Discussion Forum: Thread 346773

 Author: roba235 View Messages Posted By roba235
 Posted: Sep 16, 2023 09:29
 Subject: 212th helmet (is this considered missprint?)
 Viewed: 111 times
 Topic: Help
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

roba235 (0)

Location:  Germany, Bayern
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 16, 2023 Contact Member Buyer
Buying Privileges - OK
 
Part No: 2019pb02 Name: Minifigure, Headgear Helmet SW Clone Trooper (Phase 2) with Holes with Black Visor and Orange 212th Attack Battalion Markings Pattern
* 		2019pb02 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet SW Clone Trooper (Phase 2) with Holes with Black Visor and Orange 212th Attack Battalion Markings Pattern
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear {White}

Is this considered a misprint?
 
 Author: Familybuild View Messages Posted By Familybuild
 Posted: Sep 16, 2023 14:59
 Subject: Re: 212th helmet (is this considered missprint?)
 Viewed: 34 times
 Topic: Help
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Familybuild (113)

Location:  Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
Member Since Contact Type Status
Nov 16, 2022 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Seller Ships to My Country Store: FamilyBuilds
In Help, roba235 writes:
  
 
Part No: 2019pb02 Name: Minifigure, Headgear Helmet SW Clone Trooper (Phase 2) with Holes with Black Visor and Orange 212th Attack Battalion Markings Pattern
* 		2019pb02 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet SW Clone Trooper (Phase 2) with Holes with Black Visor and Orange 212th Attack Battalion Markings Pattern
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear {White}

Is this considered a misprint?

Im not top level SW expert ; but to me it seems to be a different (variation)
all together. The orange pit on top is shaped differently also .

Did you try google Lens with some Angeles or background variation?
 Author: Nubs_Select View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select
 Posted: Sep 16, 2023 15:03
 Subject: Re: 212th helmet (is this considered missprint?)
 Viewed: 40 times
 Topic: Help
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Nubs_Select (3837)

Location:  Canada, Ontario
Member Since Contact Type Status
Mar 15, 2016 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Seller Ships to My Country Store: Nub's Select
it almost looks fake
 Author: roba235 View Messages Posted By roba235
 Posted: Sep 16, 2023 15:43
 Subject: Re: 212th helmet (is this considered missprint?)
 Viewed: 36 times
 Topic: Help
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

roba235 (0)

Location:  Germany, Bayern
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 16, 2023 Contact Member Buyer
Buying Privileges - OK
In Help, roba235 writes:
  
 
Part No: 2019pb02 Name: Minifigure, Headgear Helmet SW Clone Trooper (Phase 2) with Holes with Black Visor and Orange 212th Attack Battalion Markings Pattern
* 		2019pb02 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet SW Clone Trooper (Phase 2) with Holes with Black Visor and Orange 212th Attack Battalion Markings Pattern
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear {White}

Is this considered a misprint?

It is from the At-te.
The orange triangle is common at these helmets.
 Author: wyvern View Messages Posted By wyvern
 Posted: Sep 16, 2023 18:54
 Subject: Re: 212th helmet (is this considered missprint?)
 Viewed: 38 times
 Topic: Help
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

wyvern (75)

Location:  USA, Ohio
Member Since Contact Type Status
Nov 12, 2018 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Seller Ships to My Country Store: Under the Mountain
The discrepancy between sharp triangle and the more U-shaped pattern is odd.
Every single minifig I see online has the U-shape, while the triangle is only
on this packaging and in the helmet render. Note how it's the 2 rendered
"minifigs" that have the triangle, while the real one (in the big red
D on the bag) has the U-shape. Maybe the printers aren't printing the intended
design correctly? That being said, I am not a SW expert, and it could just be
a variant.

Anyway, that gray streak is what I assume you're talking about. I would say
that indeed is a misprint! It's cool that it looks like battle damage. Could
be worth something to someone who likes making dioramas