Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Admin_Russell | [...] Many of the currently entered Packing Dimensions were mass imported from LDraw data when Instant Checkout was implemented in 2017. These measurements have no user credit [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Brick.Door (7512) | For parts is the z dimension the height? Because I looked at 1x1x5 brick and the height is .8 cm. The actual height was entered as the y dimension. Or is the z dimension the [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - brickerking (1864) | [...] Yay, this makes sense! You can always perform a calculation on the server side to display stud dimensions. Entering a real unit of measurement on the user/data entry [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Admin_Russell | [...] There is no relationship or dependency between the two types of dimensions - stud and metric. I know in the past that stud dimensions were used to give an estimate of [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Admin_Russell | [...] They were rejected because we do not accept stud dimensions on non-standard parts. Especially now that we have actual metric values being added, there is no need to find [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - cosmicray (3491)  | [...] Believe it or not, the correct answer to this question also involves orientation within the envelope when shipped. If you put solid bricks (or any part) in the [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - cosmicray (3491) | [...] I'll see you ancient balance scale, and raise you a couple of USPS built to last 100 years heavy duty scales. Both are in daily use in the Cosmic Toys shipping department [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - cosmicray (3491) | [...] An observation, and not a criticism, the Z dimension (on the brick and the slope) correctly includes the height of the stud on top, and because of that is not [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Admin_Russell | [...] They are actually still stored in the system as mm, but we didn't want the catalog upload forms to use two different measurement standards. All of the dimensions [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 7, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: Sets missing on Bricklink - Bricks2Love (3259) | [...] Hi, would you share pictures of the set 9781-1 with me? ill try to complet this rare set. Kind regards Guido Guido@briks2love.com
(37 months ago, Apr 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Emporiosa (5533) | [...] Sorry that's my mistake in how I described it because I said any dimension (and that's not accurate). I think it's oversized only on the triple dimensions [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Brick.Door (7512) | [...] So you have to exclude a part with any dimension over 20mm? That doesn't seem like it would work very well. A 1x6x5 brick can easily fit but only one of its dimensions [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Emporiosa (5533) | [...] I love seeing these kinds of new features for sellers being implemented! Thank-you so much! :) A feature to add later which would be fantastic (which another [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature - Emporiosa (5533) | [...] It's already very much in use with Canadians sellers; it can jump from a $1.94 stamp to $22 if the part is over 20mm in thickness. Canadian sellers have been manually [...]
(37 months ago, Apr 6, 2021, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
