Discussion Forum: Thread 312017 |
|
|
| | Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 11:25 | Subject: | (Cancelled) | Viewed: | 234 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Discarded | |
|
| (Cancelled) |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 11:40 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| At what point, is it a build or sub-set and not a minifigure?
To use one example: this minifig-categorized build, is composed of common
parts, none specific-to or unique (print or otherwise) that distinguish it as
a minifigure. Yet when this collection of 32 parts are bundled for sale, it’s
considered a unique minifigure within the catalog?
Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
Just curious
|
In the instructions for the set, this droid is not shown at the beginning where
the instructions for making the real minifigs are.
https://www.lego.com/cdn/product-assets/product.bi.core.pdf/4648330.pdf
I believe the droid is not a minifig. To me this is abuse of minifig
categorization in the catalog.
David
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | qwertyboy | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 11:59 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| At what point, is it a build or sub-set and not a minifigure?
To use one example: this minifig-categorized build, is composed of common
parts, none specific-to or unique (print or otherwise) that distinguish it as
a minifigure. Yet when this collection of 32 parts are bundled for sale, it’s
considered a unique minifigure within the catalog?
Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
Just curious
|
In the instructions for the set, this droid is not shown at the beginning where
the instructions for making the real minifigs are.
https://www.lego.com/cdn/product-assets/product.bi.core.pdf/4648330.pdf
|
It also doesn't show up as a figure in the little rectangle at the bottom
right on the original box, so TLG apparently did not consider it a figure as
such.
Niek.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 12:12 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| I believe the droid is not a minifig. To me this is abuse of minifig
categorization in the catalog.
|
Any droid, or that droid in particular ?
IMHO, a droid, minifig, or anything else is a sub-assembly. There are
many different types of sub-assemblies, one being minifigs, and another being
droids. Both TLG and BL have raised minifigs to a special level, but they are
composed of parts that are sometimes unique, and sometimes rather common.
There are lots and lots of recognizable sub-assemblies ... for example the Landspeeder
in 7110-1. In fact, that set might be thought of as three sub-assemblies ...
the Landspeeder and two minifigs. But BL has no specific way to sell just the
Landspeeder sub-assembly. Some sellers try to list it under the 7110 set catalog
entry, which pollutes the PG.
Food for thought.
Nita Rae
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 14:10 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| At what point, is it a build or sub-set and not a minifigure?
To use one example: this minifig-categorized build, is composed of common
parts, none specific-to or unique (print or otherwise) that distinguish it as
a minifigure. Yet when this collection of 32 parts are bundled for sale, it’s
considered a unique minifigure within the catalog?
Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
Just curious
|
In the instructions for the set, this droid is not shown at the beginning where
the instructions for making the real minifigs are.
https://www.lego.com/cdn/product-assets/product.bi.core.pdf/4648330.pdf
I believe the droid is not a minifig. To me this is abuse of minifig
categorization in the catalog.
David
|
I think that argument is well and truly lost.
At least now this type is marked for deletion...
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 12:18 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| At what point, is it a build or sub-set and not a minifigure?
To use one example: this minifig-categorized build, is composed of common
parts, none specific-to or unique (print or otherwise) that distinguish it as
a minifigure. Yet when this collection of 32 parts are bundled for sale, it’s
considered a unique minifigure within the catalog?
Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
Just curious
|
Well actually all minifigs should be in counterparts and the inventory for sets
contain just single parts
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 12:34 | Subject: | (Cancelled) | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| (Cancelled) |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 12:49 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
|
I'll add that I was speaking more broadly, of the rationale used. But in
the specific example I gave: empirically, it’s a weapon.
Categorically, the droid type (droideka) was never given personality or traits
beyond that of a machine. Though some animism was attributed to the Droidekas
within the Canon, I believe?
I just don’t know. It’s gotta be tough for the catalog folks.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | runner.caller | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 13:27 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| At what point, is it a build or sub-set and not a minifigure?
To use one example: this minifig-categorized build, is composed of common
parts, none specific-to or unique (print or otherwise) that distinguish it as
a minifigure. Yet when this collection of 32 parts are bundled for sale, it’s
considered a unique minifigure within the catalog?
Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
Just curious
|
I don't have a good answer, but I've got a simple one.
Because Star Wars.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | kzinti | Posted: | Nov 4, 2021 14:37 | Subject: | Re: How we view things... | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| At what point, is it a build or sub-set and not a minifigure?
To use one example: this minifig-categorized build, is composed of common
parts, none specific-to or unique (print or otherwise) that distinguish it as
a minifigure. Yet when this collection of 32 parts are bundled for sale, it’s
considered a unique minifigure within the catalog?
Is the rationale for the established guidance in this instance, that the build
is marketed/presented from LEGO (within a set) as a minifgure or character representation?
Just curious
|
I see that they finally added the characters in
as minifigures. I recall having to sell them as Incomplete Sets for each one
when the set first came out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|