrator [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 22, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: New color - Part #98283 - peregrinator (776)  | [...] Only parts that actually appear in a set inventory are listed under Known Colors. But you should be able to list the part for sale in white once you have it in hand.
(35 months ago, Jun 21, 2021, to Catalog) |
New color - Part #98283 - Coldwater (2049) | I submitted this using the part form and it was deleted after two days. Part 98283 has a new color being sold in LEGO Brick & Pieces. Listed as white. LEGO element number [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 21, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - SylvainLS (46) | [...] That would be a (ro)bot… and robots are forbidden (supposedly). Anyway, simpler would be to generate the complete requests for change. That is, access [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 20, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - qwertyboy (7866) | [...] Agreed. Then do a forced trigger for all non-decorated entries already in the DB (so current decorated items get fixed), and then change the current web page [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 20, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - Leftoverbricks (2225) | [...] Thank you hpoort! Wouldn't it be possible to do this with Python? I was googling "python webbrowser fill form" and got this idea: - set up a loop where the item number [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 20, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - jennnifer (3535) | Yes, this. Asked for many times and (apparently) impossible to achieve. On the bright side, whoever submits these hundreds of dimensions will get tons of credit in [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 19, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - hpoort (412) | [...] +1, it has been raised many times before. I suspect that they may have lost the (Part 40359a) (or the expertise) to the database (Part 2958pb051) and have to [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 19, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - Leftoverbricks (2225) | As suggested by Baskrie: "What I also see is that there are many the same kind of items without dimensions. So a lot of torsos (without arms, 973*), but I also see a lot [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 19, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - Teup (6606) | [...] With any luck that will include fixing this problem of parts appearing as a chaotic mess in inventories and partouts because they're not sorted by dimensions anymore, [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 19, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - Vosblokjes (7204) | [...] Maybe it should be enforced that when setting an item to volume based, dimensions are required. On the other hand, sellers have been able (since 2017) to spot [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 19, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - BigBBricks (16144) | Thanks for the awesome update Russell! I'm looking forward to all the announcements and especially more emails in the future. Keep up the great work! I was wondering if the [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 18, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Packing Dimensions - Seller Tools - Admin_Russell | It has been a little over two months since we released Phase 1 of our new Packing Dimensions feature. (URL) Now we have started on Phase 2 and the most critical part of that [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 18, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Missing parts in partslist cargo terminal - jeetn (150) | I recently build the cargo terminal. I saw that the counterparts list is not up to date, we are missing some stickered parts in the list, like a number of numberplates and the [...]
(35 months ago, Jun 18, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Missing Studs on Catalog Image? - SylvainLS (46) | [...] Yep, that’s one bad render. And it’s used for 3 of the 5 colours. It’s also unfortunate it’s the default image :( But, on the other hand, they are the official [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 17, 2021, to Catalog) |
Missing Studs on Catalog Image? - wyvern (75) | (Part 30274) There are supposed to be studs on the raised 1x2 area in the back. Why is the model in this catalog image without them?
(36 months ago, Jun 17, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Something new on BrickLink! - SylvainLS (46) | [...] And a popup appears warning you if you didn’t specify a colour :) (A bit surprising when you’re quoting a macro though: “er, I didn’t include a macro!?”)
(36 months ago, Jun 16, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Something new on BrickLink! - wildchicken13 (876) | [...] Awesome! I was having fun learning color codes, but this way is so much easier. Also, I hate to add a suggestion to a newly-implemented feature, but it would be nice [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 16, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Something new on BrickLink! - Admin_Russell | Hello everyone, In response to some voices we heard last year, we have released a tool to help folks out with using the catalog macro tags in the Forum and system messages. [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 15, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - MrPetovan (946) | [...] Fair enough, but aren't the help pages already fulfilling your wish?
(36 months ago, Jun 14, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - MrPetovan (946) | Right, I confused with the height of a plate, d'oh! In Catalog, SylvainLS writes: [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 14, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - hpoort (412) | [...] Nope, what's 'new' is packaging dimensions. The general dimensions of the parts have been there for ages and have been defined. The only thing missing is [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 14, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - MrPetovan (946) | These dimension values are new and relying on the existing but unsaid convention that Stud = 1 x 1 x 1 Brick, which means that length and width will be effectively measured in [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - qwertyboy (7866) | [...] Do you have one of these? (Part 2454) (Part 2453) How high would you say those bricks are? Niek.
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - Stuart9 (1065) | Many people collect these, the most popular are the 2 x 4’s. In Catalog, northshorebrick writes: [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - northshorebrick (611) | Appreciate the info, it's pretty cool. Something I'll hang on to. In Catalog, Stuart9 writes: [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - northshorebrick (611) | [...] Not according to the page. "IN STUDS" Hence my confusion. I found what you are showing me. I'm sure it's the correct part Number solely on the fact their is [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - Stuart9 (1065) | Last one is a moulding error, colour change item or bad mix that should not have made it’s way out into circulation. A little of the old colour left in the injection when they [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Part ID's - hpoort (412) | [...] (Part 4131) Height is not measured in studs, but in brick heights of the surrounding frame.
(36 months ago, Jun 13, 2021, to Catalog) |
| New color ?? white metalic 2x4 brick - donja_nl (7768) | Hello all, With my last purchase from S@H, I decided to buy a keychain with 2x4 brick in white metalic. I like it very much and wondered if this is a new color. Item 854084 [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 9, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Parts with string attached as counterparts? - WilliamRaine (176) | Is there a sort of limit on how these should be listed? The medium and thick string is easy enough to untie from my experience, but when it comes to the thin string (Part x77a) [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Same stickersheet with 2 catalog entries - Dimi_DBB (233) | Hi, I have stickersheet 71459/4106745 but it has 2 entries in the catalog. (Part 2129stk01) and (Part 8205stk01) Can someone explain to me why the same stickersheet needs a separate [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: PU battery box name clarification - MrPetovan (946) | [...] Fun fact, I recently wanted to add a missing set relationship in the name of this part but the input field for part name has a size limit that is shorter than the existing [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: PU battery box name clarification - wildchicken13 (876) | [...] To address the name concern, I think it has to do with searchability. As far as I am aware, there is no way to add search tags to an item in the catalog, so all relevant [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| PU battery box name clarification - ratas (43) | Being quite the newbie with the Powered Up stuff, I'm not confident enough to go straight to change request, so... (URL) Currently named as "Electric 9V Battery Box Powered [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: 973pb0106 marked for deletion - randyf (442) | [...] The note was added with what was known at the time. I have updated the notes to include your information. Thank you for noticing. Cheers, Randy
(36 months ago, Jun 5, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Dazed and Confused? MF inconsistency - macebobo (2440) | Will someone please explain the reasoning behind why (Minifigure twt023) has (Part 65468f,95) attached but not (Part 65468d,95) and (Part 6254,89) all of which are added in step [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 5, 2021, to Catalog) |
| 973pb0106 marked for deletion - edk (9183) | These octan torsos (Part 973pb0106) have a note that the font also comes with a certain style of inner rib (short/long). I have both font types with the long inner ribs. [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 5, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Meaning of pkg type (volume / weight bound) - Gaston.La.Brick (1841) | Hello all, although I have been a regular buyer and seller on BrickLink, something isn't clear regarding the attribute "pkg type" on an item and the effect of it. I hope [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 4, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Black String, Cord Thin length in sets - WilliamRaine (176) | [...] Thanks for this! I'm going to submit a request to add these strings in the approximate length listed on peeron. Maybe someday it can be confirmed by someone who owns [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 3, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: photo or render - preferred? - popsicle (6664) | [...] [...] Don't know about needed, but often preferred. That said, I'm sure there are establish guidelines for what the cat-folks will use. Digital renders (especially [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 2, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: photo or render - preferred? - Turez (43) | [...] See (URL) As far as I know, for printed parts (and most animals and figures are printed) good quality photos are always preferred.
(36 months ago, Jun 2, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: photo or render - preferred? - jennnifer (3535) | [...] High-quality photos are always appreciated. FYI: renders are used as the main image (as a general standard) when a part comes in many different colors for consistency's [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 2, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: photo or render - preferred? - MrPetovan (946) | If you're willing to contribute them, more images is always better. They may not replace the default image for the part but they will be featured in the image gallery for [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 2, 2021, to Catalog) |
| photo or render - preferred? - weblectricity (180) | I'm wondering what kind of item image is preferred in the catalog - a 3d render or a photograph? Especially for animals, minifigures and characters. I have some animals from [...]
(36 months ago, Jun 2, 2021, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
