| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Brickwilbo  | | Posted: | Oct 30, 2019 02:33 | | Subject: | Re: Lego doesnt always include the "extra" parts? | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, allstar005317 writes:
| | I am parting out a set that I have three of, but only one of the sets seems to
have the "extra" parts. I'm newer to selling and thus parting out sets like
this, but is this normal? Every other set have have parted out always has the
exact number of "extras" as Bricklink says it should have.
|
Tha Catalog should be used as guide.
Always verify the parts when uploading stock.
|
 |
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Sep 24, 2019 05:13 | | Subject: | Re: Sort by in Wanted List | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, iprice writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, iprice writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:
| | Hello
Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".
Cheers
Greg
|
The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.
|
I actually find the "Have" feature to be very useful, though I would like an
"Ordeded/Purchased" feature too; I've purchased loads of parts multiple times
accidentally, as I'd forgotten I had already ordered them and didn't
check through my current orders properly. If I could mark wanted parts as "Ordered"
it would save me time. money and storage space.
|
That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.
|
It does though. If you look in your Wanted list it clearly shows how many you
Want and how many you Have in hand. Now go to a store and select Wanted List
it shows sjhows your Wanted Qty (which is original Wanted minus Have).
As for Have - I don't want it
|
I just checked and it still doesn't subtract Have from original Want.
Usually I don't want to search for the original Want quantity but for new
Want quantity.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Sep 24, 2019 04:51 | | Subject: | Re: Sort by in Wanted List | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, iprice writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, iprice writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:
| | Hello
Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".
Cheers
Greg
|
The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.
|
I actually find the "Have" feature to be very useful, though I would like an
"Ordeded/Purchased" feature too; I've purchased loads of parts multiple times
accidentally, as I'd forgotten I had already ordered them and didn't
check through my current orders properly. If I could mark wanted parts as "Ordered"
it would save me time. money and storage space.
|
That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.
|
It does though. If you look in your Wanted list it clearly shows how many you
Want and how many you Have in hand. Now go to a store and select Wanted List
it shows sjhows your Wanted Qty (which is original Wanted minus Have).
As for Have - I don't want it
|
If it does now, the Have feature probably has been tweeked.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Sep 23, 2019 13:06 | | Subject: | Re: Sort by in Wanted List | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, iprice writes:
| | In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:
| | Hello
Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".
Cheers
Greg
|
The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.
|
I actually find the "Have" feature to be very useful, though I would like an
"Ordeded/Purchased" feature too; I've purchased loads of parts multiple times
accidentally, as I'd forgotten I had already ordered them and didn't
check through my current orders properly. If I could mark wanted parts as "Ordered"
it would save me time. money and storage space.
|
That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Sep 23, 2019 07:24 | | Subject: | Re: Sort by in Wanted List | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:
| | Hello
Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".
Cheers
Greg
|
The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
Netherlands, Gelderland
