| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | needful_things  | | Posted: | May 8, 2023 11:41 | | Subject: | Re: Problem with shipping options: weight bands | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| In Technical Issues, NelisSolis writes:
| | In Technical Issues, needful_things writes:
| | Hi,
I've received an order of 86 gramm, but the shipping methode which is choosen
only has the following weight bands in gramms:
0 - 9.00
9.01 - 33.00
I expected that this shipping option wouldn't be available for the buyer
and an other of my shipping methodes would be choosen.
Is this normal behaviour or an error?
|
How is your shipping method configured? Did the 86 gram show up on your scale
or on the BL order page?
|
On the order page. All Items have a weight on the order page the total weight
is 84,6 gramm (instead of 86 gramm, but still more than the specified weight
bands).
|
 |
| Author: | NelisSolis | | Posted: | May 8, 2023 06:08 | | Subject: | Re: Problem with shipping options: weight bands | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| In Technical Issues, needful_things writes:
| | Hi,
I've received an order of 86 gramm, but the shipping methode which is choosen
only has the following weight bands in gramms:
0 - 9.00
9.01 - 33.00
I expected that this shipping option wouldn't be available for the buyer
and an other of my shipping methodes would be choosen.
Is this normal behaviour or an error?
|
How is your shipping method configured? Did the 86 gram show up on your scale
or on the BL order page?
|
|
| Author: | needful_things | | Posted: | May 8, 2023 00:44 | | Subject: | Problem with shipping options: weight bands | | Viewed: | 72 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| Hi,
I've received an order of 86 gramm, but the shipping methode which is choosen
only has the following weight bands in gramms:
0 - 9.00
9.01 - 33.00
I expected that this shipping option wouldn't be available for the buyer
and an other of my shipping methodes would be choosen.
Is this normal behaviour or an error?
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | May 5, 2023 20:21 | | Subject: | Re: No scrolling pages in Firefox | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| In Technical Issues, nikosafentakis writes:
| | After the latest update of Firefox, all pages originated from the "Want"
menu are impossible to scroll up/down, not only with the mouse wheel but also
by using PgUp/PgDn, arrows, or any other method. They just freeze in their first
position. Edge and Chrome browsers have no problem. I did all possible remedies
in Firefox (cache, clean cookies, re-initialize) but nothing seems to work. Anyone
else can replicate this?
|
Well known. Log off, clear the BrickLink cookies, Log on, it'll work!
|
|
| Author: | nikosafentakis | | Posted: | May 5, 2023 20:20 | | Subject: | No scrolling pages in Firefox | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| After the latest update of Firefox, all pages originated from the "Want"
menu are impossible to scroll up/down, not only with the mouse wheel but also
by using PgUp/PgDn, arrows, or any other method. They just freeze in their first
position. Edge and Chrome browsers have no problem. I did all possible remedies
in Firefox (cache, clean cookies, re-initialize) but nothing seems to work. Anyone
else can replicate this?
|
|
| Author: | brickotronic | | Posted: | May 5, 2023 18:59 | | Subject: | TIMESTAMP_REUSED OAuth errors in API | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| Hi,
did anyone got TIMESTAMP_REUSED authentication errors?
Example: {"meta":{"description":"TIMESTAMP_REUSED: consumerKey:
XXXXXXXXXX timestamp: 1682887142 nonce: 1683475737654","message":"BAD_OAUTH_REQUEST","code":401}}
I'm getting these very regularly especially when doing price guide requests
or adding items to inventory.
It also seems to happen more often at certain times. It seems like, it happens
for more costly operations and probably at peak times.
I'm using the jave code provided on the API Guide (https://www.bricklink.com/v3/api.page?page=auth),
the BLAuthSigner class.
I have to admit that I'm no OAuth expert and I'm just starting looking
into it in more detail. But even getting a "TIMESTAMP_REUSED" error seems
odd to me. Using the same timestamp should be allowed as long as I'm using
a different nonce. Otherwise, I'd only be able to do one request per second.
What's even more hinting to a Bricklink error is that my inventory gets updated
even though, I get this authentication error back. If authentication really fails,
my inventory shouldn't update.
Any help is appreciated.
Cheers, Hannes
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | May 5, 2023 14:51 | | Subject: | Re: Slow? | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| | true it does seem to be better now |
| Author: | billamber | | Posted: | May 5, 2023 14:40 | | Subject: | Re: Slow? | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| In Technical Issues, Nubs_Select writes:
| | is bricklink running super slow for anyone else right now
|
yep, but I think it just picked up 
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | May 5, 2023 14:33 | | Subject: | Slow? | | Viewed: | 129 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| | is bricklink running super slow for anyone else right now |
| Author: | macebobo | | Posted: | May 3, 2023 00:28 | | Subject: | Re: Forum home is throwing an error | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
|
| In Technical Issues, wildchicken13 writes:
| | This is how the world ends. Not with a bang, but with an internal server error.
|
Where's the Kaboom?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9wmWZbr_wQ
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
Netherlands, Gelderland
France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
Greece, Crete
Austria, Vorarlberg
Canada, Ontario
USA, California