Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | bb1054204  | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2018 00:15 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Some strange changes were made to this set.
Set originally inventoried with "a" type then in 2010 "a" type changed to "b"
type in regular section. In 2012 "a" type return but as an alternate. Finally
in 2013 in regular section "b" type changed to "a" but "a" left in alternate
So now we have "a" in both regular and alternate section. 
Unfortunately, any discussion about these changes remain.
And here we go again, this mess have to be straighten
Can somebody shed some light on this matter?
Marek
|
It seems the change was already made but here is further evidence, if it helps.
I've attached a photo of the 1995 instructions I came across that shows the
valid part. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks.
|
|
 |
| Author: | bb1054204 | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2018 00:04 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | I don't find the connection between the reliability of the username with
the reason Marek gave (below):
|
Speaking of usernames, I find it interesting that a zero feedback user who recently
signed up is submitting a complicated change request for obscure technical details
and then not bothering to comment on it.
|
Valid point, however I am a real person who just started inventorying classic
80s and 90s sets and came across this issue. I have the original instructions
booklet from a 1995 set that shows the valid part.
|
|
| Author: | Stoick | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 22:39 | | Subject: | Wanted list colors | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| When adding an item to my wanted list, I typically want it in 5 colors. As it
is, I have to add the item in each color or select 'no-applicable' which
means when I check a store I get a rainbow of the item which slows my search.
When I add an item it should just let me select boxes for the desired colors.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 20:09 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location:  USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
 |
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Inventories Requests, WoutR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, WoutR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Are you sure based on what? Based on the other two sets?
Based on the way Storm-chaser treats this type of cases, you should ONLY accept
any of these variations if there is an evidence: sealed set or an owner who has
kept the set with original parts.
All my inventories supported with any other type of evidence (including instructions)
have been rejected.
I don't think it is correct to have various procedures depending on which
admin check the request.
|
Our system on BrickLink is based on the reliability of the username.
|
Could we please rephrase that to:
"The system on BrickLink is evidence based. When in doubt the judgement can be
based on the reliability of the username."
I think that is what you mean to say. The way it was written could be interpreted
with a completely different meaning.
|
Before there is evidence, there must be a reliable deliverer of that evidence.
In any court of law, testimonies are given about the nature of the evidence as
to where and when it was found. If the testimonies can't be believed, than
neither can the evidence.
That having been said, it is very helpful and important that contributors document
their presentations as thoroughly as possible. So I'm not saying evidence
is not necessary. But the BrickLink catalog relies principally on a large group
of contributors who have built up their reputation on the site to the point where
their submissions can be trusted.
|
Any new user can submit new information to the catalog. If there is enough evidence,
the submission is accepted. At that time, the contributor does not have a reputation
yet. The submission is a first step in building that.
Our large group of contributors have gained their reputation of being reliable
because they have shown consistent and careful evidence-based work. That reputation
has to be based on something more than just a large number of catalog change
requests.
|
Of course, new users have to start somewhere, and we extend to each one a certain
token amount of goodwill. And their work gets checked extra carefully.
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 19:50 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, WoutR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Are you sure based on what? Based on the other two sets?
Based on the way Storm-chaser treats this type of cases, you should ONLY accept
any of these variations if there is an evidence: sealed set or an owner who has
kept the set with original parts.
All my inventories supported with any other type of evidence (including instructions)
have been rejected.
I don't think it is correct to have various procedures depending on which
admin check the request.
|
Our system on BrickLink is based on the reliability of the username.
|
Could we please rephrase that to:
"The system on BrickLink is evidence based. When in doubt the judgement can be
based on the reliability of the username."
I think that is what you mean to say. The way it was written could be interpreted
with a completely different meaning.
|
Before there is evidence, there must be a reliable deliverer of that evidence.
In any court of law, testimonies are given about the nature of the evidence as
to where and when it was found. If the testimonies can't be believed, than
neither can the evidence.
That having been said, it is very helpful and important that contributors document
their presentations as thoroughly as possible. So I'm not saying evidence
is not necessary. But the BrickLink catalog relies principally on a large group
of contributors who have built up their reputation on the site to the point where
their submissions can be trusted.
|
Any new user can submit new information to the catalog. If there is enough evidence,
the submission is accepted. At that time, the contributor does not have a reputation
yet. The submission is a first step in building that.
Our large group of contributors have gained their reputation of being reliable
because they have shown consistent and careful evidence-based work. That reputation
has to be based on something more than just a large number of catalog change
requests.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 19:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
| Location: USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
|
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Inventories Requests, WoutR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Are you sure based on what? Based on the other two sets?
Based on the way Storm-chaser treats this type of cases, you should ONLY accept
any of these variations if there is an evidence: sealed set or an owner who has
kept the set with original parts.
All my inventories supported with any other type of evidence (including instructions)
have been rejected.
I don't think it is correct to have various procedures depending on which
admin check the request.
|
Our system on BrickLink is based on the reliability of the username.
|
Could we please rephrase that to:
"The system on BrickLink is evidence based. When in doubt the judgement can be
based on the reliability of the username."
I think that is what you mean to say. The way it was written could be interpreted
with a completely different meaning.
|
Before there is evidence, there must be a reliable deliverer of that evidence.
In any court of law, testimonies are given about the nature of the evidence as
to where and when it was found. If the testimonies can't be believed, than
neither can the evidence.
That having been said, it is very helpful and important that contributors document
their presentations as thoroughly as possible. So I'm not saying evidence
is not necessary. But the BrickLink catalog relies principally on a large group
of contributors who have built up their reputation on the site to the point where
their submissions can be trusted.
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 19:26 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | | My username does not have a hyphen and the second word is capitalized: StormChaser.
|
My apologies.
| | As for the way I treat these kinds of cases, read this message from less than
a month ago:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1091324
I did exactly the same thing there that Marek did with this request for 6279
and I said:
| | I don't consider the thin ring clip variant proven to have appeared in this set, but I am adding it back into the inventory as a regular part to avoid inconsistency in the catalog.
|
|
Yes you did (but you were reluctant to do so). But I am not following everything
here:
You wrote many times that inconsistency of catalog cannot be a reason to add
a variant of a part and this would not be considered as evidence. Should we distinguish
the regular and alternate (later variant)? For what reason?
I can give many instances in which you didn't accept to add a variant because
a similar set released on the same years came also with that variant (and I do
agree that this is not enough at all. But I will continue the other "probabilistic
discussion soon...")
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 18:58 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, WoutR writes:
| | The user signed up 6 months ago.
|
Which is relatively recent, to my mind. Six months with no buying/selling transactions
and no other catalog/inventory activity until now.
| | Why could this not be a new user who found something odd in the inventory and
is now being helpful and trying to correct the information?
|
This very well could be the case. But maybe it's not.
| | Am I missing something here?
|
Sometimes people have more than one account. That may not be what's happening
here, but maybe it is.
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 18:57 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Are you sure based on what? Based on the other two sets?
Based on the way Storm-chaser treats this type of cases, you should ONLY accept
any of these variations if there is an evidence: sealed set or an owner who has
kept the set with original parts.
All my inventories supported with any other type of evidence (including instructions)
have been rejected.
I don't think it is correct to have various procedures depending on which
admin check the request.
|
Our system on BrickLink is based on the reliability of the username.
|
Could we please rephrase that to:
"The system on BrickLink is evidence based. When in doubt the judgement can be
based on the reliability of the username."
I think that is what you mean to say. The way it was written could be interpreted
with a completely different meaning.
| | The admins
have a lot of experience reading logs and determining the creditworthiness of
users both current and inactive. I am quite confident that any of our admins
(including our catalog admins and myself) would have come up with the same conclusion
in this case.
| | In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Inventory change request aproved. I only move "a" variant to regular and "b"
variant to alternate as in other two sets (8210-1 and 6090-1) from this year
with this situation to be consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 18:49 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | I don't find the connection between the reliability of the username with
the reason Marek gave (below):
|
Speaking of usernames, I find it interesting that a zero feedback user who recently
signed up is submitting a complicated change request for obscure technical details
and then not bothering to comment on it.
|
Is it?
The user signed up 6 months ago.
The proposed change is a simple part version change.
The change request only became complicated because of the change history which
the user might not have known.
The change request was made less than 24 hours ago. To early to say he does not
comment.
Why could this not be a new user who found something odd in the inventory and
is now being helpful and trying to correct the information? Am I missing something
here?
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 18:07 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | I don't find the connection between the reliability of the username with
the reason Marek gave (below):
|
Speaking of usernames, I find it interesting that a zero feedback user who recently
signed up is submitting a complicated change request for obscure technical details
and then not bothering to comment on it.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 17:59 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Based on the way Storm-chaser treats this type of cases,
|
My username does not have a hyphen and the second word is capitalized: StormChaser.
As for the way I treat these kinds of cases, read this message from less than
a month ago:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1091324
I did exactly the same thing there that Marek did with this request for 6279
and I said:
| | I don't consider the thin ring clip variant proven to have appeared in this set, but I am adding it back into the inventory as a regular part to avoid inconsistency in the catalog.
|
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 17:17 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | | Our system on BrickLink is based on the reliability of the username. The admins
have a lot of experience reading logs and determining the creditworthiness of
users both current and inactive. I am quite confident that any of our admins
(including our catalog admins and myself) would have come up with the same conclusion
in this case.
|
I don't find the connection between the reliability of the username with
the reason Marek gave (below):
| | Inventory change request aproved. I only move "a" variant to regular and "b"
variant to alternate as in other two sets (8210-1 and 6090-1) from this year
with this situation to be consistent.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 16:17 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Check how the hinges 4276a and 4276b have been changed for this set 7824 from
1983-90:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChangeItem.asp?itemType=S&itemNo=7824-1&viewDate=Y&viewStatus=1
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | this is again another way to help:
See
https://worldbricks.com/en/catalog-year/1990/catalogs-1995.html
The reviewer doesn't say if he opened a new one but this copy is so neat
coming with everything, like the clear inner tray and catalog of 1995. The catalog
shows that this copy was from 1995 and we can see in the images 4265a.
My guess is that in the early releases, 4265a was used but it is likely that
in the following year, it got replaced by 4265b.
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Some strange changes were made to this set.
Set originally inventoried with "a" type then in 2010 "a" type changed to "b"
type in regular section. In 2012 "a" type return but as an alternate. Finally
in 2013 in regular section "b" type changed to "a" but "a" left in alternate
So now we have "a" in both regular and alternate section.
Unfortunately, any discussion about these changes remain.
And here we go again, this mess have to be straighten
Can somebody shed some light on this matter?
Marek
|
|
I'm sure that this set should have both variant "a" and "b" in inventory
(one of them as alternate), another set from the same year for example
the only strange think were these changes through years with final result having
the same part variant twice 
|
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 16:11 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Are you sure based on what? Based on the other two sets?
Based on the way Storm-chaser treats this type of cases, you should ONLY accept
any of these variations if there is an evidence: sealed set or an owner who has
kept the set with original parts.
All my inventories supported with any other type of evidence (including instructions)
have been rejected.
I don't think it is correct to have various procedures depending on which
admin check the request.
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Inventory change request aproved. I only move "a" variant to regular and "b"
variant to alternate as in other two sets (8210-1 and 6090-1) from this year
with this situation to be consistent.
|
|
|
| Author: | shungabubus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 15:52 | | Subject: | Re: Seller with no honor | | Viewed: | 328 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Nope, the price was 70 for 2 items (I did not do screenshot as I gave up buying)
so if he sold for 60 he is even worse...
I guess it is better to go back to ebay. You guys really don't have any boundaries...
In Administrative, yorbrick writes:
| | Also, it looks like the one they sold was at £60 not £70. So they could have
been alerted to their cheap price by the other person buying it.
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 11:30 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Inventory change request aproved. I only move "a" variant to regular and "b"
variant to alternate as in other two sets (8210-1 and 6090-1) from this year
with this situation to be consistent.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 11:20 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | this is again another way to help:
See
https://worldbricks.com/en/catalog-year/1990/catalogs-1995.html
The reviewer doesn't say if he opened a new one but this copy is so neat
coming with everything, like the clear inner tray and catalog of 1995. The catalog
shows that this copy was from 1995 and we can see in the images 4265a.
My guess is that in the early releases, 4265a was used but it is likely that
in the following year, it got replaced by 4265b.
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Some strange changes were made to this set.
Set originally inventoried with "a" type then in 2010 "a" type changed to "b"
type in regular section. In 2012 "a" type return but as an alternate. Finally
in 2013 in regular section "b" type changed to "a" but "a" left in alternate
So now we have "a" in both regular and alternate section.
Unfortunately, any discussion about these changes remain.
And here we go again, this mess have to be straighten
Can somebody shed some light on this matter?
Marek
|
|
I'm sure that this set should have both variant "a" and "b" in inventory
(one of them as alternate), another set from the same year for example
the only strange think were these changes through years with final result having
the same part variant twice
|
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:24 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 5973-1 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 58181pb11 Trans-Clear Slope 33 3 x 6 without Inner Walls with 3 Bullet Hole Cracks Pattern (Sticker) - Set 5973 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:23 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 9095-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 93273pb079R Lime Slope, Curved 4 x 1 Double No Studs with Snake Skin and Red Eye Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 9095 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:22 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 70704-1 | | Viewed: | 13 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 44126pb040L White Slope, Curved 6 x 2 with Green Arrow in Circle, Metal Plates and Bolts Pattern (Sticker) - Set 70704 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:21 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 70756-1 | | Viewed: | 15 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 2335pb178 Black Flag 2 x 2 Square with Ninjago Metal and Speed Elemental Logos Pattern on Opposite Sides (Stickers) - Set 70756 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:20 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 41009-1 | | Viewed: | 11 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 60581pb102 White Panel 1 x 4 x 3 with Side Supports - Hollow Studs with Round Mirror Pattern (Sticker) - Set 41009 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:18 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 9468-1 | | Viewed: | 10 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 87421pb039a Light Bluish Gray Panel 3 x 3 x 6 Corner Wall without Bottom Indentations with Bricks and White Eyes (Glow in the Dark) Pattern (Sticker) - Set 9468 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | therobo | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 09:17 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 264-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA62pb01 Blue Stickered Assembly 8 x 1 x 3 with Grandfather and Grandmother Portraits Pattern (Stickers) - Set 264-1 - 3 Bricks 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 08:34 | | Subject: | Re: Seller with no honor | | Viewed: | 226 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Also, it looks like the one they sold was at £60 not £70. So they could have
been alerted to their cheap price by the other person buying it.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 08:32 | | Subject: | Re: Seller with no honor | | Viewed: | 192 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | The response was that he raised the price but no reply. I am sad to see he managed
to sell one in the meantime...
I submitted a complaint but no response there. I am both upset and angry there
is no way this is allowed on any selling site...
|
A seller is allowed to change their prices whenever they like before an order
is placed. You contacting them probably alerted them to see that their price
was rather low. Is what they did ethical? No. Is it allowed? Yes.
Their new price is still quite cheap anyway - they are still cheapest in Europe
for new by about 5 Euro. You can now decide to buy from them or buy from someone
else.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 07:43 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Part 2878c01 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Front242 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* | | 2878c01 (Inv) Train Wheel RC, Holder with Black Train Wheel Pair on Chrome Silver Metal Axle with Slots (2878 / 2879c01)
Parts: Wheel |
* Delete 2 Part 57878 Black Train Wheel RC Train
* Add 2 Part 2879 Black Train Wheel
|
Perhaps someone who has some insight into this matter will be willing to share
their knowledge?
This part only comes in one set (with part 57878 Train Wheel RC Train listed
as a counterpart):
This part comes in 70 sets and two parts:
Are they the same part with duplicate catalog entries? This is what I suspect.
|
Part 2879 is only in the inventory for set 9764-1. Brickset has that set listed
with part 57878 in the inventory.
|
|
| Author: | shungabubus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 07:01 | | Subject: | Seller with no honor | | Viewed: | 401 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Dear Admins,
I want to share one of my first experiences as a new bricklink member I had to
suffer. There is no response on my complaint (there is no even proper category
for this) so I'm desperate to seek justice.
I was searching for set 60051 and I found a great deal as you can see in the
first image.
I wanted to buy one, but seeing the price I decided to go for both. Unfortunately
shop size policy stopped me from ordering so I contacted the seller (I've
seen replicas on eBay, and that time I was not sure if they can be sold here):
"Subject: 60051
Sent: Jun 12, 2018 18:35
From: shungabubus (0)
To: Mole2704 (20)
Read: Yes
Hello,
I am interested in your High Speed trains. They are real LEGO, aren't they?
If
so, I am thinking to buy both of them, but the shipping cost can be an issue.
I wonder how much it is to 4400 Nyiregyhaza Hungary? I also wonder if it would
be better to take the sealed small packages our ofthe paper box and re-package
them? I don't need the box nor the instructions, if you find it reasonable
I'm
more than happy to leave them with you in exchange for this favor.
What do you say?
Cheers:
Tamas"
The response was that he raised the price but no reply. I am sad to see he managed
to sell one in the meantime...
I submitted a complaint but no response there. I am both upset and angry there
is no way this is allowed on any selling site...
Many thanks:
Tamas
|
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 04:47 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| this is again another way to help:
See
https://worldbricks.com/en/catalog-year/1990/catalogs-1995.html
The reviewer doesn't say if he opened a new one but this copy is so neat
coming with everything, like the clear inner tray and catalog of 1995. The catalog
shows that this copy was from 1995 and we can see in the images 4265a.
My guess is that in the early releases, 4265a was used but it is likely that
in the following year, it got replaced by 4265b.
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Some strange changes were made to this set.
Set originally inventoried with "a" type then in 2010 "a" type changed to "b"
type in regular section. In 2012 "a" type return but as an alternate. Finally
in 2013 in regular section "b" type changed to "a" but "a" left in alternate
So now we have "a" in both regular and alternate section.
Unfortunately, any discussion about these changes remain.
And here we go again, this mess have to be straighten
Can somebody shed some light on this matter?
Marek
|
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 04:40 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8720-1 | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Hygrotus, this is also one way to help, isn't it?
From my personal collection. The last set I got as a kid. My brother promised
to buy a Lego for me at some point and bought this after few years! It was bought
sometime about 1993 but there is no way we can know at what year my copy was
released.
I remember I got 5 of 4265a from this set and these were all 4265a I had. Unfortunately
one of 4265a were already smashed (broken) in the sealed box! That was disappointing
but I had forgiven TLG since this set was supposed to come with 3 of them and
by the way, I had still 4 (one extra).
In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 3 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II
* Add 3 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I
* Add 2 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (Extra)
|
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 04:34 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8720-1 | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 3 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II
* Add 3 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I
* Add 2 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (Extra)
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 04:26 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 9963-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 24 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I
* Add 24 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II
Comments from Submitter:
This is one way to help!
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 03:26 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, ZwarteMagica writes:
| | Seems odd, the same part as regular and alternate.
Does BrickLink also log changes made to the parts them self back in 2013?
I suspect there were made some changes to that part specific.
|
Yes if the name or number of part is changed there is also log with that changes.
Those two parts don't have any.
|
|
| Author: | ZwarteMagica | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 03:20 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Seems odd, the same part as regular and alternate.
Does BrickLink also log changes made to the parts them self back in 2013?
I suspect there were made some changes to that part specific.
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Some strange changes were made to this set.
Set originally inventoried with "a" type then in 2010 "a" type changed to "b"
type in regular section. In 2012 "a" type return but as an alternate. Finally
in 2013 in regular section "b" type changed to "a" but "a" left in alternate
So now we have "a" in both regular and alternate section.
Unfortunately, any discussion about these changes remain.
And here we go again, this mess have to be straighten
Can somebody shed some light on this matter?
Marek
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 01:43 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, poluteyourjorts writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
Some strange changes were made to this set.
Set originally inventoried with "a" type then in 2010 "a" type changed to "b"
type in regular section. In 2012 "a" type return but as an alternate. Finally
in 2013 in regular section "b" type changed to "a" but "a" left in alternate
So now we have "a" in both regular and alternate section.
Unfortunately, any discussion about these changes remain.
And here we go again, this mess have to be straighten
Can somebody shed some light on this matter?
Marek
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 00:56 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 21142-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part minebear01 White Minecraft Polar Bear Baby - Complete Assembly (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part minebear02 White Minecraft Polar Bear - Complete Assembly (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | bb1054204 | | Posted: | Jun 19, 2018 00:39 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 6279-1 | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4265a Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type I (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 4265b Light Gray Technic Bush 1/2 Toothed Type II (match ID 1)
Comments from Submitter:
4265a replaced with 4265b as per original instructions.
|
|
| Author: | qwertyboy | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 19:53 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 2362-1 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4883c02 Yellow Duplo Car Base 2 x 6 with Red Wheels and Old Style Closed Hitch End
* Add 1 Part 2312c02 Yellow Duplo Car Base 2 x 6 with Red Wheels and Open Hitch End
* Change {4 to 7} Part Blue 3437 Duplo, Brick 2 x 2
* Change {1 to 4} Part Blue 3011 Duplo, Brick 2 x 4
* Change {4 to 7} Part Green 3437 Duplo, Brick 2 x 2
* Change {2 to 4} Part Yellow 3011 Duplo, Brick 2 x 4
Comments from Submitter:
This is a significantly incomplete list of similar things. What common characteristic do they share?
Acupuncture
|
[snip]
They are all in your post.
Niek.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 18:37 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 1193-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | I could hear the groans from the audience in my head. 
|
Please accept my apology. Like an unseasoned and hurriedly-cooked meal caught
from a polluted stream by an impoverished man, it was in poor taste.
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 18:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 2362-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | What common characteristic do they share?
|
A lack of convincing evidence.
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 18:25 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 2362-1 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4883c02 Yellow Duplo Car Base 2 x 6 with Red Wheels and Old Style Closed Hitch End
* Add 1 Part 2312c02 Yellow Duplo Car Base 2 x 6 with Red Wheels and Open Hitch End
* Change {4 to 7} Part Blue 3437 Duplo, Brick 2 x 2
* Change {1 to 4} Part Blue 3011 Duplo, Brick 2 x 4
* Change {4 to 7} Part Green 3437 Duplo, Brick 2 x 2
* Change {2 to 4} Part Yellow 3011 Duplo, Brick 2 x 4
Comments from Submitter:
This is a significantly incomplete list of similar things. What common characteristic do they share?
Acupuncture
Ancient astronauts
Anti-vaccination
Applied kinesiology
Astrology
Attachment therapy
Bermuda Triangle
Biorhythms
Channeling
Climate change denial
Colon cleansing
Conspiracy theories
Conversion therapy
Creationism
Crop circles
Cryptozoology
Crystal healing
Detoxification
Demons
Dianetics
Dowsing
Ear candling
Electronic voice phenomenon
Exorcism
Extra-sensory perception
Faith healing
Feng shui
Flat Earth
Free energy
Ghosts
Graphology
Hollow Earth
Holocaust denial
Homeopathy
Hypnosis
Intelligent design
Iridology
Ley lines
Magnet therapy
Memetics
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Naturopathy
Neuro-linguistic programming
Numerology
Palmistry
Parapsychology
Phrenology
Polygraphy
Psychic surgery
Radionics
Reflexology
Reiki
Scriptural codes
Séances
Superstitions
Therapeutic touch
Ufology
Urine therapy
Vampires
Werepeople
Witches
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 18:21 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 1193-1 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {1 to 2} Part Blue 4066pb060 Duplo, Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with 2 Fish Pattern
Comments from Submitter:
Something seems a little fishy with this inventory.
|
I could hear the groans from the audience in my head.
Randy
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Part 2878c01 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Front242 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* | | 2878c01 (Inv) Train Wheel RC, Holder with Black Train Wheel Pair on Chrome Silver Metal Axle with Slots (2878 / 2879c01)
Parts: Wheel |
* Delete 2 Part 57878 Black Train Wheel RC Train
* Add 2 Part 2879 Black Train Wheel
|
Perhaps someone who has some insight into this matter will be willing to share
their knowledge?
This part only comes in one set (with part 57878 Train Wheel RC Train listed
as a counterpart):
This part comes in 70 sets and two parts:
Are they the same part with duplicate catalog entries? This is what I suspect.
|
|
| Author: | wannes. | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 13:52 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 118-1 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, wannes. writes:
| | sorry but i don't own any at the moment. don't worry every collector
knows that these things come with a red dot
|
I would still like to see some evidence and have that evidence preserved for
those who examine this change in the future. I've looked at several scans
of catalogs from the time period and don't see the red dot in any of the
photos.
Just to be clear: I don't have any doubt that you know what you're talking
about. I'd just like to see changes to these older sets thoroughly documented.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | revel | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 08:23 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Part 2878c01 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Front242 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* | | 2878c01 (Inv) Train Wheel RC, Holder with Black Train Wheel Pair on Chrome Silver Metal Axle with Slots (2878 / 2879c01)
Parts: Wheel |
* Delete 2 Part 57878 Black Train Wheel RC Train
* Add 2 Part 2879 Black Train Wheel
|
Why?
|
|
| Author: | Front242 | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 07:34 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Part 2878c01 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* | | 2878c01 (Inv) Train Wheel RC, Holder with Black Train Wheel Pair on Chrome Silver Metal Axle with Slots (2878 / 2879c01)
Parts: Wheel |
* Delete 2 Part 57878 Black Train Wheel RC Train
* Add 2 Part 2879 Black Train Wheel
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 07:07 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 1193-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {1 to 2} Part Blue 4066pb060 Duplo, Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with 2 Fish Pattern
Comments from Submitter:
Something seems a little fishy with this inventory.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2018 07:03 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1193-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {1 to 2} Part Blue 4066pb060 Duplo, Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with 2 Fish Pattern
Comments from Submitter:
Something seems a little fishy with this inventory.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Canada, Alberta
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
Hungary, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie
Germany, Berlin
United Kingdom, England
)
)
)
)
)
)
Belgium
Denmark
)
)