Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | popsicle  | | Posted: | May 13, 2022 12:14 | | Subject: | Re: Wow! It seems like just yesterday... | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Sadler_Bricks writes:
| | A new brick would be interesting for the high end.
|
What Lego color for such a special brick designation, can you envision?
-Thanks
|
 |
| Author: | macebobo | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 17:35 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ryanaitch writes:
| | In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| | Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit 
|
I had not heard about OLO, so a quick google found https://www.brickarchive.org/categories/2x4-bricks/production/olo/
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 16:51 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Definitely “OLO”.
In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| | In Suggestions, ryanaitch writes:
| | In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| | Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
Could be Minitalia:
https://us.v-cdn.net/5015319/uploads/FileUpload/cd/99e96151a4605d4429bc448a8ece65.jpg
|
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 16:48 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ryanaitch writes:
| | In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| | Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
Could be Minitalia:
https://us.v-cdn.net/5015319/uploads/FileUpload/cd/99e96151a4605d4429bc448a8ece65.jpg
|
|
| Author: | rylie_aitch | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 16:02 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| | Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
|
| Author: | maxx3001 | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 13:25 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| | Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
What a coincidence, you offered these on our local marketplace too!
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 10:14 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Definitely a market.
In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| | Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
|
| Author: | Sadler_Bricks | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 06:44 | | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| I believe there is a market for it. I have not dwelled too much of it these seem
to be the pat pend ones nice find.
Sadler_bricks
|
| Author: | Mesken | | Posted: | May 12, 2022 06:09 | | Subject: | Test bricks | | Viewed: | 193 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
|
| Author: | Sadler_Bricks | | Posted: | May 11, 2022 20:13 | | Subject: | Re: Wow! It seems like just yesterday... | | Viewed: | 74 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| A new brick would be interesting for the high end.
Sadler_bricks
|
| Author: | ValpraX | | Posted: | May 11, 2022 05:45 | | Subject: | inventory and wanted list | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| like on inventory, where it shows (1) a small number next to the writing in the
items preview page, how about if i have 1 of that item in my brickstore it should
show a small (1) next to the word inventory adjacent to the wanted list?
|
|
| Author: | hpoort | | Posted: | May 9, 2022 02:08 | | Subject: | Re: A place for Stud.io part requests... | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, HGProductions writes:
| | All that I am suggesting for this is that I think it would be nice if there
was a tab in Stud.io to request new parts to be added in upcoming updates. I
don't know how plausible or logical this request is, or if I just accidentally
suggested something that is way too big or hard to do.
Thanks,
HGProductions
|
You can do that in the Stud.io dedicated forum here: https://forum.bricklink.com/
|
To be slightly more specific, in the parts subforum:
https://forum.bricklink.com/viewforum.php?f=6
after you have read the Parts FAQ at:
https://forum.bricklink.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6368
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | May 9, 2022 01:35 | | Subject: | Re: A place for Stud.io part requests... | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, HGProductions writes:
| | All that I am suggesting for this is that I think it would be nice if there
was a tab in Stud.io to request new parts to be added in upcoming updates. I
don't know how plausible or logical this request is, or if I just accidentally
suggested something that is way too big or hard to do.
Thanks,
HGProductions
|
You can do that in the Stud.io dedicated forum here: https://forum.bricklink.com/
|
|
| Author: | HGProductions | | Posted: | May 8, 2022 21:15 | | Subject: | A place for Stud.io part requests... | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| All that I am suggesting for this is that I think it would be nice if there
was a tab in Stud.io to request new parts to be added in upcoming updates. I
don't know how plausible or logical this request is, or if I just accidentally
suggested something that is way too big or hard to do.
Thanks,
HGProductions
|
|
| Author: | wildchicken13 | | Posted: | May 8, 2022 15:54 | | Subject: | Re: Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| | I'd like to see (knowing this will probably take some time!) the ability
for a wanted list to store multiple copies of the same model within the one wanted
list.
I have a bunch of rolling stock that are all copies of the same model. Rather
than having multiple wanted lists or a single wanted list with multiples of the
parts (e.g. 16 of a part for 4 copies of 4 parts each), it might be nicer to
manage as a bunch of copies of the same model within the wanted list.
This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go, but would allow me also to know when one copy is fully
ready to build even if I haven't got parts for *all* copies (so I can start
building that one while waiting for other orders to arrive).
Best regards,
-J
|
Perhaps I am not understanding, but using the "Quantity" button at the top of
the page, you can multiply a wanted list by a constant factor. That way, you
can maintain a single wanted list for multiple copies of an item. I often do
this when I am building multiple copies of the same MOC.
|
|
|
| Author: | Greenbutterfly | | Posted: | May 8, 2022 08:59 | | Subject: | Re: Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Llewyn writes:
| | In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| | This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go
|
I assume you're already aware, but you can run Buy All on multiple lists
- select it from one list, then on the results page check the others lists you
want and hit Apply to update the results.
To me, it seems that what you're suggesting would be way too niche to be
a worthwhile use of BL's limited development resource.
|
That works OK for me if your lists are significantly different. What I've
encountered with that mechanism trying to buy multiple copies of the one model
in the same purchase was that it didn't combine well and ended up only giving
me parts-to-purchase-count for one model, not all of them.
Now, that was a while ago when I used it and maybe it was broken at the time
I used it, but what I've done since is to buy one and then simply increase
the amounts in the cart based on the other lists and what's available and
needed... but it's a rather manual process that I'd prefer to avoid.
|
|
| Author: | Sadler_Bricks | | Posted: | May 8, 2022 05:30 | | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Not that i have noticed vut would be a pretty nifty option.
Sadler_bricks
|
|
| Author: | kzinti | | Posted: | May 5, 2022 14:54 | | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mattkaupke writes:
| | Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
As there is no BL message that accompanies it and I don't get a notification
in the page header, the only way I ever see them is if I happen to open whatever
page it is that finally shows the payment due notification. It's not a page
I open often - the profile maybe? I stumbled upon it this morning only to realize
I hadn't paid my April fees.
Why can't I set it to auto charge my Paypal account or credit card upon receipt
of the invoice? Or is there a way to do this? Or maybe at least to get a message
in BL messages when an invoice is issued so I get a flag on the header?
|
Not currently, but you could always pre-pay for a while. Figure your annual sales
charges and pay that much at the first billing. Should be running on credit until
end of the year.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/mystore/fee.page
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | May 5, 2022 13:32 | | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mattkaupke writes:
| | Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
|
You receive an e-mail.
You can set up your favorite Calendar app (Thunderbird here).
Or program your wife to take care of it
|
|
|
| Author: | psusaxman2000 | | Posted: | May 5, 2022 13:10 | | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mattkaupke writes:
| | Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
As there is no BL message that accompanies it and I don't get a notification
in the page header, the only way I ever see them is if I happen to open whatever
page it is that finally shows the payment due notification. It's not a page
I open often - the profile maybe? I stumbled upon it this morning only to realize
I hadn't paid my April fees.
Why can't I set it to auto charge my Paypal account or credit card upon receipt
of the invoice? Or is there a way to do this? Or maybe at least to get a message
in BL messages when an invoice is issued so I get a flag on the header?
|
I get an email every month when I have fees do with the subject "Your Bricklink
Invoice for ". Additionally when you go to your "My Store", there
is a big banner that shows up. Maybe you have a filter the is blocking the emails?
|
|
| Author: | mattkaupke | | Posted: | May 5, 2022 13:03 | | Subject: | Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | | Viewed: | 140 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
As there is no BL message that accompanies it and I don't get a notification
in the page header, the only way I ever see them is if I happen to open whatever
page it is that finally shows the payment due notification. It's not a page
I open often - the profile maybe? I stumbled upon it this morning only to realize
I hadn't paid my April fees.
Why can't I set it to auto charge my Paypal account or credit card upon receipt
of the invoice? Or is there a way to do this? Or maybe at least to get a message
in BL messages when an invoice is issued so I get a flag on the header?
|
|
| Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 15:21 | | Subject: | Re: Wantedlist size should be choosen by us | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, tec writes:
| | I suggest we will benefit from a simple settings which commands the on-screen
size (25,50 or 100,200) of our wanted lists.
Much like we have settings to control search results size (50,100,200...) in
current settings.
|
This?
|
YES but in settings https://www.bricklink.com/v2/settings/pref_settings.page
so we can assign a default size for ALL wantedlists we open everyday
|
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 09:44 | | Subject: | Re: Wantedlist size should be choosen by us | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, tec writes:
| | I suggest we will benefit from a simple settings which commands the on-screen
size (25,50 or 100,200) of our wanted lists.
Much like we have settings to control search results size (50,100,200...) in
current settings.
|
This?
|
|
| Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 09:27 | | Subject: | Wantedlist size should be choosen by us | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I suggest we will benefit from a simple settings which commands the on-screen
size (25,50 or 100,200) of our wanted lists.
Much like we have settings to control search results size (50,100,200...) in
current settings.
|
|
| Author: | pollie1213 | | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 05:34 | | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| No, I do not agree.
What you describe below can be set on Paid payment status. If an order is PAID
you cannot add to it. Because we do this on Order status now, does not mean it
is the right way.
It is not that you cannot add to the order because the seller already packed
it, you cannot add to the order because the order is Paid for. (therefore the
block should be on payment status, not order status)
In a similar way, if you did not pay for the order, and payment status is pending,
but seller already Packed your order, you also cannot add to it. But now the
block is on the Order status.
In my opinion these are 2 different situations, where Bricklink now "misuses"
the order status for a payment status change.
In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | | | I as a seller find it extremly anoying that my order status is set to Paid, and
that I cannot set it to Pending or processing without switching all kind of order
status around.
Payment and Order status are 2 different things.
|
Yes but no...
If an Order is Paid it must be automatically Packed (or such closed status),
so the buyer cannot add to it, and the seller cannot remove items for example.
But if FULLY refunded, it should retrieve either Pending or such.
In short, payment and order status are linked somewhere.
It's more or less how it works right now.
|
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 09:09 | | Subject: | Re: After posting feedback "Go Back" Button | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| | In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| | Had no idea you posted about this till I randomly saw it on my activity page
yesterday. Still does not work in Chrome for me.
In Suggestions, Admin_Jaclyn writes:
| | Hi randyipp,
Thanks for reporting this issue! I have marked this suggestion as implemented
since a fix was released this morning. Please let us know if you are still experiencing
a problem.
Thanks again!
-Jaclyn
BrickLink Admin Team
In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| | Please fix this "go back" button to load the orders page not actually go back
a page. This requires me to hit refresh in order to see what order needs feedback
next. It's not an issue when there are only 1 or 2 but more than that and
it can get a little annoying.
This issue was observed on Chrome, it may react differently on other browsers,
if so I would love to hear about which ones if the button works!
Thanks!
|
|
|
Still does not work in IE11 either.
|
Also doesn't work in Edge.
Admins, please re-open this because whatever the fix was, it appears to be long
gone.
Best regards,
-J
|
Agreed! I've been working around it for so long, I think I would be confused
if it started working.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | Llewyn | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 08:46 | | Subject: | Re: Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| | This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go
|
I assume you're already aware, but you can run Buy All on multiple lists
- select it from one list, then on the results page check the others lists you
want and hit Apply to update the results.
To me, it seems that what you're suggesting would be way too niche to be
a worthwhile use of BL's limited development resource.
|
|
| Author: | Greenbutterfly | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 04:41 | | Subject: | Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I'd like to see (knowing this will probably take some time!) the ability
for a wanted list to store multiple copies of the same model within the one wanted
list.
I have a bunch of rolling stock that are all copies of the same model. Rather
than having multiple wanted lists or a single wanted list with multiples of the
parts (e.g. 16 of a part for 4 copies of 4 parts each), it might be nicer to
manage as a bunch of copies of the same model within the wanted list.
This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go, but would allow me also to know when one copy is fully
ready to build even if I haven't got parts for *all* copies (so I can start
building that one while waiting for other orders to arrive).
Best regards,
-J
|
|
| Author: | Greenbutterfly | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 04:33 | | Subject: | Reset wanted list quantity to 0 | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I'd like the wanted list quantity that can be applied to be allowed to be
0.
I am in the process of building multiple copies of the same sets of rolling stock.
I have one wanted list of each from when I first uploaded them (to verify that
the build would work IRL) and now that I've done that I want to build 4 or
5 more of each.
I'm making each copy a separate wanted list for my own management (so once
I've got all the parts for one I can start building it while more parts arrive).
Rather than uploading from the studio file each time (which is a lengthy process
for some of these models due to their size), I thought I'd simply copy the
existing wanted list. However, they've all got the quantity set to full and
the mechanism to reset doesn't allow it to go to 0; the message says it must
be positive.
Thanks and best regards,
-J
|
|
| Author: | Greenbutterfly | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 04:28 | | Subject: | Re: After posting feedback "Go Back" Button | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| | Had no idea you posted about this till I randomly saw it on my activity page
yesterday. Still does not work in Chrome for me.
In Suggestions, Admin_Jaclyn writes:
| | Hi randyipp,
Thanks for reporting this issue! I have marked this suggestion as implemented
since a fix was released this morning. Please let us know if you are still experiencing
a problem.
Thanks again!
-Jaclyn
BrickLink Admin Team
In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| | Please fix this "go back" button to load the orders page not actually go back
a page. This requires me to hit refresh in order to see what order needs feedback
next. It's not an issue when there are only 1 or 2 but more than that and
it can get a little annoying.
This issue was observed on Chrome, it may react differently on other browsers,
if so I would love to hear about which ones if the button works!
Thanks!
|
|
|
Still does not work in IE11 either.
|
Also doesn't work in Edge.
Admins, please re-open this because whatever the fix was, it appears to be long
gone.
Best regards,
-J
|
|
| Author: | sydneybrickemp | | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 20:17 | | Subject: | New User Tutorial HELP HELP HELP | | Viewed: | 104 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| The current New User Tutorial links to a VERY OLD uTube Video and was last updated
in 2013.
I‘m no content creator but surely someone within Bricklink can solve this dilemma.
The home page looks completely different now and it’s about time that the site
made things current and easy to follow for new users.
The best way to drive sales to the platform is through education. Introduce people
and teach them how to use it.
Win/Win sales generate fee revenue.
Just spent hours scouring uTube for Bricklink Tutorials and it’s a mess videos
are 10min to 40min in length.
Most tutorials are too long and/or become information overload.
The site needs a series of short, easy to follow video tutorials split into categories
for BUYERS and SELLERS example:
1. How to register an account (the number of people that can’t manage this simple
set would blow your mind, so many people get stuck and give up entirely and move
on to eBay or Brickowl)
2. How to navigate the site
3. How to create a wanted list
4. How to place an order
5. How to request a quote
6. How to request an invoice
Similar tutorials for sellers.
Please HELP - ANYONE?
Sydney Brick Emporium
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 11:22 | | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | I as a seller find it extremly anoying that my order status is set to Paid, and
that I cannot set it to Pending or processing without switching all kind of order
status around.
Payment and Order status are 2 different things.
|
Yes but no...
If an Order is Paid it must be automatically Packed (or such closed status),
so the buyer cannot add to it, and the seller cannot remove items for example.
But if FULLY refunded, it should retrieve either Pending or such.
In short, payment and order status are linked somewhere.
It's more or less how it works right now.
|
|
| Author: | pollie1213 | | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 10:54 | | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| The problem is not that a Seller has too many statusses to choose from. The problem
is that a Payment status is used by BL within the Order status.
Order Status should be:
Pending
Processing
Processed or Packed
Shipped
Completed (if you like)
Returned
Cancelled
Payment status:
Pending
Sent
Paid or Payment received
Bounced
(Partially) Refunded
If the order was Paid through onsite Payment that should result in Paid in the
Payment Status.
Order status can then still be Pending, as I as a seller have not started processing
the order yet.
NSS should be based upon Payment status, not Order status.
I as a seller find it extremly anoying that my order status is set to Paid, and
that I cannot set it to Pending or processing without switching all kind of order
status around.
Payment and Order status are 2 different things.
In Suggestions, mbryson1 writes:
| | From the perspective of a very new buyer, there are too many status options available
to sellers.
In my situation, I instantly paid for an order. After a week, the seller updated
the order status from "paid" to "processing." As a result, I am unable to submit
a NSS complaint until 1 week after the seller updated the order status, even
though there has been no material change and the only action to date is my payment.
(And yes, I did reach out to the seller, but never received a response).
There is still 1 more day before the 2nd week expires, and the seller will have
the opportunity to use another of the many status options available to delay
the NSS complaint another week. I imagine this could continue and prohibit me
from ever initiating the NSS process.
My suggestion is that BrickLink change this functionality so that once an order
is "paid" a seller cannot update the status to earlier in the timeline. The
only options available after "paid" should be "packed" and "shipped." There
should be no reason for an order to be "processing," which indicates the seller
is creating an invoice, after the order has been paid.
|
|
|
| Author: | Rainbowuser | | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 10:44 | | Subject: | Include part numbers on ITEM REMOVAL REQUESTS | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Would it be possible for item removal requests to have the part number listed
with the part to locate and insure correct part is being either deleted or adjusted
quantity......from the seller's perspective it would be helpful and should
only be a minor update I would think...thanks!
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2022 09:46 | | Subject: | Re: suggest solution for counterpart of self | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| | In Suggestions, tec writes:
I actually don't understand why the pulley, alone, would be listed as a counterpart.
The assembly is the counterpart.
|
Let’s look how it works for minifigure parts: the results is the set the part
appears in and the whole minifigure it appears in. So, you get the same set
twice, which skews the quantities¹, but at least you know that it came in a minifigure.
E.g.:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=2531&colorID=74&in=A
(¹ That part in Trans-Medium Blue is said to appear (“be known”) twice but there’s
actually only one in the set.)
There’s more and more big assemblies in Counterparts that are minifigs-but-not-minifigs
(so, not just wheel + tyre or part + sticker) and, IIUC, there’s a plan to harmonize
that (those assemblies and the minifigs). This suggestion would be a good step
toward that harmonization.
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2022 08:51 | | Subject: | Re: suggest solution for counterpart of self | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, tec writes:
I actually don't understand why the pulley, alone, would be listed as a counterpart.
The assembly is the counterpart.
|
|
| Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2022 08:38 | | Subject: | suggest solution for counterpart of self | | Viewed: | 86 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| When searching for SOME color of parts, we often find things that are counterparts
of themselves, and not real other parts that can fit into the role.
look at that:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=4185&colorID=5&in=A
An experienced fellow told me it's because the part be inside an assembly.
I suggest this should be more clearly stated.
I suggest:
a) a new section at the end (e.g after "appears as regular" "appears as extra"
"appears as counterpart") named "APPEARS INSIDE ASSEMBLIES"
b) enrich the text, from "2 in 1234-1(inv)"
"2 as assembly 4158c01(inv) in 1234-1(inv)"
giving us a way to see the assembly, plus go into its contents.
|
|
| Author: | benelson | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2022 15:39 | | Subject: | Re: Wanted List Sort Alphabetical & Filter/Search | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| I think this is an older message, but I wanted to give it a thumbs up after finding
it recently, while searching how to set the default Wanted List order to alphabetical.
(Which doesn't seem like an option currently.) I'm relatively new to
Bricklink, and while many of its quirks are endearing, it's kind of maddening
to have to re-sort the main Wanted List page to alphabetical every single time
I toggle back and forth to it. In the way that I use my Wanted Lists, the date
created is pretty much irrelevant. Thanks!
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 11:13 | | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WildBricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
Ha! I should have known that Nita Rae had already suggested it.
|
You meant of course the not as attractive or smart as her ~ popsicle
|
| Author: | WildBricks | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 10:02 | | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
Ha! I should have known that Nita Rae had already suggested it.
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 09:37 | | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WildBricks writes:
| | With as many messages and questions as are flying across the forum, why hasn't
a VAT specific Topic Description been added?
|
Then you'll need a "Sales Tax" one also - but maybe it exists, didn't
check.
Otherwise simply a general "Taxes" one?
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 08:23 | | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WildBricks writes:
| | With as many messages and questions as are flying across the forum, why hasn't
a VAT specific Topic Description been added?
|
A good idea https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1244764
|
| Author: | WildBricks | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 08:19 | | Subject: | Please add a Topic Description for VAT | | Viewed: | 141 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Implemented | |
|
| With as many messages and questions as are flying across the forum, why hasn't
a VAT specific Topic Description been added?
|
| Author: | wildchicken13 | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2022 12:18 | | Subject: | Re: Bricklink Discord | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, GuglMajo writes:
| | In Suggestions, TwinSooBricks writes:
| | I recently upgraded the discord channel to add a few new channels, were still
looking for members to make this server a success.
Please come on over and join us we don't bite.. hard
https://discord.gg/xhTDz3s
|
doesn't really work
|
https://discord.gg/WfuCBhPA
|
| Author: | GuglMajo | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2022 12:15 | | Subject: | Re: Bricklink Discord | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TwinSooBricks writes:
| | I recently upgraded the discord channel to add a few new channels, were still
looking for members to make this server a success.
Please come on over and join us we don't bite.. hard
https://discord.gg/xhTDz3s
|
doesn't really work
|
|
| Author: | Vosblokjes | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2022 01:22 | | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mbryson1 writes:
| | From the perspective of a very new buyer, there are too many status options available
to sellers.
In my situation, I instantly paid for an order. After a week, the seller updated
the order status from "paid" to "processing." As a result, I am unable to submit
a NSS complaint until 1 week after the seller updated the order status, even
though there has been no material change and the only action to date is my payment.
(And yes, I did reach out to the seller, but never received a response).
There is still 1 more day before the 2nd week expires, and the seller will have
the opportunity to use another of the many status options available to delay
the NSS complaint another week. I imagine this could continue and prohibit me
from ever initiating the NSS process.
My suggestion is that BrickLink change this functionality so that once an order
is "paid" a seller cannot update the status to earlier in the timeline. The
only options available after "paid" should be "packed" and "shipped." There
should be no reason for an order to be "processing," which indicates the seller
is creating an invoice, after the order has been paid.
|
Are you sure about this?
Help page says "At least 7 days have passed from the order submission date (since
the order was last submitted or updated)."
And altering a status is not the same as updating an order.
So I think you should still be able to file the NSS at this moment.
|
|
| Author: | mbryson1 | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2022 18:22 | | Subject: | Too many status options available to sellers | | Viewed: | 161 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| From the perspective of a very new buyer, there are too many status options available
to sellers.
In my situation, I instantly paid for an order. After a week, the seller updated
the order status from "paid" to "processing." As a result, I am unable to submit
a NSS complaint until 1 week after the seller updated the order status, even
though there has been no material change and the only action to date is my payment.
(And yes, I did reach out to the seller, but never received a response).
There is still 1 more day before the 2nd week expires, and the seller will have
the opportunity to use another of the many status options available to delay
the NSS complaint another week. I imagine this could continue and prohibit me
from ever initiating the NSS process.
My suggestion is that BrickLink change this functionality so that once an order
is "paid" a seller cannot update the status to earlier in the timeline. The
only options available after "paid" should be "packed" and "shipped." There
should be no reason for an order to be "processing," which indicates the seller
is creating an invoice, after the order has been paid.
|
|
| Author: | JediMindbrix | | Posted: | Apr 14, 2022 20:52 | | Subject: | Display, filter and sort by locality / state | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Please make it easier to find local resellers by displaying the state abbreviation
in search results, and if possible add a search filter for states and provinces
of North America. For world wide, maybe add ability to sort by closest to your
post code. This would help on larger sets to reduce shipping costs and support
local businesses.
|
|
| Author: | Rusky456 | | Posted: | Apr 13, 2022 18:25 | | Subject: | Re: Wanted list default options | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, beaverbrick writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rusky456 writes:
| | Please, please, please give us an option to select a default "Sort By" in the
Wanted Lists.
My preference is "Alphabetical" and I note others have asked for this before.
The reverting to "Newest" every time you leave and return to the page is really
tiresome.
For such a useful and clever website I can't believe this is not a do-able
thing.
Does anybody read these ?
|
You can sort of do it...
Open your Wanted List.
Change the sort order.
Hit the Edit button (in the group of buttons next to search bar).
Then hit the Save button.
Note: this will change the sort order for all your Wanted Lists.
|
I think OP is talking about the order of the list of WLs, not the items
inside the WLs themselves.
|
Thanks beaverbrick , you taught me a new trick.
SylvainsLS is correct, I am referring to the order of the Wanted Lists themselves
I have about 150 incomplete sets as wanted lists- with names beginning with their
set numbers. So an alphabetical order is the easiest for me when jumping around
the list.
Thank you for your replies.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 13, 2022 05:08 | | Subject: | Re: Wanted list default options | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, beaverbrick writes:
| | In Suggestions, Rusky456 writes:
| | Please, please, please give us an option to select a default "Sort By" in the
Wanted Lists.
My preference is "Alphabetical" and I note others have asked for this before.
The reverting to "Newest" every time you leave and return to the page is really
tiresome.
For such a useful and clever website I can't believe this is not a do-able
thing.
Does anybody read these ?
|
You can sort of do it...
Open your Wanted List.
Change the sort order.
Hit the Edit button (in the group of buttons next to search bar).
Then hit the Save button.
Note: this will change the sort order for all your Wanted Lists.
|
I think OP is talking about the order of the list of WLs, not the items
inside the WLs themselves.
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
USA, Washington
United Kingdom, England
Netherlands, Utrecht
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
South Africa, Western Cape
Australia, South Australia
France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
Italy, Marche
New Zealand, Waikato