Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | shawnxyz  | | Posted: | Jun 16, 2017 12:46 | | Subject: | Show a total on "Orders" Page? | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I'd like to know what the sum of all my 15 current orders are - so I'd
like a "total" section on the orders page.
|
| Author: | bb217310 | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2017 10:32 | | Subject: | Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| I prefer clasic wanted list.
Thanks. If you can show two options, is beetter.
|
 |
| Author: | bb69656 | | Posted: | Jun 14, 2017 17:50 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - dec. hip&leg restict. | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:
| | Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Guidelines for adding items to the catalog:", Section 8, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
"Decorated Minifig Hips and Legs - Submission of entries for the separate component
parts of a printed Minifig, Legs Assembly item is currently discouraged except
under certain circumstances. Those are 1) an administrative judgment that the
minifig involved is significant in some way, and 2) the general design of the
minifig involved is produced in both printed and unprinted legs assembly versions."
Please do this so that all decorated hips and legs may be added and sold individually
on bricklink without restriction.
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
Thank you for your consideration,
Andy
|
I voted yes bc some hips are good for customs but legs too ornate, ie this is
a belt on hips.
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 14:21 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WoutR writes:
| | Having the images in the catalog is one thing, creating inventories and selling
them is something else.
|
Agreed. I'm definitely for having and being able to add to the Unreleased
Sets section, so I support that part of the suggestion. I question the wisdom,
however, of adding inventories for unreleased sets.
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 14:15 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, StormChaser writes:
| | In Suggestions, WoutR writes:
| | If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets?
|
I don't believe anyone wants to pretend they were official sets, but the
Unreleased Sets section of the BrickLink catalog is very useful since many of
them have official LEGO set images:
|
Having the images in the catalog is one thing, creating inventories and selling
them is something else.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 14:07 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WoutR writes:
| | If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets?
|
I don't believe anyone wants to pretend they were official sets, but the
Unreleased Sets section of the BrickLink catalog is very useful since many of
them have official LEGO set images:
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 13:58 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:
| | In Suggestions, novabrick writes:
| | In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:
| | Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Items that should not be added to the catalog:", Section 1, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
"Also, do not submit items which have been verified as never released, even if
a picture is available."
There is already a large list of unreleased sets on bricklink. There is no reason
why more should not be allowed to be added, so that bricklink can remain the
most complete Lego database. (Otherwise, what's the point to even having
the current list???)
And there is no reason why people should not be able to buy and sell these sets
even if the boxes and instructions were not officially released (since many of
these sets can be fully made from the released pieces).
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
Thank you for your consideration,
Andy
|
This does exist yet:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N
or am I missing something?
Christian
novabrick-team
|
Yes, the catalog adminstrators refuse to add more sets to that category when
I have submitted them multiple times. The submission is immediately deleted.
Also, I am not allowed to sell sets in the unreleased category, even if all of
the parts are available and I can make a used set to sell.
|
If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets? Maybe the only place where they belong is in the MOC
shop.
Or am I missing something here?
|
|
| Author: | LordSkylark | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 13:25 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, novabrick writes:
| | In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:
| | Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Items that should not be added to the catalog:", Section 1, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
"Also, do not submit items which have been verified as never released, even if
a picture is available."
There is already a large list of unreleased sets on bricklink. There is no reason
why more should not be allowed to be added, so that bricklink can remain the
most complete Lego database. (Otherwise, what's the point to even having
the current list???)
And there is no reason why people should not be able to buy and sell these sets
even if the boxes and instructions were not officially released (since many of
these sets can be fully made from the released pieces).
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
Thank you for your consideration,
Andy
|
This does exist yet:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N
or am I missing something?
Christian
novabrick-team
|
Yes, the catalog adminstrators refuse to add more sets to that category when
I have submitted them multiple times. The submission is immediately deleted.
Also, I am not allowed to sell sets in the unreleased category, even if all of
the parts are available and I can make a used set to sell.
|
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 12:07 | | Subject: | Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Are you sure? 4 are used per wing = 8 total.
Pg. 17: four are used for one wing. Then on pg. 35 it shows that you repeat
all the steps from pgs. 16-35 to build the second wing.
In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:
| | Piece 2420 (2x2 corner plate) in dark gray is in this set 8 times according to
the Bricklnk parts list, but in reality you need 16. Please fix this, so others
who want to bricklink the set don't encounter the same problem I did when
putting everything together  . Thanks!
|
|
|
| Author: | M.Boss | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 12:03 | | Subject: | Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:
| | Piece 2420 (2x2 corner plate) in dark gray is in this set 8 times according to
the Bricklnk parts list, but in reality you need 16. Please fix this, so others
who want to bricklink the set don't encounter the same problem I did when
putting everything together . Thanks!
|
Use the link below for Inventory changes, the suggestions topic is meant for
improving the website.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChange.asp?itemType=S
M.Boss
|
|
| Author: | TomVanhaelen | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 11:32 | | Subject: | Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Piece 2420 (2x2 corner plate) in dark gray is in this set 8 times according to
the Bricklnk parts list, but in reality you need 16. Please fix this, so others
who want to bricklink the set don't encounter the same problem I did when
putting everything together . Thanks!
|
|
| Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 02:50 | | Subject: | Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:
| | Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Items that should not be added to the catalog:", Section 1, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
"Also, do not submit items which have been verified as never released, even if
a picture is available."
There is already a large list of unreleased sets on bricklink. There is no reason
why more should not be allowed to be added, so that bricklink can remain the
most complete Lego database. (Otherwise, what's the point to even having
the current list???)
And there is no reason why people should not be able to buy and sell these sets
even if the boxes and instructions were not officially released (since many of
these sets can be fully made from the released pieces).
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
Thank you for your consideration,
Andy
|
This does exist yet:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N
or am I missing something?
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| Author: | LordSkylark | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 18:00 | | Subject: | Bionicle+Hero Factory+Large Figure Category | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Please combine the catalog categories on one category:
Bionicle
Hero Factory
Large Figure Part
(and even a few bionicles parts that are for some reason stuck in the technic
category when they are used for nothing other than bionicles).
Then, sub-divide that category into several smaller categories such as:
Head, Mask, Torso, Limb, Foot, etc.
There is no reason to have these three categories. Large amounts of a part found
in one category is used by another. For example, some Hero Factory parts are
used in more bionicle figures than Hero Factory. And wading through any of those
three categories even in their current state in order to find something is almost
ridiculous.
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
|
|
| Author: | LordSkylark | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 17:48 | | Subject: | Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr. | | Viewed: | 109 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Items that should not be added to the catalog:", Section 1, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
"Also, do not submit items which have been verified as never released, even if
a picture is available."
There is already a large list of unreleased sets on bricklink. There is no reason
why more should not be allowed to be added, so that bricklink can remain the
most complete Lego database. (Otherwise, what's the point to even having
the current list???)
And there is no reason why people should not be able to buy and sell these sets
even if the boxes and instructions were not officially released (since many of
these sets can be fully made from the released pieces).
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
Thank you for your consideration,
Andy
|
|
| Author: | LordSkylark | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 17:47 | | Subject: | Remove catalog policy - dec. hip&leg restict. | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Guidelines for adding items to the catalog:", Section 8, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71
"Decorated Minifig Hips and Legs - Submission of entries for the separate component
parts of a printed Minifig, Legs Assembly item is currently discouraged except
under certain circumstances. Those are 1) an administrative judgment that the
minifig involved is significant in some way, and 2) the general design of the
minifig involved is produced in both printed and unprinted legs assembly versions."
Please do this so that all decorated hips and legs may be added and sold individually
on bricklink without restriction.
(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)
Thank you for your consideration,
Andy
|
|
| Author: | Bionicleseller | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 14:18 | | Subject: | Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Please Please Please leave up the old version! I use it all the time and the
new version is nowhere near as useful. It doesn't even work at all! I have
tried to figure out why but I have no idea and I can't imagine other people
who are new to the site would be having an easier time using it either.
I have a suggestion. BrickLink should have all of the users vote on what they
think should be done. It's just my opinion, but I think you guys would be
surprised to see how many people really don't like the new version and want
to stick with the classic version.
|
|
| Author: | randyipp | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 13:54 | | Subject: | Re: Keep history of Splash page | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | Some sellers don't have anything listed in the terms and conditions and nothing
listed in thes shipping section. Instead everything is posted in their splash
page. This gives those sellers the ability to change their terms and shipping
rates at anytime without the buyer being able to go back and look at the terms/shipping
when they made their purchase.
The only method to prove what the terms were is to make a screenshot of the splash
page when the purchase is made. Then the burden of proof is on the buyer to
prove that the screenshot was the terms/shipping policy when the purchase was
made.
Please start keeping a history of the splash page. For sellers that externally
host their splash page maybe and automatic daily screenshot can be captured and
retained as the terms/shipping policy for the day.
|
Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.
|
Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.
If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.
|
You should inform those sellers that they should state fees etc on their Terms
page.
All additional fees other than shipping and insurance must be stated here.
Please keep your terms clear and to the point. Your terms are also displayed
to a buyer on checkout prior to placing an order.
|
Yes this seems like a poor way to deal with shipping/terms when there is no history
retained. Seems to me that none of their terms should be enforceable with the
way they have configured their store.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 13:47 | | Subject: | Re: Keep history of Splash page | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | Some sellers don't have anything listed in the terms and conditions and nothing
listed in thes shipping section. Instead everything is posted in their splash
page. This gives those sellers the ability to change their terms and shipping
rates at anytime without the buyer being able to go back and look at the terms/shipping
when they made their purchase.
The only method to prove what the terms were is to make a screenshot of the splash
page when the purchase is made. Then the burden of proof is on the buyer to
prove that the screenshot was the terms/shipping policy when the purchase was
made.
Please start keeping a history of the splash page. For sellers that externally
host their splash page maybe and automatic daily screenshot can be captured and
retained as the terms/shipping policy for the day.
|
Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.
|
Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.
If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.
|
You should inform those sellers that they should state fees etc on their Terms
page.
All additional fees other than shipping and insurance must be stated here.
Please keep your terms clear and to the point. Your terms are also displayed
to a buyer on checkout prior to placing an order.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 13:38 | | Subject: | Re: Keep history of Splash page | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | […]
| | Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.
|
Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.
If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.
|
Sorry, when I say “don’t take… as proof,” I’m thinking “BL admins ought not to
take… as proof.”
If there’s a problem, only the terms page should serve as proof. If the seller
has only given their policies in their splash page, tough luck, the buyer is
right.
|
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 12:33 | | Subject: | Re: Keep history of Splash page | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | Some sellers don't have anything listed in the terms and conditions and nothing
listed in thes shipping section. Instead everything is posted in their splash
page. This gives those sellers the ability to change their terms and shipping
rates at anytime without the buyer being able to go back and look at the terms/shipping
when they made their purchase.
The only method to prove what the terms were is to make a screenshot of the splash
page when the purchase is made. Then the burden of proof is on the buyer to
prove that the screenshot was the terms/shipping policy when the purchase was
made.
Please start keeping a history of the splash page. For sellers that externally
host their splash page maybe and automatic daily screenshot can be captured and
retained as the terms/shipping policy for the day.
|
Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.
|
Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.
If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.
|
|
| Author: | Lkj | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 11:45 | | Subject: | Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| So glad you haven't dropped the good, old Classic Wanted List. So much better
than the new one! Hope you've changed your minds. Please keep it!
In Administrative, Admin_Jaclyn writes:
| | Hello Everyone,
In June of last year, we introduced a new Wanted List upgrade. This upgrade came
with a newly-designed buying experience which focused on the necessity to compare
and plan out multiple carts at once, as well as make it easier to manage multiple
lists.
Since BrickLink's Wanted List is a core feature for most users, we currently
provide the classic version for members to use as a backup in case there are
glitches with the new version. This is intended to be a temporary solution.
The classic version of the Wanted List feature will become unavailable on
June 5, 2017. At this point, we have ensured that the new version of the
Wanted List covers all desired functionality (plus more) from the classic version.
If you have any issues with the new version, please let us know as soon as possible.
Thank you for the continued support, bug reports, and helpful feedback as we
continue to roll out important changes.
Sincerely,
Jaclyn
BrickLink Customer Support
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 09:12 | | Subject: | Re: Keep history of Splash page | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Cob writes:
| | Some sellers don't have anything listed in the terms and conditions and nothing
listed in thes shipping section. Instead everything is posted in their splash
page. This gives those sellers the ability to change their terms and shipping
rates at anytime without the buyer being able to go back and look at the terms/shipping
when they made their purchase.
The only method to prove what the terms were is to make a screenshot of the splash
page when the purchase is made. Then the burden of proof is on the buyer to
prove that the screenshot was the terms/shipping policy when the purchase was
made.
Please start keeping a history of the splash page. For sellers that externally
host their splash page maybe and automatic daily screenshot can be captured and
retained as the terms/shipping policy for the day.
|
Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.
|
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2017 08:48 | | Subject: | Keep history of Splash page | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Some sellers don't have anything listed in the terms and conditions and nothing
listed in thes shipping section. Instead everything is posted in their splash
page. This gives those sellers the ability to change their terms and shipping
rates at anytime without the buyer being able to go back and look at the terms/shipping
when they made their purchase.
The only method to prove what the terms were is to make a screenshot of the splash
page when the purchase is made. Then the burden of proof is on the buyer to
prove that the screenshot was the terms/shipping policy when the purchase was
made.
Please start keeping a history of the splash page. For sellers that externally
host their splash page maybe and automatic daily screenshot can be captured and
retained as the terms/shipping policy for the day.
Thank you,
Jacob
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 10, 2017 05:42 | | Subject: | Move new pop up login screen | | Viewed: | 143 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Because the new pop up login screen pops up in the middle of the screen is it
disappears under the also popping up keyboard on my mobile phone.
Please consider moving it to the upper right, where it was before.
Thank you.
| |
| | | | In Administrative, C0lsanders_ writes:
One thing I have just noticed while logging in, is the new log in method, no
more drop-down (despite the little arrow remaining) and a new little window pops
up. but takes a good bit longer to load on my computer and/or with my not-so-great
internet. "Old" drop-down was always just about instant. But I can deal with
that.
|
|
| | | | However, there does not seem to be an equivalent for the previous "go to My BL"
or whatever it said. Requires an extra step now. Can that be added? Just one
small radio button on the dialog box...
Otherwise, great news on attempting to address scammers!
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
| | In Administrative, QA_Sheryl writes:
Hi C0lsanders_,
Sorry I forgot to mention that! We updated the Settings page so that you are
now able to select your default landing page after logging in. There are several
options for you to choose from. Just a reminder for everyone, you can access
this page by hovering over or clicking on My BL and then clicking on Settings.
Thanks,
Sheryl
|
|
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jun 10, 2017 05:38 | | Subject: | Add more options as landing page | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
Please consider adding more landing page options as Forum etc.
Thank you.
| |
In Administrative, QA_Sheryl writes:
| |
Sorry I forgot to mention that! We updated the Settings page so that you are
now able to select your default landing page after logging in. There are several
options for you to choose from. Just a reminder for everyone, you can access
this page by hovering over or clicking on My BL and then clicking on Settings.
Thanks,
Sheryl
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
USA, Washington
Spain, Madrid
Canada, Ontario
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
Belgium, Oost-Vlaanderen
Germany, Schleswig-Holstein
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
United Kingdom, England