Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | carluiscruz  | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 12:26 | | Subject: | Re: 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, carluiscruz writes:
| | Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
this
variant (better picture of minifig color)
|
Many thanks,
As a matter of fact, the minifigure is the one presented as . Now I
can store it in a propoer way, in my collection.
Best regards,
Cruz
|
 |
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 11:02 | | Subject: | Re: 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, carluiscruz writes:
| | Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
this
variant (better picture of minifig color)
|
|
| Author: | carluiscruz | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 10:49 | | Subject: | 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Aug 4, 2019 17:49 | | Subject: | 973pb3600c01 | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
Has anyone actually seen this part in a BAM box with the mitt attached? I have
seen multiple of them in three different stores now, and they do not have the
mitt. They have a single hand and a missing hand. You can add either a mitt or
a hand, staff don't care.
So should this be listed with a mitt, given that this is not how it is supplied?
Or at least have a note about this, as not all the torsos will have mitts.
|
|
| Author: | anathema | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 17:42 | | Subject: | 128-2 - colour of winch reel | | Viewed: | 95 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
The instructions show the reel in the winch to be black; the inventory here has
it as red.
Does anyone know for certain which colour the set actually shipped with?
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 12:16 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | […]
It is hard to believe that Lego makes
mistakes, most of us think that they are gods on Mt Olympus. They also contribute
to problems and often in the distant past put whatever they had into sets. The
old set 800 (I think that that is the number) called for a garage and they substituted
something totally different. They had ran out of the correct parts.
|
Considering Greek gods are far from paragons of perfection, subject to their
whims, inconsistent, unreasonable, and uncaring of us, mortals, I’d say “most
of us” are on to something here  
|
|
| Author: | legoman77 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:55 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
Could you have had 497?
|
No, my instructions say 928. But 497 doesn't seem to change anything with
respect to these plates.
/Jan
|
I had a couple of these and I sort of remember a problem like you are writing
about. But my memory is a bit foggy. It is hard to believe that Lego makes
mistakes, most of us think that they are gods on Mt Olympus. They also contribute
to problems and often in the distant past put whatever they had into sets. The
old set 800 (I think that that is the number) called for a garage and they substituted
something totally different. They had ran out of the correct parts.
John P
|
|
| Author: | Brick.Door | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
I had this set as a child and don't recall anything like that. And I built
and un-builthe it 100 times.
Probably the consistency and quality control weren't as high back then. I
expect you just had a copy of the set with a packing error.
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:38 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
Could you have had 497?
|
No, my instructions say 928. But 497 doesn't seem to change anything with
respect to these plates.
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | legoman77 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:22 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
Could you have had 497?
John P
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 10:58 | | Subject: | 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 117 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 31, 2019 07:07 | | Subject: | New wire version for set 156-1 | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello,
In my sealed version of set the connectors are 'Cross-cut'
and not 'Hollow Pin'
The current wire in inventory is this one:
I know wire are on hold for now (project #15)
A) shall I create a new cross-cut connectors wire for 15 studs and modify inventory
(as alternate)?
B) I create inventory request with:
and
I prefer option (A).
As every wire length for same type of connectors are going to grow or reduce
the same size depending of project #15.
For example: if wire 996ac15blue need to be adjusted +1 studs, new wire on option
(A) will also grow +1 studs
-Fred
|
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 19:42 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 83 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| | In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
I presume you reported the listing? If so then it will get removed 
|
What might work faster than reporting it is contacting the seller. Tell them
that you think they made an error in the listing and they should probably fix
it.
For those dishonest sellers who do this on purpose, they're not really helping
themselves. Nobody who wants a new set is actually going to buy one that isn't,
and someone who doesn't mind a used, incomplete set for a better deal is
probably going to hide all new listings. They're basically harming their
own business and are giving themselves a bad name. I'm not going to order
from someone who purposely is dishonest on listings, what else might they be
lying about?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 15:09 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
I'd bet $2.30 that one is from the 1988 set and the other is from the 1969-1972
sets.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 15:06 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
Pattern is completly different. Add new part.
|
Okay,
Shall I create 2 new parts for "Thick" and "Thin" ?
Actual 649pb10 should be "unterminated"
-Fred
|
Yes, create two specific entries so that the original entry will be able to be
marked for deletion and set to undetermined.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 12:12 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Question for other SW collectors - is it common knowledge that sealed polybags
will sometimes cost much less than the minifigure itself?
|
I've run into friends polybags that are the same way. I always try to keep
sets together for resale, but sometimes I'm shocked that its not worth it
for the tiny sets.
I also just finished a Ninjago set recently where the figure was rare-ish and
more than I wanted to pay and I found a seller who had parted a bunch of that
fig out and was able to buy him in pieces for far less than buying the assembled
fig. Its normally the reverse.
::shrug::
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 12:08 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
FWIW I had a 4 cent part get removed/flagged very recently because I had somehow
hit new on it when listing it (it was bizzare because the rest of the part out
was marked used with comments stating "good for used" or something to that affect).
So there is either a person or an algorithim out there doing something.
|
|
| Author: | BricksThatStick | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 11:57 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
I presume you reported the listing? If so then it will get removed
|
|
| Author: | tpr | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 11:03 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, gogogovro writes:
| | Just a thought... this might not bother you as much if you only concerned yourself
about what your own margin is on the sets you sell instead of going by the 6
mo. average... which (for sets) is never a good idea in my opinion.
I mean, perhaps the seller just parted out the minifig and forgot to change the
condition from new, sealed to new, incomplete. Does he deserve our wrath, no.
A friendly reminder by a fellow brick linker, yes.
It's easy to get self righteous about things like this... but people make
mistakes... I'm assuming this seller is a human not a robot and it is human
to err.
In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
|
|
Maybe
Once a mistake
Two possibly
A lot - definitely not a mistake
Check out his set listings
tpr
| | | |
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
|
|
|
| Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 10:54 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Just a thought... this might not bother you as much if you only concerned yourself
about what your own margin is on the sets you sell instead of going by the 6
mo. average... which (for sets) is never a good idea in my opinion.
I mean, perhaps the seller just parted out the minifig and forgot to change the
condition from new, sealed to new, incomplete. Does he deserve our wrath, no.
A friendly reminder by a fellow brick linker, yes.
It's easy to get self righteous about things like this... but people make
mistakes... I'm assuming this seller is a human not a robot and it is human
to err.
In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 10:04 | | Subject: | Re: 21045 Trafalgar Square | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WorcesterWolf writes:
| | When will the parts list be updated?
It is available on Brickset
|
When someone who owns the set decides to submit the inventory to BrickLink.
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | tpr | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 09:58 | | Subject: | Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 176 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 09:40 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
Pattern is completly different. Add new part.
|
Okay,
Shall I create 2 new parts for "Thick" and "Thin" ?
Actual 649pb10 should be "unterminated"
-Fred
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 08:46 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
Pattern is completly different. Add new part.
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 08:35 | | Subject: | New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
|
| Author: | WorcesterWolf | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 05:28 | | Subject: | 21045 Trafalgar Square | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| When will the parts list be updated?
It is available on Brickset
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 00:08 | | Subject: | Re: Pattern spelt wrong | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, talltim writes:
This struck me as funny as 'spelt' looks like it is spelled wrong to
me.
Had to look it up...
Jen
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 26, 2019 03:28 | | Subject: | Re: BA84pb01R Sticker over assembly | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, novabrick writes:
| | [p=BA84pb01R]
These two bricks are jujst hold together by a sticker. I thought this was against
policy here. I just noticed this when looking through new additions to the catalog.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
The policy changed some time ago.
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | Jul 26, 2019 02:09 | | Subject: | BA84pb01R Sticker over assembly | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| [p=BA84pb01R]
These two bricks are jujst hold together by a sticker. I thought this was against
policy here. I just noticed this when looking through new additions to the catalog.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 25, 2019 12:43 | | Subject: | Re: Minifigure Query | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, leopard37 writes:
| | Morning, Catalog guys I have a query for you. In regards to items attached on
the back there is no guideline in the help page (see full description below).
Could this please be defined and added. Even if there are minifigures that require
editing (I will help if needed). I just wish to prevent less work in the future
by having a clear guideline on what's included and what's not. The one
that peaked my interest is the Mr. Freeze in set 76118 (sh587).
Thanks in advance.
Tyson.
|
It is listed on the Catalog Roadmap as number 25 under Projects Under Consideration:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
Until there is more than one Catalog Associate, the catalog projects are kind
of on hold, but we hope to start in on them later in the year.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | leopard37 | | Posted: | Jul 25, 2019 10:08 | | Subject: | Minifigure Query | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Morning, Catalog guys I have a query for you. In regards to items attached on
the back there is no guideline in the help page (see full description below).
Could this please be defined and added. Even if there are minifigures that require
editing (I will help if needed). I just wish to prevent less work in the future
by having a clear guideline on what's included and what's not. The one
that peaked my interest is the Mr. Freeze in set 76118 (sh587).
Thanks in advance.
Tyson.
"Minifigs - The catalog should only contain minifigs that came in an official
LEGO set or that can be attributed to an official LEGO program, display, activity
or event, regardless of whether the minifig is actually publicly distributed
during or at such program, display, activity or event.
The minifig item should not include hand-held accessories or items defined as
utensils, with the exception of robot winder keys. But do include all other accessories
definable as footgear (flippers, snow shoes, etc.), neckgear (generally defined
as items requiring the removal of the head in order to be placed over the neck,
such as capes, armor, backpacks, etc.) and headgear (hair, helmets, etc.), and
assembled parts serving as such, when these are shown attached to the minifig
in official LEGO set instructions. For instructions with images showing the minifig
in a play scenario, refer only to the portion of the instructions concerned with
assembling the minifig. If no official instructions were produced, then illustrations
on packaging or other marketing materials directly related to the minifig may
be used instead for this guide purpose. (See Exceptions below.)
Minifigs decorated by a sticker may have an entry for the figure without the
sticker applied, and an entry for the figure with the sticker applied. (See Exceptions
below.)
If 2 or more minifigs that came in an official LEGO set are the same except for
different hand-held accessories, do not add another entry for a minifig with
a particular accessory. An example of this would be "Majisto the Wizard with
glow-in-the-dark wand" which should not be added in addition to an otherwise
identical "Majisto the Wizard" entry.
Exceptions:
When the use of set instructions or other official LEGO images provide poor clues
about the precise nature of accessories: For example, numbers printed on neckgear
armor worn by each figure of a series, yet nowhere is it clearly shown which
figure bears which numbered armor. In this case the figures can be added without
neckgear armor. Arbitrarily associating a particular numbered armor with the
other elements of a minifig should not be done.
When the hand held accessory is an integral physical part of the minifig: For
example, the electric light-up figs released beginning in 2005. All the parts
that make up the complete light-up device, including those not integral to its
electric function, should be included as a part of the minifig.
When there is more than one possibility presented within a set for decoration
of the minifig by sticker, a catalog entry should not be created for each variation.
This rule also applies to the Torso and Torso Assembly parts of such minifigs.
For example, some Soccer theme sets have a sticker sheet that allows the builder
to choose from various team insignias and jersey numbers for each player in the
set. If every variation were given an entry, the catalog would be overwhelmed.
The early “stiff” minifigs (1975-1977) were often built into the model and not
shown in a freestanding position. In these cases, a minifig can be considered
a unit without being prescribed as such in the instructions or box images as
long as the four basic parts are present – legs, torso, head and hat/hair."
|
|
| Author: | Teup | | Posted: | Jul 24, 2019 06:50 | | Subject: | Re: Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Biscuit_head writes:
| | Sustainability: avoidance of the depletion of natural resources in order to maintain
an ecological balance.
They're using less crude oil by no longer using it to make plant peices.
They could possibly make all of the parts from plants instead of oil once they
find enough sugar cane farms that can keep up with the demand.
|
I guess producing crude oil generates a lot of emissions. But I wonder how much
less emissions their new production process really involves. I guess it kind
of stands or falls with that.
The end result is the same: polyethylene, which is basically a polluting substance.
But that's if you throw it away, of course, and thankfully LEGO is far from
single use. But the amount of parts LEGO pumps out of their machines per day
is staggering and it has to go somewhere eventually.
I would be more impressed if LEGO invested in degrading plastic. Not making parts
that degrade, I mean, but degrading the durable high quality parts with some
special process. I don't know about ABS but scientists already discovered
caterpillars that are able to digest polyethylene. If LEGO had some scheme you
could send in old and broken parts in exchange for some VIP points of whatever,
and they'd degrade or recycle it, then we'd be talking.
|
|
| Author: | Pam_Shaver | | Posted: | Jul 23, 2019 20:35 | | Subject: | Re: Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| The future will just be holographs or all computer generated images. You
won't even need real bricks. You will be able to trade online for your holographic
bricks just like you do when playing those vitual games. You pay vitual money
for vitual bricks to build your sets.
Afterall you can read a book without having a real book in your hands. You can
play solitaire on the computer without touching a real card. Why not build Lego
sets without a physical brick.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jul 23, 2019 19:56 | | Subject: | Re: Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Biscuit_head writes:
| | Sustainability: avoidance of the depletion of natural resources in order to maintain
an ecological balance.
They're using less crude oil by no longer using it to make plant peices.
They could possibly make all of the parts from plants instead of oil once they
find enough sugar cane farms that can keep up with the demand.
|
No, they couldn’t. Most of the parts are ABS, not PE. Different plastics, different
processes.
PE can be made from ethanol. (Ahoy matey, sugar cane is rum!)
ABS is more complex.
|
|
| Author: | Biscuit_head | | Posted: | Jul 23, 2019 19:08 | | Subject: | Re: Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Sustainability: avoidance of the depletion of natural resources in order to maintain
an ecological balance.
They're using less crude oil by no longer using it to make plant peices.
They could possibly make all of the parts from plants instead of oil once they
find enough sugar cane farms that can keep up with the demand.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jul 23, 2019 18:54 | | Subject: | Re: Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| | In Catalog, TallyToyBricks writes:
| | How are the 2417 plant leaves different from the "plant based" 2417?
Thanks
|
It's the same plastic: Polyethylene. It's just made from fresh plants
rather than from dinosaurs (oil). But it isn't biodegradable in any way and
as far as I can see doesn't have much merit in terms of sustainability or
the environment.
"The new sustainable LEGO elements are made from polyethylene, which is a soft,
durable and flexible plastic, and while they are based on sugar-cane material,
they are technically identical to those produced using conventional plastic."
(and a bit of marketing blabla about sustainability)
https://www.lego.com/en-us/aboutus/news-room/2018/march/pfp
|
Intentions aside, it's kind of fascinating - plants turned into plastic mimicking
plants. The equivalent of making a long-lasting forest diorama out of chemically
processed wood and pine resin?
No more plastic straws where I live, just like plastic bags a few years back.
The zoomers' kids' kids are going to grow up with flimsy magnetic-silicone
LEGO and holographic bricks. Good thing ABS takes forever to break down 
|
|
|
| Author: | Teup | | Posted: | Jul 23, 2019 17:47 | | Subject: | Re: Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, TallyToyBricks writes:
| | How are the 2417 plant leaves different from the "plant based" 2417?
Thanks
|
It's the same plastic: Polyethylene. It's just made from fresh plants
rather than from dinosaurs (oil). But it isn't biodegradable in any way and
as far as I can see doesn't have much merit in terms of sustainability or
the environment.
"The new sustainable LEGO elements are made from polyethylene, which is a soft,
durable and flexible plastic, and while they are based on sugar-cane material,
they are technically identical to those produced using conventional plastic."
(and a bit of marketing blabla about sustainability)
https://www.lego.com/en-us/aboutus/news-room/2018/march/pfp
|
|
| Author: | TallyToyBricks | | Posted: | Jul 23, 2019 17:41 | | Subject: | Plant 2417? | | Viewed: | 101 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| How are the 2417 plant leaves different from the "plant based" 2417?
Thanks
|
|
| Author: | bje | | Posted: | Jul 15, 2019 07:27 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | That is not true for series 1 up to 15 where all leaflets had a unique numbering,
also most series at least up to series 13 (if not all) had a unique code on them
to unlock the characters on the website https://www.playminifigures.com/ (is
no longer active, was closed at the end of 2016).
|
What do you mean by unique numbering?
Do you mean the 122091-1, 2, 3 codes?
I've just looked at 27 Series 8 leaflets, all have 122091-1 or 122091-2,
and I have not seen any other numbers after the dash. The exact same number is
on other series leaflets too. For Series 10 I have a 122091-3. I don't think
these numbers were unique to individual sets within a series.
|
Ditto. Entire Team GB series 122091-1, Series 4: 122091-2, series 5 122091-1
I do not see a unique code on any leaflet at all
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 15, 2019 07:15 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | That is not true for series 1 up to 15 where all leaflets had a unique numbering,
also most series at least up to series 13 (if not all) had a unique code on them
to unlock the characters on the website https://www.playminifigures.com/ (is
no longer active, was closed at the end of 2016).
|
What do you mean by unique numbering?
Do you mean the 122091-1, 2, 3 codes?
I've just looked at 27 Series 8 leaflets, all have 122091-1 or 122091-2,
and I have not seen any other numbers after the dash. The exact same number is
on other series leaflets too. For Series 10 I have a 122091-3. I don't think
these numbers were unique to individual sets within a series.
|
|
| Author: | WEYLAND_YUTANI | | Posted: | Jul 15, 2019 07:02 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
It is due to the fact that each collectible minifigure is treated as a separate
set in the BrickLink catalog. Since each set entry in the BrickLink catalog automatically
has an instructions entry added to it on creation, each collectible minifigure
set gets an instructions entry added to it on creation. It would be wrong to
say that each one of these sets does not have instructions included with it,
since each collectible minifigure does indeed come with the leaflet. Therefore,
each collectible minifigure set gets the leaflet as its instructions.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thanks Randy, makes sense.
And I would a little bit modify my question then.
Anyone noticed that especially for HP collectables are there some differences
?
From what I found it seems all those HP leaflets are just the same.
But I might overlooked something, so I am curious whether anyone could confirm
they are just the same ?
Thx,
J.
|
The leaflet is the exact same for most of the collectible minifigure series.
Sorry that I can't speak specifically about the HP ones, but I would highly
doubt that there would be any difference in that series.
Cheers,
Randy
|
That is not true for series 1 up to 15 where all leaflets had a unique numbering,
also most series at least up to series 13 (if not all) had a unique code on them
to unlock the characters on the website https://www.playminifigures.com/ (is
no longer active, was closed at the end of 2016).
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 15:43 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
It is due to the fact that each collectible minifigure is treated as a separate
set in the BrickLink catalog. Since each set entry in the BrickLink catalog automatically
has an instructions entry added to it on creation, each collectible minifigure
set gets an instructions entry added to it on creation. It would be wrong to
say that each one of these sets does not have instructions included with it,
since each collectible minifigure does indeed come with the leaflet. Therefore,
each collectible minifigure set gets the leaflet as its instructions.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thanks Randy, makes sense.
And I would a little bit modify my question then.
Anyone noticed that especially for HP collectables are there some differences
?
From what I found it seems all those HP leaflets are just the same.
But I might overlooked something, so I am curious whether anyone could confirm
they are just the same ?
Thx,
J.
|
The leaflet is the exact same for most of the collectible minifigure series.
Sorry that I can't speak specifically about the HP ones, but I would highly
doubt that there would be any difference in that series.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | jerzeeg | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 15:32 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
It is due to the fact that each collectible minifigure is treated as a separate
set in the BrickLink catalog. Since each set entry in the BrickLink catalog automatically
has an instructions entry added to it on creation, each collectible minifigure
set gets an instructions entry added to it on creation. It would be wrong to
say that each one of these sets does not have instructions included with it,
since each collectible minifigure does indeed come with the leaflet. Therefore,
each collectible minifigure set gets the leaflet as its instructions.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thanks Randy, makes sense.
And I would a little bit modify my question then.
Anyone noticed that especially for HP collectables are there some differences
?
From what I found it seems all those HP leaflets are just the same.
But I might overlooked something, so I am curious whether anyone could confirm
they are just the same ?
Thx,
J.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 15:20 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
It is due to the fact that each collectible minifigure is treated as a separate
set in the BrickLink catalog. Since each set entry in the BrickLink catalog automatically
has an instructions entry added to it on creation, each collectible minifigure
set gets an instructions entry added to it on creation. It would be wrong to
say that each one of these sets does not have instructions included with it,
since each collectible minifigure does indeed come with the leaflet. Therefore,
each collectible minifigure set gets the leaflet as its instructions.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | jerzeeg | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 13:44 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, jerzeeg writes:
| | Hi,
I could not find anything on the topic :/
Could anyone explain please why are leaflets (instructions) for each minifigure
of the series kept separately in the catalog when they seems to be all the same?
It seems especially weird, when I saw that someone bought leaflet for percival
graves for such high price:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=colhp-22#T=P
while it seems that this leaflet is just pretty the same as all the rest of the
leaflets from this series....
Thx in advance,
J.
|
* I meant a photo, not screenshot
And please see another photo:
|
|
|
| Author: | jerzeeg | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 13:42 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WEYLAND_YUTANI writes:
| | Hi jerzeeg,
Each collectable minifigure leaflet has an unique number. On the backside of
the leaflet at one of the corners there is a small red or black circle with a
white dot inside containing the number of that particular collectable minifigure.
Note: The unique numbering of the minifigs in the catalog is not the same
as the unique leaflet numbering.
Example: catalog set number col12-2 (Hun-Warrior) has number 8 on leaflet.
|
Hi Yutani,
thank you for the answer! Anyway it seems it does not apply everytime. In example
for HP there is unluckily nothing like that :/
Leaflets from different bags have all the same number in both the top-right corner
(as on screenshot) or the bottom left corner.
Please see the screenshots:
|
|
|
| Author: | WEYLAND_YUTANI | | Posted: | Jul 14, 2019 12:55 | | Subject: | Re: collectable minifigures leaflets | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Hi jerzeeg,
Each collectable minifigure leaflet has an unique number. On the backside of
the leaflet at one of the corners there is a small red or black circle with a
white dot inside containing the number of that particular collectable minifigure.
Note: The unique numbering of the minifigs in the catalog is not the same
as the unique leaflet numbering.
Example: catalog set number col12-2 (Hun-Warrior) has number 8 on leaflet.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Portugal
USA, California
United Kingdom, England
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Denmark
Switzerland, Vaud
Canada, Alberta
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie
Germany, Schleswig-Holstein
Netherlands, Utrecht
South Africa, Western Cape
Czech Republic, Moravskoslezský Kraj
