Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 16:36 | Subject: | Re: Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
|
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
Yes
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 16:32 | Subject: | Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
Author: | run4ever | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 10:08 | Subject: | Re: help to find a item | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| In Catalog, run4ever writes:
| Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
Thanks so much!!!
|
Author: | brickconnector | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 06:58 | Subject: | Re: How to add instruction weight? | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank you, I could not have found it without help |
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 04:56 | Subject: | Re: How to add instruction weight? | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brickconnector writes:
| I cannot add the weight of instruction book 8307-1. (177 grams). If I go to https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
which category should I choose?
Set | Part | Minifig | Book | Gear | Catalog
Whichever I choose it doesn't work.
|
Category sets https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S in the top
field ("item no") enter the set number and enter the weight in grams in the field
"Change weight of instructions to."
|
Author: | brickconnector | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 03:47 | Subject: | How to add instruction weight? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I cannot add the weight of instruction book 8307-1. (177 grams). If I go to https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
which category should I choose?
Set | Part | Minifig | Book | Gear | Catalog
Whichever I choose it doesn't work.
|
Author: | Cob | Posted: | Jun 12, 2019 14:33 | Subject: | Re: help to find a item | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, run4ever writes:
| Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
Author: | run4ever | Posted: | Jun 12, 2019 14:32 | Subject: | help to find a item | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 18:46 | Subject: | Re: adding something to the catalog | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, samsam2 writes:
| Darn, I was about to help add these parts to the catalog, but the stickers are
not correct....
In Catalog, mjsheller writes:
| Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
They were added but I rejected them due to this reason, stickers are wrongly
applied.
|
|
Author: | samsam2 | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 18:37 | Subject: | Re: adding something to the catalog | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Darn, I was about to help add these parts to the catalog, but the stickers are
not correct....
In Catalog, mjsheller writes:
| Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 12:51 | Subject: | Re: parts | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, mikemuscar writes:
| help I'm looking for parts. 1 what Lego digital designer calls mini alien
pet. 2 what Lego digital designer calls shell morning star. dose anyone
have this parts or know wat set they are in. also where if anywhere I can find
them in the studio program.
|
In LDD, look at the Part # / Design ID in the status line. Use that as a search
term. To catch patterned or composite parts, add a star.
“MINI ALIEN PET” = 95204, a search for “95204*” gives:
“SHELL - MORNING STAR” = 54177, a search for “54177” gives:
If you want both, add them in a Wanted List and then you can search stores (
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/buy.page ).
|
|
Author: | mikemuscar | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 11:42 | Subject: | parts | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| help I'm looking for parts. 1 what Lego digital designer calls mini alien
pet. 2 what Lego digital designer calls shell morning star. dose anyone
have this parts or know wat set they are in. also where if anywhere I can find
them in the studio program.
|
|
Author: | mjsheller | Posted: | Jun 9, 2019 14:57 | Subject: | adding something to the catalog | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | May 29, 2019 13:20 | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| Thanks each!
I didn't realize they HAD been added, as I kept searching for the numbers
I had given them as I made the addition form. I didn't know that the "approver"
would change them. That's good though!
|
They were needed a correction as they weren't properly numbered
|
Miles (C0lsanders_)
In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
|
|
Author: | C0lsanders_ | Posted: | May 29, 2019 13:18 | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks each!
I didn't realize they HAD been added, as I kept searching for the numbers
I had given them as I made the addition form. I didn't know that the "approver"
would change them. That's good though!
Miles (C0lsanders_)
In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | May 29, 2019 11:54 | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
It depends if pending item is problematic or not.
| And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
|
No messages are sended when item is approved. Correspondence with submitter is
only with problematic items (somtimes, firstly a note is added to pending item
in such cases - in item name like in this one for example [p=15068pb169x]) or
when they are rejected.
That is why submitters should check they "My activity page"
https://www.bricklink.com/myActivity.asp
or this page, section "My Additions Pending Approval:"
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp
Pending items can bee seen also here
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPend.asp
You should check also this page where new additions to the catalog are showed
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?
Check this help page also
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2482
There are also answers to questions about pending items.
|
|
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | May 29, 2019 10:07 | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
They were already approved on Monday if you're talking about these two.
[p=3068bpb1232]
[p=3068bpb1233]
|
|
Author: | tons_of_bricks | Posted: | May 29, 2019 09:19 | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
I've requested two changes to listings in the past, both were approved really
quickly but I didn't get a message. If you click on "My Activity" from your
profile, you can see the requests you've made and how many have been approved.
|
|
Author: | C0lsanders_ | Posted: | May 29, 2019 08:50 | Subject: | First time addition, how long | Viewed: | 165 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | May 27, 2019 11:26 | Subject: | Re: 62436c01pb01 - year released | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, aladar123 writes:
| Hi,
I just have a 62436c01pb01 in my hands also its pair and both have 2006 as the
year on them. Do I have a different part or the catalog needs an update?
Thanks,
Tamas
|
The year on the part is the copyright year. The year in the Bricklink catalog
is when it was first included in a set. This is often a year later because of
the time it takes to design and then produce parts.
|
Author: | mokibricks | Posted: | May 27, 2019 10:11 | Subject: | 62436c01pb01 - year released | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I just have a 62436c01pb01 in my hands also its pair and both have 2006 as the
year on them. Do I have a different part or the catalog needs an update?
Thanks,
Tamas
|
|
Author: | novabrick | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:33 | Subject: | Re: Magnetic Dooku | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
Thanks for the quick response. I'll keep him as a desk decoration or make
a custom listing or something.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:19 | Subject: | Re: Magnetic Dooku | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, novabrick writes:
| Hi Guys.
We have a Count Dooku Clonewars figure
on a magnet from
It's only missing the lightsaber.
However different to the listing the minifig is permanently glued to the base
+ Torso to the Legs. Basically only Head arms and cape are removable.
|
| Is there
a plan to include these glued Magnetfigs in the catalog?
|
No
| Or is only the complete
set considered sellable.
Also there maybe should be added a notice to those sets in regards of being glued
or with lose minifigs.
Regards
Christian
novabrick-team
|
Here you have very good summarizing article about them
http://thebrickblogger.com/2011/06/glued-and-non-glued-lego-magnets/
|
|
Author: | novabrick | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:12 | Subject: | Magnetic Dooku | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi Guys.
We have a Count Dooku Clonewars figure
on a magnet from
It's only missing the lightsaber.
However different to the listing the minifig is permanently glued to the base
+ Torso to the Legs. Basically only Head arms and cape are removable. Is there
a plan to include these glued Magnetfigs in the catalog? Or is only the complete
set considered sellable.
Also there maybe should be added a notice to those sets in regards of being glued
or with lose minifigs.
Regards
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
Author: | Classicsmiley | Posted: | May 26, 2019 22:55 | Subject: | Re: 11650c01 Vehicle Base sub-components | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| I was wondering if anyone has attempted/managed to separate the joined sub-components
that make up this assembly. As far as I can tell on mine, doing this would cause
damage. I'm curious to know what the 'rivet-like' pins on the bottom
look like separated and whether they could serve another useful purpose on their
own. I would hazard a guess that it is stud diameter for a length of one plate-thickness
with a bar-size (or similar) hole in the center on the inside.
I presume there is no LEGO-published part number for the pin alone.
|
* | | 11650c01 Vehicle, Base 5 x 10 x 2 1/2 with Mudguards and 6 x 2 Recessed Center with 3 Holes with (Same Color) Wheels Holders Attached Parts: Vehicle, Base |
|
|
Author: | clrv4000 | Posted: | May 26, 2019 22:49 | Subject: | 11650c01 Vehicle Base sub-components | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I was wondering if anyone has attempted/managed to separate the joined sub-components
that make up this assembly. As far as I can tell on mine, doing this would cause
damage. I'm curious to know what the 'rivet-like' pins on the bottom
look like separated and whether they could serve another useful purpose on their
own. I would hazard a guess that it is stud diameter for a length of one plate-thickness
with a bar-size (or similar) hole in the center on the inside.
I presume there is no LEGO-published part number for the pin alone.
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:45 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 110 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
I've changed the catalog note for both entries. See if that sounds better
to you.
|
|
Author: | maninblack | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:42 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
Many years ago I managed to speak directly with a Lego engineer. I reported it
to Admin and for some time the description of the conversation was shown in the
Additional Notes for the part.
The slot is NOT intentional but is more a problem with the design of the part.
Whether a slot forms or not is down, mainly, to the age of the mold.
A redesign is not possible and it is considered to be such a minor flaw that
keeping things as they are is better than scrapping the part altogether.
|
|
Author: | tonnic | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:27 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
|
Author: | WhiteHorseMatt | Posted: | May 26, 2019 06:30 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
|
Author: | tonnic | Posted: | May 26, 2019 05:26 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
|
Author: | seymour3113 | Posted: | May 26, 2019 04:30 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank You
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
|
Author: | hpoort | Posted: | May 26, 2019 03:24 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
This is something we are going to look into. From what I have seen over the years,
there is no real "smooth slopes" for some of those parts (or any of them). What
they are are parts that come from molds where the sand-blasted texture has been
worn down over time making the slopes look more smooth than others that were
produced when the molds were new. One thing is for certain - none of them are
smooth like real smooth-molded slopes such as
Cheers,
Randy
|
Don't forget about versus with complete, intended smoothness
in the a-version.
Hans-Peter
|
|
Author: | clrv4000 | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:47 | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | Viewed: | 63 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint
balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with
such a piece. That's got me brainstorming...
|
Okayyyyy- now I see it! You may be right!
|
Sort of reminds me of this thing someone 3D printed:
https://www.myminifactory.com/de/object/3d-print-1l-lego-technic-liftarm-81004
Of course you wouldn't want to get THAT stuck in a 32474! (I occasionally
run into a similar 'homemade solution' when I find 1L axle stubs snapped
off of Bionicle detail parts in used LEGO batches. I had to drill a tiny center
hole and drive a fine screw into the bit to remove it on a couple occasions.)
|
|
Author: | bb1237701 | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:27 | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint
balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with
such a piece. That's got me brainstorming...
|
Okayyyyy- now I see it! You may be right!
|
|
Author: | clrv4000 | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:22 | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint
balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with
such a piece. That's got me brainstorming...
|
|
Author: | bb1237701 | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:11 | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:03 | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
I *had* seen it, probably at the same time as the new 2x4 brick with axle holes
and that technic connector block...
But I can't find it so I probably noticed the part when I was looking at
new items pending approval in our catalog...
|
Author: | clrv4000 | Posted: | May 25, 2019 20:22 | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
All I can say is that I really would like a part like that! I can already
think of some situations I could have solved easily with that. Hopefully some
sleuth can sort this out for us. Please keep us updated.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 25, 2019 18:15 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
This is something we are going to look into. From what I have seen over the years,
there is no real "smooth slopes" for some of those parts (or any of them). What
they are are parts that come from molds where the sand-blasted texture has been
worn down over time making the slopes look more smooth than others that were
produced when the molds were new. One thing is for certain - none of them are
smooth like real smooth-molded slopes such as
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | manganschlamm | Posted: | May 25, 2019 16:02 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
Why do you think that smooth slopes is not an appropriate entry? I actually prefer
textured slopes and when I order textured slopes and get smooth slopes it does
not make me happy.
|
|
Author: | Brickitty | Posted: | May 25, 2019 15:18 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:34 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Author: | seymour3113 | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:10 | Subject: | 4070a | Viewed: | 125 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 23, 2019 10:13 | Subject: | Old Mosaic pieces. | Viewed: | 113 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Can I ask what proof is required to submit the rectangular version of the 3062oldtile
?
I have both the one shown below and the rectangular version without stud that
I suppose would be something like 3005oldtile.
Not ready to list just yet but might want to do so sometime this year.
[p=3062oldtile]
|
|
Author: | sheppy02 | Posted: | May 22, 2019 06:40 | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
|
There are 87 of the "set", whereas there are 4294 listings for the part. So most
people have listed them as the single part. The sealed ones listed as sets are
likely to be correct, as are the used ones listed as sets as they do not need
to contain the packaging (although the listing should say that).
If you have plenty of a single part set (or single minifigure set), it is often
a good idea to list some as the part (or minifigure) and some as the set, as
different buys will search for different things.
|
Thanks, that is very helpful
Alex
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 22, 2019 06:12 | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
|
There are 87 of the "set", whereas there are 4294 listings for the part. So most
people have listed them as the single part. The sealed ones listed as sets are
likely to be correct, as are the used ones listed as sets as they do not need
to contain the packaging (although the listing should say that).
If you have plenty of a single part set (or single minifigure set), it is often
a good idea to list some as the part (or minifigure) and some as the set, as
different buys will search for different things.
|
|
Author: | sheppy02 | Posted: | May 22, 2019 05:58 | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, NelisSolis writes:
| In Catalog, sheppy02 writes:
| Hello All,
I am just listing some items, I had one
[p=630-3]
trying to find the others in my inventory no joy, searched by brick separator
my others are listed
which are up for approx. 8 times the price. what is the difference? or are they
essentially the same products?
Thanks
Alex
|
the is a set (service pack) with only 1 part and the is the
part in that set.
|
Thanks Nelis,
Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
Alex
|
|
Author: | NelisSolis | Posted: | May 22, 2019 05:50 | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, sheppy02 writes:
| Hello All,
I am just listing some items, I had one
[p=630-3]
trying to find the others in my inventory no joy, searched by brick separator
my others are listed
which are up for approx. 8 times the price. what is the difference? or are they
essentially the same products?
Thanks
Alex
|
the is a set (service pack) with only 1 part and the is the
part in that set.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|