| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | randyf  | | Posted: | Feb 25, 2024 04:20 | | Subject: | Re: Another New Color | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, here4bricks614 writes:
I saw the pending image for this part on BrickLink yesterday. It's absolutely
beautiful. I love how it kind of looks like the old Trans-Neon Yellow (157 Transparent
Fluorescent Yellow).
|
 |
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Feb 13, 2024 19:29 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | In Colors, TheBrickGuys writes:
| | In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
Once you compare them side by side, like the one shown in the link posted by
1001bricks, you can see that old trans brown is very accurate.
Jim
|
I have looked at them side by side, and I agree there is a difference, as previously
noted. I do not agree, however, that brown is an accurate description.
|
Freaking daltonics 
|
|
|
| Author: | mwright5 | | Posted: | Feb 13, 2024 19:19 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, TheBrickGuys writes:
| | In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
Once you compare them side by side, like the one shown in the link posted by
1001bricks, you can see that old trans brown is very accurate.
Jim
|
I have looked at them side by side, and I agree there is a difference, as previously
noted. I do not agree, however, that brown is an accurate description.
pbbbbbbtssss!!!! Raspberry to all of you.
|
|
| Author: | TheBrickGuys | | Posted: | Feb 12, 2024 22:30 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
Once you compare them side by side, like the one shown in the link posted by
1001bricks, you can see that old trans brown is very accurate.
Jim
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Feb 12, 2024 21:22 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, wildchicken13 writes:
| | In Colors, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Colors, randyf writes:
| | In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1402419
This has been in place for quite a while now, and the entire membership was notified
through email last year when the change took place. Have you been away for a
while?
|
What? Which change? When?
|
Nice picture of a black bear
|
No, Brown!
|
|
| Author: | wildchicken13 | | Posted: | Feb 12, 2024 21:17 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Colors, randyf writes:
| | In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1402419
This has been in place for quite a while now, and the entire membership was notified
through email last year when the change took place. Have you been away for a
while?
|
What? Which change? When?
|
Nice picture of a black bear
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Feb 12, 2024 18:27 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, randyf writes:
| | In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1402419
This has been in place for quite a while now, and the entire membership was notified
through email last year when the change took place. Have you been away for a
while?
|
What? Which change? When?
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Feb 12, 2024 18:06 | | Subject: | Re: Trans-brown (old trans-black) | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, mwright5 writes:
| | Seriously? Light trans-black would have been a more appropriate identifier as
there is a noticeable difference, however there is nothing brown about this color
that we are now calling trans-brown.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1402419
This has been in place for quite a while now, and the entire membership was notified
through email last year when the change took place. Have you been away for a
while?
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
USA, Ohio
France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
