Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | minibricks  | | Posted: | Aug 20, 2020 12:57 | | Subject: | Re: mx1142m | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| Transparent M Modulex does exist in 1x1, 1x2, 1x4. I have all of those.
Karyn
| |
Transparent M logo may not exist, I am still hoping to find one.
|
|
| Author: | rick_holl | | Posted: | Mar 9, 2020 13:04 | | Subject: | Re: 8 x 8 dish | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In Catalog, rick_holl writes:
| | Hi,
Anyone knows what finish the 8 x 8 DBG dish that is included in 75159 death star
comes into? There seems to be 2 variants of finish on this one (smooth and shiny)
|
|
| Author: | Sadler_Bricks | | Posted: | Oct 10, 2019 03:37 | | Subject: | Re: mx1142m | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| Nice mix here
I'm doing something similar to create a nice color grid for my store I do
3 high but yes will be harder to get all the colors I have most at the moment
Sadler_Bricks
|
 |
| Author: | maxx3001 | | Posted: | Oct 9, 2019 16:56 | | Subject: | Re: mx1142m | | Viewed: | 91 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In Modulex, yoavheskia writes:
| | Hi there.
Maybe one of the modulex experts here knows how many colours this brick have?
I have 14 colours and I know that I'm missing at list 4: mx medium blue,
mx violet, mx pink-red & mx light bluish grey.
Is there more colours I'm not aware of?
Thanks in advance,
Yoav
|
There are two different M logo bricks, the old ones and the newer ones.
There are even a few very rare colors found, like dark red and a bluish green.
See picture for the standard colors, row one are the LEGO logo bricks, the middle
are the old M logo bricks etc.
Transparent M logo may not exist, I am still hoping to find one.
2. white, light gray, black, terracotta, buff, red , orange, lemon, pastel green,
pastel blue, pink
3. Light bluish gray, charcoal, light orange, light yellow, medium blue, aqua
green, pink, violet
|
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 12:37 | | Subject: | Re: Make website mobile-friendly | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | I cannot figure out why someone would try to use Bricklink on a phone. A tablet
maybe, but even the biggest phone screens wouldn't be enough to make good
use of this site in any form.
David
|
I use my tablet to pull orders and its meh, could be better, but I've used
my phone to check prices or sell rates when in a store sometimes and its awful.
I end up just doing "lego" + "set number" + "bricklink" in google to just skip
straight to the entry. It's faster to do it that way then through the BL
site, on my old phone at least.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 12:36 | | Subject: | Re: Make website mobile-friendly | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | I cannot figure out why someone would try to use Bricklink on a phone. A tablet
maybe, but even the biggest phone screens wouldn't be enough to make good
use of this site in any form.
David
|
It depends what you are buying. If just minifigures, then a normal to larger
smart phone screen would be fine if there was a decent interface. Similarly,
if buying from an already set up wants list, a smaller screen is fine.
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 11:17 | | Subject: | Re: Make website mobile-friendly | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | I cannot figure out why someone would try to use Bricklink on a phone. A tablet
maybe, but even the biggest phone screens wouldn't be enough to make good
use of this site in any form.
David
|
Couldn't agree more. 
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | May 1, 2019 11:12 | | Subject: | Re: Make website mobile-friendly | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| I cannot figure out why someone would try to use Bricklink on a phone. A tablet
maybe, but even the biggest phone screens wouldn't be enough to make good
use of this site in any form.
David
|
|
| Author: | bb414973 | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2018 03:38 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, Speg writes:
| | The comment section is great for adding whether or not a piece if mint or has
issues. Honestly, any real universal grading system would result in a nightmare
for both buyers and sellers.
|
I understand, grading would be difficult if it was on a mandated scale, but each
store should be able to differentiate between Used (Like New), Used (Fine) and
Used (Poor), etc. Vast majority of stores don't add comments so buyers have
no idea of the quality until it's actually received.
|
|
| Author: | Addict2Brick | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2018 02:36 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| The comment section is great for adding whether or not a piece if mint or has
issues. Honestly, any real universal grading system would result in a nightmare
for both buyers and sellers.
|
|
| Author: | bb414973 | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2018 01:24 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | In General, PurpleDave writes:
| | In General, SylvainLS writes:
| | With New, you can easily part out sets into your inventory. With Used, when
you don’t know which sets the parts are from (and whether they are all there),
it’s more work.
|
Exactly. New, you part out and list an entire set all at once. Used, you track
down and list a single piece.
|
If you're parting out a new set, yes; the same doesn't hold true for
adding Pick-A-Brick to a store or other parts bought as new for the purpose of
reselling.
It's extremely obvious that you would have to find individual parts in the
catalog here when adding used parts to a store. It's been that way from
the beginning. I just don't understand why OP was getting upset with that
method. What does he expect—a BL scanner to identify used parts?
David
|
Adding a part to your BO inventory is a 3-click, same-page process once you've
found the part. I get the feeling that BL has a far more convoluted method, but
I use BrickStock and Bricksync so I wouldn't know.
But I read the OP as meaning that all used bricks are treated the same; there's
no grading built in to the system. Everything is binary, either new or used.
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2018 00:05 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, PurpleDave writes:
| | In General, SylvainLS writes:
| | With New, you can easily part out sets into your inventory. With Used, when
you don’t know which sets the parts are from (and whether they are all there),
it’s more work.
|
Exactly. New, you part out and list an entire set all at once. Used, you track
down and list a single piece.
|
If you're parting out a new set, yes; the same doesn't hold true for
adding Pick-A-Brick to a store or other parts bought as new for the purpose of
reselling.
It's extremely obvious that you would have to find individual parts in the
catalog here when adding used parts to a store. It's been that way from
the beginning. I just don't understand why OP was getting upset with that
method. What does he expect—a BL scanner to identify used parts?
David
|
|
| Author: | PurpleDave | | Posted: | Feb 28, 2018 21:36 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, SylvainLS writes:
| | With New, you can easily part out sets into your inventory. With Used, when
you don’t know which sets the parts are from (and whether they are all there),
it’s more work.
|
Exactly. New, you part out and list an entire set all at once. Used, you track
down and list a single piece. Then the next one is the same piece, but you have
to list it differently because you want to note differences in condition and
price them accordingly. The only reason I can figure that people can make any
money at all on Used is they can often get hugely undervalued lots on sites like
Craigslist or by hitting up garage sales. Or, you know, you can price it higher
than New and hope people will buy it without paying attention because "Used is
always less expensive".
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 28, 2018 21:08 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 72 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | In General, SylvainLS writes:
| | In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Problem, CheshireBricKs writes:
| | Your ability to inventory used Lego is appalling.
|
I have no idea what you mean by that. The inventories in the catalog are submitted
by users, and they're generally inventoried using new sets, not used.
|
Replace “to inventory” with “to put in your store’s inventory.”
|
That definitely changes the meaning, but it still doesn't make sense. Has
there been some change in the way parts are added to a store when they are used?
|
With New, you can easily part out sets into your inventory. With Used, when
you don’t know which sets the parts are from (and whether they are all there),
it’s more work.
I understand a lot of people use BrickStock (or similar) but sellers tools are
scarce on BL.
(And tote that I’m a buyer only  )
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Feb 28, 2018 20:52 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, SylvainLS writes:
| | In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Problem, CheshireBricKs writes:
| | Your ability to inventory used Lego is appalling.
|
I have no idea what you mean by that. The inventories in the catalog are submitted
by users, and they're generally inventoried using new sets, not used.
|
Replace “to inventory” with “to put in your store’s inventory.”
|
That definitely changes the meaning, but it still doesn't make sense. Has
there been some change in the way parts are added to a store when they are used?
David
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Feb 28, 2018 20:03 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 82 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | In Problem, CheshireBricKs writes:
| | Your ability to inventory used Lego is appalling.
|
I have no idea what you mean by that. The inventories in the catalog are submitted
by users, and they're generally inventoried using new sets, not used.
|
Replace “to inventory” with “to put in your store’s inventory.”
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Feb 28, 2018 19:50 | | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In Problem, CheshireBricKs writes:
| | Your ability to inventory used Lego is appalling.
|
I have no idea what you mean by that. The inventories in the catalog are submitted
by users, and they're generally inventoried using new sets, not used.
David
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jan 22, 2018 10:06 | | Subject: | Re: AJAX error while searching for stores | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, xenocryst writes:
| | […]
| | The Classic Wanted View By Shop still works.
|
You keep saying this in all the threads, and maybe I’m just dense, but Classic
is so inscrutable to me that it may as well also be broken.
|
(Just in case: You get Classic “By Shop” by clicking “Classic” then “By Shop”
on the menu bar in the WL page.)
It shows the list of stores ordered by the number of lots or items they have.
That’s exactly what you get on the (new) “Buy” page just after loading it (when
it works ).
What Classic doesn’t have:
1. no Auto-Select, no Easy-Buy,
2. no way to select items to look for, it’s whole WLs or nothing,
3. no way to quickly see exactly what items each store has without opening the
store,
4. no way to select a store / preselect items to buy (thus removing the items
from the list of items to look for and updating the list of stores),
5. and undoubtedly other things I don’t remember right now.
Well, at least, you still have a list of stores with items in your WL….
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jan 22, 2018 10:04 | | Subject: | Re: AJAX error while searching for stores | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, xenocryst writes:
| | In General, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, a213jf writes:
| | I am unable to place or search for any stores with my WANTED list. Everytime
I try to search for stores from my wanted list, I get an "AJAX error while searching
for stores. Check you local network." I am sure you have been getting several
complaints, this has been going on for nearly 24 hrs now for me. Looking forward
to a quick fix!
|
The Classic Wanted View By Shop still works.
|
You keep saying this in all the threads, and maybe I’m just dense, but Classic
is so inscrutable to me that it may as well also be broken.
|
The Classic view does exactly the same as the New view.
For many it can be helpful enough to know about the existence of the Classic
view.
|
|
| Author: | xenocryst | | Posted: | Jan 22, 2018 09:28 | | Subject: | Re: AJAX error while searching for stores | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Suggestions, a213jf writes:
| | I am unable to place or search for any stores with my WANTED list. Everytime
I try to search for stores from my wanted list, I get an "AJAX error while searching
for stores. Check you local network." I am sure you have been getting several
complaints, this has been going on for nearly 24 hrs now for me. Looking forward
to a quick fix!
|
The Classic Wanted View By Shop still works.
|
You keep saying this in all the threads, and maybe I’m just dense, but Classic
is so inscrutable to me that it may as well also be broken.
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Jan 22, 2018 07:31 | | Subject: | Re: AJAX error while searching for stores | | Viewed: | 121 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In Suggestions, a213jf writes:
| | I am unable to place or search for any stores with my WANTED list. Everytime
I try to search for stores from my wanted list, I get an "AJAX error while searching
for stores. Check you local network." I am sure you have been getting several
complaints, this has been going on for nearly 24 hrs now for me. Looking forward
to a quick fix!
|
The Classic Wanted View By Shop still works.
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Dec 18, 2017 21:53 | | Subject: | Re: 'blservice@bricklink.com' as the sending addr | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In Suggestions, kwmcmillan writes:
| | When I receive messages from members that have been generated via the Contact
Form, my instinct is to hit the 'reply' button and then proceed providing
a response to whatever question has been posed. THis is the way every other email
or messaging system I have ever encountered works.
But doing so yields an unpleasant surprise: my response is sent to a black hole
instead of the actual sending party.
I (now) know that the member address can be found in the body of the email, but
two things:
1 - Would I ever really want to reply to 'blservice@bricklink.com'? (No)
2 - Replying on a mobile device where copying text segments (the email address)
isn't very easy makes this situation worse
I can't think of any good reason that the sending member's address ISN'T
the one provided upon receipt and would respectfully suggest that it be changed.
k.
|
It USED to work like you mention. It's been less than a year that it's
been broken.
David
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Oct 22, 2017 00:43 | | Subject: | Re: Clearing should be the same as Paid | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, tEoS writes:
| | It's for split payment status from order status. See picture (It's actually
a gold color text):
In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.
David
|
|
Interesting...
I've never used that before, but it's good to know.
Thanks,
David
|
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Oct 21, 2017 23:38 | | Subject: | Re: Clearing should be the same as Paid | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| It's for split payment status from order status. See picture (It's actually
a gold color text):
In General, crazylegoman writes:
| | I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.
David
|
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Oct 21, 2017 23:30 | | Subject: | Re: Clearing should be the same as Paid | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | General | |
|
| I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.
David
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
USA, Alaska
Canada, Quebec
Netherlands, Utrecht
United Kingdom, England
Belgium, Flemish Brabant
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
