Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | yorbrick  | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 04:16 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | That, of course, is the real issue. IMO we need an auxiliary buyer feedback system
that is completely anonymous, where the results are amalgamated before presenting
them (privately) to the seller. These results could then be used to weed out
sellers who consistently perform poorly and lower the reputation of the site.
|
There are a number of sellers that come up time and time again, for bad selling
practices. Leaving negative feedback, not supplying items but refunding to get
out of NSS, sending orders missing items and refunding for missing parts without
telling buyers, and so on. If BL really cared, they could weed out these sellers
now.
Part of the problem is buyers keep buying from sellers with relatively poor feedback,
suggesting (some) buyers don't care.
|
 |
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 01:35 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I basically told him the same thing, but the core issue is the buyer has no recourse
to get what is obviously retaliatory feedback removed.
which brings into question how can buyers leave honest feedback when they face
the potential of retaliatory feedback that cannot be removed? such a situation
is a threat to what the feedback system is.
|
That, of course, is the real issue. IMO we need an auxiliary buyer feedback system
that is completely anonymous, where the results are amalgamated before presenting
them (privately) to the seller. These results could then be used to weed out
sellers who consistently perform poorly and lower the reputation of the site.
I have always felt that public feedback was not enough to raise the selling standards
of the site. For many BrickLink sellers, their standards are sky-high and represent
their passion for the hobby. For others, they do nothing but dull the effect
of the excellent sellers, cause problems for us in the Help Desk, and in general
apply a lot of pressure on us to implement a heavy-handed "sellers will only
get paid when the buyer is happy" system where BrickLink controls all the money.
|
Unfortunately such a system would not work well with the seller waiting for money
till buyer receives item, sounds good in theory, but in practice not so well,
one of the things that could be added is like eBay's star system or with
holding feed back till both parties give feedback with neither knowing the other,
then it would be honest feedback from both sides. if neither party is happy then
they can communicate with the other party on getting the feedback removed. which
can only be removed if both parties agree.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 01:27 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location:  USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
 |
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I basically told him the same thing, but the core issue is the buyer has no recourse
to get what is obviously retaliatory feedback removed.
which brings into question how can buyers leave honest feedback when they face
the potential of retaliatory feedback that cannot be removed? such a situation
is a threat to what the feedback system is.
|
That, of course, is the real issue. IMO we need an auxiliary buyer feedback system
that is completely anonymous, where the results are amalgamated before presenting
them (privately) to the seller. These results could then be used to weed out
sellers who consistently perform poorly and lower the reputation of the site.
I have always felt that public feedback was not enough to raise the selling standards
of the site. For many BrickLink sellers, their standards are sky-high and represent
their passion for the hobby. For others, they do nothing but dull the effect
of the excellent sellers, cause problems for us in the Help Desk, and in general
apply a lot of pressure on us to implement a heavy-handed "sellers will only
get paid when the buyer is happy" system where BrickLink controls all the money.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 00:49 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
oh wouldn't be surprised if the seller made it onto a lot of peoples do not
buy from lists since his actions are not those of a good seller. but the whole
reason behind admins and moderators is to moderate between 2 parties, instead
the buyer was forced to file an NSS so as to remove said feedback, do you think
that is better?
|
An NSS like that will never stand. It is abuse of the system and admin will remove
it immediately upon notice.
|
I basically told him the same thing, but the core issue is the buyer has no recourse
to get what is obviously retaliatory feedback removed.
which brings into question how can buyers leave honest feedback when they face
the potential of retaliatory feedback that cannot be removed? such a situation
is a threat to what the feedback system is.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 00:28 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
| Location: USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
|
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
oh wouldn't be surprised if the seller made it onto a lot of peoples do not
buy from lists since his actions are not those of a good seller. but the whole
reason behind admins and moderators is to moderate between 2 parties, instead
the buyer was forced to file an NSS so as to remove said feedback, do you think
that is better?
|
An NSS like that will never stand. It is abuse of the system and admin will remove
it immediately upon notice.
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 00:19 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 10176-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Black {2453 Brick 1 x 1 x 5 (Undetermined Stud Type) to 2453a Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud}
* Change 13 Part Light Bluish Gray {2453 Brick 1 x 1 x 5 (Undetermined Stud Type) to 2453a Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud}
* Change 2 Part Reddish Brown {4460 Slope 75 2 x 1 x 3 (Undetermined Stud Type) to 4460a Slope 75 2 x 1 x 3 - Open Stud}
Comments from Submitter:
I acquired this set from its original owner in fantastic shape and still built. I am reasonably confident that these parts were not mixed with other sets, and this can be treated as a reliable source to update the inventory.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 22:26 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
They are volunteers. They aren't required to be here around the clock. 
|
yeah but it can be worrisome since if someone posts something that is not to
be posted of an illegal nature and there is no one around to remove it, it can
cause problems for this site, like it did for Majhost.
|
So you want someone standing by in the forums 24/7/365 to make sure that a couple
of spam posts do not last on the forums for more than a little while? I am sorry,
but I don't need BrickLink to be a nanny for everything. People are supposed
to be adults here, and adults can take the time to figure out if something is
legitimate or not. I don't need BrickLink making sure that a "hall monitor"
is staffed all hours of the day, and I don't want the fees that sellers pay
to increase due to the need for said "hall monitor". Not to mention that spam
posts are so rare around here.
|
Spam posts are not my concern you should learn what happened to Majhost and almost
happened to Brickshelf because they lacked proper moderation. and then you will
understand my concern since I have seen some issues like that on other sites
happen of late.
|
in fact people don't remember but we also had issues almost like that here
too, but had a more active moderation team at that time.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 22:24 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
They are volunteers. They aren't required to be here around the clock.
|
yeah but it can be worrisome since if someone posts something that is not to
be posted of an illegal nature and there is no one around to remove it, it can
cause problems for this site, like it did for Majhost.
|
So you want someone standing by in the forums 24/7/365 to make sure that a couple
of spam posts do not last on the forums for more than a little while? I am sorry,
but I don't need BrickLink to be a nanny for everything. People are supposed
to be adults here, and adults can take the time to figure out if something is
legitimate or not. I don't need BrickLink making sure that a "hall monitor"
is staffed all hours of the day, and I don't want the fees that sellers pay
to increase due to the need for said "hall monitor". Not to mention that spam
posts are so rare around here.
|
Spam posts are not my concern you should learn what happened to Majhost and almost
happened to Brickshelf because they lacked proper moderation. and then you will
understand my concern since I have seen some issues like that on other sites
happen of late.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 22:13 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
They are volunteers. They aren't required to be here around the clock.
|
yeah but it can be worrisome since if someone posts something that is not to
be posted of an illegal nature and there is no one around to remove it, it can
cause problems for this site, like it did for Majhost.
|
So you want someone standing by in the forums 24/7/365 to make sure that a couple
of spam posts do not last on the forums for more than a little while? I am sorry,
but I don't need BrickLink to be a nanny for everything. People are supposed
to be adults here, and adults can take the time to figure out if something is
legitimate or not. I don't need BrickLink making sure that a "hall monitor"
is staffed all hours of the day, and I don't want the fees that sellers pay
to increase due to the need for said "hall monitor". Not to mention that spam
posts are so rare around here.
|
|
| Author: | M.Boss | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 22:06 | | Subject: | Darth Vader Head Mold Variance | | Viewed: | 123 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
When comparing two Darth Vader figures I had, I discovered a mold variance between
two helmets. The "old" type came likey was made from 1999-2014, while The "new"
type appeared in the 2019 20th Anniversary Clone Scout Walker I think
this new mold was created because in order to create the anniversary figure lego
wanted to use a 1 piece Vader helmet, as opposed to the 2 piece helmets they
switched to a couple of years ago. This mold variation deserves a note in the
catalog entry for the helmet,, or a variant added to the catalog, but I'm
not sure which. If someone wants to take the appropriate action from here, please
go ahead. See the attached image for the differences between the two.
|
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 21:46 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
They are volunteers. They aren't required to be here around the clock.
|
yeah but it can be worrisome since if someone posts something that is not to
be posted of an illegal nature and there is no one around to remove it, it can
cause problems for this site, like it did for Majhost.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 21:43 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, qwertyboy writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | the incident is over a seller not shipping a full order, which the buyer left
negative feedback then the seller left retaliatory feedback and the only option
the buyer had was to file an NSS.
|
I get that the buyer wants to have the neg removed, and I am not condoning seller's
behaviour, but posting an NSS just to get rid of a FB is not the way to go. It
is a mis-use of the system. According to the rules, seller did refund the missing
parts, so an NSS is simply not applicable.
Niek.
|
I agree an NSS was excessive, but the way the rules are written for removing
negative feedback, that was the buyers only option, since he cannot have retaliatory
feedback removed.
|
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 21:41 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| This is all we see. From a message that I'm pretty sure Brickwilbo cancelled.
In Suggestions, qwertyboy writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | It's visible below the canceled post who canceled it.
|
Maybe for moderators, but I don't think us mere mortals can see that info.
Niek.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 21:35 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
They are volunteers. They aren't required to be here around the clock.
|
|
| Author: | qwertyboy | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 21:11 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | the incident is over a seller not shipping a full order, which the buyer left
negative feedback then the seller left retaliatory feedback and the only option
the buyer had was to file an NSS.
|
I get that the buyer wants to have the neg removed, and I am not condoning seller's
behaviour, but posting an NSS just to get rid of a FB is not the way to go. It
is a mis-use of the system. According to the rules, seller did refund the missing
parts, so an NSS is simply not applicable.
Niek.
|
|
| Author: | qwertyboy | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 20:57 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | It's visible below the canceled post who canceled it.
|
Maybe for moderators, but I don't think us mere mortals can see that info.
Niek.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 20:38 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | I don’t think it’s fair but I also don’t think that merits an intervention or
an investment of resources.
The retaliatory feedback reflects worse on the person who left it.
As a seller, this feedback wouldn’t cause me to block the buyer- specially considering
the seller who left it has a bad track record.
This has no impact on the buyer, it impacts the seller negatively as it should-
seems like it’s working okay.
It’s not perfect but it doesn’t merit investment of resources.
|
Actually you would be wrong, how do people not know the buyer was very difficult
or made outrageous demands or such? you don't all you know is the buyer got
a negative feedback which reflects on him in the negative and you are saying
he has to suffer with it. wouldn't be surprised if this keeps up this site
may lose many potential buyers because they are not allowed to change a grave
injustice to their reputation and you are ok with that.
|
Your insinuation of me not caring about buyers experience is a good point for
me to tag out and not waste any further time debating you.
good luck.
|
But it is true, you say he should just keep the negative feedback, it is like
you do not care and think nothing should be done about and that I disagree with.
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 20:25 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | I don’t think it’s fair but I also don’t think that merits an intervention or
an investment of resources.
The retaliatory feedback reflects worse on the person who left it.
As a seller, this feedback wouldn’t cause me to block the buyer- specially considering
the seller who left it has a bad track record.
This has no impact on the buyer, it impacts the seller negatively as it should-
seems like it’s working okay.
It’s not perfect but it doesn’t merit investment of resources.
|
Actually you would be wrong, how do people not know the buyer was very difficult
or made outrageous demands or such? you don't all you know is the buyer got
a negative feedback which reflects on him in the negative and you are saying
he has to suffer with it. wouldn't be surprised if this keeps up this site
may lose many potential buyers because they are not allowed to change a grave
injustice to their reputation and you are ok with that.
|
Your insinuation of me not caring about buyers experience is a good point for
me to tag out and not waste any further time debating you.
good luck.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 20:09 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | I don’t think it’s fair but I also don’t think that merits an intervention or
an investment of resources.
The retaliatory feedback reflects worse on the person who left it.
As a seller, this feedback wouldn’t cause me to block the buyer- specially considering
the seller who left it has a bad track record.
This has no impact on the buyer, it impacts the seller negatively as it should-
seems like it’s working okay.
It’s not perfect but it doesn’t merit investment of resources.
|
Actually you would be wrong, how do people not know the buyer was very difficult
or made outrageous demands or such? you don't all you know is the buyer got
a negative feedback which reflects on him in the negative and you are saying
he has to suffer with it. wouldn't be surprised if this keeps up this site
may lose many potential buyers because they are not allowed to change a grave
injustice to their reputation and you are ok with that.
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 19:49 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | I see, I think that there's blame on both sides here.
This should have been resolved better by the seller as the customer was obviously
not satisfied and was justified to leave a non positive.
The seller fell short and obviously didn't provide a satisfactory solution
to the buyer- and escalated the matter by leaving non positive.
The buyer abused the NSS system as a result of the seller's behavior.
This could be looked at in a couple ways- the feedback system wasn't abused
here- the NSS system was abused.
Our store puts more emphasis on customer experience so we would have sent the
piece or would have made a plea for the buyer to see what would be a reasonable
solution.
We also notify our buyers before shipping an order that is short to give them
an option to cancel.
I do think it is reasonable to spend $4 to repair a 7 cent mistake- but i believe
in taking full responsibility for my mistakes.
Two adults should be able to resolve their disputes- no need for a nanny.
the NSS was an abuse of BL TOS and requires interjection by admin- the feedback
system doesn't.
|
and yet the buyer is stuck with a negative he does not deserve and you do not
think that needs to be fixed?
|
I don’t think it’s fair but I also don’t think that merits an intervention or
an investment of resources.
The retaliatory feedback reflects worse on the person who left it.
As a seller, this feedback wouldn’t cause me to block the buyer- specially considering
the seller who left it has a bad track record.
This has no impact on the buyer, it impacts the seller negatively as it should-
seems like it’s working okay.
It’s not perfect but it doesn’t merit investment of resources.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 19:28 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | I see, I think that there's blame on both sides here.
This should have been resolved better by the seller as the customer was obviously
not satisfied and was justified to leave a non positive.
The seller fell short and obviously didn't provide a satisfactory solution
to the buyer- and escalated the matter by leaving non positive.
The buyer abused the NSS system as a result of the seller's behavior.
This could be looked at in a couple ways- the feedback system wasn't abused
here- the NSS system was abused.
Our store puts more emphasis on customer experience so we would have sent the
piece or would have made a plea for the buyer to see what would be a reasonable
solution.
We also notify our buyers before shipping an order that is short to give them
an option to cancel.
I do think it is reasonable to spend $4 to repair a 7 cent mistake- but i believe
in taking full responsibility for my mistakes.
Two adults should be able to resolve their disputes- no need for a nanny.
the NSS was an abuse of BL TOS and requires interjection by admin- the feedback
system doesn't.
|
and yet the buyer is stuck with a negative he does not deserve and you do not
think that needs to be fixed?
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 19:17 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
oh wouldn't be surprised if the seller made it onto a lot of peoples do not
buy from lists since his actions are not those of a good seller. but the whole
reason behind admins and moderators is to moderate between 2 parties, instead
the buyer was forced to file an NSS so as to remove said feedback, do you think
that is better?
|
Not sure which seller you are speaking of.
Buyers filing NSS to remove feedback is a violation against bricklinks' TOS
therefore does require interjection- retaliatory feedback isn't.
The case you described is very rare.
|
the incident is over a seller not shipping a full order, which the buyer left
negative feedback then the seller left retaliatory feedback and the only option
the buyer had was to file an NSS.
read this entire forum chain to get at why I posted this:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1205906
|
I see, I think that there's blame on both sides here.
This should have been resolved better by the seller as the customer was obviously
not satisfied and was justified to leave a non positive.
The seller fell short and obviously didn't provide a satisfactory solution
to the buyer- and escalated the matter by leaving non positive.
The buyer abused the NSS system as a result of the seller's behavior.
This could be looked at in a couple ways- the feedback system wasn't abused
here- the NSS system was abused.
Our store puts more emphasis on customer experience so we would have sent the
piece or would have made a plea for the buyer to see what would be a reasonable
solution.
We also notify our buyers before shipping an order that is short to give them
an option to cancel.
I do think it is reasonable to spend $4 to repair a 7 cent mistake- but i believe
in taking full responsibility for my mistakes.
Two adults should be able to resolve their disputes- no need for a nanny.
the NSS was an abuse of BL TOS and requires interjection by admin- the feedback
system doesn't.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:39 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
oh wouldn't be surprised if the seller made it onto a lot of peoples do not
buy from lists since his actions are not those of a good seller. but the whole
reason behind admins and moderators is to moderate between 2 parties, instead
the buyer was forced to file an NSS so as to remove said feedback, do you think
that is better?
|
Not sure which seller you are speaking of.
Buyers filing NSS to remove feedback is a violation against bricklinks' TOS
therefore does require interjection- retaliatory feedback isn't.
The case you described is very rare.
|
the incident is over a seller not shipping a full order, which the buyer left
negative feedback then the seller left retaliatory feedback and the only option
the buyer had was to file an NSS.
read this entire forum chain to get at why I posted this:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1205906
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:32 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
oh wouldn't be surprised if the seller made it onto a lot of peoples do not
buy from lists since his actions are not those of a good seller. but the whole
reason behind admins and moderators is to moderate between 2 parties, instead
the buyer was forced to file an NSS so as to remove said feedback, do you think
that is better?
|
Not sure which seller you are speaking of.
Buyers filing NSS to remove feedback is a violation against bricklinks' TOS
therefore does require interjection- retaliatory feedback isn't.
The case you described is very rare.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:23 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Heartbricker writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
oh wouldn't be surprised if the seller made it onto a lot of peoples do not
buy from lists since his actions are not those of a good seller. but the whole
reason behind admins and moderators is to moderate between 2 parties, instead
the buyer was forced to file an NSS so as to remove said feedback, do you think
that is better?
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:16 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
I understand the frustration of getting a retaliatory feedback BUT i don't
support interjecting the BL admins into disputes over feedback.
The BL team has enough to do without this added task which is not a revenue producing
nor a productive use of their time.
Having the admin being a referee between two disputing users may result in one
of those users leaving the site which will not be beneficial for the greater
good.
Retaliatory feedback is easy to spot and usually hurts the image of the user
who left it more than the user who received it.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:15 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
Thank you for reporting.
There were two scam posts reported around 5 at night, in my timezone.
Both were canceled immediately after I woke up. 😉
|
figured it was you that removed them, in fact feels like you are the only moderator
working.
|
You can be assured that all active moderators are working together.
It's visible below the canceled post who canceled it.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:11 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Tracyd writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Tracyd writes:
| | The definition of retaliatory is in the eye of the beholder. If I think I did
everything right and did not deserve the feedback left for me then it is not
deserved. But the other party thinks they are right and it should stand. This
would make Bricklink the final judge and jury of feedback. I look at seller's
feedback and the buyer's feedback if I am evaluating a seller. Some buyers
are unhappy at every little thing. Some sellers overreact to even the smallest
criticism.
|
yes that is why it should be an option to let the admin decide, take this recent
case into question, this buyer received negative feedback because of negative
feedback he left the seller who failed to deliver items the buyer bought and
refused to deal with the situation, the seller deserved the negative feedback,
the buyer did not and it is obviously retaliatory in nature:
https://www.bricklink.com/feedback.asp?u=sludgemonster
|
The retaliation came for the NSS charge. They shipped, missing item was refunded,
even PayPal wouldn't side with the buyer on this.
|
actually the NSS came after the negative feedback since that is evidently the
only way to remove said feedback by the rules.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:10 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
Thank you for reporting.
There were two scam posts reported around 5 at night, in my timezone.
Both were canceled immediately after I woke up. 😉
|
figured it was you that removed them, in fact feels like you are the only moderator
working.
|
|
| Author: | Tracyd | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:06 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Tracyd writes:
| | The definition of retaliatory is in the eye of the beholder. If I think I did
everything right and did not deserve the feedback left for me then it is not
deserved. But the other party thinks they are right and it should stand. This
would make Bricklink the final judge and jury of feedback. I look at seller's
feedback and the buyer's feedback if I am evaluating a seller. Some buyers
are unhappy at every little thing. Some sellers overreact to even the smallest
criticism.
|
yes that is why it should be an option to let the admin decide, take this recent
case into question, this buyer received negative feedback because of negative
feedback he left the seller who failed to deliver items the buyer bought and
refused to deal with the situation, the seller deserved the negative feedback,
the buyer did not and it is obviously retaliatory in nature:
https://www.bricklink.com/feedback.asp?u=sludgemonster
|
The retaliation came for the NSS charge. They shipped, missing item was refunded,
even PayPal wouldn't side with the buyer on this.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:05 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
Thank you for reporting.
There were two scam posts reported around 5 at night, in my timezone.
Both were canceled immediately after I woke up. 😉
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 18:03 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Tracyd writes:
| | The definition of retaliatory is in the eye of the beholder. If I think I did
everything right and did not deserve the feedback left for me then it is not
deserved. But the other party thinks they are right and it should stand. This
would make Bricklink the final judge and jury of feedback. I look at seller's
feedback and the buyer's feedback if I am evaluating a seller. Some buyers
are unhappy at every little thing. Some sellers overreact to even the smallest
criticism.
|
yes that is why it should be an option to let the admin decide, take this recent
case into question, this buyer received negative feedback because of negative
feedback he left the seller who failed to deliver items the buyer bought and
refused to deal with the situation, the seller deserved the negative feedback,
the buyer did not and it is obviously retaliatory in nature:
https://www.bricklink.com/feedback.asp?u=sludgemonster
|
|
| Author: | Tracyd | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 17:58 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
The definition of retaliatory is in the eye of the beholder. If I think I did
everything right and did not deserve the feedback left for me then it is not
deserved. But the other party thinks they are right and it should stand. This
would make Bricklink the final judge and jury of feedback. I look at seller's
feedback and the buyer's feedback if I am evaluating a seller. Some buyers
are unhappy at every little thing. Some sellers overreact to even the smallest
criticism.
|
|
| Author: | Rob_and_Shelagh | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 17:54 | | Subject: | Re: Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
How and who decides if feedback is retaliatory or not and what would be the criteria
for that?
I would agree that purely retaliatory feedback is wrong but there then becomes
an issue where there are 2 sides to a story..
Robert
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 17:45 | | Subject: | Changing rules of feedback | | Viewed: | 318 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| As it goes a rule not allowing retaliatory feedback should also be added for
removal of said feedback since as the rules stand retaliatory feedback is allowed:
Feedback you Received:
The following are currently the only valid reasons for which you can request
feedback you received to be removed:
Feedback you received contains vulgar language.
Feedback you received contains personally identifying information including your
name, address, e-mail address or telephone number.
You are the seller and the buyer has not paid. Non-Paying Buyer Alert has been
completed or the buyer has accepted the NPB penalty via NPX.
You are the buyer and the seller has not responded or shipped. Non-Responding
Seller Alert or Non-Shipping Seller Alert has been completed.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who had their
membership terminated.
Feedback you received was posted by a duplicate account of a user who was on
your Stop List before the order was placed.
If you're requesting feedback to be removed for the last 2 reasons above,
you should contact the Help Desk before you submit the request and let us know
the original username of the duplicate account.
Requests can be submitted until the order is purged from the system - up to 6
months from the order date. Requests are submitted to the BrickLink Administration
for approval. If the feedback is removed, it cannot be reposted. Each request
has a status:
|
|
| Author: | TheBrickGuys | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: bricklink lego piece not found | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| | In Catalog, foxbricks2009 writes:
| | what if i have a piece that i know is lego but i can't find it in the catalog.
could we have a feature for adding your own piece? or should i just make a custom
item?
i have this 2x8 apple bush piece i can't find.
|
|
Not Bad, 2 Minutes!
Jim
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 16:39 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 182-1 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 2 Part 3009pb213 Yellow Brick 1 x 6 with Crossed Knife and Fork Pattern (Sticker) - Set 182 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
Not according to instructions
|
|
| Author: | Fox_Brickr | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 15:42 | | Subject: | Re: bricklink lego piece not found | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| | In Catalog, foxbricks2009 writes:
| | what if i have a piece that i know is lego but i can't find it in the catalog.
could we have a feature for adding your own piece? or should i just make a custom
item?
i have this 2x8 apple bush piece i can't find.
|
|
BrickLink search is very specific.
In this situation apple is incorrect, you must search for either apple* or apples
|
oh,i looked up apple and not apples, thank you!
|
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 15:39 | | Subject: | Re: bricklink lego piece not found | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| | In Catalog, foxbricks2009 writes:
| | what if i have a piece that i know is lego but i can't find it in the catalog.
could we have a feature for adding your own piece? or should i just make a custom
item?
i have this 2x8 apple bush piece i can't find.
|
|
BrickLink search is very specific.
In this situation apple is incorrect, you must search for either apple* or apples
|
|
| Author: | Fox_Brickr | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 15:39 | | Subject: | Re: bricklink lego piece not found | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| | In Catalog, foxbricks2009 writes:
| | what if i have a piece that i know is lego but i can't find it in the catalog.
could we have a feature for adding your own piece? or should i just make a custom
item?
i have this 2x8 apple bush piece i can't find.
|
|
thank you!
|
|
| Author: | Crafteewon | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 15:38 | | Subject: | Re: bricklink lego piece not found | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, foxbricks2009 writes:
| | what if i have a piece that i know is lego but i can't find it in the catalog.
could we have a feature for adding your own piece? or should i just make a custom
item?
i have this 2x8 apple bush piece i can't find.
|
|
| Author: | Fox_Brickr | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 15:36 | | Subject: | bricklink lego piece not found | | Viewed: | 128 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| what if i have a piece that i know is lego but i can't find it in the catalog.
could we have a feature for adding your own piece? or should i just make a custom
item?
i have this 2x8 apple bush piece i can't find.
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:35 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 3804-1 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 5306bc020 Black Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 20 Studs Long (Alternate) (match ID 3)
* Change 4 Part Black 5306bc017 Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 17 Studs Long {match ID 0 to 3}
|
Not a perfect picture, I realize. I had to borrow extra hands to get it and
then didn't look at the picture until later. But I think it is just good
enough.
|
This looks like a situation where having a lack of defined wire protocols leads
to differing views on how to measure a wire. You are measuring the wire from
end to end with the connectors, so it seems to be ~20L. The one that is in the
inventory looks like it is also ~20L when measured this way, but it was inserted
into the catalog as ~17L which is just the length of the wire. I would almost
bet that the 5306bc017 and 5306bc020 entries are probably the same and should
probably be merged, but we have not got to the wire project yet. Please make
a note somewhere of the wire length you received for this set and how it was
measured, so we can use it at a later time. For now, the inventory will be left
as is concerning the wire.
Cheers,
Randy
|
The wire itself would only be 16L.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:26 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | Should be all. But to what degree each are, dunno. Here are the Hall of Fame
Discussion Mods, in any case
|
think the hall of fame refers to past mods.
|
Yes, they are former admins and mods. Thought it would interest you and others.
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:23 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | Should be all. But to what degree each are, dunno. Here are the Hall of Fame
Discussion Mods, in any case
|
think the hall of fame refers to past mods.
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:22 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
are they? when a couple scam reported posts are still up most of the day after
being reported it just tells me there is not a good spread of mods to cover all
time zones.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:17 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
you forgot to mention i've seen some serious spam posts like buying fake
ID's and such and I almost gave up reporting them because finding the report
post function is not user friendly. when you have to go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/helpMain.asp
Then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=18
then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1107
just to get to here:
https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
My suggestion is to reduce that greatly. to go straight to the last part.
|
Yeah, I understood with this morning spam why you posted the suggestion. I connected
those dots before I posted my reply.
So my thoughts stand: have the mods endorse the suggestion. It's their wheelhouse.
|
other then Brickwilbo being on the fence (agrees it is complicated but not sure
how to fix it) have not heard from any other mods, in fact not sure who the other
mods are if any others?
|
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp?utm_content=subnav
I’d add Russell, as well
|
curious how many of those mods are still active moderating? cause noticed a couple
of posts reported were still around for a long while.
|
Should be all. But to what degree each are, dunno. Here are the Hall of Fame
Discussion Mods, in any case
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:17 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | curious how many of those mods are still active moderating?
|
All of them are.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:12 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 3804-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 5306bc020 Black Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 20 Studs Long (Alternate) (match ID 3)
* Change 4 Part Black 5306bc017 Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 17 Studs Long {match ID 0 to 3}
|
Not a perfect picture, I realize. I had to borrow extra hands to get it and
then didn't look at the picture until later. But I think it is just good
enough.
|
This looks like a situation where having a lack of defined wire protocols leads
to differing views on how to measure a wire. You are measuring the wire from
end to end with the connectors, so it seems to be ~20L. The one that is in the
inventory looks like it is also ~20L when measured this way, but it was inserted
into the catalog as ~17L which is just the length of the wire. I would almost
bet that the 5306bc017 and 5306bc020 entries are probably the same and should
probably be merged, but we have not got to the wire project yet. Please make
a note somewhere of the wire length you received for this set and how it was
measured, so we can use it at a later time. For now, the inventory will be left
as is concerning the wire.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:12 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
you forgot to mention i've seen some serious spam posts like buying fake
ID's and such and I almost gave up reporting them because finding the report
post function is not user friendly. when you have to go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/helpMain.asp
Then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=18
then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1107
just to get to here:
https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
My suggestion is to reduce that greatly. to go straight to the last part.
|
Yeah, I understood with this morning spam why you posted the suggestion. I connected
those dots before I posted my reply.
So my thoughts stand: have the mods endorse the suggestion. It's their wheelhouse.
|
other then Brickwilbo being on the fence (agrees it is complicated but not sure
how to fix it) have not heard from any other mods, in fact not sure who the other
mods are if any others?
|
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp?utm_content=subnav
I’d add Russell, as well
|
curious how many of those mods are still active moderating? cause noticed a couple
of posts reported were still around for a long while.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:07 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
you forgot to mention i've seen some serious spam posts like buying fake
ID's and such and I almost gave up reporting them because finding the report
post function is not user friendly. when you have to go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/helpMain.asp
Then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=18
then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1107
just to get to here:
https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
My suggestion is to reduce that greatly. to go straight to the last part.
|
Yeah, I understood with this morning spam why you posted the suggestion. I connected
those dots before I posted my reply.
So my thoughts stand: have the mods endorse the suggestion. It's their wheelhouse.
|
other then Brickwilbo being on the fence (agrees it is complicated but not sure
how to fix it) have not heard from any other mods, in fact not sure who the other
mods are if any others?
|
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp?utm_content=subnav
I’d add Russell, as well
|
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 14:02 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
you forgot to mention i've seen some serious spam posts like buying fake
ID's and such and I almost gave up reporting them because finding the report
post function is not user friendly. when you have to go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/helpMain.asp
Then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=18
then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1107
just to get to here:
https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
My suggestion is to reduce that greatly. to go straight to the last part.
|
Yeah, I understood with this morning spam why you posted the suggestion. I connected
those dots before I posted my reply.
So my thoughts stand: have the mods endorse the suggestion. It's their wheelhouse.
|
other then Brickwilbo being on the fence (agrees it is complicated but not sure
how to fix it) have not heard from any other mods, in fact not sure who the other
mods are if any others?
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 13:54 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
you forgot to mention i've seen some serious spam posts like buying fake
ID's and such and I almost gave up reporting them because finding the report
post function is not user friendly. when you have to go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/helpMain.asp
Then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=18
then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1107
just to get to here:
https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
My suggestion is to reduce that greatly. to go straight to the last part.
|
Yeah, I understood with this morning spam why you posted the suggestion. I connected
those dots before I posted my reply.
So my thoughts stand: have the mods endorse the suggestion. It's their wheelhouse.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 13:46 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
you forgot to mention i've seen some serious spam posts like buying fake
ID's and such and I almost gave up reporting them because finding the report
post function is not user friendly. when you have to go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/helpMain.asp
Then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=18
then go here:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1107
just to get to here:
https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
My suggestion is to reduce that greatly. to go straight to the last part.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 13:44 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
yeah but a bit redundant when you have to go thru 3 clicks just to get tot the
report post section.
|
sorry make that 4 clicks before you get to the page where you give the post number
and reason.
|
Yes, it's a lot of clicks and copy/paste. Not easy on a mobile phone.
|
while a simple report post button on the post itself would make it so much easier
|
It would probably also lead to accidentally clicked reports.
I prefer a more visible button with two-step verification to report a message.
|
well when you have to click the button on the post then fill in the info and
click report that would be like a 2-step verification. my suggestion would be
to have the button on the post go right to the report function, avoiding all
those extra steps and such to get there. in other words the button on the post
would take you here https://www.bricklink.com/problemMessage.asp
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 13:39 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
Can you imagine the level of misuse such a convenient tab would allow for?
The Discussions Mods might have to give up their day jobs, considering the amount
of time it would take in filtering through the invalid to find the valid claims.
On the other hand, I could be wrong and if all the Discussions Mods were to call
for it, or at least back the suggestion, I’d say why not.
-Cory
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 13:36 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
yeah but a bit redundant when you have to go thru 3 clicks just to get tot the
report post section.
|
sorry make that 4 clicks before you get to the page where you give the post number
and reason.
|
Yes, it's a lot of clicks and copy/paste. Not easy on a mobile phone.
|
while a simple report post button on the post itself would make it so much easier
|
It would probably also lead to accidentally clicked reports.
I prefer a more visible button with two-step verification to report a message.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 13:23 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
yeah but a bit redundant when you have to go thru 3 clicks just to get tot the
report post section.
|
sorry make that 4 clicks before you get to the page where you give the post number
and reason.
|
Yes, it's a lot of clicks and copy/paste. Not easy on a mobile phone.
|
while a simple report post button on the post itself would make it so much easier
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 12:02 | | Subject: | Re: Apply order on multiple wish lists | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Tholwin writes:
| | In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
… but it would still be better if it were directly on BL.
|
Indeed. It's a nice tool though. (Sadly my OS isn't compatible.)
|
It’s Python, it should work on a Mac too.
You can also talk to the author, I’m sure he’ll be open to help you make it work.
|
|
|
| Author: | Tholwin | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 07:24 | | Subject: | Re: Apply order on multiple wish lists | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
… but it would still be better if it were directly on BL.
|
Indeed. It's a nice tool though. (Sadly my OS isn't compatible.)
|
|
| Author: | bb371467 | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 04:00 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8253-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 6629pb028R Black Technic, Liftarm 1 x 9 Bent (6 - 4) Thick with Red Lever and Six Buttons Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 8253 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 03:24 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
yeah but a bit redundant when you have to go thru 3 clicks just to get tot the
report post section.
|
sorry make that 4 clicks before you get to the page where you give the post number
and reason.
|
Yes, it's a lot of clicks and copy/paste. Not easy on a mobile phone.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 02:11 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
yeah but a bit redundant when you have to go thru 3 clicks just to get tot the
report post section.
|
sorry make that 4 clicks before you get to the page where you give the post number
and reason.
|
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 02:09 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
yeah but a bit redundant when you have to go thru 3 clicks just to get tot the
report post section.
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 01:31 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
This was suggested before.
The Problem Center is below the page. Click forum, then enter the message number.
|
|
| Author: | jeffgerry | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 00:49 | | Subject: | Re: Help to Identify Part Numbers for these... | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Colors, jeffgerry writes:
| | Can't seem to locate these. Not a sticker, printed pattern.
Thank You!
|
|
Thank YOU!!
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2020 00:41 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 4548431-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Red {3044 Slope 45 2 x 1 Double (Undetermined Underside Type) to 3044b Slope 45 2 x 1 Double - with Inside Bar}
Comments from Submitter:
From a sealed set.
|
| Author: | FantasyBricks | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 23:51 | | Subject: | Re: Report post button | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Rick_S. writes:
| | I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
+1
|
| Author: | 0to60 | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 23:50 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60062-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 3245c Orange Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder (Counterpart)
* Add 2 Part 3245c White Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
two orange 3245 w/ arctic explorer sticker
two white 3245 w/ arctic explorer sticker
|
| Author: | Rick_S. | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 23:44 | | Subject: | Report post button | | Viewed: | 164 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I feel we should get a report post button added since trying to find that page
is very not user friendly.
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 23:42 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 3804-1 | | Viewed: | 13 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 5306bc020 Black Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 20 Studs Long (Alternate) (match ID 3)
* Change 4 Part Black 5306bc017 Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 17 Studs Long {match ID 0 to 3}
|
Not a perfect picture, I realize. I had to borrow extra hands to get it and
then didn't look at the picture until later. But I think it is just good
enough.
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 23:42 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 3804-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 5306bc020 Black Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 20 Studs Long (Alternate) (match ID 3)
* Change 4 Part Black 5306bc017 Electric, Wire with Brick 2 x 2 x 2/3 Pair, 17 Studs Long {match ID 0 to 3}
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 23:23 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 2507-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, adamstaines73 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 2417 Green Plant Leaves 6 x 5
|
These leaves are bright green and are already in the inventory.
|
| Author: | adamstaines73 | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 19:07 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 2507-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 2417 Green Plant Leaves 6 x 5
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 18:07 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60265-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 3065pb09 Trans-Clear Brick 1 x 2 without Bottom Tube with Red Fish with White Stripes and Sand Blue Seagrass on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 15068pb266 Yellow Slope, Curved 2 x 2 with Black '02', Rectangles and Line on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 15068pb267 Yellow Slope, Curved 2 x 2 with Hammerhead Shark Head on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 54095pb11 Yellow Slope, Curved 8 x 8 x 2 Double with '01', 'CONTROL ROOM', 'ACCESS' and Red Arrow Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 54095pb12 Yellow Slope, Curved 8 x 8 x 2 Double with '03', 'CREW QUARTERS' and White Lightning Bolt on Red Triangle Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 45411pb14 Yellow Slope, Curved 6 x 8 x 2 Double with Hammerhead Shark Head, Black Lines and Red Arrows Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 3069bpb796 White Tile 1 x 2 with Groove with 'SGD2002' License Plate Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
* Add 2 Part 93273pb127 Yellow Slope, Curved 4 x 1 Double with Black Danger Stripes on Transparent Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60265 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 16:24 | | Subject: | Re: Another color mystery | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, WildBricks writes:
| | So are all the lots being sold on both sites a mix of the 2 colors since neither
seem to have a separate color for Lilac #219? Things that make you go "Hm" .
In Colors, yoavheskia writes:
| | The upper brick is medium violet
There is 2 shades of medium violet:
it's 2 different Lego colors:
1.Medium Bluish Violet Lego color no. 112
2.Lilac Lego color no. 219
The lower brick is Dark Pink (I think)
|
|
Yes.
|
|
| Author: | WildBricks | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 16:03 | | Subject: | Re: Another color mystery | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| So are all the lots being sold on both sites a mix of the 2 colors since neither
seem to have a separate color for Lilac #219? Things that make you go "Hm" .
In Colors, yoavheskia writes:
| | The upper brick is medium violet
There is 2 shades of medium violet:
it's 2 different Lego colors:
1.Medium Bluish Violet Lego color no. 112
2.Lilac Lego color no. 219
The lower brick is Dark Pink (I think)
|
|
|
| Author: | WildBricks | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 15:55 | | Subject: | Re: Another color mystery | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| You rock! Thanks so much. We have been beating our heads against this for a
while now. I was guessing light purple on the lower brick, but I've never
seen in before and couldn't verify it. Guess we have 2 new items to add to
our color chart now.
In Colors, yoavheskia writes:
| | The upper brick is medium violet
There is 2 shades of medium violet:
it's 2 different Lego colors:
1.Medium Bluish Violet Lego color no. 112
2.Lilac Lego color no. 219
The lower brick is Dark Pink (I think)
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 15:49 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75105-1 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| No, I can't, because I unfortunately do not have this set. If you have the
set with the correct sticker, you can follow these tutorials on how to add a
stickered counterpart to BrickLink:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1191009
Cheers,
Randy
In Inventories Requests, Lith writes:
| | Oh, OK, thank you, but can you add the relevant part to the inventory? I have
no idea on how to approach this properly (can I make a new part number, like
3678bpb05X?), I am a newbie 
Have a good one
Lith
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Lith writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 3678bpb055 Light Bluish Gray Slope 65 2 x 2 x 2 with Bottom Tube with Ridges, Hole and Yellow Light Pattern (Sticker) - Set 7965 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
A light bluish gray slope with sticker is missing from the inventory (sticker no. 5 from the sheet)
Seems identical to 3678bpb055
Sorry if I made a mistake
|
This request will not be accepted as the sticker is different. For additional
details, please see https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=260177&nID=1166564
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
|
| Author: | yoavheskia | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 15:17 | | Subject: | Re: Another color mystery | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| | The lower brick is Light purple |
| Author: | yoavheskia | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 15:15 | | Subject: | Re: Another color mystery | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| The upper brick is medium violet
There is 2 shades of medium violet:
it's 2 different Lego colors:
1.Medium Bluish Violet Lego color no. 112
2.Lilac Lego color no. 219
The lower brick is Dark Pink (I think)
|
|
|
| Author: | Lith | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 12:39 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75105-1 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Oh, OK, thank you, but can you add the relevant part to the inventory? I have
no idea on how to approach this properly (can I make a new part number, like
3678bpb05X?), I am a newbie
Have a good one
Lith
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Lith writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 3678bpb055 Light Bluish Gray Slope 65 2 x 2 x 2 with Bottom Tube with Ridges, Hole and Yellow Light Pattern (Sticker) - Set 7965 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
A light bluish gray slope with sticker is missing from the inventory (sticker no. 5 from the sheet)
Seems identical to 3678bpb055
Sorry if I made a mistake
|
This request will not be accepted as the sticker is different. For additional
details, please see https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=260177&nID=1166564
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| Author: | WildBricks | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 12:01 | | Subject: | Another color mystery | | Viewed: | 152 times | | Topic: | Colors | | Status: | Open | |
|
| The top circled brick almost looks like medium violet, but it isn't. I know
the sample for medium violet is correct because I have a whole bag of them. Any
ideas on either of these 2 bricks?
|
|
| Author: | lego.12vtrains | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 07:02 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 555-2 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | I apologize for having said a wrong thing, and thank you for accepting the request. |
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 06:22 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 7570-1 | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Light Bluish Gray {2453 Brick 1 x 1 x 5 (Undetermined Stud Type) to 2453a Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud}
Comments from Submitter:
From a sealed set.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 05:41 | | Subject: | Re: maybe wrong part in 8877-1 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, tjekkers writes:
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. It looks like you may have discovered
a set redesign!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The original version of the instructions (either 4281689 [IN] or 4281693 [NA])
show four 32140 in what appears to be the old pearl dark gray (PDG) color.
https://www.lego.com/biassets/bi/4281689.pdf
https://www.lego.com/biassets/bi/4281693.pdf
It just so happens that this exact part is currently listed as an alternate item
in the set inventory with match ID 4.
The later version of the instructions (4299301 [IN]) show four 32526 in what
appears to be dark bluish gray (DBG).
https://www.lego.com/biassets/bi/4299301.pdf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These parts also have a *long* history in the inventory change logs for the set.
(1) The original inventory on June 19, 2005, had four PDG 32140. (Score - PDG:
4; DBG: 0)
(2) On June 17, 2006, the inventory was updated to add two DBG 32140 without
removing the four PDG 32140. (Score - PDG: 4; DBG: 2)
(3) On May 29, 2008, the four PDG 32140 were finally removed leaving just two
DBG 32140. (Score - PDG: 0, DBG: 2)
(4) On September 22, 2008, an additional four DBG 32140 were added as a separate
line item. (Score - PDG: 0, DBG: 2+4)
(5) On September 24, 2008, the line item containing the two DBG 32140 were removed.
(Score - PDG: 0, DBG: 4)
(6) On August 9, 2014, the original four PDG 32140 were added back in as alternates
to the four DBG 32140. (Score - PDG: 4 as alternate; DBG: 4 as regular)
So according to the change log, it looks like DBG 32140 were used as alternates
to the original PDG 32140 in some sets. But where does this leave the fact that
the later version of the instructions shows four DBG 32526? Why haven't these
been noticed before now and added to the inventory in some way? Did all of these
members just not realize that the 32140's were really 32526's?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basically, we have to have proof for all of the variations.
The first version of the set with four PDG 32140 is very well documented in this
sealed set being built:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=404573
Since the original inventory here on BrickLink had four PDG 32140 and the instructions
seem to also show four PDG 32140, those are the ones that should be in the Regular
Items section as they originally were. I will get those moved.
So now we just need to prove the DBG 32140 and/or DBG 32526.
After looking at ~100 used set listings from past auctions, some sets had PDG
32140, some had DBG 32140, and some had a mixture of both. I couldn't find
a sealed one that showed the DBG 32140, but with that many showing up in used
listings and the inventory change request history here on BrickLink, I am 95%
certain that some sets came with DBG 32140.
The only thing I can't find is any existence of DBG 32526 in the set besides
the set of instructions. Until a time that it can ever be proven that those parts
were ever included in a copy of the set, the inventory on BrickLink remains as
correct as possible concerning these parts.
|
|
| Author: | Roxyncz | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 05:29 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60140-1 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 87552pb055 White Panel 1 x 2 x 2 with Side Supports - Hollow Studs with Gold Police Badge Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60140 (Counterpart)
|
| Author: | michaeljp64 | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 03:47 | | Subject: | skin tones | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Colors | | Status: | Open | |
|
| | whats avaliable |
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 00:36 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 265-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA194pb01 White Stickered Assembly 6 x 6 x 2 with Orange and Yellow Fish on White Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 265-1, 1 Brick 1 x 4, 3 Brick 1 x 6 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA195pb01 White Stickered Assembly 1 x 14 x 4 with Orange and Yellow Fish on White Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 265-1 - 1 Brick 1 x 2, 1 Brick 1 x 6, 4 Bricks 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2020 00:31 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 182-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part BA192pb01 Yellow Stickered Assembly 1 x 14 x 1 with Black Knife, Fork and Number 182 on White Background Pattern (Stickers) - Set 182 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA191pb01L Blue Stickered Assembly 1 x 16 x 2 with White Number 1 and 2 and Black 182 Pattern Model Left Side (Stickers) - Set 182 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 3 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA191pb01R Blue Stickered Assembly 1 x 16 x 2 with White Number 2 and 1 and Black 182 Pattern Model Right Side (Stickers) - Set 182 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 3 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA193pb01L Black Stickered Assembly 2 x 8 x 2 with White Number 182 with Border on Black Background Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 182 - 1 Brick 1 x 2, 1 Brick 1 x 8, 1 Brick 2 x 2 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA193pb01R Black Stickered Assembly 2 x 8 x 2 with White Number 182 with Border on Black Background Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 182 - 1 Brick 1 x 2, 1 Brick 1 x 8, 1 Brick 2 x 2 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 22:35 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75105-1 | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Lith writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 3678bpb055 Light Bluish Gray Slope 65 2 x 2 x 2 with Bottom Tube with Ridges, Hole and Yellow Light Pattern (Sticker) - Set 7965 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
A light bluish gray slope with sticker is missing from the inventory (sticker no. 5 from the sheet)
Seems identical to 3678bpb055
Sorry if I made a mistake
|
This request will not be accepted as the sticker is different. For additional
details, please see https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=260177&nID=1166564
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Mirko8710 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 19:06 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 76100-1 | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 50955pb042 Black Wedge 10 x 3 Left with White Stripes Pattern (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 50956pb042 Black Wedge 10 x 3 Right with White Stripes Pattern (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 85984pb261L Black Slope 30 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Purple Sight Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 85984pb261R Black Slope 30 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Purple Sight Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 2 Part 50950pb126 Dark Bluish Gray Slope, Curved 3 x 1 with Black and Dark Bluish Gray Danger Stripes Pattern (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 22385pb194L Black Tile, Modified 2 x 3 Pentagonal with Dark Bluish Gray Vents Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 22385pb194R Black Tile, Modified 2 x 3 Pentagonal with Dark Bluish Gray Vents Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 2 Part 30236pb01 Dark Bluish Gray Brick, Modified 1 x 2 with Handle with Black and Dark Bluish Gray Danger Stripes Pattern (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 46413pb018 Trans-Black Windscreen 8 x 4 x 2 Curved with Locking Dual 2 Fingers with Vents and Hull Plates Pattern (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 95188pb31L Black Brick, Round Corner 6 x 6 with Slope 33 Edge, Facet Cutout with White Stripes Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 95188pb31R Black Brick, Round Corner 6 x 6 with Slope 33 Edge, Facet Cutout with White Stripes Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 76100 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | electricbaer | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 18:41 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6274-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, electricbaer writes:
Is there a separate request to fulfill to have the separate sail entries be inventoried
as parts of the complete set?
Can disregard that part, I found where to do it
|
|
| Author: | electricbaer | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 18:37 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 6274-1 | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part sailbb72c01 White Cloth Sail Assembly with Blue Thick Stripes Pattern (match ID 1)
* Delete 1 Part sailbb22 White Cloth Sail 27 x 17 Top with Blue Thick Stripes Pattern
* Delete 1 Part sailbb20 White Cloth Sail Triangular 15 x 22 with Blue Thick Stripes Pattern
* Delete 1 Part sailbb21 White Cloth Sail 30 x 15 Bottom with Blue Thick Stripes Pattern
Comments from Submitter:
I wasn't 100% sure on how to tackle this, but I'd assume that correct inventory for this set would involve deleting the separate sail entries as a part of the set inventory and replacing them with the full assembly. Then of course the sails as separate entries be a part of the inventory of the complete sail set. Is there a separate request to fulfill to have the separate sail entries be inventoried as parts of the complete set?
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 18:31 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 555-2 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, lego.12vtrains writes:
| | But I think you did a mistake, the white 3001 (with cross supports) is actually
part of the inventory, so please remove it and add the white 3001old (as shown
by the pictures I added), thanks!
|
No mistake. I had not processed those requests, yet, since I was waiting for
your response. Now that I have seen your response, those requests will be processed.
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 18:14 | | Subject: | Re: Modified plate #4151 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Tried to reply quickly and mixed up my tans. 
In Catalog, iprice writes:
| | In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| |
Only supposed to be the b version found in :
Or
|
Wrong Sail Barge! 
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 18:14 | | Subject: | Re: Modified plate #4151 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Squeakie7 writes:
| | What set uses 8 x 8 modified plate #4151 with grille in a dark tan? It is not
listed in the catalog.
|
You’re sure it isn’t a b (with hole)?
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=4151b&colorID=69&in=A
Or it could be from earlier versions of these sets and no one saw or said they
were Alternates (or rather Regular and 4151b an Alternate).
|
| Author: | iprice | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2020 18:12 | | Subject: | Re: Modified plate #4151 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| |
Only supposed to be the b version found in :
Or
|
Wrong Sail Barge!
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
United Kingdom, England
)
)
Canada, Alberta
Netherlands, Gelderland
)
)
)
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Switzerland, Vaud
Serbia, Južnobački okrug
Germany, Baden-Württemberg
Israel, Mehoz Tel Aviv
Poland, w. Śląskie
)
)
Italy, Veneto
Czech Republic, Moravskoslezský Kraj
Australia, Queensland
