Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | mooselover  | | Posted: | Jan 16, 2022 08:31 | | Subject: | Part 73562 in Dark Pink | | Viewed: | 104 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Inventories Administrator | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| My set 41686-1 came with a part 73562 instead of the listed 41477 (same part,
different mold) in Dark Pink.
I can't find any listing where part 73562 comes in Dark Pink, so I'm
assuming this is a new colour for this part.
Photo: part 41477 on left - two part 73562 on right, one of them in Dark Pink
Please add.
Thanks!
|
|
 |
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 15, 2022 18:50 | | Subject: | Re: Brick 1 x 6 "frosted" (and possibly others) | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, normann1974 writes:
| | | | An additional note has been added to this part.
Cheers,
Randy
|
If no one has a better image of [P=3002f1] (I don't see any "frosting" on
the current image),
|
I can definitely see the frosting in the image.
| | I believe this may also just be the same as with
inside supports which are currently found only in set .
Please consider updating the part's note.
|
I would need to see the inside of solid color versions of 3002 from that time
period before considering the addition of a note.
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jan 15, 2022 18:27 | | Subject: | Re: Brick 1 x 6 "frosted" (and possibly others) | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| | | An additional note has been added to this part.
Cheers,
Randy
|
If no one has a better image of [P=3002f1] (I don't see any "frosting" on
the current image), I believe this may also just be the same as with
inside supports which are currently found only in set .
Please consider updating the part's note.
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | BricksThatStick | | Posted: | Jan 15, 2022 04:12 | | Subject: | Re: Split entry for part 53588pb01 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, thepretzelman writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, thepretzelman writes:
| | Part number 53588pb01 is a raised baseplate piece in the color dark bluish gray
with red marbling. The entry lists this part being contained in 5 sets. Four
of which were released in the year 2006 and one in the year 2008. The last set
is called 'Coast Guard Patrol Boat & Tower'. I believe that the version
of this part from that set should have a separate entry (with part number 53588)
as it has no red marbling. The database on rebrickable already distinguishes
between these variations so I am not alone in considering them different in this
way.
Link to existing bricklink entry: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=53588pb01#T=C
|
There was a thread on this a couple of years back. Bricklink used to distinguish
between the 4 items in Bionicle sets as being marbled and the one from 7739 as
being solid Dark Bluish Gray. However, I had purchased a dozen of the supposed
DBG versions, and all were marbled at least a little bit.
So at the behest of the inventory admin I sent messages to every seller who had
the item listed. We could not locate a single item that was solid DBG. Some have
a reddish color mixed in, others don't, but all were marbled -- and as
with many marbled pieces, the marbling is not consistent.
The "pictures" on Rebrickable are just renders, not actual photographs, and I
believe Rebrickable still lists that as a separate part for set 7739 only because
Bricklink used to, and Rebrickable has not updated the entry since the change
on Bricklink.
If you have evidence of a solid non-marbled Dark Bluish Gray 53588, please provide
clear pictures from every angle, including from the underside. Otherwise, this
seems to be an error from when 7739 was originally inventoried.
|
Upon further inspection, I have found red marbling on mine which I previously
assumed to be from the latter set. It is very minimal and hard to notice if not
in direct light but it is there. I suspected them all to be marbled but perhaps
some excluded red but no, that is not the case it seems.
Mine has a 2005 date underneath and I suspect they were all manufactured then.
I suppose I was just lucky to get an especially gray one and the official set
photos of 7739 mislead me.
|
Here is the earlier thread for reference:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=286039&nID=1259846
Thanks
Paul.
|
|
| Author: | thepretzelman | | Posted: | Jan 14, 2022 23:49 | | Subject: | Re: Split entry for part 53588pb01 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, thepretzelman writes:
| | Part number 53588pb01 is a raised baseplate piece in the color dark bluish gray
with red marbling. The entry lists this part being contained in 5 sets. Four
of which were released in the year 2006 and one in the year 2008. The last set
is called 'Coast Guard Patrol Boat & Tower'. I believe that the version
of this part from that set should have a separate entry (with part number 53588)
as it has no red marbling. The database on rebrickable already distinguishes
between these variations so I am not alone in considering them different in this
way.
Link to existing bricklink entry: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=53588pb01#T=C
|
There was a thread on this a couple of years back. Bricklink used to distinguish
between the 4 items in Bionicle sets as being marbled and the one from 7739 as
being solid Dark Bluish Gray. However, I had purchased a dozen of the supposed
DBG versions, and all were marbled at least a little bit.
So at the behest of the inventory admin I sent messages to every seller who had
the item listed. We could not locate a single item that was solid DBG. Some have
a reddish color mixed in, others don't, but all were marbled -- and as
with many marbled pieces, the marbling is not consistent.
The "pictures" on Rebrickable are just renders, not actual photographs, and I
believe Rebrickable still lists that as a separate part for set 7739 only because
Bricklink used to, and Rebrickable has not updated the entry since the change
on Bricklink.
If you have evidence of a solid non-marbled Dark Bluish Gray 53588, please provide
clear pictures from every angle, including from the underside. Otherwise, this
seems to be an error from when 7739 was originally inventoried.
|
Upon further inspection, I have found red marbling on mine which I previously
assumed to be from the latter set. It is very minimal and hard to notice if not
in direct light but it is there. I suspected them all to be marbled but perhaps
some excluded red but no, that is not the case it seems.
Mine has a 2005 date underneath and I suspect they were all manufactured then.
I suppose I was just lucky to get an especially gray one and the official set
photos of 7739 mislead me.
|
|
| Author: | Brickitty | | Posted: | Jan 14, 2022 23:17 | | Subject: | Re: Split entry for part 53588pb01 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, thepretzelman writes:
| | Part number 53588pb01 is a raised baseplate piece in the color dark bluish gray
with red marbling. The entry lists this part being contained in 5 sets. Four
of which were released in the year 2006 and one in the year 2008. The last set
is called 'Coast Guard Patrol Boat & Tower'. I believe that the version
of this part from that set should have a separate entry (with part number 53588)
as it has no red marbling. The database on rebrickable already distinguishes
between these variations so I am not alone in considering them different in this
way.
Link to existing bricklink entry: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=53588pb01#T=C
|
There was a thread on this a couple of years back. Bricklink used to distinguish
between the 4 items in Bionicle sets as being marbled and the one from 7739 as
being solid Dark Bluish Gray. However, I had purchased a dozen of the supposed
DBG versions, and all were marbled at least a little bit.
So at the behest of the inventory admin I sent messages to every seller who had
the item listed. We could not locate a single item that was solid DBG. Some have
a reddish color mixed in, others don't, but all were marbled -- and as
with many marbled pieces, the marbling is not consistent.
The "pictures" on Rebrickable are just renders, not actual photographs, and I
believe Rebrickable still lists that as a separate part for set 7739 only because
Bricklink used to, and Rebrickable has not updated the entry since the change
on Bricklink.
If you have evidence of a solid non-marbled Dark Bluish Gray 53588, please provide
clear pictures from every angle, including from the underside. Otherwise, this
seems to be an error from when 7739 was originally inventoried.
|
|
| Author: | thepretzelman | | Posted: | Jan 14, 2022 23:01 | | Subject: | Split entry for part 53588pb01 | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Already Exists | |
|
| Part number 53588pb01 is a raised baseplate piece in the color dark bluish gray
with red marbling. The entry lists this part being contained in 5 sets. Four
of which were released in the year 2006 and one in the year 2008. The last set
is called 'Coast Guard Patrol Boat & Tower'. I believe that the version
of this part from that set should have a separate entry (with part number 53588)
as it has no red marbling. The database on rebrickable already distinguishes
between these variations so I am not alone in considering them different in this
way.
Link to existing bricklink entry: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=53588pb01#T=C
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2022 21:08 | | Subject: | Re: New mold: alternate or new part? | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
| | Thanks for taking care of this!
Jen
|
You're very welcome. 
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2022 18:16 | | Subject: | Re: New mold: alternate or new part? | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| Thanks for taking care of this!
Jen
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2022 11:27 | | Subject: | Re: SET 40522-1 | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, jfksdca writes:
| | HI. I created an XML file for 40522-1 and would like to send it to the inventory
manager or upload it myself. I would have a couple of questions before adding
it myself. Thanks, Jim
|
I am always happy to help answer questions about catalog contributions!
If you would like to add this inventory to the BrickLink catalog, all the links
you need are on the Add or Change tab.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp?utm_content=subnav
Choose Add Inventory: - Set
The data from LEGO is available for this set, so you only need to use the Manual
Add function and edit the data using the form.
If you would still prefer to use the XML, the upload tool is on that same page.
It's not quite as user-friendly but still works just fine.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | jfksdca | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2022 10:25 | | Subject: | SET 40522-1 | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| HI. I created an XML file for 40522-1 and would like to send it to the inventory
manager or upload it myself. I would have a couple of questions before adding
it myself. Thanks, Jim
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 9, 2022 21:26 | | Subject: | Re: 42098-1 (Instructions Entry) | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| I have added them for you, but you can use the standard form in the future:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog Requests, AlfredMangott writes:
| | Please set packing dimensions
27 x 20 x 2 cm
|
|
| Author: | AlfredMangott | | Posted: | Jan 9, 2022 15:06 | | Subject: | 42098-1 (Instructions Entry) | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| Please set packing dimensions
27 x 20 x 2 cm
|
|
| Author: | Samst | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2022 19:56 | | Subject: | Re: 30531-1 (Instructions Entry) | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| Thanks.
I did it by using the standard form. But when I click on « Submit Request »,
it opens up to me a blank page and indicate that there is server issue.
So, that's why I posted on the forum 
Thanks 😀
Sylvain
In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | I have added them for you, but you can use the standard form in the future:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog Requests, Samst writes:
| | I have Weight and dimensions for the instructions of the polybag 30531 (Ninjago
- Sons of Garmadon)
Weight : 3.6 grams
Dimensions :
x=5.3 ; y= 6.9 ; z=0.02
I am unable to enter this new information. So I give them to you here.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2022 17:23 | | Subject: | Re: 30531-1 (Instructions Entry) | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| I have added them for you, but you can use the standard form in the future:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog Requests, Samst writes:
| | I have Weight and dimensions for the instructions of the polybag 30531 (Ninjago
- Sons of Garmadon)
Weight : 3.6 grams
Dimensions :
x=5.3 ; y= 6.9 ; z=0.02
I am unable to enter this new information. So I give them to you here.
Thanks
|
|
|
| Author: | Samst | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2022 16:51 | | Subject: | 30531-1 (Instructions Entry) | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| I have Weight and dimensions for the instructions of the polybag 30531 (Ninjago
- Sons of Garmadon)
Weight : 3.6 grams
Dimensions :
x=5.3 ; y= 6.9 ; z=0.02
I am unable to enter this new information. So I give them to you here.
Thanks
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2022 16:38 | | Subject: | Please Add Alternate Number | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
|
Now molded 76782. I compared to the Superman hair and don't see any difference
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2022 08:44 | | Subject: | Re: New mold: alternate or new part? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, WoutR writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
| | Hello,
I found a new mold for part 60614 in set 10297.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-95270
https://brickset.com/parts/design-60614
By the way, the stock images for 60614 has misleading details: the big rounded
hinge pins. Does anyone actually have one of these or is it just another bad
render from LEGO? The actual photos of this part match the parts I have in hand
molded with 60614.
* | | 60614 Door 1 x 2 x 3 with Vertical Handle, Mold for Tabless Frames
Parts: Door |
Either way, 95270 has cosmetic differences from 60614.
I would vote for adding this as an alternate and creating a note regarding the
variants. Any other opinions?
Jen
|
|
I agree with you. It is a variant. Please mention the year of first (known) use
AND the different design numbers in the note for future reference.
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2022 08:41 | | Subject: | Re: New mold: alternate or new part? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
| | Hello,
I found a new mold for part 60614 in set 10297.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-95270
https://brickset.com/parts/design-60614
By the way, the stock images for 60614 has misleading details: the big rounded
hinge pins. Does anyone actually have one of these or is it just another bad
render from LEGO? The actual photos of this part match the parts I have in hand
molded with 60614.
* | | 60614 Door 1 x 2 x 3 with Vertical Handle, Mold for Tabless Frames
Parts: Door |
Either way, 95270 has cosmetic differences from 60614.
I would vote for adding this as an alternate and creating a note regarding the
variants. Any other opinions?
Jen
|
I agree with you. It is a variant. Please mention the year of first (known) use
in the note for future reference.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 21:14 | | Subject: | Please Add Alternate Part Number | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
|
Now molded 48461. I can't see an important difference between them, which
is lucky because according to Brickset we've had them mixed for several years
without acknowledging it.
|
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 11:00 | | Subject: | New mold: alternate or new part? | | Viewed: | 110 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| Hello,
I found a new mold for part 60614 in set 10297.
https://brickset.com/parts/design-95270
https://brickset.com/parts/design-60614
By the way, the stock images for 60614 has misleading details: the big rounded
hinge pins. Does anyone actually have one of these or is it just another bad
render from LEGO? The actual photos of this part match the parts I have in hand
molded with 60614.
* | | 60614 Door 1 x 2 x 3 with Vertical Handle, Mold for Tabless Frames
Parts: Door |
Either way, 95270 has cosmetic differences from 60614.
I would vote for adding this as an alternate and creating a note regarding the
variants. Any other opinions?
Jen
|
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 07:25 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Part Number | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Turez writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | New Part 50809. I compared it to 50747pb16. Part number is stamped and if 50747
is stamped it isn't in the same place. A few other little things are different
like that with the mold, but not any of the functional areas or material shape.
|
Maybe there is a hinge difference that was not split in those canopies?
[p=54671]
The rest of 50747* have difficult images to see the hinge.
|
All 50747* have hinges with seven teeth.
|
Thanks Jonas, its interesting how some connections are updated in some parts
over a long long time.
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 07:14 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Part Number | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | New Part 50809. I compared it to 50747pb16. Part number is stamped and if 50747
is stamped it isn't in the same place. A few other little things are different
like that with the mold, but not any of the functional areas or material shape.
|
Maybe there is a hinge difference that was not split in those canopies?
[p=54671]
The rest of 50747* have difficult images to see the hinge.
|
All 50747* have hinges with seven teeth.
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 07:04 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Part Number | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | New Part 50809. I compared it to 50747pb16. Part number is stamped and if 50747
is stamped it isn't in the same place. A few other little things are different
like that with the mold, but not any of the functional areas or material shape.
|
Maybe there is a hinge difference that was not split in those canopies?
[p=54671]
The rest of 50747* have difficult images to see the hinge.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 06:51 | | Subject: | Please Add Alternate Part Number | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| New Part 50809. I compared it to 50747pb16. Part number is stamped and if 50747
is stamped it isn't in the same place. A few other little things are different
like that with the mold, but not any of the functional areas or material shape.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2022 03:11 | | Subject: | Re: Minifig Series 22 isn't complete | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, idotter writes:
These two minifigures were just submitted yesterday, so us admins had not seen
them yet. I have gone ahead and approved them just now.
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | Snots4Life | | Posted: | Jan 6, 2022 15:42 | | Subject: | Please add Alternate Item Number | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| I have the bicycle helmet with hair part from the skate park set, but it has
a new part number of 76417 molded in. So please add an alternate item number
for this part. Original Item #: 54647pb03.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 16:48 | | Subject: | Re: Please add catalog description to gear 500599 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| | | Whenever such info is available - artwork is always displayed/listed with the
year or at least a general timeline for when it was/is thought to be conceived.
That kind of info is also most often listed at the very end. That's *exactly*
what we have right now and it is just not right. No matter how you look at it
in it's current form - the answer to the question 'Can this be misleading'
is 'yes'. This is not an opinion and it is not something debatable. What
is debatable is whether BL wants to have it this way or not. Hence my suggestion
to add an actual year of production of the print. If there was no year mentioned
in the description - we probably would not be talking about this.
|
It is already clearly stated on the page - released 2019.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 15:52 | | Subject: | Re: Please add catalog description to gear 500599 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, enig writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, enig writes:
| | Please add extended description:
*******************************
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO® Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Printed on premium paper with embossing.
25.5cm x 31.6cm (10.03" x 12.44")
Available exclusively as a VIP Reward for 650 points beginning in August 2019.
Between November 27 and November 30, 2020, the "cost" of this reward was reduced
to 325 points as part of a Black Friday / Cyber Monday promotion before returning
to the original 650 points. Beginning February 1, 2021, the "cost" of this reward
was reduced to 150 points in celebration of LEGO Patent Day.
*******************************
ADDITIONALLY
Currently it makes it look as if you're buying an actual watercolour item
from 1937
I propose a name change to:
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937 (2019)
|
It is in the gear / poster section, so should be fairly obvious you are getting
a poster and not a real toy of an elephant from 1937.
I'm fairly sure the naming of it here is exactly what LEGO called it. It
is no longer in my rewards centre, but "1st Edition of Wooden Duck Print, 1958"
is. It also has the same name in the brickset database, suggesting it is LEGO's
name for it.
If this one gets changed to a different name then so should others like
to make it clear you are getting a print and not a brochure in this case or an
original patent in some other cases. Although it is obvious (to me) that these
are prints based on their category.
And does it really need the full history of the VIP point costs for redemption?
No other VIP rewards have this information and someone would need to keep track
of the redemption costs (and the history of the redemption costs) of all VIP
gifts such as:
* | | 5005205 VIP Chrome Red Minifigure Key Chain with LEGO Logo Tile, Modified 3 x 2 Curved with Hole - Yellow Label
Gear: Key Chain |
They don't even get a note that they were VIP gifts, just like sets don't
get a note about which stores they were sold in or whether they were given away
with newspapers or magazines. Add to that that the costs (and the history of
the costs) of regular sets is not stored either, so why do it for VIP redemptions?
|
I see the name of the item has already been changed and the note added. Catmins
- thanks for the quick turnaround!
@yorbrick
1) You have misunderstood me. I don't think anyone looking at the listing
would think that they'll be getting an actual wooden Elephant? My issue was
in the description not being clear enough and leading to think that it is an
actual watercolour artwork from circa 1937. I still do not think
the naming as it is right now is clear enough:
LegoFirst Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Whenever such info is available - artwork is always displayed/listed with the
year or at least a general timeline for when it was/is thought to be conceived.
That kind of info is also most often listed at the very end. That's *exactly*
what we have right now and it is just not right. No matter how you look at it
in it's current form - the answer to the question 'Can this be misleading'
is 'yes'. This is not an opinion and it is not something debatable. What
is debatable is whether BL wants to have it this way or not. Hence my suggestion
to add an actual year of production of the print. If there was no year mentioned
in the description - we probably would not be talking about this.
|
The items are now named exactly as they are on the prints themselves. The year
of release is superfluous information because the catalog entry already stores
the year of release.
| | 2) Extended description - argument that other items do not have such info is
not an argument to not add it. Origins of the item are always interesting to
know, especially when it has something to do with art. As far as the MSRP/retail
price goes - the amount of points needed to redeem the item... also tells a story.
If the proposed description was an essay instead of a paragraph then yes, perhaps
it would be a good idea to see if it can be shortened but in this case I do not
really see a problem. Besides, the value of any random LEGO set sold at lego.com
can at least be ball-parked. While saying that 'this was available to redeem
for points' leaves you guessing about the amount of points required/relative
value at the time.
|
If someone takes the time to add some historical information to a catalog entry,
then I think it should be added. It does not mean that it has to be added to
everything.
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 15:03 | | Subject: | Re: Add 37829pb07 as appearance in 122217-1 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, saarlaenner writes:
| | This dinosaur Baby is Part of this foil pack.
|
The foil pack does not have an inventory yet. If you own the set, you can submit
the inventory here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvAdd.asp?viewType=S
|
| Author: | saarlaenner | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 14:48 | | Subject: | Add 37829pb07 as appearance in 122217-1 | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Already Exists | |
|
| | This dinosaur Baby is Part of this foil pack. |
|
| Author: | enig | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 14:27 | | Subject: | Re: Please add catalog description to gear 500599 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, enig writes:
| | Please add extended description:
*******************************
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO® Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Printed on premium paper with embossing.
25.5cm x 31.6cm (10.03" x 12.44")
Available exclusively as a VIP Reward for 650 points beginning in August 2019.
Between November 27 and November 30, 2020, the "cost" of this reward was reduced
to 325 points as part of a Black Friday / Cyber Monday promotion before returning
to the original 650 points. Beginning February 1, 2021, the "cost" of this reward
was reduced to 150 points in celebration of LEGO Patent Day.
*******************************
ADDITIONALLY
Currently it makes it look as if you're buying an actual watercolour item
from 1937
I propose a name change to:
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937 (2019)
|
It is in the gear / poster section, so should be fairly obvious you are getting
a poster and not a real toy of an elephant from 1937.
I'm fairly sure the naming of it here is exactly what LEGO called it. It
is no longer in my rewards centre, but "1st Edition of Wooden Duck Print, 1958"
is. It also has the same name in the brickset database, suggesting it is LEGO's
name for it.
If this one gets changed to a different name then so should others like
to make it clear you are getting a print and not a brochure in this case or an
original patent in some other cases. Although it is obvious (to me) that these
are prints based on their category.
And does it really need the full history of the VIP point costs for redemption?
No other VIP rewards have this information and someone would need to keep track
of the redemption costs (and the history of the redemption costs) of all VIP
gifts such as:
* | | 5005205 VIP Chrome Red Minifigure Key Chain with LEGO Logo Tile, Modified 3 x 2 Curved with Hole - Yellow Label
Gear: Key Chain |
They don't even get a note that they were VIP gifts, just like sets don't
get a note about which stores they were sold in or whether they were given away
with newspapers or magazines. Add to that that the costs (and the history of
the costs) of regular sets is not stored either, so why do it for VIP redemptions?
|
I see the name of the item has already been changed and the note added. Catmins
- thanks for the quick turnaround!
@yorbrick
1) You have misunderstood me. I don't think anyone looking at the listing
would think that they'll be getting an actual wooden Elephant? My issue was
in the description not being clear enough and leading to think that it is an
actual watercolour artwork from circa 1937. I still do not think
the naming as it is right now is clear enough:
LegoFirst Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Whenever such info is available - artwork is always displayed/listed with the
year or at least a general timeline for when it was/is thought to be conceived.
That kind of info is also most often listed at the very end. That's *exactly*
what we have right now and it is just not right. No matter how you look at it
in it's current form - the answer to the question 'Can this be misleading'
is 'yes'. This is not an opinion and it is not something debatable. What
is debatable is whether BL wants to have it this way or not. Hence my suggestion
to add an actual year of production of the print. If there was no year mentioned
in the description - we probably would not be talking about this.
2) Extended description - argument that other items do not have such info is
not an argument to not add it. Origins of the item are always interesting to
know, especially when it has something to do with art. As far as the MSRP/retail
price goes - the amount of points needed to redeem the item... also tells a story.
If the proposed description was an essay instead of a paragraph then yes, perhaps
it would be a good idea to see if it can be shortened but in this case I do not
really see a problem. Besides, the value of any random LEGO set sold at lego.com
can at least be ball-parked. While saying that 'this was available to redeem
for points' leaves you guessing about the amount of points required/relative
value at the time.
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 13:05 | | Subject: | Re: what fits onto a 56145 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| It does show a list below image.
In Catalog Requests, tec writes:
| |
* | | 56145 Wheel 30.4mm D. x 20mm with No Pin Holes and Reinforced Rim
Parts: Wheel |
Do someone know the tires it fits?
we lack a proper note I think.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 12:46 | | Subject: | Re: Please add catalog description to gear 500599 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, enig writes:
| | Please add extended description:
*******************************
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO® Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Printed on premium paper with embossing.
25.5cm x 31.6cm (10.03" x 12.44")
Available exclusively as a VIP Reward for 650 points beginning in August 2019.
Between November 27 and November 30, 2020, the "cost" of this reward was reduced
to 325 points as part of a Black Friday / Cyber Monday promotion before returning
to the original 650 points. Beginning February 1, 2021, the "cost" of this reward
was reduced to 150 points in celebration of LEGO Patent Day.
*******************************
ADDITIONALLY
Currently it makes it look as if you're buying an actual watercolour item
from 1937
I propose a name change to:
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937 (2019)
|
It is in the gear / poster section, so should be fairly obvious you are getting
a poster and not a real toy of an elephant from 1937.
I'm fairly sure the naming of it here is exactly what LEGO called it. It
is no longer in my rewards centre, but "1st Edition of Wooden Duck Print, 1958"
is. It also has the same name in the brickset database, suggesting it is LEGO's
name for it.
If this one gets changed to a different name then so should others like
to make it clear you are getting a print and not a brochure in this case or an
original patent in some other cases. Although it is obvious (to me) that these
are prints based on their category.
And does it really need the full history of the VIP point costs for redemption?
No other VIP rewards have this information and someone would need to keep track
of the redemption costs (and the history of the redemption costs) of all VIP
gifts such as:
* | | 5005205 VIP Chrome Red Minifigure Key Chain with LEGO Logo Tile, Modified 3 x 2 Curved with Hole - Yellow Label
Gear: Key Chain |
They don't even get a note that they were VIP gifts, just like sets don't
get a note about which stores they were sold in or whether they were given away
with newspapers or magazines. Add to that that the costs (and the history of
the costs) of regular sets is not stored either, so why do it for VIP redemptions?
|
|
| Author: | enig | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 11:52 | | Subject: | Re: Please add catalog description to gear 5005997 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, enig writes:
| | Please add extended description:
*******************************
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO® Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Printed on premium paper with embossing.
25.5cm x 31.6cm (10.03" x 12.44")
Available exclusively as a VIP Reward for 650 points beginning in August 2019.
Between November 27 and November 30, 2020, the "cost" of this reward was reduced
to 325 points as part of a Black Friday / Cyber Monday promotion before returning
to the original 650 points. Beginning February 1, 2021, the "cost" of this reward
was reduced to 150 points in celebration of LEGO Patent Day.
*******************************
ADDITIONALLY
Currently it makes it look as if you're buying an actual watercolour item
from 1937
I propose a name change to:
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937 (2019)
Side-question. How does one post a gear-item inside the message? I am relatively
sure that it was possible to do previously. Did this feature got broken with
the addition of color attribute?
[g=500599]
[g=500599-1]
[gear=500599]
[gear=500599-1]
|
Oh. The correct gear ID is 5005997
/facepalm
|
|
| Author: | enig | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2022 11:39 | | Subject: | Please add catalog description to gear 500599 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| Please add extended description:
*******************************
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO® Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937
Printed on premium paper with embossing.
25.5cm x 31.6cm (10.03" x 12.44")
Available exclusively as a VIP Reward for 650 points beginning in August 2019.
Between November 27 and November 30, 2020, the "cost" of this reward was reduced
to 325 points as part of a Black Friday / Cyber Monday promotion before returning
to the original 650 points. Beginning February 1, 2021, the "cost" of this reward
was reduced to 150 points in celebration of LEGO Patent Day.
*******************************
ADDITIONALLY
Currently it makes it look as if you're buying an actual watercolour item
from 1937
I propose a name change to:
First Edition Print - Illustration in Water Color for LEGO Wooden Toy Elephant,
Circa 1937 (2019)
Side-question. How does one post a gear-item inside the message? I am relatively
sure that it was possible to do previously. Did this feature got broken with
the addition of color attribute?
[g=500599]
[g=500599-1]
[gear=500599]
[gear=500599-1]
|
|
| Author: | Classicsmiley | | Posted: | Jan 4, 2022 14:58 | | Subject: | Re: 45517-1 Inventory | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In General, pb_bricks writes:
| | I bought set (in its sealed box) and expected to have part
* | | 86444 Electric Power Adapter / Transformer, Input: 120V AC / Output: 10V DC
Parts: Electric |
inside,
as this is what Bricklink states as the inventory of the set. Instead of part
86444, I got part
* | | 16523 Electric Power Adapter / Transformer, Input: 100V - 240V AC / Output: 10V DC (Square Top)
Parts: Electric |
. So is this an inventory mistake or am I missing something?
|
|
|
| Author: | pb_bricks | | Posted: | Jan 4, 2022 14:47 | | Subject: | 45517-1 Inventory | | Viewed: | 92 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Inventories Administrator | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| I bought set 45517-1 (in its sealed box) and expected to have part 86444 inside,
as this is what Bricklink states as the inventory of the set. Instead of part
86444, I got part 16523. So is this an inventory mistake or am I missing something?
|
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Jan 3, 2022 08:28 | | Subject: | Set 4820 PCCs and Trans Purple 6510 | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| The instructions for set 4820 contain many PCCs that aren’t present on Bricklink,
but also raise another question regarding the existence of part 6510 in Trans-Purple.
Is there any evidence to suggest this part even exists? This part isn’t on sale,
nor does it have a PCC, photo, or presence on a render. It is also not present
on the instructions.
Perhaps a catalog associate can add these PCCs to the catalog. Some of the numbers
are quite difficult to make out, and perhaps they can make them out better than
I can.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2022 20:48 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Number | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | I got a new bicycle wheel on the racing wheelchair and it IS a new color, but
it is actually the wheel that I already had on a bike from an older set. #28578.
28575c01
|
I can't find a 28578 or 28575 anywhere in the catalog.
What is the old number and what is the new number?
|
Sorry, I had a lot on my shoulders. I see it already done, but I am talking about
the one piece bicycle wheel. [p= 92851c01] now molded 28578.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2022 13:48 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Number | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, paulvdb writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | I got a new bicycle wheel on the racing wheelchair and it IS a new color, but
it is actually the wheel that I already had on a bike from an older set. #28578.
28575c01
|
I can't find a 28578 or 28575 anywhere in the catalog.
What is the old number and what is the new number?
|
28578 is the design ID https://brickset.com/parts/design-28578
|
Thanks, Paul.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2022 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Number | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | I got a new bicycle wheel on the racing wheelchair and it IS a new color, but
it is actually the wheel that I already had on a bike from an older set. #28578.
28575c01
|
I can't find a 28578 or 28575 anywhere in the catalog.
What is the old number and what is the new number?
|
28578 is the design ID https://brickset.com/parts/design-28578
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2022 11:38 | | Subject: | Re: Please Add Alternate Number | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | I got a new bicycle wheel on the racing wheelchair and it IS a new color, but
it is actually the wheel that I already had on a bike from an older set. #28578.
28575c01
|
I can't find a 28578 or 28575 anywhere in the catalog.
What is the old number and what is the new number?
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2022 11:30 | | Subject: | Please Add Alternate Number | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| I got a new bicycle wheel on the racing wheelchair and it IS a new color, but
it is actually the wheel that I already had on a bike from an older set. #28578.
28575c01
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Dec 30, 2021 07:56 | | Subject: | Additional note for 39787c01 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| lease add additional note below for part
* | | 39787c01 Duplo Siren with Light and Sound, 1 x 2 Base with Trans-Dark Blue Lights, Curved Edges and Red 2 Stud Button on Top
Parts: DUPLO, Vehicle |
Additional note:
This part requires 3 LR41 batteries.
-Fred
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Dec 30, 2021 07:46 | | Subject: | Additional note for 52189c02 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| Please add additional note below for part
Additional note:
This part requires 3 LR41 batteries.
-Fred
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Dec 29, 2021 18:19 | | Subject: | Please mark for deletion 2972 | | Viewed: | 68 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
|
* | | 2972 Train Base 6 x 34 Split-Level with Bottom Tubes (Undetermined Type)
Parts: Train
Marked for Deletion |
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Dec 28, 2021 20:29 | | Subject: | Re: Please Merge These Clikits Pens | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| | [g=4271396] and [g=P3602]
The packaging says neither clip nor carabiner, but I believe carabiner is a better
name.
|
Done.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Canada, Alberta
USA, Ohio
Denmark
United Kingdom, England
Austria, Tirol
France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
Spain, Comunidad Valenciana
Germany, Niedersachsen
Switzerland, Solothurn
Lithuania, Panevėžys
