Discussion Forum: Messages by StormChaser (568)
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 19:06
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sim002
 Viewed: 26 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Minifig No: sim002  Name: Marge Simpson with Apron
* 
sim002 (Inv) Marge Simpson with Apron
Minifigures: The Simpsons

* Change 1 Part {Lime to White} 16816pb01 Minifigure, Skirt Cloth Length 10mm with Lime Print Surrounding Apron Pattern
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 18:45
 Subject: Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 38 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
  As we know, 3937 works with all canopies.

It does. However, this item relationship match is not capable of handling complex
relationships consisting of all the parts with which an individual part will
fit and work together. It is another limitation of the system over which I have
no control.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 17:19
 Subject: Re: Does this count as a catalog entry?
 Viewed: 33 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mnoel2 writes:
  Would this pack count as a set? For sale at a retail store. Or, if not, would
the figs count as a catalog entry?

I don't see any figs in that package.

As for whether it would count as a set, you say they were all prepackaged? Were
the contents of all of them identical?

If so, then I really can't think of a reason why it shouldn't be considered
a set.

How many were for sale at that location? Was there an item number for the set?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 04:04
 Subject: Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion?
 Viewed: 30 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
  I have checked the instructions of set 8667 and have come with a very solid complete
assembly with two parts.

Yes, you're right. For some reason I thought those were:

 
Part No: 2420  Name: Plate 2 x 2 Corner
* 
2420 Plate 2 x 2 Corner
Parts: Plate

and I was adding in the red plate below.

  Would this then be accepted?

If you look at the existing sticker over assembly parts, then you can see that
the parts for each assembly are all in the same colors (at least I believe they
are). I haven't thought about multicolored parts and how that would work.
I don't guess it wouldn't really matter all that much, but let me ponder
it for a bit. I'll get back with you.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 03:58
 Subject: Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 42 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mhortar writes:
  So I tried adding a new relationship for P=3937 and P=6134 and got an error.
Should I have modified the existing relationship instead?

Well, there's a problem with this new relationship type. It works great
if you only have two items, but it doesn't work well if there are multiple
items (unless they all only work with each other). So for now just send in items
which only work with each other and perhaps we can figure something out for other
things later.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 24, 2018 01:49
 Subject: Re: Extra Parts classification change?
 Viewed: 29 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
  Out of all the changes, only multipacks are really new.

No, that's not true, either. This multipack has been in the catalog since
March, 2007:

 
Part No: 41114  Name: Scala Hay Bale (Complete Package)
* 
41114 (Inv) Scala Hay Bale (Complete Package)
Parts: Scala
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 22:48
 Subject: Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 45 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
  I like this new relation type very much

OMG, I knew you would!! I was telling everyone, "Even if no one else likes this,
at least I know David will. In fact, I think he'll like it very much."

  but I wonder if the title will convey the intended meaning.

I also brought up this concern in the intensive, three-week long meeting we had
when discussing this new relationship type. You're right . . . don't
most parts fit together? Unfortunately, the meeting ended before any of us could
manufacture a more appropriate title for this relationship.

   Would Parts that Belong Together work better?

I think it would. I think it so strongly that I just changed everything to this
title. If anyone asks you, though, you must tell them that I alone came up with
the title. I will deny your involvement to my dying day.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 21:23
 Subject: Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 41 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, randyf writes:
  My suggestion

Yes, I like it. Thanks! So, my original version:

Shows parts that naturally fit together which are designed to work together
and which are nearly always used together as a single unit.


Your revision:

Shows parts that were designed to naturally work with each other and are nearly
always used together as a single unit.


My revision of your revision (just cut two words and changed another word to
account for that):

Shows parts designed to naturally work with each other which are nearly always
used together as a single unit.


I've updated the guidelines with that last version.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 20:09
 Subject: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 155 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
We have long needed a relationship match that shows items which fit together
and which are frequently used together. I have asked for this type of match
in the past and have gotten nowhere.

Instead, these kinds of matches were added as paired parts even though they did
not fit the spirit or definition of that match (and the sentence "Exceptions
to these definitions are determined at administrative discretion." was added
to the Item Relationships definitions page). Some examples of items currently
matched as paired parts:

 
Part No: 44225  Name: Technic Rotation Joint Disk with Large Pin and 3L Liftarm Thick
* 
44225 Technic Rotation Joint Disk with Large Pin and 3L Liftarm Thick
Parts: Technic
 
Part No: 44224  Name: Technic Rotation Joint Disk with Large Pin Hole and 3L Liftarm Thick
* 
44224 Technic Rotation Joint Disk with Large Pin Hole and 3L Liftarm Thick
Parts: Technic

 
Part No: 92910  Name: Technic, Steering Ball Joint Large Open with C-Shape Pivot Frame
* 
92910 Technic, Steering Ball Joint Large Open with C-Shape Pivot Frame
Parts: Technic, Steering
 
Part No: 92911  Name: Technic, Steering Ball Joint Large Receptacle
* 
92911 Technic, Steering Ball Joint Large Receptacle
Parts: Technic, Steering

 
Part No: 87617  Name: Cylinder 1 x 5 1/2 with Bar Handle (Friction Cylinder)
* 
87617 Cylinder 1 x 5 1/2 with Bar Handle (Friction Cylinder)
Parts: Cylinder
 
Part No: 87618  Name: Bar   5L with Handle (Friction Ram)
* 
87618 Bar 5L with Handle (Friction Ram)
Parts: Bar

In my ongoing struggle to make the world a better place, generally speaking,
by addressing first-world problems of the lowest magnitude, we now have a new
relationship match:

Parts that Fit Together

Shows parts that naturally fit together which are designed to work together
and which are nearly always used together as a single unit.


If anyone sees where this definition could be improved, then please let me know.
Otherwise, start sending me some new item relationships and let's see how
well this works. I've added a few to get us started and here is one of them
so you can see how it looks:

 
Part No: 3937  Name: Hinge Brick 1 x 2 Base
* 
3937 Hinge Brick 1 x 2 Base
Parts: Hinge
 
Part No: 3938  Name: Hinge Brick 1 x 2 Top Plate
* 
3938 Hinge Brick 1 x 2 Top Plate
Parts: Hinge

See the project on the catalog roadmap:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476

See the new relationship match added and defined today:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRel.asp
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 18:17
 Subject: Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion?
 Viewed: 49 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
  So would this mean that an item . . . can not be added in the catalog?

No. It just means that the assembly must include enough parts to be solid and
not be held together merely by the sticker. Look at this example:

[P=BA47pb02]

The sticker is only on the tiles. The complete assembly includes the underlying
4 x 12 plates to make the whole thing solid. Any assembly, of course, must match
what the set instructions show for that assembly.

For the part under discussion, it looks like the complete assembly would need
to include three other parts to be approved as a catalog entry (see the instructions
for set 8667).
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 23, 2018 16:44
 Subject: Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion?
 Viewed: 35 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
  I was sorting through a lot of Lego and came across an assembled item (with a
sticker holding it together).

  Could you give me more info about this item and the reason it is marked for deletion?

I've added an additional note to this item explaining why it was marked for
deletion:

[P=BA43pb02]

Feel free to submit a new catalog entry for a similar assembly which is held
together by more than just the sticker.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 22, 2018 02:27
 Subject: Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? UPDATE
 Viewed: 42 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  Is there actually a 3626bpx28?.

No, there is not.

Thank you for researching this and bringing it to my attention and to axaday
for contacting sellers and to JulieK and baylit for responding with here with
evidence from their store inventories.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 20, 2018 19:18
 Subject: Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28?
 Viewed: 37 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  so much for that attempt at humor

Sorry, didn't realize it was an attempt at humor. I've been getting
some occasionally unfriendly feedback of late and thus I've tended to assume
things are criticism unless stated otherwise.

It's funny . . . people complain about bitter, unresponsive administrators
and never think to question how that happens.
 
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 20, 2018 18:06
 Subject: Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28?
 Viewed: 44 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  Oh, well. We can all ignore it and then someone else bring up the question again
in six months.

This is not ignoring it:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1120803

I will paraphrase what I said in that message:

If it's wrong, then let's fix it. But first, let's make sure it's
wrong by asking some sellers who claim to have the no-stubble head and figure
for sale.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 20, 2018 14:40
 Subject: Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28?
 Viewed: 53 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  Catalog lists all the "Bandit 1" as having head without stubble. However, every
instance I can find of this head in various sources all display the stubble.

I don't consider the original source for the inventory of the figure to have
been reliable at all. I'm sure we carried these parts over from other websites
and I have no problem with updating things.

I believe in this case we'd need to mark the current figure for deletion
and add a new one. Then the inventories of six sets would need to be updated.

We should probably have a better understanding of the heads and figures on the
market right now, though, and where they came from. What has worked well in
the past is contacting sellers and asking them about their items for sale. Would
you be willing to do this?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 20, 2018 02:49
 Subject: Re: Extra Parts classification change?
 Viewed: 49 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Sorry to keep posting. I should've figured out everything I wanted to say
first. I also should have invested in Tesla stock (about 3,200 shares would
have done it) back in 2010. I didn't have $50K to invest then, though.
Still don't, as a matter of fact.

Anyway, Marek and Randy could better respond to this post since they're in
charge of inventories. I'm just responding because they haven't yet.

In Catalog, Necrotron writes:
  Extra parts in sets can vary during production, and will sometimes vary from region
to region. These extra parts do not represent a complete set, nor are those pieces
required to complete a set.

The site is well aware of that and we do not consider extras necessary to have
a complete set. Please read how we define regular and extra parts by our policy
(which was changed, as I said, quite some time ago - I just checked and the primary
changes were made eight months ago in mid-April):

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1562

Extra parts are still considered extra parts. We all know what they are and
there is still an Extra Items section in BrickLink inventories where they go.
I don't see that ever changing.

As for parts on sprues, they've been inventories for a long time.
Not much change there other than sweeping up the remaining parts. As for parts
which came preassembled, the site has been going that way for a long time, too.
We're just doing it more quickly now. Out of all the changes, only multipacks
are really new.

What the site really needs is an inventory which can reflect two states of existence:
new and used. I asked for that when I was an inventories administrator and Randy
is still pushing for it. This requires a functional update to the site, but
it would solve this problem permanently. Once the solution was in place you
could choose to see/buy/sell the set in the state it existed when new or the
state it exists in once used.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 20, 2018 02:24
 Subject: Re: Extra Parts classification change?
 Viewed: 37 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Necrotron writes:
  I've seen a post in the eurobricks forum which a states that the extra parts
section here on bricklink is changing. Please do not make this change.

That policy change was made something around a year ago. I'm clueless as
to why it's just being mentioned now.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 20, 2018 02:23
 Subject: Re: Extra Parts classification change?
 Viewed: 46 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Necrotron writes:
  I've seen a post in the eurobricks forum

https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/169127-if-you-use-bricklink-to-confirm-set-inventories/&tab=comments#comment-3054162
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 19, 2018 04:20
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set lille-1
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: lille  Name: LEGO Store Grand Opening Exclusive Set, Euralille, Lille, France blister pack
* 
LILLE-1 (Inv) LEGO Store Grand Opening Exclusive Set, Euralille, Lille, France blister pack
2 Parts, 3 Minifigures, 2013
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Brand Store: Grand Opening

* Add 1 Part 3626cpb0363 Yellow Minifigure, Head Dual Sided Bushy Eyebrows and Goatee / Worried Pattern - Hollow Stud (Alternate) (match ID 1)

Comments from Submitter:
Per expired additional note for figure cas502 which comes in this set.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 17, 2018 20:38
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 182-1
 Viewed: 20 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, mvdheide writes:
  Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 182  Name: Train Set with Signal
* 
182-1 (Inv) Train Set with Signal
354 Parts, 1975
Sets: Train: 4.5V

* Add 2 Part 3009pb213 Yellow Brick 1 x 6 with Crossed Knife and Fork Pattern (Sticker) - Set 182 (Counterpart)

Marek and Randy,

When you check the instructions for this set you will see that the sticker covers
multiple parts. However, if you look at the sticker sheet for the set and photos
of actual sets with the stickers applied, then you can see that the sticker is
only large enough for the brick it is on.

At least that was what I found, so I approved this catalog entry. If there's
a problem with it, then please let me know.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 16, 2018 04:44
 Subject: Re: Extra Sticker set in Indoraptor Rampage
 Viewed: 23 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories, paulvdb writes:
  But the sticker sheets were clearly not intended to be included as extra parts
and don't appear often enough to justify including them as extra parts.

There are two schools of thought on this and good arguments can definitely be
made for both positions. You have presented one side well and I will present
the other side:

1. Frequency of appearance is not currently the deciding factor in the
inclusion of an extra part in a set inventory. Should it be? I don't believe
so. How could you reasonably set a quantity of appearances before an extra is
allowed into an inventory?

2. I've never heard a convincing explanation of why any extra parts
are included in any sets, although I've certainly heard a number of theories.
Extra sticker sheets certainly don't appear to be consistent extras, but
should intentionality on the part of TLG be the deciding factor on including
extras in an inventory? I don't believe so, or at least not until we can
conclusively define (based on convincing evidence) the circumstances regarding
extra parts and their appearance in sets.

3. It is possible that extra sticker sheet extras are more common than
any of us realize, even if only packing errors. If we're not keeping any
records of their appearance in sets, then how would we truly know?

4. Extra sticker sheets fit the definition of extra parts as well as
any other extra part does. They appear in some sets and not in others. Should
we base decisions on extra parts on anything other than the fact that they came
in a set and were extra? I don't believe so.

But, perhaps Marek and Randy can produce some guidelines for us on how extra
sticker sheets should be handled in set inventories considering the positions
we've outlined.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 15, 2018 15:15
 Subject: Re: Extra Sticker set in Indoraptor Rampage
 Viewed: 32 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories, randyf writes:
  It's not unheard of to get a duplicate sticker sheet in a set here or there.
It has happened to me two or three times.

We may have differing opinions on this - not sure because we've never discussed
it. My opinion is that a sticker is a part. We consider it a part and TLG considers
it a part and includes it in the part count.

If you have an extra one of these parts, then I believe it fits the definition
of an extra part and should be included in the set inventory as such:

 
Set No: 41351  Name: Creative Tuning Shop
* 
41351-1 (Inv) Creative Tuning Shop
404 Parts, 2 Minifigures, 2018
Sets: Friends

Were sticker sheets systematically included as extras in some sets in the way
that other parts are? We really don't know, since we haven't been keeping
data on extra appearances. The current inventory guidelines don't address
how frequently an extra must appear in order to be added to the inventory, but
the unwritten rule has been one time.

What are your thoughts?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 13, 2018 16:25
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8272-1
 Viewed: 19 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
  One of the last things that were written were "Further,
there is some debate over whether PLG and flat silver are officially different
colors or merely variations in what TLG intended to be the same color." So I
chose to stop the discussion there rather than wasting everybody's time.

We do intend to address the issue of the differences between these colors when
we launch the project on colors. It is possible that pearl light gray and flat
silver will be combined into a single color, but we can discuss it further at
that time.

Until then, I see (and saw) little point in changing PLG parts to flat silver
parts and vice versa. If we combine the colors, then it's just a waste of
time to do inventory changing now from either color to the other.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 13, 2018 15:35
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set 6280-1
 Viewed: 12 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 6280  Name: Armada Flagship
* 
6280-1 (Inv) Armada Flagship
270 Parts, 3 Minifigures, 1 Gear, 1996
Sets: Pirates: Pirates I: Imperial Armada

* Add 1 Gear p96pirate (Not Applicable) Pirates Poster 1996 (4.103.789/4.103.790-EU)

Comments from Submitter:
Per additional note for poster.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 13, 2018 15:32
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set 7075-1
 Viewed: 12 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 7075  Name: Captain Redbeard's Pirate Ship
* 
7075-1 (Inv) Captain Redbeard's Pirate Ship
132 Parts, 4 Minifigures, 1 Gear, 2004
Sets: 4 Juniors: Pirates

* Add 1 Gear 4244911 (Not Applicable) Pirates Captain Redbeard Poster (Double-Sided)

Comments from Submitter:
Additional note says that poster came in this set.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 13, 2018 15:28
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set 7074-1
 Viewed: 12 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 7074  Name: Skull Island
* 
7074-1 (Inv) Skull Island
78 Parts, 3 Minifigures, 1 Gear, 2004
Sets: 4 Juniors: Pirates

* Add 1 Gear 4244910 (Not Applicable) Pirates Captain Kragg Poster

Comments from Submitter:
Freestyle posters are included in set inventories, so I see no reason why this poster should not also be included in the inventory of the set in which it came.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 13, 2018 04:41
 Subject: Re: Please approve LEGO Movie 2 30620 Polybag
 Viewed: 41 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, rapar writes:
  Can you please approve The Lego Movie 2: 30620 Star-Stuck Emmet Polybag? I have
some in my hands. This polybag can already be purchased in Poland.

For you I will, but only just this once.

 
Set No: 30620  Name: Star-Stuck Emmet polybag
* 
30620-1 (Inv) Star-Stuck Emmet polybag
37 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2019
Sets: The LEGO Movie 2
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 12, 2018 16:36
 Subject: Re: Stickered Parts separate category
 Viewed: 42 times
 Topic: Suggestions
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Suggestions, brickphils writes:
  Pls create separate category for stickered parts so that we dont have to go through
them when we are browsing items only with decorated/printed ones.

I definitely want the catalog to give members the ability to easily distinguish
between plain parts, stickered designs, printed designs, and molded designs.
We should be able to easily see what we want to see in search results without
having to go to another website or filter within search results.

However, I don't think more categories are the solution here. I believe
this needs some programming to happen, so I have moved your request to the Suggestions
topic. Suggestions are largely not read or acted upon, but don't worry -
I will continue to advocate that we have this functionality for the catalog in
the future.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 11, 2018 15:37
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 60147-1
 Viewed: 18 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
  Sticker should be on 1x6 white tile (part 6636)

It was easily fixed. Now it's a 1 x 6 tile.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 10, 2018 00:54
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set 8091-1
 Viewed: 22 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 8091  Name: Republic Swamp Speeder - Limited Edition
* 
8091-1 (Inv) Republic Swamp Speeder - Limited Edition
153 Parts, 5 Minifigures, 2010
Sets: Star Wars: Star Wars Episode 3

* Delete 1 Part 3039pb094 Dark Bluish Gray Slope 45 2 x 2 with Red and Gray Buttons and Controls Pattern (Sticker) (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 3039pb119 Dark Bluish Gray Slope 45 2 x 2 with Dark Red and Gray Buttons and Controls Pattern (Sticker) (Counterpart)

Comments from Submitter:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1118942
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 9, 2018 14:33
 Subject: Re: Quiver out of inventoryname.
 Viewed: 29 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog Requests, tonnic writes:
  I was putting some minifigs into my inventory when I saw the following minifig
that is mentioned to have a quiver but in fact is without quiver. See the inventory!

Thank you for mentioning this. It has been corrected.

If you need to correct an item name in the future, then please use this form:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 8, 2018 14:45
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8091-1
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, Redhawk_Kevin writes:
  Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 8091  Name: Republic Swamp Speeder - Limited Edition
* 
8091-1 (Inv) Republic Swamp Speeder - Limited Edition
153 Parts, 5 Minifigures, 2010
Sets: Star Wars: Star Wars Episode 3

* Add 1 Part 3039pb094 Dark Bluish Gray Slope 45 2 x 2 with Red and Gray Buttons and Controls Pattern (Sticker) - Set 8129 (Counterpart)

I know it has already been done, but I think a new catalog entry should probably
be added here. The buttons on one slope are red and the buttons on the other
slope are dark red. Also, the patterns don't precisely match.
 


 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 5, 2018 18:12
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 9252-2
 Viewed: 20 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, 69transamman writes:
  I just have to say that no matter what the subject is, I always read thru your
post completely in search of the humor you often interject!

Aww, thanks! That made my day.

  drug or alcohol induced

Nope. You may not believe this, but I have never even tasted alcohol and have
never experimented with drugs. I don't use caffeine. I smoke cigarettes
and that's it.

I don't think there's a thing wrong with drug or alcohol use, but I have
always preferred to be in control of my own mind. I do, however, think that life
is something of an absurdity and a joke and I intend to laugh at it whilst I
am able in whatever ways I find.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 5, 2018 17:53
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 9252-1
 Viewed: 15 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
  Am creating a new catalog entry for the early version of the set

Note that the later version of the set included 13 sealed bags instead of the
12 bags from the first version. An attached photo from an auction site shows
the contents of the later set, although the green large bricks are not visible
in the photo.

Also, the date printed on the activity/instructions cards is 1994, but the date
printed on the cover/inventory card is 1993. The actual date of re-release is
unknown. I went with 1994, but it could have been earlier.
 
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 5, 2018 17:34
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 9252-2
 Viewed: 23 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
  Another message follows.

I wanted to include some additional information about this set for future reference
and an inventory change is the best way to do that.

First, I personally and carefully checked every single brick in this set from
sealed contents for which I opened every bag and handled the parts (photos of
my set attached). Mine was the early version of the set released in 1991 and
there were 12 bags in the set. All of the bricks included cross supports except
a single 2 x 3 brick in yellow (the other 11 of the same brick had cross supports).
This is a late appearance for this brick (two years late according to BrickLink's
current timeline) and I was surprised to find it, but there it was.

As for inside supports, those little ridges inside the brick which are only currently
distinguished for one brick (the Brick 2 x 2 without Inside Supports in case
the title or part number changes in the future):

 
Part No: 3003old  Name: Brick 2 x 2 without Inside Supports
* 
3003old Brick 2 x 2 without Inside Supports
Parts: Brick

All bricks in the set, including those with designs, had these ridges with the
exceptions listed below. I mention this because it will be useful data if we
decide to distinguish these parts in the future (I compared the parts listed
below (except the last two, for which I had no comparison parts) to recent examples
and all of the newer bricks I checked had inside supports).

The aforementioned 2 x 3 brick in yellow without cross supports.
All 2 x 6 bricks in the set.
All 2 x 8 bricks in the set.
All 2 x 10 bricks in the set.
All 4 x 12 bricks in the set.
All 8 x 16 bricks in the set.

The empty window frames had hollow studs as I indicated in the inventory. The
bricks with eyes had no white included as indicated in the inventory.

Finally, and I really don't think we'd ever distinguish this difference,
exactly half of the doors and windows were attached to the left and half to the
right. So two doors attached facing left and four windows attached facing left
and the same number of each facing right. TLG did not distinguish this difference
and I see no need for us to. The door and window directions are easily reversible.

The complete contents of the set are the storage case with no lid, 12 bags of
parts and four green large bricks loose, the cover/inventory cardboard with nothing
printed on the other side, four double-sided activity/instructions cards, and
the informational sheet of paper. All of these are included in an outer original
box with the set number printed thereupon. I have the activity cards from the
1994 version and verified that each of these was different than the 1991 version
in spite of having the same 6-digit identification number printed on each card
for both versions.

I'm certain this last bit has no relevance whatsoever to the discussion,
but I mention it for the sake of completeness: my second cousin's first name
is Frank.
 






 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 5, 2018 17:01
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set 9252-2
 Viewed: 18 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 9252  Name: Large LEGO Basic Set (1991 Version)
* 
9252-2 (Inv) Large LEGO Basic Set (1991 Version)
608 Parts, 8 Minifigures, 6 Books, 1 Gear, 1991
Sets: Educational & Dacta: Universal Building Set

* Add 12 Part 3002old Yellow Brick 2 x 3 without Cross Supports (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 12 Part Yellow 3002 Brick 2 x 3 {match ID 0 to 1}

Comments from Submitter:
Another message follows.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 5, 2018 14:01
 Subject: Inventory Change Request for Set 9252-1
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests (Entry)
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 9252  Name: Large LEGO Basic Set (1994 Version)
* 
9252-1 (Inv) Large LEGO Basic Set (1994 Version)
626 Parts, 6 Books, 1 Gear, 1994
Sets: Educational & Dacta: Universal Building Set

* Delete 4 Minifig 4224c01 Basic Figure Finger Puppet Female (bfp001) (match ID 1)
* Delete 4 Minifig 4224c02 Basic Figure Finger Puppet Male (bfp002) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Black 4744px15 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Yellow Face, Moustache Pattern {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
* Change 1 Part Black 4744px9 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Yellow Face, Simple Pattern {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
* Change 2 Part Black 4744px14 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Yellow Face, Woman Pattern {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
* Change 1 Part Red 4744px3 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Yellow Face, Freckles and Ears Pattern {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
* Change 1 Part Red 4744px15 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Yellow Face, Moustache Pattern {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}
* Change 2 Part White 4744px16 Brick, Modified 2 x 4 x 2 Double Curved Top with Baby Face Pacifier Pattern {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 0}

Comments from Submitter:
Am creating a new catalog entry for the early version of the set to avoid an unnecessarily complicated inventory.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 4, 2018 21:21
 Subject: Re: Bored? I Need Help
 Viewed: 58 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In General, StormChaser writes:
  I am absolutely going to need help with these definitions

I'll do:

2nd Section: F, G, H, I, J


This only leaves the 4th and 5th sections which still need to be worked on.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 4, 2018 17:38
 Subject: Re: 40292 minifig error
 Viewed: 41 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, randyf writes:
  However, when it comes to adding minifigures to the catalog, the guidelines are
clear and were followed: https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2477

I need to make it clear that these are not official guidelines. I have been
working on a project to rework the catalog Help Center and the page linked to
above is a proposed page which is not yet complete or official.

The current catalog guidelines still in effect are only those on the left
side of this page:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?topicID=21

The sections on the right side of the page are proposals and are works in progress.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Dec 3, 2018 03:57
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6387-1
 Viewed: 21 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
What's the difference between these two items?

[P=4210c04]

[P=4210c02]

You've submitted the first one to the catalog, but isn't it the same
as the second one which is already in the catalog?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 29, 2018 22:40
 Subject: Bored? I Need Help
 Viewed: 250 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
I am embarking on an ambitious project to create written definitions of every
single category in the BrickLink catalog. This has never been done before, although
Dan made a start here:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1568

I realize now that it was never done because it's a massive amount of work.
Even coding the page is taking me a while, but I have the first eight letters
in the alphabet done:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2479

I am absolutely going to need help with these definitions and, since you'll
be the ones most affected by category definitions, who better to ask?

Please read very carefully:

1. Descriptions should be short, but complete. I'm not looking for a legal
definition, but also don't want something vague and ambiguous - the point
of these definitions is so that we can easily and completely see what fits into
a category. Creating short, accurate, complete descriptions may tax your writing
ability, but I believe it is possible for every category. Focusing on accurate
descriptions rather than listing exclusions would be best.

2. Yes, my list is not structured like Dan's. His focuses on readability
while mine focuses more on functionality. This page, to my mind, exists to serve
a purpose, like a dictionary, and not to entertain or greatly inform. My page
is more of a reference we can all use as necessary and the alphabetical order
should make it easy to quickly locate information. So I've given this structure
some thought and I'm not too interested in restructuring the page.

3. Limit descriptions to one or two reasonably short sentences. My goal
is to get everything onto one line without breaks between categories. You can
see that the Years category at the top approaches the limit in length. If we
absolutely can't accomplish this for some categories, then we're stuck
with exceptions - but let's shoot for this goal.

4. Please do not post every five minutes with new definitions. Pick the section
below you're going to work on and create all the definitions for that
section. Then post back here with your complete list. I recommend doing this
in MS Word or some other word processing software to avoid losing data. You
may claim any of these sections already unclaimed:

1st Section: A, B, C, D, E
2nd Section: F, G, H, I, J
3rd Section: K, L, M, N, O
4th Section: P, Q, R, S, T
5th Section: U, V, W, X, Y

Ignore the letter Z - I'll get that out of the generosity of my heart.

5. Some of these definitions will require research. For parts, look over the
categories carefully and try to completely understand why they're structured
like they are before defining them. For sets, do enough research to present
a quality definition. Some categories are repetitious, so try to include slightly
differing information for each one (years, for example). An example of repetitious
categories are the Dimensions Wave 1-9. I'm defining every category except
for years for the sake of consistency.

6. Completely ignore decorated categories. There are 33, I think, and I will
create definitions for them.

7. We will have discussion about these categories later. First we need to get
definitions in place and then, later, we can all discuss together if the definitions
need improvements. So there should, in theory, only be 10 replies to this post:
five category claims and five category section definitions.

8. I will edit your definitions as I see necessary. Save your definitions somewhere
(shouldn't be a problem if you're writing them in word processing software)
and we can discuss later if you think I've butchered any of them beyond your
liking.

Okay, that's all I can think of. This will be work, but I can't imagine
doing this all on my own. So assistance is deeply appreciated and I wish I could
do more for you than just appreciate it.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 29, 2018 15:54
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6393-1
 Viewed: 26 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
  Minifigures for this set were almost completely assembled in the sealed sets;
leg assemblies were the only thing separate from the combined hat/head/torso.
Therefore, if you only add in *two* parts for each minifigure in the set (of
which there are five), that brings the part total to 587.

The figures were assembled with headgear for display purposes, but I doubt it
would have changed how many parts TLG considered them to be for purposes of an
official part count. I don't know for sure, though - just mentioning it
as something for consideration.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 14:42
 Subject: Re: Decorated V Pattern
 Viewed: 36 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In General, mfav writes:
  The instructions are a horror show. Can you update those?

Yes. Few people would ever read through all those 2,700 words before submitting
an item to the catalog, nor should they have to.

That's not to say it isn't necessary to have rules, because it is. But
that particular page desperately needs to be simplified to the salient points
along with clear, simple guidelines for completing the form. The minutiae can
be moved elsewhere.

The entire Catalog Help Center needs a makeover. There are too many topics and
some of them have not been updated in forever. I was going to work on other
things today, but I've been putting this off for too long.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 07:12
 Subject: Re: Decorated vs. Pattern
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  I don't see the point of the "pattern" in the title anyway.
If everything in a decorated category has pattern in the title, it becomes useless
for searching if you restrict searches to that category.

Something is necessary in the title because not everyone goes to categories first.
Sometimes people just want to find all the 2 x 2 bricks with a pattern. That's
the whole point of having a search feature and the search feature is only as
good as item titles.

Ideally, as you pointed out, we would be able to tag things for the purpose of
searching and we could have more reasonable item titles.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 07:04
 Subject: Re: Decorated V Pattern
 Viewed: 47 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In General, mwright5 writes:
  I actually have submitted things only to have it rejected.

I'm sorry to hear that you had a negative experience in the past. We're
working on our communication and I make a serious effort to send an explanatory
message to every single contributor when I am unable to approve submissions.

  I'm sure I didn't fill out the form correctly . . . I just find the form to be convoluted as heck.

One of the jobs of a catalog administrator is to check submissions and correct
them to catalog standards before approving them. It is true that if you make
a perfect submission it makes my job much easier and it will be approved quicker,
but don't let fear of errors dissuade you from submitting. You don't
have to get things perfect.

I know the submission form is difficult to understand, but I do not have the
ability to change it. I can tell you from experience that the more submissions
you make the easier it gets and the more comfortable you become with the form.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 06:50
 Subject: Re: postcards and assortiment gidsen
 Viewed: 31 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, ZwarteMagica writes:
  Any examples from postcards available? It makes uploading them much easier.

389 examples here:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catType=G&catString=472&itemBrand=1000
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 04:36
 Subject: Re: Decorated vs. Pattern
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
  verbal eye candy.

And that, my friends, is the tragedy which can befall you when you attempt to
be clever whilst also being tired.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 04:34
 Subject: Re: Decorated vs. Pattern
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Lauren_Luke writes:
  The word 'Pattern', used in parts titles, is just a comfortable placeholder
in reading the part titles. Pick out ten random parts and read them with the
word 'Pattern' and then read them without the word 'Pattern'
and they mean the same thing.

No, this word serves a very important purpose. You can search for "pattern"
and "-pattern" to modify your search results as desired. It's not just verbal
eye candy.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 04:32
 Subject: Re: Decorated vs. Pattern
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mhortar writes:
  Are there any Printed/Stickered parts?

Yep. Just came across one, in fact.

Printed nose:

 
Part No: 18907pb01  Name: Aircraft Fuselage Forward Top Curved 6 x 10 x 4 with 5 Window Panes with Shuttle Nose Pattern
* 
18907pb01 Aircraft Fuselage Forward Top Curved 6 x 10 x 4 with 5 Window Panes with Shuttle Nose Pattern
Parts: Aircraft, Decorated

Printed nose and stickered part (no space in the title for "Pattern," apparently):

 
Part No: 18907pb02  Name: Aircraft Fuselage Forward Top Curved 6 x 10 x 4 with 5 Window Panes with Shuttle Nose Pattern and Space Logo on White Background on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 60080
* 
18907pb02 Aircraft Fuselage Forward Top Curved 6 x 10 x 4 with 5 Window Panes with Shuttle Nose Pattern and Space Logo on White Background on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 60080
Parts: Aircraft, Decorated

  I'm pretty sure there are molded/printed parts (at least dual-molded arms)

Yep. Here's one:

 
Part No: 981pb169  Name: Arm, Left with White Short Sleeve with 2 Black Stripes Pattern
* 
981pb169 Arm, Left with White Short Sleeve with 2 Black Stripes Pattern
Parts: Minifigure, Body Part

  but not sure about the other combinations.

But that's the point of such a system. It would be designed for the future
as well as the past.

  There's something to be said for making the category names and the
terms used in the actual names to be consistent. I'd be agreeable to 'Patterned' for the category name.

Meh. Perhaps we'll consider it in the future. I sense a lack of enthusiasm.
I changed the new category to Decorated and finished moving all the Aircraft
parts.

I actually like the eight definitions I came up with thanks to this discussion.
We need to be able to distinguish between printed, stickered, and molded designs
and people have asked for that ability. I don't think those identifiers
would ever go into part titles, but they could go into tags and result in a simplification
of overly complicated existing part titles.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 04:18
 Subject: Re: postcards and assortiment gidsen
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, ZwarteMagica writes:
  Are these considered lego(products) and is it worth adding them into the catalog?

Yes, they look like LEGO products and I don't see any reason why they wouldn't
be accepted.

I changed your post from Catalog Requests to Catalog. The Catalog Requests topic
is only to ask that something in the catalog be changed which can't be changed
through existing forms.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 02:31
 Subject: Re: Decorated vs. Pattern
 Viewed: 46 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mhortar writes:
  I'm not sure that 'Pattern' actually fits.

The word "design" means "decorative pattern."

If we wanted to be truly accurate and consistent, then every single part title
would have one of the eight following identifiers:

Plain
Printed Design
Stickered Design
Printed/Stickered Design
Molded Design
Molded/Printed Design
Molded/Stickered Design
Molded/Stickered/Printed Design (pretty sure there are none of those)

Have I missed any? Maybe when/if we get tags we can do this. I think it would
be helpful.

But it sounds like "Decorated" is the preferred term so far from all three commentors.
I still think it's quite strange that part categories are the only place
we use that word, but this ain't a one-man show.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 01:24
 Subject: Decorated vs. Pattern
 Viewed: 150 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In my continual effort to make your lives marginally better (which is a close
second to my continual effort to be a person who does not use catchphrases),
I propose the following for discussion: why do we call patterns patterns pretty
much everywhere but in category names?

Nearly the only place you will see "Decorated" on BrickLink is in category names
(32 of them). When you click on decorated parts, though, you see parts with
patterns. I propose changing the word "Decorated" to the word "Pattern" in those
32 category names. This will have no effects except in aesthetics and site-wide
consistency.

LordSkylark has asked for a category split of the Aircraft category into patterned
and non-patterned parts. I decided to succumb to his demand and have created
a new category titled Aircraft, Pattern. Now you can look at it on the parts
category page and see if you prefer the way things are now or the way I suggest
we do things.

Provide input, please.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 28, 2018 00:56
 Subject: Re: Finally! An Image of 9978-1
 Viewed: 55 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, LordSkylark writes:
  Remember too, there's a couple polybags for parts that came with books that
were recently rejected that I submitted because neither I nor you were able to
locate a photo.

Yes, I remember. There's really only one fix for that: someone will have
to buy the books and photograph the bags. These kinds of sets wouldn't appear
in any catalog because the book must be opened to see them. Once we have photos,
then the sets will be quickly approved.

We're moving away from approving any submission which is not accompanied
by an image and I expect that will become firm policy within the next six months
or so.

There are simply too many items in the catalog completely missing images:

3 minifigures
29 sets
106 catalogs
108 books
133 gear
575 parts
902 instructions
4,236 original boxes

The idea in the past was that if you approved an item then eventually someone
would add a picture. That approach sort of works - sort of. I, for one, am
tired of seeing that we are missing 6,000+ images and that number* will only
keep growing if we don't stop it now.



*To be fair, instructions and boxes don't count as much because they're
created for all sets. Still, 950+ missing images are nothing in which to take
pride. If you look through the list of items missing images, you will see a
fair number of things for sale - clearly we need to do better at rewarding contributors.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 21:55
 Subject: Re: Please Allow Alternate Item Numbers for Books
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: Suggestions
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Suggestions, Admin_Russell writes:
  This suggestion has now been implemented.

Thank you for this and for the other work you're continually doing behind
the scenes to improve the catalog and inventory systems.

Little improvements like this have been needed for many, many years and you've
made many of them since you've been there.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 17:17
 Subject: Finally! An Image of 9978-1
 Viewed: 200 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
I have been searching for an image of this set for years:

 
Set No: 9978  Name: Home Environment
* 
9978-1 (Inv) Home Environment
70 Parts, 4 Minifigures
Sets: Educational & Dacta: DUPLO: Playhouse

The set has no date of addition, so it must have been added to the site not too
terribly long after BrickLink was founded. At times I have wondered if the set
was even real, but the specificity of its name always made me think that it must
have existed.

Today I got this catalog in the mail which was not in the BrickLink database
and which I just now added:

 
Catalog No: c92usdac  Name: 1992 Large US Dacta (Play is the Work of Children)
* 
c92usdac 1992 Large US Dacta (Play is the Work of Children)
Catalogs: 1992: Educational & Dacta

In that catalog I finally found the long-missing image and added it. I'm
pretty confident that this is the only website anywhere that you can see an image
of set 9978-1. I'm pretty excited that my long search has finally ended
in satisfaction and wanted to share.

We are now down to only 29 sets without any image (and one of them is from 2018,
so it doesn't really count). If you'd like to see what we're missing,
click here:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catType=S&imgID=0&itemBrand=1000
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 05:42
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Updated
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  You said it could move into the Catalog
Help Center.

Actually, it is already there. I just meant that if we keep it, then it will
go to a different page. I hijacked the page it's on right now because I
can't create new Help Center pages.

I've updated the list. See if this new approach solves the concerns you
had.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 05:35
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Updated
 Viewed: 37 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Nordbart writes:
  Anyway, what I am saying is we need a definition of what is a figure and what
is not. At least here on BrickLink.

This is project number two on the roadmap:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2473

It will happen, but it is not happening right now. Please give this subject
some thought between now and the time when it does happen so that you may provide
some input at that time.

BTW, I already have written rules laid out for this project (defining all six
item types), but I am giving them some additional consideration before I begin
this project and release them for discussion. Please be patient.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 05:26
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Updated
 Viewed: 33 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  It is definitely looking a lot better. Although this one still confuses me:


Minifigure-Scale Character Figure

This is my third reply to this post. Perhaps if I had read it more carefully,
then I could have saved some ones and zeros.

Your question here was about policy and I have answered it.

  Minifigure-Scale Brick Built Figure

Your question here was about actual inconsistencies in the additional figure
types I added at your request. I can see what you mean about inconsistencies
and I agree. So, what would you suggest to correct these inconsistencies?

I think the easiest distinction would be between specially-molded figures and
brick-built figures - this would remove having a separate item type for character
figures. Does that sound right?

BTW, did you see that I made the pictures bigger and added little frames around
each photo? I thought it looked better.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 05:07
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Updated
 Viewed: 38 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  But what about Scooby Doo and Santa's Little Helper, and other similar characters.
Are they animals or figures? After all, Angry Birds are birds, which are animals.
Cartoon animals that are characters. Just like Scooby Doo and Sant's Little
Helper are cartoon dogs.

Since you've spent some time thinking about this, I don't want to just
brush you off as I sort of did in what I just posted. The answer to this is
that there has never been a written definition of minifigures. This explains
the inconsistency of some figures being considered parts and others considered
figures. It also explains member frustration when some figures have been allowed
and others denied.

In the past, what was and was not a figure was decided on unwritten rules according
to the preferences of the person deciding. One of the self-imposed tasks I face
is ending this practice and creating written rules so that we're all on the
same page. You'll notice that a number of catalog projects mention this.

Until such time as we have written rules, there is not much point in discussing
what should or should not be a figure and until we have the ability to sort figures
by type, if we ever have it, then there is not much point in going into the minutiae
of different types.

I encourage you to keep thinking about these things, though, because when I get
to rulemaking I will open the rules for discussion and possible modification
before they're implemented (something which has rarely happened in the past).
I look forward to your input then.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 27, 2018 04:45
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Updated
 Viewed: 40 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  This is why I think the definitions of each category need to be considered carefully
so that inconsistencies do not appear.

I do appreciate your feedback and you can see that I incorporated some of it
into the page, but again, these are not category definitions. They change nothing
in the catalog. We haven't the ability to sort figures by what type they
are. If we ever do have that ability, then we can have a serious discussion.

Until then, I hope you are able to somehow locate the ability to be pleased that
I volunteered my time to make a list in the first place.

I believe you may have missed the disclaimer at the beginning of the description
of this list:

. . . figure types should not be considered definitive.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 20:51
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Updated
 Viewed: 50 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
I have read your suggestions, took them to heart, and updated the page:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=88

I added three new types close to the beginning and added a disclaimer that this
is only an experimental project. The purpose of the framework on that page is
to gauge desirability. If members want to keep this list and BrickLink agrees
to keep it, then it will be improved with better descriptions, better photos,
and better ordering of the entries on the list (possibly by chronological order?).
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 20:01
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 32 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Rainey writes:
  I like it! It just helped me learn a few things! I do think that you need to
get rid of the repeat after the title though.

That part is just a placeholder. It will be filled in with further information
about each kind of figure if we decide to keep this as a permanent catalog feature.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 18:27
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 43 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  It's differently inaccurate. And as I've stated elsewhere, it has the potential to create confusion with regards to the half-dozen or so other "figures" which are in the catalog but not in this section. Not asking you to agree, but asking do you get the point I'm putting forward.

I absolutely do get your point. I agree that we would be wise to include all
figures of all sizes in the same place. We already do include nearly all of
them in the same place and that place is Minifigs. Some we don't and those
are the ones which you're concerned about.

The problem is that once we get them there we have no easy way to find the specific
kind of figure you're looking for. They're all mixed together and only
sorted by theme. There is currently discussion behind the scenes on how we can
better sort figures and I have suggested that figure type be given consideration
as one way of sorting.

  But isn't that what good labelling *should* do? Isn't the point to accurately
define which items are included?

Yes, and the place for that is here:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=170

An item type is simply a quick and dirty method of splitting things. We only
have six item types and we will not get any more.

An item type is simply not the place for any kind of specific definition and
the current title indicates that only minifigures are housed there when, in fact,
we put nearly all figures there. Figures is a more inclusive title and thus,
more accurate. The ways in which the word Figures is inaccurate stem from policies,
and policies can be changed.

  So if it already doesn't accurately define what's in there, why change
it so it doesn't accurately define what's in there?

Because the change would be from less accuracy to perfect accuracy provided
that additional changes were made to what was included or what should be included
in this item type. You want those changes made first, but I think we must first
start with reconsidering the idea that this section is only for minifigures.
Clearly, it already is not.

You see the item name change as the last step and I see it as the first step,
so perhaps it's just a difference of opinion.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 17:37
 Subject: Seventh Catalog Project - Complete So Soon?
 Viewed: 43 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Wow, it's hard to believe that we accomplished this in just two days. Very
impressive work, everyone! We are finished with this, right?

One of the benefits of the change logs is that it gives us a picture of how many
figures had set/gear/book numbers in their titles. This is not precise because
it was necessary to change some existing titles to avoid confusion, but I believe
I have accounted for the differences.

So, roughly, we can say that around 2,100 figures had other item numbers in their
titles and those have now been removed. The total number of affected figures
was about one fifth of all the figures in the catalog.

I feel pretty good about this change because, as those of you who have done the
actual work have seen, set numbers were a lazy way out of usefully describing
figures so that people could find them (and, honestly, figure names are, too).
I point no fingers, because I have added many figures to the catalog and only
described them with a brief name and a set number.

Anyway, if we're done with all the categories, then I'll put this project
to rest in the Completed Projects section of the catalog roadmap. We still need
to check for duplicate titles and orphaned figures, but that shouldn't take
much more work.

Thanks again to everyone who made this happen.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 16:45
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Action Plan
 Viewed: 37 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
  In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
  Robert after working through Star wars category and seeing this mess (especially
in Han Solo, Obi-Wan and Luke names) I now admit that I started to like your
Standardize Figure Titles project

I'm glad to hear that. You may appreciate it even more if you looked at
all 10,000+ figures together and saw the diverse range of titling methods which
have been applied. Not only is there no standardized title for figures, but
dashes, commas, and round brackets have been used in a number of different (and
thus ultimately confusing) ways.

And there are entire categories of figures which are simply titled Figure 1,
Figure 2, Figure 3, etc.

The problem with that project and why I shelved it for now is that it is very
complicated to create simple rules for a standard way of titling all figures.
I will continue thinking about it, though.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 16:33
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  I'm not sure the StormChaser has clearly articulated the reason for relabelling the section, why he finds the current labelling problematic, and what the intended result of the renaming is supposed to achieve.

I apologize for not doing this. I will address all three of these below, but
the most important point to understand is this: the only change which would occur
is to remove Mini from Figures.


What is the reason for renaming this item type?

I have asked for a name change because the current name does not accurately describe
the contents of this section of the catalog.

Why is the current labelling problematic?

The label Minifigs is not accurate because in this item type we include many
different sizes of figures which vary in size from tiny to vary large. We also
include a range of different styles of figures at these different scales.

What is the intended result of renaming this section?

Renaming from Minifigs to Figures would present a more accurate picture of what
users can expect to find in this item type and that is the intended result.
This name change is not intended to and will not define which items are included
in this section.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 08:15
 Subject: Re: Unofficial LEGO color guide
 Viewed: 35 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Abels_Bricks writes:
  I just purchased this and wonder if should be added as its an amazing resource and there is this item

That item was added because it was supposedly sold through official TLG channels.
If you can provide evidence that the book you purchased is currently for sale
or was ever sold by TLG, then yes, it can be added.

Otherwise, it is not an official LEGO item and would not be accepted into the
catalog.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 07:54
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 31 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In General, mfav writes:
  I could tear this apart for the next two days, but I have to visit the dentist
for pain

I'm sorry to hear that you're in pain. I've had toothaches, as I'm
sure we all have, and they're definitely not fun. I trust the dentist will
be able to help you feel better.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 07:25
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 43 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In General, yorbrick writes:
  The idea of using the name FIGURES is a good one. Although possibly CHARACTERS
is better

I don't think we need to be that technical with this item type. The casual
user needs a basic item type name which is immediately identifiable. Figures
would encompass a wide range of items and Minifigs inaccurately described
that section of the catalog almost from the beginning.

  I think the definition of what it means to be a minifigure is very important to get right.

This page is not intended to define what a minifigure is. That is handled by
this page (updating it is on my list of things to do):

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=170

The list of figure types is only intended to be an informative overview of the
different types/sizes of figures which have been produced.

  Droids - there aren't any!

To answer all of your questions: the list is just a framework right now and I'm
mainly interested in hearing whether members want it or not. We can worry about
the details later.

I will say that if such a list needs to become bogged down in minutiae beyond
the point of usability, then it was clearly not a good idea.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 07:11
 Subject: Re: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 37 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In General, iprice writes:
  You appear to be missing at least one sort

The list is obviously just an incomplete framework. At this point I'm looking
more for commentary on two things and we can worry about the details of that
list later.

1. Is this list of figure types something you find useful?
2. How do you feel about retitling the item type?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 26, 2018 06:21
 Subject: Something I Just Threw Together
 Viewed: 299 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In my continual quest to make your lives marginally better, I have just now put
together a list with photos of the different types of figures the LEGO Group
has produced over the years.

This list is not yet official and will change. It will have more detailed descriptions
of figures and hopefully better photos. It will also move from the current location
to an unknown location in the Catalog Help Center section. Or, of course, it
could also get shot down.

I have also asked that the item type Minifigs be retitled to Figures
in light of the wide range of figures of all different sizes we include in this
one section - no word on if this will happen or not. So the six item types would
be:

Sets
Parts
Figures
Books
Catalogs
Gear

This is truly a sneak peak for everyone - the people at the BrickLink office
haven't even seen it yet:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=88

Your thoughts on this list and the item type retitle? Do you find this list
of figure types useful or is it something not needed?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 25, 2018 23:50
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Action Plan
 Viewed: 36 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, axaday writes:
  I did Angry Birds and am working LOTR

I'm not sure precisely where we are with this, but all requests have been
approved. I've done all my categories and Scala.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 25, 2018 14:50
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Action Plan
 Viewed: 30 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, axaday writes:
  I actually did a few. But I wasn't sure I was supposed to since there will
be another project to do that.

Yes, but that may not happen for some time. Until then, we definitely don't
want any figures to have identical titles. In fact, if you wouldn't mind
going back through Harry Potter and fixing these, then I would appreciate it.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 25, 2018 14:37
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Action Plan
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, axaday writes:
  I will do L this afternoon

Thanks for your help with this project. Some figure are only differentiated
by set numbers in the titles. I noticed this especially with Harry Potter figures
and I will go back through this theme and add brief identifying features to figures
which now have identical titles as a result of changes.

As you're doing future categories, please remember to do this for any figures
which will match existing titles when the set number is removed.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 25, 2018 05:44
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6591-1
 Viewed: 27 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
  Marek, maybe the real reason that you don't approve this is because I would
have higher inventory submitted than you so you have more inventory to submit
and get approved and then you approve mine?

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogStores.asp

P.S. you figure I am just kidding?

Kidding or not, the implication that an administrator is stalling or denying
requests to make a profit by having a personal store featured over someone else's
is not acceptable.

Marek's store is closed right now and has been since September 5th, so he
has nothing to gain from doing this. The page you linked to is only populated
by stores which have made the highest contributions within the past two weeks.

And, of course, Marek would never do something like what you have joked about,
nor would any of us.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 25, 2018 04:03
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Action Plan
 Viewed: 30 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, bje writes:
  Rest of the B's, C and D. I'm assuming you want catalog change requests
and not forum posts like the colors, correct?

Okay, so you're taking Bionicle through Duplo. And yes, catalog change requests,
please.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 25, 2018 03:02
 Subject: Seventh Catalog Project - Action Plan
 Viewed: 70 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
Thank you all for caring enough to provide the fascinating discussion and for
listening as I tried to formulate my own thoughts on figure titles with that
rather convoluted set of rules which I posted.

Some of you were for set numbers and some were against. The only thing we really
all agreed on was that set/book/gear numbers should be in figure titles until
that figure is added to an inventory.

The only point that I haven't yet addressed (I think) is the mention that
Brickset uses item numbers in the titles to link back here. I've checked
this for some figures without set numbers in the titles and Brickset still
links back to us on those figures, so I don't think that would be a valid
reason for keeping item numbers.

So here's what I've done:

Added Figure Title Standardization to the Catalog Roadmap

We absolutely need to standardize figure titles catalog-wide and we will. However,
this particular project was only to decide if we should have set numbers in titles
and I've decided on that. The members who said that we should start at the
beginning with figure titles are right - and in an ideal world we would. For
now, though, we're just going to address the issue at hand.

Progress sometimes comes in fits and starts and we are making slow progress
with catalog issues, even if we're not doing it in the most efficient way
possible.

Updated the Help Center Section to Address Figure Titles

See here:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=179

This section had not been updated in over eight years. I added the following
sentence:

Figure titles should not include set, book, or gear numbers; these are only allowed
in the figure title until that figure is added to an inventory and must then
be removed.

Updated Project

I waffled back and forth on set/book/gear numbers in figure titles, but in the
end I don't think we gain much from keeping them. They are something which
need continual management (meaning occasional review and corrections when necessary)
to remain correct and members simply aren't doing this. I certainly don't
have the time to do this regularly and clearly other administrators don't
either. I found an error, BTW, fairly early when selecting a figure at random
which the title said appeared in two sets when it only appeared in one set.

We gain little by keeping numbers in the title once a figure is inventoried,
they must be changed when occurrences of figures change, no one is reviewing
them periodically for corrections, they're something else members have to
think about when looking at titles (and titles don't explain what these numbers
mean), they would need an additional identifier such as (Multiple Sets) to be
consistent catalog-wide, and they lessen the aesthetic appeal of figure titles.

So we are removing set/book/gear numbers from every figure in which they appear
except those figures not yet inventoried. Please submit catalog requests as
necessary if you'd like to help and do not submit any other changes with
your requests unless a serious error is discovered (include a note to me with
your request in that case). The colors project wasn't coordinated so well,
so I'm doing something different here.

Please use this thread to claim some categories which you are checking and correcting.
This should make things go more smoothly. We will go in alphabetical order,
so here are the categories I am claiming and will correct myself:

4 Juniors
Adventurers
Agents
Alpha Team
Aquazone
Atlantis
Avatar
Basic
Batman 1
Belville
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 14:35
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 35 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  I break it down here.

Thank you very much for making a chart. This kind of in-depth, serious analysis
is greatly appreciated. I haven't had time to look it over completely, but
I wanted to explain the first title section in more detail.

The Minifigs section of the catalog is an item type wherein we group most sizes
and types of figure that TLG has ever made with the exception of a few which
we consider parts:

 
Part No: spa0012  Name: Giant-Man - Set 76051
* 
spa0012 (Inv) Giant-Man - Set 76051
Parts: Special Assembly

and those we consider gear:

 
Gear No: displayfig01  Name: Display Figure 7in x 11in x 19in (blue jacket, red pants, white T-Shirt with Lego logo, construction helmet)
* 
displayfig01 Display Figure 7in x 11in x 19in (blue jacket, red pants, white T-Shirt with Lego logo, construction helmet)
Gear: Retail Display

and those we don't include at all:

 
Set No: 7920  Name: McDonald's Sports Set Number 5 - Blue Hockey Player #4 polybag
* 
7920-1 (Inv) McDonald's Sports Set Number 5 - Blue Hockey Player #4 polybag
3 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2004
Sets: Sports: Hockey

Item types are different than categories and we only have one item type (Minifigs)
to use for a wide variety of figures of differing sizes and types. Some of these
we have given descriptive names (statuette, big figure, microfigure, etc.).
Others we have not (Technic figure, Duplo figure, 4 Juniors figure). The first
part of the title is intended to indicate the type of figure, not the theme (although
theme names are used).

Yes, it is inconsistent. However, the alternative is to come up with non-themed
names to describe each size/type of figure. And yes, as I explained in the original
posting, technically this section should be included for all figures and it should
be organized like this:

Figure, Minifigure
Figure, Technic
Figure, Statuette
Figure, Microfigure
Figure, Big
Figure, Primo
Figure, Duplo Brick
Figure, Duplo, Early Brick
Figure, Duplo, Doll
Figure, Duplo LEGO Ville
Figure, Mini Doll
Figure, Belville
Figure, 4 Juniors
Figure, Quatro
Figure, Fabuland

And so on. The word "figure" is necessary to avoid the appearance that these
are just themes. Since we're genuinely stuck with throwing all figures into
one place, I tried to make the best of it. We should retitle that item type
Figures instead of Minifigs and I will ask if this can be done
(I can't change item types like Sets, Books, Catalogs, etc.).

As for the different sizes and giving every one of those different sizes/types
of figures its own name instead of a theme name, I despair.

BTW, don't take my thoughts on figure titles as any sort of gospel. It's
only a starting point for a discussion. If you came up with your own titling
system independently, then what would it look like?
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 14:03
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 38 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, mfav writes:
  I'm just noting that there's a mix of apples and oranges in this column.

Right, and I did think of that and disliked it. I have most of the 4 Juniors
sets done now according to the guidelines:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catType=M&catString=516&itemBrand=1000

Honestly, when I see all those set numbers together on one page I don't much
care for the idea of including them at all. For those of you who want set numbers
added to the titles, do you like the way they look?

We could go with including them for one set only and use (Multiple Sets) after
that. This would fix the issue mfav pointed out. But, if I were the only person
deciding, I'd just leave them off completely except for figures which hadn't
yet been included in an inventory. They just look messy to me.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 07:14
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Part Dragon03
 Viewed: 15 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
  Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Part No: Dragon03  Name: Dragon, Fantasy Era, Dark Green Head with Armor
* 
Dragon03 (Inv) Dragon, Fantasy Era, Dark Green Head with Armor
Parts: Animal, Air

* Delete 1 Part 40379 Dark Green Dinosaur Tail End Section

Comments from Submitter:
The end of the Tail is not Part 40379 but part 51874pb03 (already in the inventory of this Dragon).

I think that part may be used at the back of the head.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 05:57
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 41 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
  may I please you to consider fianlly changing their numbers to sw... as all others
Sw minifigs have.

Taking a hard look at item numbers is another huge project which is on my distant
radar. Item numbers aren't changed very often because it can have negative
effects in a number of ways, but I think it's a little foolish to still be
using item numbers from other websites.

This is a project where we will have to tread carefully, but it is something
which needs to be done.

  Following these above this one should also have part number left because it has
it own part number: 87561
Now if it is sw978 these two with parts number should be changed to sw... it
the same case

I left the part number in place for Han Solo in Carbonite, but changed it to
an alternate item number. The word didn't crumble or anything, so it may
not hurt to give these two figures SW numbers and move the existing numbers to
additional item numbers.

Do this for me, please. Submit a separate forum catalog request so that I can
have it handy and reference it when asking higher up.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 05:31
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 33 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
  I would leave only
Clone Trooper Episode Three (7261, 7655)
his occupation is being Clone Trooper

Right, but adding trooper at the beginning of all troopers will group them all
together and fit in with the larger plan for all minifigures. As I said, this
initial identifier doesn't have to be an occupation. It can be a type of
theme-specific minifigure like trooper or droid.

As for destroyer droid, I don't think we need to be that specific (although
we certainly could, I suppose). "Destroyer droid" is an identifier which could
only be applied to a few figures, while "droid" is more inclusive. But I'm
always open to reconsidering anything.

  So I can help you with Star Wars category

I would, of course, appreciate it.

  I will later also look what else can be made more consistent in there.

Once we get the final rules agreed upon and in place, they should take care of
any inconsistencies on their own if applied correctly to all figures. The Star
Wars category is fairly well titled as a whole and the only changes in many cases
would be adding occupation or type identifiers at the beginning of the titles
and set numbers to the ends.

If you find any figures for which this approach would cause problems, please
let me know. And be aware that we're not making any changes right now except
to 4 Juniors figures.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 05:05
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 32 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
  So you like see this
[m=sw432] as
Farmer, Luke Skywalker

This is his occupation, this is what he was doing on Tatooine
I don't Like it after change according to this rule

For this we'd probably do something like:

Hero, Luke Skywalker, Additional Descriptors as Necessary (Set Number)

And:

Villain, Darth Vader, Additional Descriptors as Necessary (Set Number)

We can definitely discuss those terms, though. They don't necessarily have
to be any one specific thing like occupation. Or, we could simply go with this
if you preferred (and maybe this would be a better approach anyway):

Character Star Wars, Luke Skywalker, Additional Descriptors as Necessary (Set
Number)

In the past specific themes appear to have been titled independently of the whole,
at least in some cases, and that's what catalog-wide figure title standardization
would correct. I'm thinking in terms of all 10,000 figures and not just
one theme.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 04:39
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 33 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
  I'm against it and I don't like it.

I almost get the sense that you simply don't care for it.

But you're definitely right: I got my examples wrong.

  It complicate too much in nicley
named in my opinon Star Wars minifigs, many of them have their on specific names
which function quite well, why change them?

Yes, this was my own problem, too. It reduces the aesthetic appeal of some titles
and I'm with you - I don't like it either.

But in Star Wars the droids, for example, are scattered everywhere and some of
them won't even appear when you search for droid:

[M=sw441]

  Darth Vader is Darth vader adding something like supervillain or Dark Lord of
Sith (which suit better in this case is completly unnecessary

Yes, it is unnecessary for this figure. The only thing it would be necessary
for is across-the-board standardization. You mention later in your post that
we should not mess with licensed lines, but I'm unsure why these figures
deserve special treatment that other figures are denied.

Star Wars figure titles are, generally speaking, usually just the figure name,
sometimes with a set number and sometimes not. Literally the only things I'm
suggesting adding to that are type classifications at the beginning and set numbers
where they don't already exist.

  No this is Clone Trooper not Trooper, Clone

You're right. Please consider these titles and see if you would consider
them acceptable:

[M=sw522]

Trooper, 212th Battalion Trooper (75036)

[M=sw374]

Trooper, Death Star Trooper (9492)

[M=sw126]

Trooper, Clone Trooper Episode Three (7261, 7655)

As a side note, why are we using Ep.3 in that title? Ep. is a poor substitute
for Episode and the number 3 is stripped from searches anyway.

So hopefully these examples will demonstrate that almost nothing would change
with Star Wars titles and the change would be an improvement in that it would
group similar figures together. I do apologize for the misleading examples I
gave.

By the way, here are some Star Wars examples of poor titling which need to be
standardized. How does adding non-searchable numbers like 1, 2, and 3 at the
end give anyone an idea which figures these are? Essentially these figures have
identical titles and I, not being very familiar with Star Wars, would have to
examine the photos closely to find the differences. There are more besides just
these, too.

[M=sw678]
[M=sw708]
[M=sw734]
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 03:52
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Pretty_Pieces writes:
  Imho, there is no need to include the set number in minifig titles. If I am
looking for figs from a specific set, I pull up that set, and click the included
minifigures link.

Right, but remember that your experience with the catalog is different than mine
and mine is different than Randy's. Some people do want the item numbers
there and would use them.

  When I search a set/gear number in the catalog, having a clutter of figs to wade
through is unhelpful.

We already use set numbers in every single sticker sheet title and every stickered
part title. When I search for 10261 (the roller coaster) I get 32 results and
only 11 of those are minifigures. Like it or not, we're stuck with set numbers
in titles anyway and I don't think adding minifigures into the mix will change
things too much for the worse.

  But here’s the kicker: when I print out my packing list, I *really* don’t want
a quarter page of useless set numbers on every fig.

And you won't have these. Most modern figures appear in only one or two
sets and we won't add set numbers beyond three sets. I don't think this
change will affect your printing packing lists much at all (if any).

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this. It's always good to hear additional
perspectives.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 03:44
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, bje writes:
  I find it easier to apply rather than discuss in the air as it were, so following
on from the above and using a few of the catalog items I've submitted, let
me see if I can get these correct from the word go.

Great, thanks for testing these out! The interpretation of others will allow
me to see where explanatory flaws lie.

  Maybe a sandbox forum topic for
this should be used, so these can be tested efficiently and in one place?

We're not really changing anything yet except 4 Juniors, so I don't think
there's a need for anyone to post a huge number of examples and no need for
anything separate.

  
 
Minifig No: idea041  Name: Grandmother
* 
idea041 (Inv) Grandmother
Minifigures: LEGO Ideas (CUUSOO)
would become: Character CUUSOO, Grandmother (21315)

Seeing it in print makes me realize that there's already a problem with the
rules. In this case this figure is a grandmother so we'd want to indicate
that first in the title. Yet her name is also Grandmother. So properly formatted
according to the rules, the title should look like this:

Grandmother, Grandmother (21315)

Remember that we want to list the occupation/type first in the title. This groups
similar figures like grandmothers together and there are six of them in the catalog.
When an occupation exists, the "Character" portion of the title isn't necessary
and what follows is any official figure name or any necessary descriptors.

This would be an easy update: if the occupation/type exactly matches the figure
name, then the occupation/type would be excluded from the title. This change
would make the current title completely in compliance with the rules. Thanks
for finding this one.

  
 
Minifig No: 90398pb039  Name: Jack Statuette / Trophy
* 
90398pb039 Jack Statuette / Trophy
Minifigures: LEGO Ideas (CUUSOO)
would become: Microfigure - Character CUUSOO, Jack (21315)

Okay, so for this one microfigures already exist in the catalog. Search "microfigure"
and you can see them. Here we would use statuette to describe the figure size/type.
Also, CUUSOO was only two sets. Everything after was Ideas. So here I'd
go with:

Statuette - Character Ideas, Jack (21315)
  
 
Minifig No: pln171  Name: Plain Red Torso with Red Arms, Dark Blue Legs, No Headgear, Black Eyebrows, Thin Grin
* 
pln171 (Inv) Plain Red Torso with Red Arms, Dark Blue Legs, No Headgear, Black Eyebrows, Thin Grin
Minifigures: School Supplies
would become: Plain Torso, Red (Gear 81087)

This one is perfect except for the word Gear. Russell taught me a little trick
to thinking about catalog items: since they all have different item numbers,
we don't really need to worry about whether they're sets or gear. Also,
if an item moves from one to the other, then we'd have to go back and change
figure titles.

  
 
Minifig No: frnd274  Name: Friends Mia - Dark Purple Shorts, Dark Azure Plaid Shirt, Dark Red Ponytail
* 
frnd274 (Inv) Friends Mia - Dark Purple Shorts, Dark Azure Plaid Shirt, Dark Red Ponytail
Minifigures: Friends
would become: Mini Doll - Character Friends, Mia, Dark Azure Plaid Shirt, Dark
Purple Shorts, (10749, 41345)

When we go through every minifigure title in the catalog we will find errors.
Here's an example of an error: the following figure has exactly the same
top as the figure you mention, but it is incorrectly described as a different
color in the title:

 
Minifig No: frnd236  Name: Friends Mia - Lime Cropped Trousers, Blue Top
* 
frnd236 (Inv) Friends Mia - Lime Cropped Trousers, Blue Top
Minifigures: Friends

So for this incarnation of Mia, we would cut the color from the top altogether.
It is unnecessary because the top only comes in one color. We would go in order
through the figure characteristics until we found the difference and remember
that we're only looking for differences in otherwise identical figures.
For this figure the title would be:

Mini Doll - Character Friends, Mia, Plaid Shirt, Ponytail, Eyes Green and Freckles,
Shorts (10749, 41345)

The part about descriptors could be modified to say that instead of going in
order we would only identify any difference after the torso, I suppose, and that
all affected figures would get the same title treatment up to the difference.
I worded it the way I did because of the wide variety of similar Town figures,
but we could reexamine that approach. It seems silly for one figure to have
all that information and the other to have nothing - it will result in long titles
and short titles for otherwise similar figures and will look odd.

  
 
Minifig No: hol130  Name: Snowman with 2 x 2 Curved Top Brick as Legs
* 
hol130 (Inv) Snowman with 2 x 2 Curved Top Brick as Legs
Minifigures: Holiday & Event: Christmas
would become: Snowman, 2 x 2 Curved Top Brick as Legs (60201)

Here we would only need the additional descriptors in the title if other snowmen
existed (and they do). I would like to keep numbers like 2 x 2 out of titles
when possible because they aren't necessary and skew results when viewing
by title (which is, I believe, the default view). I should have mentioned that
in the guidelines as well. So I'd go more with:

Snowman, Brick Curved Top as Legs (60201)

  A few problems I had:
Gear numbers are not set numbers, so the set number should be the standard and
gear items should be stated as such.

I've addressed that above. We can safely ignore adding Gear or Set to the
title.

  The snowman is strictly not a minifig, but I do not think that something like
is Parts Figures or Figure from Parts should be used, in this case, the identifier
should be the part that does not conform to it being a standard Figure.

As you look through minifigures you will find many examples of non-minifigure
parts used in figures. I think just briefly describing the part would be fine
and I think I need o do some more work on the part in the rules about descriptors.
It would probably be best to go straight to the most significant difference
and this approach is already used for numerous figures.

  I'll work through a few more later, but for the time being, is this moving
in the right direction?

Yep, you did fine and you identified some problems with the guidelines. Thank
you. I am doing the 4 Juniors figures strictly by the rules as we speak and
we can identify further problems once we see them all together in a group.

This time challenge yourself by finding some minifigures which really strain
the rules and let's see how well they work under stress.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 24, 2018 01:21
 Subject: Seventh Catalog Project - Titles Update
 Viewed: 81 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
  On a more serious note, this project actually consists of standardizing
whether set numbers appear in minifigure titles.

A couple of people have suggested we begin at the beginning with standardized
titles for all minifigures. I agree and thank Lauren_Luke and mfav for mentioning
it. The necessity of standardized titles becomes apparent if you look at all
10,000+ minifigures together.

It's easy to suggest that we standardize minifigure titles, but it gets complex
when you actually start looking into it. My goal was to come up with standards
which could be used for any figure in the entire catalog. I spent most of today
on them and still am not sure that I'm satisfied with the results - these
rules are still not perfected and any instances where they need improvement (with
examples) would be appreciated.

Here are the guidelines I've come up with and am presenting for commentary
and modification. All of these sound complicated and they are - they'd be
intended more for the use of administrators, although they would be public in
the Help section. The result of these rules would be titles which are somewhat
less aesthetically pleasing (see the Arctic Batman example later in this post),
but which are consistent catalog-wide. They follow fairly well with what has
been done in the past:

Preliminary Section of Title:

The preliminary section of the title is not used for standard-sized minifigures.
This section describes the figure type (mini doll, microfigure, big figure,
Duplo figure, Technic figure, 4 Juniors figure, etc.). This section of the title
is not intended for the theme of a figure, does not include commas, and is separated
from the rest of the title with a dash.

To be truly consistent every figure should be titled the same way. Examples
are Figure, Technic and Figure, Belville, and Figure, Minifigure and Figure,
Microfigure and Figure, Statuette. However, it is possible to add too much to
titles and thus this approach was not used.

First Section of Title

The occupation or type of the figure goes here. These words would include firefighter,
pilot, race driver, doctor, knight, superhero, robot, droid, skeleton, zombie,
alien, etc. and should be used in identical ways for similar figures. Additional
occupations are listed in ascending alphabetical order up to a maximum of three
and are separated by a forward slash. Theme-specific words are used where appropriate.
For example, a Star Wars trooper is identified as Trooper, 212th Battalion or
Trooper, Clone, 41st Kashyyyk.

For figures which have no apparent occupation, the word "character" is used followed
by the theme without a comma. An example is Character Minecraft. For plain
figures with no torso pattern which also have no occupation, the term "plain
torso" is used, followed by the color. An example is Plain Torso, Red.

Second Section of Title:

This section includes the name of the figure if it has a name and is separated
from the first section by a comma. Additional names or name-type descriptors
are separated with a forward slash. For figures without a name, descriptions
are used. For multiple figures with the same name, the name is followed by a
comma and further descriptors separated by commas.

No two figures should have exactly the same title, but all descriptions should
be limited to the minimum necessary to differentiate one figure from another.
When describing a figure, characteristics should be listed in this order and
ended once the first differing characteristic is listed: torso assembly, hair/headgear,
body wear such as backpacks when applicable, head, and legs assembly. Titles
of individual items used for descriptors should be shortened where possible and
descriptor colors should be eliminated where possible. When descriptor colors
are required they should be placed after descriptors. The word "pattern" should
not be used in minifigure titles.

The sole exceptions for this section are Duplo figures which always include complete
descriptions in their titles.

Third Section of Title:

The set number in which the minifigure appears is included in round brackets
(parentheses) in ascending order and the -1 identifier is not used in the set
number unless it is greater than one. This information is only included for
figures which appear in three or fewer sets and combination/value packs are not
included. For figures which appear in more than three sets the term (Multiple
Sets) is used. The (Multiple Sets) identifier is necessary for consistency in
appearance and shows that the figure is in more than three sets. It also allows
members to easily identify figures for which this section of the title is missing.

Coda Section of Title:

This section is used for any additional information necessary and is separated
from the rest of the title with a dash. This information usually relates to
commerce, such as describing that a collectible minifigure entry is for only
the figure.

And that's everything. Let's see these rules in action: for each figure
below I've shown how titles would appear with these changes (several required
research to see if the colors included in the titles were actually necessary).

 
Minifig No: js019  Name: Airplane Pilot with Black Pants, Black Shirt and Black Cap with Logo
* 
js019 Airplane Pilot with Black Pants, Black Shirt and Black Cap with Logo
Minifigures: 4 Juniors: Jack Stone

4 Juniors Figure - Pilot, Airplane (4619, 4620)

 
Minifig No: baby007  Name: Primo Figure Baby Minnie Mouse with Pink Clothing and Pink Bow
* 
baby007 Primo Figure Baby Minnie Mouse with Pink Clothing and Pink Bow
Minifigures: Primo: Disney: Baby Mickey

Primo Figure - Character Disney, Minnie Mouse (2592, 2594)

 
Minifig No: s007  Name: 'S' - White with Red / Black Stripe, White Legs, Red Classic Helmet
* 
s007 (Inv) 'S' - White with Red / Black Stripe, White Legs, Red Classic Helmet
Minifigures: Town: Classic Town

Race Driver, Stripes Red and Black, Classic Helmet Red (Multiple Sets)

[M=cty287]

Firefighter, Fire Suit with Utility Belt Brown, Fire Helmet, Airtanks (4427,
853378)

 
Minifig No: sh009  Name: Bane - Light Nougat Hands
* 
sh009 (Inv) Bane - Light Nougat Hands
Minifigures: Super Heroes: Batman II

Supervillain, Bane, Black Suspenders (6860)

 
Minifig No: sh047  Name: Batman, Arctic Batman
* 
sh047 (Inv) Batman, Arctic Batman
Minifigures: Super Heroes: Batman II

Superhero, Batman, Arctic (76000)

 
Minifig No: frnd024  Name: Friends Andrea - Light Aqua Layered Skirt, Lime Halter Neck Top
* 
frnd024 (Inv) Friends Andrea - Light Aqua Layered Skirt, Lime Halter Neck Top
Minifigures: Friends

Mini Doll - Character Friends, Andrea, Halter Top, Skirt (3938)

 
Minifig No: nba055  Name: Basketball Street Player, Tan Torso and black Legs #2
* 
nba055 (Inv) Basketball Street Player, Tan Torso and black Legs #2
Minifigures: Sports: Basketball

Basketball Player, Basket Torso, Sunglasses (3390)

[M=Belvmale7a]

Belville Figure - King, Cross and Dots (5808)

 
Minifig No: tech012  Name: Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms
* 
tech012 Technic Figure Black Legs, Light Gray Top with 2 Brown Belts, Black Arms
Minifigures: Technic

Technic Figure - Construction Worker/Race Driver, Two Belts (Multiple Sets)

 
Minifig No: 71520  Name: Scala Doll (Emma with Clothes, Dress Blue)
* 
71520 Scala Doll (Emma with Clothes, Dress Blue)
Minifigures: Scala

Scala Figure - Character Emma, Sweater (3200)

 
Minifig No: soc072  Name: Soccer Player White Team Player  2
* 
soc072 (Inv) Soccer Player White Team Player 2
Minifigures: Sports: Soccer

Soccer Player, Hair Brown, Arched Eyebrows and Stubble (3425) - White Team Player
2

 
Minifig No: 2327pb32  Name: Duplo 2 x 2 x 2 Figure Brick, Red Base With Number 1 Race Pattern, Yellow Head, Brown Male Hair
* 
2327pb32 Duplo 2 x 2 x 2 Figure Brick, Red Base With Number 1 Race Pattern, Yellow Head, Brown Male Hair
Minifigures: DUPLO: Basic Set

Duplo Figure Brick - Base Red with Number 1 Race, Hair Brown, Head Yellow (9051,
9053)

I am going to apply these rules soon to the low-impact category 4 Juniors so
that we can see what they'll look like for an entire category. Beyond that,
I'll wait to see what kind of feedback everyone has before doing anything
further.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 20:57
 Subject: Re: Consider changing title
 Viewed: 34 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog Requests, Lauren_Luke writes:
  Please consider changing the following titles of these parts:

Please submit these requests as catalog requests:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp

The ability to submit requests in the discussion forum should only be used for
things which cannot be done with existing forms. Include any notes regarding
the changes in the comments section of the form.

Thank you.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 19:02
 Subject: Re: image for hol132??
 Viewed: 26 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Reki_Lobsheek writes:
  How on Earth did this image get cleared by the catmins?

I have seem some blurry, dark, petite, ... pictures of Lego items in the past
15 years on BL, but a sideways image of a minifig?
I don't even get what benefit there would be from taking a picture this way.

We don't like to add items to the catalog without an image and hardly ever
do. In the case of this figure the inventory is pending approval and rather
than delay the inventory while waiting for a perfect picture, this figure was
approved with the image submitted because it was the only image submitted.

The picture shows all the relevant characteristics of the minifigure, even though
it is not the traditional front-facing image. The good thing about this image
is that it is not permanent - anyone who feels like they have a better image
can submit that image to replace the current one.

Our other option is to hold every item in a pending status until perfect pictures
come in. I trust that is not something desired by most members.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 18:17
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 9630-1
 Viewed: 24 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
  I leave for now as it is it agrees with parts list now showed in this thread
if something will needs to be corected then new change request can be submited.

I understand. The inventory is now missing some 30 parts which were actually
included in every copy of the set, though. You might consider adding an inventory
note which mentions the difficulties with this inventory.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 17:48
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 9630-1
 Viewed: 21 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
  Peeron's inventory should be a big help.

As a side note, Peeron's inventory may have been the 2002 version. I haven't
checked, but it wasn't added to the site until 2008. Since the submitter
has a copy of the 1997 set in hand, this would be your best resource for making
sure everything is correct for the 1997 version. The submitter may also be able
to help you determine what parts may have genuinely been extras.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 17:41
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 9630-1
 Viewed: 23 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
  Robert if you have time between catalog work I would appreciate if you also look
at this if there something more to correct.

I'm sorry that I didn't give you more support on this. I have, indeed
been very busy elsewhere. If you'll take a look at the Peeron inventory,
you'll see that it was done from a MISB source and includes 216 parts and
around 72 extra parts. So I think it comes down to how we define extras.

This set was consistently advertised in catalogs with a lower quantity of parts
than that printed on the box and included in the set. Both Peeron and BrickLink
considered those 70+ parts to be extras. However, they're not extras according
to our current definition because they were included in every set and reflected
in the part count on the set box.

So my suggestion here is to get the part count to match the total on the set
box. To do this, you'll have to select some of the extras (around 10, I
think) and just make them extras based on what you think would be reasonable.
You will kind of be making this up, but I don't think even having a sealed
set in front of you would help here. There were a defined number of parts (presumably
the 216) used in models and the rest were just included.

Once you reach the part count on the box, you'll just have to decide what
else is extra. It's a complicated mess, but it definitely can be done and
Peeron's inventory should be a big help.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 04:58
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 35 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  Note it is not Genie "with a lamp" but "of the Lamp", so it is part of his name.
The minifigure (only) name should really change to reflect this.

I just checked and TLG refers to this character as both Genie and Genie of the
Lamp. So either is technically appropriate as the official title. TLG, like
BrickLink, is not known for its consistency.

I do plan to go through and correct identical titles from the list qwertyboy
so kindly supplied. When I do that, I'll fix it along with the rest.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 04:48
 Subject: Re: Head Category Split
 Viewed: 40 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
  "Without face" sounds really strange

Okay, so what suggestions do you have for something better? Keep in mind that
it needs to be something which will keep these heads about where they are (close
to the top, but just under the plain heads) in the entire list of heads when
you look at them by title, as well as something which will only return these
heads in searches.

Previously you couldn't find any of these heads without a minifigure face
in searches, BTW, and now you can find them by searching "without face." They're
the only things that come up if you search for them.

As for your question about what criteria I used to populate the list, I tried
to include every head which was self-evidently not a face and which was
also not used in a standard-size minifigure as a head. There are two exceptions
on the list, meaning two heads which are used in minifigures.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 04:14
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6385-1
 Viewed: 16 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
  The part 4532a also came assembled with its door. If this has to be added, shall
I add this part first?

Parts which came preassembled in the box for display purposes are excepted from
having catalog entries for assemblies (see the Part Assemblies section):

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=199

Just an FYI: the catalog is not accepting any additional basic part assemblies
like this one until we get together some written guidelines on what assemblies
should or should not be in the catalog. Creating these written rules regarding
assemblies is on the list of things to do (item 17):

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2473
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 23, 2018 01:14
 Subject: Re: Head Category Split
 Viewed: 44 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
  If it's not the best idea, then I can always move the three heads back to from where they came and we can pretend this never happened.

Meh. Gave it some thought and didn't like it and changed it back. I'm
just going to retitle these heads so that they're searchable and they'll
also show up near the top of the list of heads:

 
Part No: 3626cpb1109  Name: Minifigure, Head without Face with Orange Fish with 3 White Eyes Pattern (The Simpsons Blinky) - Hollow Stud
* 
3626cpb1109 Minifigure, Head without Face with Orange Fish with 3 White Eyes Pattern (The Simpsons Blinky) - Hollow Stud
Parts: Minifigure, Head
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 22, 2018 23:44
 Subject: Head Category Split
 Viewed: 119 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
I have split heads into two categories. Minifigure heads now exist in the original
category and a new category titled Minifigure, Head, Faceless:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catType=P&catString=1010&itemBrand=1000

This category will be for any heads which do not have a minifigure face, whether
the heads are simply plain or have some non-face pattern. I have only moved
three low-impact heads right now to give everyone an idea of what it will look
like. If there are no objections, then I will move the remaining heads which
qualify.

This was necessary because in the past the practice for heads without a face
was to use the wording "Head with XXXX Pattern." The addition of the word "with"
forced faceless heads (but not plain, unprinted heads) to the bottom of the list
of heads when searching by title and thus grouped them in one place.

This was not a perfect solution, however, because it ignored unprinted heads
and caused confusion for members when titling heads. I just looked at the end
of the list and found several standard heads which used the "with" keyword (which
isn't really a keyword at all because you can't search for it).

Anyway, thoughts on this new category? If it's not the best idea, then I
can always move the three heads back to from where they came and we can pretend
this never happened.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 22, 2018 20:45
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 30 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Lauren_Luke writes:
  What about 'Dimensions Minifigs'? There are bunch of minifigs with the
word Dimensions Team Pack or Dimensions Fun Pack as their only
differentiation. If set numbers are to go ahead are these titles going to be
replaced with the relevant dimensions set numbers?

Whatever solution we achieve will be applied consistently. If set numbers, then
yes, the extra portions of the titles would be removed. Even among those figures
there is not titling consistency:

 
Minifig No: dim054  Name: Starfire - Large Eyes
* 
dim054 (Inv) Starfire - Large Eyes
Minifigures: Dimensions: Super Heroes: Teen Titans Go!
 
Minifig No: dim033  Name: Stripe
* 
dim033 (Inv) Stripe
Minifigures: Dimensions: Gremlins
 
Minifig No: dim052  Name: Blossom
* 
dim052 (Inv) Blossom
Minifigures: Dimensions: The Powerpuff Girls
 
Minifig No: dim005  Name: Wicked Witch
* 
dim005 (Inv) Wicked Witch
Minifigures: Dimensions: The Wizard of Oz
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 22, 2018 20:40
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 32 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, Lauren_Luke writes:
  Since we are contemplating change the titles en masse, I think it would be a
better time now to agree on a consistent standard.

Yes, I was looking through minifigures a little bit ago and I see that this project
will involve more than just removing set numbers from minifigure titles.

  I disagree, I have relied upon the “with” and other prepositions in searches.

Are you quite sure? I just checked and BrickLink automatically excludes the
word "with" from searches. The site also excludes the word "no," which is why
some items I recently found (and corrected) which had the term "No Pattern" in
the title were not usefully titled.

  Why? Is three a magical number? There are several minifigs with duplicate titles,
even before removing the set number, these need to be addressed for example:

Good find on those two figures. Yes, we need to address this. I am of the belief
that, generally speaking and allowing for some exceptions, items in the catalog
should not have exactly the same title.
 Author: StormChaser View Messages Posted By StormChaser
 Posted: Nov 22, 2018 19:37
 Subject: Re: Seventh Catalog Project Underway
 Viewed: 35 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

StormChaser (568)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 10, 2002 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Penultimate Harbinger
In Catalog, axaday writes:
  In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
  The general trend of opinion is to remove set numbers from minifigure titles
(pretty much everyone I've heard from privately and publicly agrees or would
be okay with it).

This consensus seems to have arrive in a couple hours on a major national holiday
in the US.

I ain't say it was a consensus. I only said everyone so far (at that time)
was in favor of removing set numbers. I've noticed that only a few people
typically comment on these changes and they're usually the same people.
I appreciate all input, of course, and wish more people would join in the discussions,
but once I've heard from the core group I have a general idea of how things
are going with a given issue.

  Initially, the parenthetical set numbers are very useful.

Yes, of course. There's nothing wrong with having these until they go into
a set inventory.

  I don't really agree with the premise. I don't think people looking
for that droid are going to hit upon the right keywords.

I definitely see what you're saying, but I wouldn't want to remove set
numbers and have three figures with the exact same titles. Of course there is
precedent in every direction for this issue, including nothing but a name:

 
Minifig No: njo298  Name: Ash
* 
njo298 (Inv) Ash
Minifigures: NINJAGO: (Other)

What we're trying to do here is find some standard approach and implement
it. It sounds like just having the set number in parentheses at the end of the
minimally-descriptive title (perhaps only the figure name) would work well for
you?

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More