| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Kenopolis | Posted: | May 4, 2020 18:34 | Subject: | Wanted List Sort By Default | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Currently the wanted list "SORT BY" defaults to "Newest."
Could there be a way to remember the last choice?
Or change the default setting for the user?
I prefer to see it in alphabetical order, because it makes it faster to find
what I'm looking for. Currently I have to change it every time, and wait
for the page to reload.
Thanks!
|
|
Author: | pete_brick | Posted: | May 4, 2020 16:26 | Subject: | Part Lists | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I expect you have heard about the inaccuracies of part lists before.
Since bricklink is now part of Lego, perhaps the bricklink part lists for sets
cold be compared with the Lego lists and corrected as necessary. I expect most
of this could be done with a computer program although it would be nice if one
could get accurate part lists for all those really old sets that one can find
in a friend's great grandfather's attic.
Thank you.
|
|
Author: | pete_brick | Posted: | May 4, 2020 16:20 | Subject: | Set Finder | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| There is an app online called "Set Finder" (http://www.spoofdata.com/setfinder/?id1=6144805)
which allows the user to enter the part number for several parts then the app
will suggest sets that contain those parts. It is not very user friendly and
part numbers are difficult to determine. The part numbers need to be complete
with colour code (sensible for logically reducing the number of possible sets)
but the numbering systems are not very well explained. In addition there are
different numbers for similar parts e.g. "2 x 4 Brick Red" has at least two different
numbers. I think there is an overlap between parts in older sets that have a
different number than newer sets but it can be quite frustrating.
Perhaps this is a function in bricklink which I have not yet discovered. I rarely
Use "Part Out" so perhaps it is there or if not perhaps that would be a good
place to add the "Set Finder " function.
Thank you.
|
|
Author: | brickskipper | Posted: | May 4, 2020 16:03 | Subject: | Junior Accounts? | Viewed: | 174 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hi,
According to BL's TOS you must be of legal age or 18 at least to register.
That is completely understandable from the buying/selling point of view.
But what about a junior account without the privileges to buy or sell?
Kids could browse the catalog, make wanted lists - maybe "publish" them or somehow
share them with "proper" users (e.g. parents) and get used to the platform.
This would lead younger users to BL without being "illegal" and without the chance
to make "bogus" orders or other interference with the "business" on this site.
Just an idea as my daughter is building a lot of stuff in Studio and would like
to create her own wanted lists in BL and is generally interested in this site.
Jan
|
|
Author: | brickskipper | Posted: | May 4, 2020 15:51 | Subject: | Make status change more flexible again | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hi,
today I received payment for two orders in "ready" status. So I went packing
them and after that I drove them to the post office right away. Upon my return
I wanted to set these orders directly to shipped. - Not possible - had to set
them to packed first, save, and then to shipped and save again. Just a minor
issue compared to other ones already mentioned but still annoying.
The orders would have been in "packed" for less than 15 minutes. Why make this
mandantory?
Jan
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|