Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: Description standardization note - BrickCompulsion (2973) | I totally support this change Consistency is key Maybe search and change all you can find and then put it out there on here for messages about items missed. That’s if the sql [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 9, 2020, to Catalog) |
Re: Description Standardization Note - calsbricks (8503) | [...] The answer is really quite simple - talk to a SQL person and they will advise you how to organise your query to find precisely what you want. It isn't rocket science. [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 9, 2020, to Catalog) |
Re: Description Standardization Note - FreeStorm (366) | [...] What do you want to find? Something like this? "* three *" => 153 results "* 3 *" => 6675 results "* three *" AND "* 3 *" => 16 results As example, last search find: [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 9, 2020, to Catalog) |
Re: Description Standardization Note - StormChaser (566) | [...] I have noticed this before and definitely agree it needs to be worked on. The problem is (and I'm starting to understand the rearranging the chairs thing) [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 9, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Description standardization note - hpoort (410) | [...] Please drop the keyword exclusion altogether. It does not make sense to make use of a full text English language keyword exclusion list, when the contents of the database [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 9, 2020, to Catalog) |
Re: Description standardization note - mfav (174) | [...] Aren't you the fella to talk to to get that changed, Mister Site Manager? [...] While that is undoubtedly true, it's not particularly helpful in any way. If [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Description standardization note - Admin_Russell | [...] Unfortunately, single digits are thrown out of many of the search results. But I think in general one would find more numerals in item names than the words spelled out [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Description standardization note - mfav (174) | It would be good for consistency in the catalog description if all instances of numbers were either integers or words, not arbitrarily some of each. So: Three eyeballs, Three [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Sticker # When adding Items - OmnipresentECA (707) | I have come across a few tiles with stickers that are not in the catalog. , nor in their set inventory. How do I go about determining the Sticker # when Adding to the catalog. [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Questions about Unikitty / Counterparts - randyf (442) | [...] The box, instructions, and LEGO set description are definitive about the situation, although it may not look that way at first. (1) LEGO lists the first instruction [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Questions about Unikitty / Counterparts - mjwest83 (685) | [...] In regards to the two Unikitties in set (Set 70831-1), if you only want to list one of them, fine. But which one? The decision is totally arbitrary. The box itself is [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - StormChaser (566) | [...] I completely agree. (Part 4150pb063) (Part 4150pb072) (Part 4150pb101) (Part 4150pb102) (Part 4150pb103) (Part 4150pb188) (Part 4150pb189) (Part 4150pb190) But I also [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - mfav (174) | [...] I'm content to let the mad geniuses of catalog control sort out the catalog. I'm just documenting the differences I can find in the handful of hats I have. Regardless [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - dcarmine (7169) | [...] According to the new standard for "difference types" the difference has to be related to the way a part functions, not just cosmetic differences. So with that rule, [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - randyf (442) | I suggest adding names and titles that have "Type 1", "Type 2", etc. in them to the project. Those terms are useless. Cheers, Randy In Catalog, StormChaser writes: [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - popsicle (6654) | [...] I've got a question, Jen... When are you going to arrive at the same conclusion that StormChaser already has, that the BL catalog needs those like you (passion [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - jennnifer (3531) | Sure! I'll play along... I am not convinced that 90460 is really a new version of 6131. (Part 90460) (Part 6131) They look the same and LEGO uses the same thumbnail image [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
| February Roadmap Project: Old and New - StormChaser (566) | We are finally making serious headway with the catalog backlog. The catalog change requests queue is cleared out. In the spirit of trying to ensure that the Catalog Roadmap [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
