Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | FreeStorm | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 13:02 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 5198-1 | Viewed: | 15 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 4 Part 4073 Trans-Clear Plate, Round 1 x 1 Straight Side
* Add 2 Part 4073c01 Trans-Clear Plate, Round 1 x 1, 2 on Sprue
* Delete 4 Part 4073 Trans-Green Plate, Round 1 x 1 Straight Side
* Add 2 Part 4073c01 Trans-Green Plate, Round 1 x 1, 2 on Sprue
* Delete 4 Part 4073 Trans-Red Plate, Round 1 x 1 Straight Side
* Add 2 Part 4073c01 Trans-Red Plate, Round 1 x 1, 2 on Sprue
* Delete 4 Part 4073 Trans-Yellow Plate, Round 1 x 1 Straight Side
* Add 2 Part 4073c01 Trans-Yellow Plate, Round 1 x 1, 2 on Sprue
Comments from Submitter:
Source:
https://www.toysperiod.com/img/cache/cd/800x600/d4e4o5g414m4r5g5m444a4f446o2o4c4z5o4p59406u203446323y3y2r2x2y2u2b4w2t294v2t2t2n2b4p4o5l2a4u264x3x254p2.jpg
|
|
Author: | mjwest83 | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 13:00 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 75953-1 | Viewed: | 12 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part spa0027 (Not Applicable) Ford Anglia - Set 75953 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part spa0028 (Not Applicable) Whomping Willow - Set 75953 (Counterpart)
|
Author: | mjwest83 | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 12:59 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 4841-1 | Viewed: | 13 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part spa0026 (Not Applicable) Ford Anglia - Set 4841 (Counterpart)
|
Author: | mjwest83 | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 12:58 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 75954-1 | Viewed: | 9 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part basilisk02 (Not Applicable) Basilisk - Set 75954 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part fawkes01 (Not Applicable) Fawkes - Set 75954 (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 12:41 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8283-1 | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Official instructions from lego.com. |
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 12:41 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8283-1 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {25 to 23} Part Light Bluish Gray 4265c Technic Bush 1/2 Smooth
Comments from Submitter:
There are only 23 of this part (and two extra) in this set (confirmed in my MISB-based set that was never mixed with other bricks). Please see count in instructions (image will follow).
|
|
Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:58 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 805-1 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 12 Part 3003old Light Gray Brick 2 x 2 without Inside Supports (Alternate) (match ID 2)
* Change 12 Part Light Gray 3003 Brick 2 x 2 {match ID 0 to 2}
Comments from Submitter:
Source: Sealed Set Contents
3001
3002old
3003old
Diana
|
|
Author: | therobo | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:56 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, therobo writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
|
Here it is:
|
I changed now inventory sw534 no longer has 553pb016, can be Xref moved from
red 553pb016 to this new one?
|
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:56 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
It will be difficult to implement.
|
No, not difficult to implement; just slightly difficult to get the right minifigs
into the catalog quickly. For now, I will add an inventory note to the set stating
that the other two figures should be without helmets, and I will see if I can
get some cheap figures for the fixes.
Cheers,
Randy
|
I've been looking around too.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:45 | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| Hello,
Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
Nice polybag! It depicts a great little scene from the movie, and I love the
sand green tiles! I have a feeling this polybag will not get released over here
in the States.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:34 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
It will be difficult to implement.
|
No, not difficult to implement; just slightly difficult to get the right minifigs
into the catalog quickly. For now, I will add an inventory note to the set stating
that the other two figures should be without helmets, and I will see if I can
get some cheap figures for the fixes.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:19 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 11 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, therobo writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
|
Here it is:
|
I changed now inventory sw534 no longer has 553pb016, can be Xref moved from
red 553pb016 to this new one?
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:11 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 16 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Everything now was sorted and corrected
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1119541
as this droid can't have 553pb023 in the inventory but completly new dome
was created 553pb034 for it I have to reject your request. But thank you for
finding this mistake and notifying us.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:03 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb034 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome, Lime Dot Pattern (Astromech Droid)}
Comments from Submitter:
This droid has unique dome printig, new entry was crated for it.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1119518
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 11:00 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 18 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, therobo writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
|
Here it is:
|
Thanks
|
|
Author: | therobo | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 10:57 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
|
Here it is:
|
I will correct then everything, thank you once again for finding this
Cheers
Marek
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 08:04 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10194-1 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Teutsch writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 44375b Black Dish 6 x 6 Inverted (Radar) - Solid Studs (match ID 2)
Comments from Submitter:
I built my Emerald Night a month ago, MISB Set which I bought myself from Lego-Online-Store several years ago in Germany. The Set contains definately another version - my black dish has not any hollow studs, it has solid studs, so there is an alternate version of this set! If needed, I can send pictures of the LOT, Train itself, seals on packaging to locate the lego-factory my set got produced.
|
Please attach then pictures of your finding.
The only one which I fould with solid stud on this part is in this review:
https://youtu.be/b02yVGIH2xM?t=352
made by Australian Lego Fan, his speed build were always very good and usful
for checking variants he do them mostly from sealed set content (I trust his
reviews), but unluckily this one is older one from him so there isn't showed
box unpacking and bags unpacking
|
P.S.
I want to be here very carful for this variant here because when I was looking
for some more proofs I found many builds of lepin counterfeit showed on youtube
and in them this dish is with soild studs
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 08:03 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10194-1 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Teutsch writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 44375b Black Dish 6 x 6 Inverted (Radar) - Solid Studs (match ID 2)
Comments from Submitter:
I built my Emerald Night a month ago, MISB Set which I bought myself from Lego-Online-Store several years ago in Germany. The Set contains definately another version - my black dish has not any hollow studs, it has solid studs, so there is an alternate version of this set! If needed, I can send pictures of the LOT, Train itself, seals on packaging to locate the lego-factory my set got produced.
|
Please attach then pictures of your finding.
The only one which I fould with solid stud on this part is in this review:
https://youtu.be/b02yVGIH2xM?t=352
made by Australian Lego Fan, his speed build were always very good and usful
for checking variants he do them mostly from sealed set content (I trust his
reviews), but unluckily this one is older one from him so there isn't showed
box unpacking and bags unpacking
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 07:48 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sw534 | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, samsam2 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory: [M=sw534]
* Change 1 Part Red {553pb016 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Pattern (R4-P17 / Astromech Droid)) to 553pb023 Brick, Round 2 x 2 Dome Top with Silver Band around Dome Pattern (R4-P17)}
Comments from Submitter:
dome top is with silver band version. Existing image of 553pb016 (should not have silver band) in red shows the silver band. Silver band version is part 553pb023
|
Sorry for long waiting, but I wanted to study this problem, which looked like
easy one on the first sight.
Good catch, I didn't notice it when I was submiting new replacment image
for red
I didn't do inventory for [m=sw534], so somebody else used part 553pb016
in its inventory submission and then I submited only new image to replace one
being for this part in red color submited before by inventory submitter of this
minifg and didn't compare them in that time (as I remember it was 2014
).
I created 553pb016 and 553pb023 for different astomechs which I inventoried:
[m=sw456] and [m=sw706]
So you excellently noticed that dome for sw534 has silver stripe, I appreciate
this.
I this post I attached comparison images of all three astromech.
But I think we should create completely new unique dome for this particualr droid.
Why? Look at the droid indicator on dome in sw534 is lime but in sw706 having
part 553pb023 is blue
This is difference in pattern printing recognized in similar parts in catalog:
So summarizing
- photo of dome for sw534 is correct
- dome for sw534 is classified under wrong entry
- sw534 has unique pattern printing which should have own catalog entry.
I will correct then everything, thank you once again for finding this
Cheers
Marek
|
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 07:27 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | Viewed: | 18 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
It will be difficult to implement.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 06:23 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8714-1 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 2715 Black Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet
* Delete 1 Part 2716 Trans-Clear Technic, Figure Accessory Helmet Visor
* Change 1 Minifig {tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms to tech030 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms, Black Helmet}
|
Since this set does not have instructions, we must look to the box to show us
what the figure should be inventoried as. Unfortunately, the box is also inconclusive
in this case as it shows the figure without the helmet on the front of the box
and with the helmet on the back of the box.
This is a tough call. I would like them to all be consistent in this set, so
let's look a little further.
There are nine complete figures in total shown on the box (three with the black
arms, three with the blue arms, and three with the red arms). Of those nine,
only three of them are shown with the helmets (one with the black arms and two
with the red arms). Therefore, the blue-armed figure should definitely not have
a helmet. (Helmets: 0; No Helmets: 1)
That leaves the black-armed figure and the red-armed figure. The black-armed
figure has two images without helmet and one with helmet. Looking at the score
shows that the black-armed figure should also not have a helmet. (Helmets: 0;
No Helmets: 2)
Finally, the red-armed figure has two images with helmet and one without helmet.
Looking at the score for this one shows that the red-armed figure should have
a helmet. (Helmets: 1, No Helmets: 2)
Since the "No Helmets" win by one point, my decision is to go with all figures
in the set with no helmets for consistency.
What do you think, Marek?
Cheers,
Randy
|
Agree to this
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 05:46 | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| Hello,
Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
If you need more information please let me know.
Thank you!
|
Nice. The NK shield in sand green.
|
Author: | rapar | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:50 | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thank you, I appreciate it!
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
|
For you I will, but only just this once.
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Dec 13, 2018 04:41 | Subject: | Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, rapar writes:
| Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.
|
For you I will, but only just this once.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|