BrickLink Discussion Forum

Discussion Forum: Messages by Rick_S. (1301)

Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies

[...] and i've seen people use non-LEGO pieces in LEGO construction, should we add those in too ?
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] well then the error was on my behalf since I thought you meant to change it from plant to coral.
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] yes and no, the cups are not sold as parts (that I know of), just like this site sells boxes, but are not sold as parts.
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] no my point is we need to keep the plant name in.
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] yeah I always used the sprue from the gold coins to build up my gold horde in my customs and such.
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] I think this exact thing was argued over before, and was denied since it is not an official LEGO part or such thing, but not sure?
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] yeah but my insinuation is to not remove the plant name part.
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] The sprue is just a piece that held this part, it has no other function outside of that.
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] yes and on first impression i'd say it is a coral, but LEGO calls it a plant and considering LEGO owns this site and to keep part name continuation between sites [...]
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] I disagree since LEGO calls this part plant, so if people are looking for this part based on what LEGO has and has sold I'd be looking for plant, this is called part [...]
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] yeah but several things to consider, 1: LEGO calls this a plant, and whoever put the description plant thallus would have been more correct in the plant family since [...]
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] so only seen seaweed in one general location then ? let us take one example shall we, how about this type of red seaweed which a picture of it is enclosed, now tell me [...]
(47 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] haven't seen much seaweed before have you? :P
(47 months ago, Jul 1, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Darth Vader Head Mold Variance - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] think one on right is a chinese knock off.
(47 months ago, Jun 25, 2020, to Catalog)

Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] Yes buyer left neutral, but still does not excuse the negative left by the seller. and the way the rules are written the seller could do nothing about it. since the rules [...]
(47 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] Nope
(47 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] ShakeyShuffle was a character.
(47 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] While I do agree such a system would be useful it could also have drawbacks too.
(47 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] Wrong again: it was negative, you notice the negative feedback they left for Sludgemonster? (URL) and it seems this seller is pretty notorious in not being a great seller [...]
(47 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)

[...] Actually there is no error, the synopsis is based on available data. but that is just one incident it still brings up the issue that retaliatory feedback cannot be removed [...]
(47 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More