Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | randyf  | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 12:51 | | Subject: | Re: 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, mfav writes:
I have also third variant 28697 not frosted. It looks like 30374 but has new
number molded on it. Checked under very high magnification.
|
...and an unnumbered version...
pic updated.
|
Yep. The original bars had no markings on them at all.
|
 |
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 12:08 | | Subject: | Re: 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, mfav writes:
I have also third variant 28697 not frosted. It looks like 30374 but has new
number molded on it. Checked under very high magnification.
|
...and an unnumbered version...
pic updated.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 11:40 | | Subject: | Re: 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, mfav writes:
I have also third variant 28697 not frosted. It looks like 30374 but has new
number molded on it. Checked under very high magnification.
|
P.S. with this new number 28697 there is also trans red, trans neon green and
trans purple
I have trans purple molded 28697 from this set
and it is not frosted.
Have no idea why only trans light blue is affected.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 11:36 | | Subject: | Re: 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
I have also third variant 28697 not frosted. It looks like 30374 but has new
number molded on it. Checked under very high magnification.
|
|
|
| Author: | pikachu3 | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 10:51 | | Subject: | Re: 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Brick.Door writes:
| | Found some frosted trans-light-blue 1x4 bars in a set recently and I'm not
comfortable mixing them with my current inventory. They are quite different and
I don't think a customer who orders several would be happy getting a mixture.
The additional notes state:
"Alternate item number 28697 is used for transparent colors. This mold variant
has no bubbles and number 28697 molded on it. It has been found in two variations
clear and frosted as showed on additional images."
So it seems the catalog admins are aware of the difference and have decided not
to reflect it in the catalog here? Personally I think this is a mold variation
worth recognizing.
|
I agree. I had about 4000 of the old kind, and went to the Lego store to get
1000 more to finish a MOC. They only had the new frosted kind, which would look
very out of place next to the ones I already had, so I had to find them elsewhere.
For sellers, these should be easy to separate. I'd also like to see the rounded
vs. flat ends separated in the catalog but that may be more difficult 
|
|
| Author: | Brick.Door | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 10:39 | | Subject: | 30374 Bar 1x4 Frosted Variant | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Found some frosted trans-light-blue 1x4 bars in a set recently and I'm not
comfortable mixing them with my current inventory. They are quite different and
I don't think a customer who orders several would be happy getting a mixture.
The additional notes state:
"Alternate item number 28697 is used for transparent colors. This mold variant
has no bubbles and number 28697 molded on it. It has been found in two variations
clear and frosted as showed on additional images."
So it seems the catalog admins are aware of the difference and have decided not
to reflect it in the catalog here? Personally I think this is a mold variation
worth recognizing.
|
|
| Author: | rick_holl | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 09:08 | | Subject: | Re: The 6x6 tiles in 10227 B-Wing | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, rick_holl writes:
| | Anyone knows if those tiles are flat or they have a shiny finish?
Thank you
|
6 x 6 tiles have a matte finish.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thank you Randy!
|
| Author: | doolallytap | | Posted: | Feb 7, 2020 06:42 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Identify the torso assembly and then you can see which minifigs it is part of
in the 'item appears in' look up the minifigs that it relates to, then
part out that minif and you will see all the parts required.
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 18:16 | | Subject: | Re: The 6x6 tiles in 10227 B-Wing | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, rick_holl writes:
| | Anyone knows if those tiles are flat or they have a shiny finish?
Thank you
|
6 x 6 tiles have a matte finish.
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | rick_holl | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 16:52 | | Subject: | The 6x6 tiles in 10227 B-Wing | | Viewed: | 104 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Anyone knows if those tiles are flat or they have a shiny finish?
Thank you
|
| Author: | apple_brick | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 06:19 | | Subject: | Re: catalogue problem - zero lots showing up | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | | | It may have to do with the software they use to upload and sync their inventory.
This shouldn't be possible, however. Zero QTY lots should only be retained
in a stockroom.
|
|
Hi Russelm
All our zero qty lots are in stockroom. So seems like a BL bug.
|
|
| Author: | apple_brick | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 06:10 | | Subject: | Re: catalogue problem - zero lots showing up | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Hi Russell,
Someone just pointed me to this topic, which i never saw earlier.
Can this be the reason that lots are 'disappearing' from our inventory?
That would be a bad thing to do i think. Can you confirm this?
Today i noticed a lot of older regular items have been removed / or renewed with
a different Lot Id. That's causing issues on our side.
Maybee you can contact us, so we can discuss this?
Regards,
Rick
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 03:44 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, anathema writes:
| | The same applies to set 8843, too - I have the supplemental sheet (which I'll
add in the next few days when I get it scanned) and the updated version of the
instructions.
|
BrickLink does not have any record in the inventory of this set of a redesign.
However, I have added a note to the instructions anyway:
You might see about updating the set inventory when you get a minute.
|
|
| Author: | anathema | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 03:39 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, anathema writes:
| | Could you also add a note to say that there are two versions of the instruction
booklet too, please? The booklet was updated to incorporate the changes from
the supplemental sheet.
|
Well . . . okay. You talked me into it. You have your note.
|
Thanks! 
The same applies to set 8843, too - I have the supplemental sheet (which I'll
add in the next few days when I get it scanned) and the updated version of the
instructions.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 03:11 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, anathema writes:
| | Could you also add a note to say that there are two versions of the instruction
booklet too, please? The booklet was updated to incorporate the changes from
the supplemental sheet.
|
Well . . . okay. You talked me into it. You have your note.
|
|
| Author: | anathema | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 03:05 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
The inventory does show that the set was redesigned during production. Please
upload a scan of the correction sheet to the instruction entry for the set and
we'll add it as an alternate image.
|
Could you also add a note to say that there are two versions of the instruction
booklet too, please? The booklet was updated to incorporate the changes from
the supplemental sheet.
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:51 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
The inventory does show that the set was redesigned during production. Please
upload a scan of the correction sheet to the instruction entry for the set and
we'll add it as an alternate image.
|
Sweet! Its late here, so I'll see what I can do tomorrow.
Thanks!!
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:40 | | Subject: | Re: Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
The inventory does show that the set was redesigned during production. Please
upload a scan of the correction sheet to the instruction entry for the set and
we'll add it as an alternate image.
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Feb 6, 2020 00:36 | | Subject: | Correction sheet for set 8847 | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| The old dragster set has a white correction sheet for step 16. It has a part
number on the page that doesn't show up in searches (120356).
Am I missing the entry somewhere? If not, should an entry exist? Or a note with
the instructions entry? (I could have sworn I had seen a note about this previously...)
Thanks!!
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 18:23 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mhortar writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty  You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
If you know that the current catalog admins are open to investigating and adding
these minifigs and you have knowledge of other minifigs that need to be corrected,
would you be willing to re-share that information with the current admins so
that the catalog can be more accurate?
|
Sure, Josh, I could and would for the current admin. In my book they are the
best we've seen here. Truly gifted and dedicated people, with strong guidance
from Russell.
But let me ask you, why is it needed? Given that TLG are in possession of the
site and it's catalog's information. They can spin whatever yarn they'd
like. In other words, get it straight from the horse's mouth. It's a
gift for you purest, if played right.
|
|
| Author: | mhortar | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 17:58 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
If you know that the current catalog admins are open to investigating and adding
these minifigs and you have knowledge of other minifigs that need to be corrected,
would you be willing to re-share that information with the current admins so
that the catalog can be more accurate?
Josh
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 15:14 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
Thank you
Some of them ar know just not yet distinguished and they are here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2488
under paragraph
Known Print Variants Not Distinguished
some examples
there are notes about them in the catalog
but in this case there wasn't even a note about it.
|
Interesting choices to start with, Marek!
Nonetheless, as to your first example: the full triangle is the anomaly. It was
initially intended as full triangle but as production produced a flawed triangle,
it was quickly corrected (wrongly in some minds) to the commonly seen trapezoid
shape. So, what’s the norm? I couldn’t say, it’s a matter of perspective. However,
the quantity of fully 'faulty' triangle produced, is far less than that
of the corrected trapezoid version.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 14:14 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
Thank you
Some of them ar know just not yet distinguished and they are here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2488
under paragraph
Known Print Variants Not Distinguished
some examples
there are notes about them in the catalog
but in this case there wasn't even a note about it.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 14:04 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| |
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
|
People noticed...
With respect to you personally Marek, for myself and let’s say a group
of Lego Star Wars Collectors that collaborate, we’ve stopped attempts to correct
or add to the BL catalog some years back, when our continued efforts were rejected
or dismissed out of hand, by those placed into those positions at the time, that
could do just that without consideration.
There’s more than a few corrections needed to the Stars Wars portion of the BL
catalog. It’s too bad, such poor judgement in personnel had been used in the
past. Now, some in the know (through painstaking research) that had once cared,
don’t.
That’s all that I would like to say, but should not! While simultaneously
disavowing that which I would like to say, and shouldn't - How’s that
for equivocating
On a serious note, good job, Marek! Now to the next, there’s plenty You are
invaluable to the current catalog team, IMHO of course.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:44 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, manganschlamm writes:
| | When I searched for the term "flesh", the search returned only custom parts.
So it appears that at least the descriptions of the legit parts have been updated.
|
Yes, as the Catalog Roadmap shows, this project is now complete:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:38 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, mfav writes:
| | In Help, Stonemonkey1974 writes:
Note "nougat/flesh" hasn't been updated since the apocalypse, and Anders
is away for a week.
|
When I searched for the term "flesh", the search returned only custom parts.
So it appears that at least the descriptions of the legit parts have been updated.
|
| Author: | Stonemonkey1974 | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:16 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, mfav writes:
| | In Help, Stonemonkey1974 writes:
Note "nougat/flesh" hasn't been updated since the apocalypse, and Anders
is away for a week.
|
Good point, thx.
The NOUGPOCALYPSE!!!
|
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:12 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, Stonemonkey1974 writes:
Note "nougat/flesh" hasn't been updated since the apocalypse, and Anders
is away for a week.
|
| Author: | Stonemonkey1974 | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:09 | | Subject: | Re: Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Try
http://avbricks.no/#/avSearch
In Help, Grinjer1 writes:
| | I have a batch of incomplete minifigures. I need help identifying them to find
out what parts I need to complete them. I seem to remember there were a couple
of sites which had this information but I can't remember the names.
Can anyone help please?
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:09 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Quba writes:
| | Dobry jesteś!
|
Thanks
|
| Author: | Grinjer1 | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:06 | | Subject: | Identifying minifigures | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I have a batch of incomplete minifigures. I need help identifying them to find
out what parts I need to complete them. I seem to remember there were a couple
of sites which had this information but I can't remember the names.
Can anyone help please?
|
| Author: | Quba | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 12:33 | | Subject: | Re: Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | Dobry jesteś! |
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 12:31 | | Subject: | Shadow Trooper | | Viewed: | 150 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
Interesting, more than ten years and almost nobody noticed it.
(OK I understand we can see them only from the front as they never retreat when
they attack so you can't see their back )
Interesting in our catalog torso is showed without long line.
According to the information which I found here
http://minifigs.nl/swminifigs/mfnl-shadow-ms.html
one with long line could be from magnet set from 2009.
* | | 852715 (Inv) Magnet Set, Minifigures SW (3) - Darth Vader, Snowtrooper, Shadow Trooper - with 2 x 4 Brick Bases blister pack
Gear: Magnet: Star Wars |
so from sets which were issued earlier 2007 and 2008 could be one with short
line
My with short line is from set
I have also two in my collection with long line but bought them years ago loose
without sets.
I submitted both as new as in this case sw0166 should be marked for deletion
as we don't know which one is currently sell under this entry.
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 05:41 | | Subject: | Re: Alternate Images | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, waltzking writes:
| | Please add these alternate images for comparison of mini doll head patterns 37591
vs 66706 and also 37592 vs 66600 with new but similar print.
Jonathan
|
Please upload the images to the appropriate parts with a note to add them as
alternate images.
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 12:30 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| 👍
Welcome back.
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Hello everyone,
Today I am very pleased to announce we have a new Catalog Associate! As you may
see from the Hall of Fame, StormChaser has previously held two catalog-type admin
positions - Inventories Admin and the legacy Catalog Admin - and has recently
returned to the site.
We're delighted he has decided to come back, and I know many of you missed
him as well. He has many ambitious plans for the catalog, and now that we have
more staff on board, it's looking as though we can start making some serious
headway.
So please join me in welcoming him. You can see his familiar profile in line
with the others here:
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
StormChaser is also the first member to officially join our new Community Expert
Program. We hope to see the other catalog admins joining in the next day or two,
and the rest of our admins within the week.
|
|
|
| Author: | electricbaer | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 12:25 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Hello everyone,
Today I am very pleased to announce we have a new Catalog Associate! As you may
see from the Hall of Fame, StormChaser has previously held two catalog-type admin
positions - Inventories Admin and the legacy Catalog Admin - and has recently
returned to the site.
We're delighted he has decided to come back, and I know many of you missed
him as well. He has many ambitious plans for the catalog, and now that we have
more staff on board, it's looking as though we can start making some serious
headway.
So please join me in welcoming him. You can see his familiar profile in line
with the others here:
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
StormChaser is also the first member to officially join our new Community Expert
Program. We hope to see the other catalog admins joining in the next day or two,
and the rest of our admins within the week.
|
Congrats, good fit
|
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 12:09 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | Excellent choice, congrats StormChaser! |
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 11:06 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Hello everyone,
Today I am very pleased to announce we have a new Catalog Associate! As you may
see from the Hall of Fame, StormChaser has previously held two catalog-type admin
positions - Inventories Admin and the legacy Catalog Admin - and has recently
returned to the site.
We're delighted he has decided to come back, and I know many of you missed
him as well. He has many ambitious plans for the catalog, and now that we have
more staff on board, it's looking as though we can start making some serious
headway.
So please join me in welcoming him. You can see his familiar profile in line
with the others here:
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
StormChaser is also the first member to officially join our new Community Expert
Program. We hope to see the other catalog admins joining in the next day or two,
and the rest of our admins within the week.
|
Congratulations and all the best from me as well.
|
|
| Author: | BrickCompulsion | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 10:38 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Excellent news on all fronts...
welcome back
|
| Author: | EnchantedBricks | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 10:16 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Biglesdug writes:
| | A true asset to the site.
|
Thank you. Very kind words, although not everyone shares your opinion at this
moment. 
| | Did they make you change your name back?
|
No. They asked and I agreed. They did it administratively, since I would not
have been able to change it on my own until 30 days had passed.
I had planned to change it back after that time had passed anyway.
|
Congrats !!
|
| Author: | jenwick | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 09:26 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | That is wonderful! Glad you came back StormChaser! |
| Author: | Honig | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 05:58 | | Subject: | NAM (Shell) Holiday Set 2014 Christmas Tree | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello,
I get a NAM (Shell) 2014 Christmas Holiday Giveaway from the brand Blokbrick
with seemed to cooperate with the Lego Company.
I've never seen these item and it's not listet in the bricklink.
Probably these set is an interseting item for the bricklink catalouge. If these
set will listed, I can send you better pictures, a tile list and the instruction
as pdf.
The parts are completly orignial Lego, the 1x1 Tile with the NAM Logo is printed.
Greetings from germany
Holger Honig
|
|
|
| Author: | bb527123 | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2020 02:25 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, LearnedBrick writes:
| | Fantastic! Does that mean that everyone is now in place and the inventory submission
backlog is next on the to-do list?
|
We are not all in place just yet, but we will be *very* shortly. And, yes, the
inventory submission backlog will be the first thing I tackle when I return in
a day or two.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thank you!!
|
|
| Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 21:53 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Hello everyone,
Today I am very pleased to announce we have a new Catalog Associate! As you may
see from the Hall of Fame, StormChaser has previously held two catalog-type admin
positions - Inventories Admin and the legacy Catalog Admin - and has recently
returned to the site.
We're delighted he has decided to come back, and I know many of you missed
him as well. He has many ambitious plans for the catalog, and now that we have
more staff on board, it's looking as though we can start making some serious
headway.
So please join me in welcoming him. You can see his familiar profile in line
with the others here:
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
StormChaser is also the first member to officially join our new Community Expert
Program. We hope to see the other catalog admins joining in the next day or two,
and the rest of our admins within the week.
|
Welcome back! 👍
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 21:43 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 88 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Biglesdug writes:
| | A true asset to the site.
|
Thank you. Very kind words, although not everyone shares your opinion at this
moment.
| | Did they make you change your name back?
|
No. They asked and I agreed. They did it administratively, since I would not
have been able to change it on my own until 30 days had passed.
I had planned to change it back after that time had passed anyway.
|
We’re grateful for the amazing work and service! Happy you are back! Best wishes
and good luck and again; thank you!
|
|
| Author: | Classicsmiley | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 19:22 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Hello everyone,
Today I am very pleased to announce we have a new Catalog Associate! As you may
see from the Hall of Fame, StormChaser has previously held two catalog-type admin
positions - Inventories Admin and the legacy Catalog Admin - and has recently
returned to the site.
We're delighted he has decided to come back, and I know many of you missed
him as well. He has many ambitious plans for the catalog, and now that we have
more staff on board, it's looking as though we can start making some serious
headway.
So please join me in welcoming him. You can see his familiar profile in line
with the others here:
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
StormChaser is also the first member to officially join our new Community Expert
Program. We hope to see the other catalog admins joining in the next day or two,
and the rest of our admins within the week.
|
Saw this coming 10 miles away, which is really the only way I'd ever look
at a tornado.
|
This is one of those rare times I've wished we had a Like button...
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 18:36 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Associate! | | Viewed: | 86 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| A very warm Welcome Back! I look forward to many pleasant discussions, disagreements,
and collaborations.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | SurplusParts | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 18:25 | | Subject: | Re: Adding photos to the Catalogue | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, SurplusParts writes:
| | When adding photos to the catalogue, can you only add 1 at a time for the same
part?
|
As far as I'm aware, yes. It is a bit annoying, but true.
Once the initial image is approved or discarded, then another image can be added.
However, I believe it is possible for multiple users to add multiple photos
for the same pending item.
|
Thanks for that, a bit odd, but not too big a deal.
I will just add the main photo for now and once the part is approved i will add
the other photo.
Great to have you back working on the Catalogue.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 18:16 | | Subject: | Re: Adding photos to the Catalogue | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SurplusParts writes:
| | When adding photos to the catalogue, can you only add 1 at a time for the same
part?
|
As far as I'm aware, yes. It is a bit annoying, but true.
Once the initial image is approved or discarded, then another image can be added.
However, I believe it is possible for multiple users to add multiple photos
for the same pending item.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
USA, Ohio
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie
Canada, Quebec
United Kingdom, England
Netherlands, Limburg
Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen
Australia, Victoria