Discussion Forum: Thread 334135 |
|
|
| | Author: | Superkrytyk | Posted: | Jan 30, 2023 10:52 | Subject: | 75023-11 possible photo change? | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Completed | |
|
| Hey,
I just found that in ,,set,, 75023-11 which is a part to advent calendar 75023
is using wrong photo. Altho it is still linking to correct minifigure.
The issue is that in this callendar official LEGO photos of its content, they
added clone troper minifigure that was just (I think) prototype, and they missed
it.
The photo for now gives us figure that consists of 61189pb03 helmet, and torso
973pb0635c01 which is very similar to correct one: 973pb1286c01
But when you bought the set, as seen in multiple reviews you will always get
minifigure sw0442 which has 973pb1286c01 torso and 61189pb13 helmet.
Would it be possible to change this photo to a correct, and delete the misleading
one?
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jan 30, 2023 14:26 | Subject: | Re: 75023-11 possible photo change? | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Superkrytyk writes:
| Hey,
I just found that in ,,set,, 75023-11 which is a part to advent calendar 75023
is using wrong photo. Altho it is still linking to correct minifigure.
The issue is that in this callendar official LEGO photos of its content, they
added clone troper minifigure that was just (I think) prototype, and they missed
it.
The photo for now gives us figure that consists of 61189pb03 helmet, and torso
973pb0635c01 which is very similar to correct one: 973pb1286c01
But when you bought the set, as seen in multiple reviews you will always get
minifigure sw0442 which has 973pb1286c01 torso and 61189pb13 helmet.
Would it be possible to change this photo to a correct, and delete the misleading
one?
|
This image comes from the official LEGO set images, and as a matter of practice,
we do not alter those images.
In this case, I have added an additional note to both of the following set entries
explaining the issue:
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|