Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Rick_S.  | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:53 | | Subject: | Re: Attack of the Blusers | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, BLUSER13161 writes:
| | In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | bluser numbers assigned already
but just happen to be known by our chosen usernames instead.
|
Yes, your bluser number can be seen by going to your Account Info page. The
second bit of information there is titled User ID. That's your bluser number.
Someday in the distant future, when we're all dead, they'll eject us
from the system and make us blusers, too. Not too fond of the idea, as I'd
rather be remembered as StormChaser, not BLUSER_13161.
Doesn't matter what I want, though.
|
I'm BLUSER 9140 
|
 |
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Please do not "+1" or otherwise comment on the AMA questions. If you want to
ask a question that has already been asked, ask it again in your own words as
a reply to the original post.
Thank you!
|
Okay thank you for confirming Russell
|
| Author: | Minifig_Central | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:37 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Can you please reply to my post in relation to site performance issues? I'd
like to at least know they've been acknowledged/started to be worked on.
|
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:25 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
|
As already been noted, people don’t read the FAQ before posting their questions.
Why do you believe they read all the previous questions? (Especially on a slooowwww
BL day, like this, er, month.)
But for some forum junkies, people just read the announcement and ask their question(s).
|
Well the high number of views against each post and the number of subsequent
comments would suggest they are being read and whilst some people are repeating
certain stuff from the FAQ including myself to a certain degree I think its just
because people are looking for a litttle more elaboration on what's previously
been anounced.
|
|
| Author: | Antarctica | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 15:59 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1237-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 4 Part Black {3704 Technic, Axle 2 to 32062 Technic, Axle 2 Notched}
Comments from Submitter:
The notches are visible in the instructions scan at https://lego.fandom.com/wiki/1237_Asimo_Robot?file=1237B.jpg in the left bottom.
The mold change was in 1996/1997, this is the only later set that has 3704 in its inventory.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 15:56 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
|
As already been noted, people don’t read the FAQ before posting their questions.
Why do you believe they read all the previous questions? (Especially on a slooowwww
BL day, like this, er, month.)
But for some forum junkies, people just read the announcement and ask their question(s).
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 14:31 | | Subject: | Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 156 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
“Please do add your questions in the thread below*. We will update the LEGO FAQ
on an ongoing basis with your most top-of-mind questions, until the closing of
the AMA on 31st January 2020 at 9AM EST.”
|
|
| Author: | HayTanBricks | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 06:12 | | Subject: | Re: New Payment Method | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Yes a blank option would be great. While AfterPay or Zippay won’t integrate with
Market place platforms, a blank option will give us the availability to use an
alternative payment solution
In Suggestions, LaygoAdelaide writes:
| | Would it be possible to add another payment method.
Afterpay
Zip Pay
or at least have a blank one so that we can input our own custom method.
|
|
| Author: | Classicsmiley | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2020 20:15 | | Subject: | Re: Piece 33492 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, davebangertgmai writes:
| | I can't seem to find piece 33492.
|
|
| Author: | bb1592198 | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2020 18:28 | | Subject: | Piece 33492 | | Viewed: | 66 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| | I can't seem to find piece 33492. |
|
| Author: | bb1301425 | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2020 07:39 | | Subject: | Re: 2FA or some other additional login security | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, patpendlego writes:
| | Please implement 2FA or some other additional login security to BrickLink account.
|
Please don't. I've dealt with 2FA supporting medical and financial software
for years. It's a pain to set up, and the training curve with too many users
is a vertical wall. I've yet to see a 2FA provider who doesn't have outages
every few weeks, and your phone is NOT secure. For what is a retail operation,
over complicated processes and ticked off customers lead to less of a retail
operation. Add in the expense of doing this internationally, and you will see
a notable jump in what TLG has to skim off the top for fees. Not something that
any of us want.
Use paypal, tie it to your credit card. That will give you security for your
money. If you're worried about some getting in and messing with your inventory....
Don't invent things to be scared of.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2020 04:05 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60258-1 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 44302a Dark Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End with Bottom Groove (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Dark Bluish Gray 44302b Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End without Bottom Groove {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
My set has 44302a
|
|
|
| Author: | superca | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 20:48 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8108-1 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 47757pb15 Black Wedge 4 x 4 Pyramid Center with Yellow Circle and Silver Robot Head Facing Back Pattern (Sticker) - Set 8105 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
This decorated wedge is missing from the inventory and is shown in the instructions (page 31 of book 2) to this set plus the sticker is part of this sets sticker sheet.
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 12:33 | | Subject: | Re: Have A Heart | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In General, BLUSER13161 writes:
| | I can't help myself from returning to this topic.
|
But I'll try to make this post the last thing I say about it. In a recent
response to a different post:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1176109
Russell said:
"Many historic accounts, such as major contributors or Dan's own personal
account were intentionally untouched by the process."
So this means that someone at BrickLink made a determination based on subjective
criteria about who would be erased and who wouldn't.
All I'm saying is that an objective standard should have been (and still
could be) used: if a member ever contributed to the catalog/inventories, then
they should not be turned into a number.
Erasing contributor usernames is a breach of the promises made here (and in other
places):
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2472
And beyond that, it is simply disrespectful.
|
|
| Author: | leggodtshop | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 08:51 | | Subject: | Re: 2FA or some other additional login security | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mfav writes:
|
|
| Author: | jonwil | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 08:07 | | Subject: | Re: 2FA or some other additional login security | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| I support the idea of proper 2FA. Messages to a phone or mobile device (via SMS
or otherwise) is not proper 2FA. Supporting the U2F standard would be perfect
IMO, its designed to be a 2FA solution that avoids all the problems of using
phones as a 2FA solution. And its open and well documented (and AFAIK designed
to be easy for sites to implement)
It can (if implement correctly) even help stop phishing attacks (where someone
creates a fake web page designed to make you think its the real page and then
uses that fake page to steal login information or otherwise do nefarious things)
|
|
| Author: | HillbillyBricks | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 04:37 | | Subject: | Re: Ability to identify parts for a specific set | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, HillbillyBricks writes:
| | How can you get a list of parts that you have in your inventory for a specific
set.
|
On your My Inventory page in the extra options Search My Inventory you can enter
a set number.
| | In the price guide it will tell you how many parts you have in inventory
for a set. I want to know what those parts are.
|
Check the option Show Items in My Inventory to see if you've got the items
in your inventory on the Catalog page:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogOptions.asp?viewFrom=P
Thank you. I'm lost. I do not see an option that works.
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 03:07 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 1676-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, 13161 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4130 Red Door Frame 2 x 4 x 5
* Delete 1 Part 4132 Red Window 2 x 4 x 3 Frame
* Delete 1 Part 4131 White Door 1 x 4 x 5
* Delete 1 Part 4133 White Window 2 x 4 x 3 Pane
* Add 1 Part 4130c02 Red Door Frame 2 x 4 x 5 with White Door 1 x 4 x 5 (4130 / 4131)
* Add 1 Part 4132c04 Red Window 2 x 4 x 3 Frame with White Window 2 x 4 x 3 Pane (4132 / 4133)
|
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 03:06 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1676-1 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 4130 Red Door Frame 2 x 4 x 5
* Delete 1 Part 4132 Red Window 2 x 4 x 3 Frame
* Delete 1 Part 4131 White Door 1 x 4 x 5
* Delete 1 Part 4133 White Window 2 x 4 x 3 Pane
* Add 1 Part 4130c02 Red Door Frame 2 x 4 x 5 with White Door 1 x 4 x 5 (4130 / 4131)
* Add 1 Part 4132c04 Red Window 2 x 4 x 3 Frame with White Window 2 x 4 x 3 Pane (4132 / 4133)
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 00:37 | | Subject: | Re: Have A Heart | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In General, randyf writes:
| | In General, qwertyboy writes:
| | Who is up for a round of Azul, Splendor, or Wingspan?
|
Man, I love me a good game of Splendor! Such an awesome game. My wife and I play
it all the time, along with our other favorites: Catan, Carcassonne, and Pandemic.
|
Catan is very frustrating for me. The game usually ends very abruptly. Now
and then it is obvious a turn away, but in those case there is usually nothing
to be done. It is often difficult to even tell who is winning until it happens
and suddenly all of my plans are for nothing.
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2020 00:25 | | Subject: | Re: Have A Heart | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In General, randyf writes:
| |
I will definitely be looking into Azul and Wingspan. We are always looking for
other great games to add to our pool to choose from. Thanks for the suggestions!
Cheers,
Randy
|
Another vote here for Azul and Wingspan. We also play a lot of Scythe, Terraforming
Mars, and Tapestry recently.
Carcassone, Agricola, and Belfort are my all time favorites. I can't play
Catan... dice don't like me.
 Jen
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
USA, California
United Kingdom, England
United Kingdom, Wales
Germany, Niedersachsen
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Australia, South Australia
Netherlands, Overijssel
Canada, British Columbia
)
)
