Discussion Forum: Thread 308718 |
|
|
| | Author: | waltzking | Posted: | Sep 1, 2021 20:48 | Subject: | Set 21123 Photo Discrepancy | Viewed: | 90 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Completed | |
|
| The main listing photo for this set
does not show this figure
which is present on the box imagery and included in the inventory.
Should a catalog note be added to clarify this?
I have seen such on other sets with official image vs. actual set discrepancies...for
example this one.
Jonathan
P.S. While on the note of wizards, is this part named correctly with the double
"z" in the word Wizzard?
[P=76371pb201,3]
If correct due to event name using the double "z" spelling, it is hard to find,
so adding the normal spelling might be advisable.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Sep 1, 2021 22:35 | Subject: | Re: Set 21123 Photo Discrepancy | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog, waltzking writes:
| The main listing photo for this set
does not show this figure
which is present on the box imagery and included in the inventory.
|
In defense of LEGO, the image was an official image. The golem is just hiding
in its underground hidey-hole.
| Should a catalog note be added to clarify this?
|
I have replaced the image with the other official one.
| I have seen such on other sets with official image vs. actual set discrepancies...for
example this one.
Jonathan
P.S. While on the note of wizards, is this part named correctly with the double
"z" in the word Wizzard?
[P=76371pb201,3]
If correct due to event name using the double "z" spelling, it is hard to find,
so adding the normal spelling might be advisable.
|
I am not sure, but I have changed it to "Wizard" just to be safe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|