|
 |
| | | Author: | tec  | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 08:44 | | Subject: | This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 275 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| I own 50+ of these little guys
But this one continue to stand out of the rest. I compared it to all my LightGrays,
then to the rest in all colours, and he's alone, a different beast.
You Judge it.
Note: color LightGray, so expect no-logo and no-microprints in those old times
of old grays.
Note2: 2 legit variants in pic2, where one has a "parting line" more visible,
but still legit imho.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | kzinti | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, tec writes:
| | I own 50+ of these little guys
But this one continue to stand out of the rest. I compared it to all my LightGrays,
then to the rest in all colours, and he's alone, a different beast.
You Judge it.
Note: color LightGray, so expect no-logo and no-microprints in those old times
of old grays.
Note2: 2 legit variants in pic2, where one has a "parting line" more visible,
but still legit imho.
|
My $0.02 worth: Looks like an older version part. I say that because back in
older parts, they used the '+' instead of the 'X' axle holes.
You can see the axle holes are very straight, and defined in the '+'
configuration, where the ones shown above are more open, in the newer, wider
'X' configuration.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 13:41 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 66 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| | | My $0.02 worth: Looks like an older version part. I say that because back in
older parts, they used the '+' instead of the 'X' axle holes.
You can see the axle holes are very straight, and defined in the '+'
configuration, where the ones shown above are more open, in the newer, wider
'X' configuration.
|
It's a good suggestion. I tested it out
I compared it to older 6632 I own, in all other colors too
Then I compared it also to 2825 and 2905 which could be older than a 6632
Results: no one has that tiny logo, that big number, or the 4 depressions in
the retro.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 14:13 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, tec writes:
| | | | My $0.02 worth: Looks like an older version part. I say that because back in
older parts, they used the '+' instead of the 'X' axle holes.
You can see the axle holes are very straight, and defined in the '+'
configuration, where the ones shown above are more open, in the newer, wider
'X' configuration.
|
It's a good suggestion. I tested it out
I compared it to older 6632 I own, in all other colors too
Then I compared it also to 2825 and 2905 which could be older than a 6632
Results: no one has that tiny logo, that big number, or the 4 depressions in
the retro.
|
Are you trying to find out what clone company made the part?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 14:54 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, randyf writes:
| | In Help, tec writes:
| | | | My $0.02 worth: Looks like an older version part. I say that because back in
older parts, they used the '+' instead of the 'X' axle holes.
You can see the axle holes are very straight, and defined in the '+'
configuration, where the ones shown above are more open, in the newer, wider
'X' configuration.
|
It's a good suggestion. I tested it out
I compared it to older 6632 I own, in all other colors too
Then I compared it also to 2825 and 2905 which could be older than a 6632
Results: no one has that tiny logo, that big number, or the 4 depressions in
the retro.
|
Are you trying to find out what clone company made the part?
|
I'm trying to find a strong assurance it's fake or genuine.
Maybe genuine like my peer said, but from some obscure theme/age?
Can you provide any input of those 6632?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 15:31 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 100 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, tec writes:
| | In Help, randyf writes:
| | In Help, tec writes:
| | | | My $0.02 worth: Looks like an older version part. I say that because back in
older parts, they used the '+' instead of the 'X' axle holes.
You can see the axle holes are very straight, and defined in the '+'
configuration, where the ones shown above are more open, in the newer, wider
'X' configuration.
|
It's a good suggestion. I tested it out
I compared it to older 6632 I own, in all other colors too
Then I compared it also to 2825 and 2905 which could be older than a 6632
Results: no one has that tiny logo, that big number, or the 4 depressions in
the retro.
|
Are you trying to find out what clone company made the part?
|
I'm trying to find a strong assurance it's fake or genuine.
Maybe genuine like my peer said, but from some obscure theme/age?
Can you provide any input of those 6632?
|
It doesn't look genuine to me. I have never seen markings like that on any
part from LEGO.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | StonesHeart | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 16:07 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, randyf writes:
| | In Help, tec writes:
| | In Help, randyf writes:
| | In Help, tec writes:
| | | | My $0.02 worth: Looks like an older version part. I say that because back in
older parts, they used the '+' instead of the 'X' axle holes.
You can see the axle holes are very straight, and defined in the '+'
configuration, where the ones shown above are more open, in the newer, wider
'X' configuration.
|
It's a good suggestion. I tested it out
I compared it to older 6632 I own, in all other colors too
Then I compared it also to 2825 and 2905 which could be older than a 6632
Results: no one has that tiny logo, that big number, or the 4 depressions in
the retro.
|
Are you trying to find out what clone company made the part?
|
I'm trying to find a strong assurance it's fake or genuine.
Maybe genuine like my peer said, but from some obscure theme/age?
Can you provide any input of those 6632?
|
It doesn't look genuine to me. I have never seen markings like that on any
part from LEGO.
|
I pulled it through Google Lens. Only get the original LEGO part (or some funny
dishwasher part  )
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 16:32 | | Subject: | Re: This little fake (again) | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| Randyf, thank you very much, any input from the inv admin is like gold.
| | It doesn't look genuine to me. I have never seen markings like that on any
part from LEGO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy, Marche
)
)
USA, Missouri
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland