| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | rmfloris  | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2023 06:57 | | Subject: | Re: NSV changes for business sellers in EU-DUTCH ONLY! | | Viewed: | 148 times | | Topic: | Administrative | |
|
| I believe in the announcement, it does both. So I need to verify myself, which
can be done without breaking the GDPR laws. But Bricklink will also need to report
the information to the tax authorities, hence it need to store the information.
There is a threshold for DAC-7, so not all sellers are reported towards the tax
authorities. In that case holding the information goes against GDPR guidelines,
as it store's PII data with no clear use case.
I believe the information should only be requested with the sellers once the
threshold is reached and there is a justification for storing the sensitive data.
In Administrative, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Administrative, rmfloris writes:
| | I believe DAC-7 requires also private entities to be reported. There is a threshold
before the need to report to the tax authorities. How will Bricklink handle these
cases as requesting the needed information, can be seen as a breach of GDPR regulations,
requesting more private information then it needs to do their daily business.
|
AFAIU, the GDPR forbids keeping the info, not asking for it, especially when
you need the info to obey other laws.
As an example, a shop owner can ask you to prove your identity (ID card, passport…)
when you pay by cheque but the GDPR forbids them to take a photo(copy).
| | The link provided ends up at a 404 page.
|
It’s missing a ‘4’ at the end.
|
|
 |
| Author: | rmfloris | | Posted: | Dec 27, 2022 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: NSV changes for business sellers in EU-DUTCH ONLY! | | Viewed: | 119 times | | Topic: | Administrative | |
|
| I believe DAC-7 requires also private entities to be reported. There is a threshold
before the need to report to the tax authorities. How will Bricklink handle these
cases as requesting the needed information, can be seen as a breach of GDPR regulations,
requesting more private information then it needs to do their daily business.
The link provided ends up at a 404 page.
With kind regards
Ralf
In Administrative, StarBrick writes:
| | Voor de NL members hier, dit lees ik op Blz 19 (definities) van de NL versie
van het document naar wordt verwezen door BL.
B. Te rapporteren verkopers
1. “Verkoper”: een gebruiker van een platform, hetzij een natuurlijke persoon,
hetzij een entiteit, die op enig ogenblik tijdens de rapportageperiode op het
platform is geregistreerd en een relevante activiteit verricht.
Dat betekent dat ook private personen gemeld moeten worden door BL. Of lees ik
dat verkeerd?
Verderop:
De rapporterende platformexploitant verzamelt alle volgende inlichtingen voor
elke verkoper die een natuurlijke persoon en geen uitgesloten verkoper is: (en
dan volgt een hele waslijst).
En dit is wat BL moet verstrekken over de verkopers:
e) de totale tegenprestatie die is betaald of gecrediteerd tijdens elk kwartaal
van de rapportageperiode, en het aantal relevante activiteiten waarvoor deze
is betaald of gecrediteerd;
f) alle honoraria, commissielonen of belastingen die door de rapporterende platformexploitant
tijdens elk kwartaal van de rapportageperiode ingehouden of geheven werden.
Feedback welkom 
|
|
|
| Author: | rmfloris | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2022 13:59 | | Subject: | Re: Allow any IP to use the bricklink API | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| So I found out the error I made. Both the IP range and the IP mask need to be
set to 0.0.0.0. Once done, it works perfectly.
In Help, rmfloris writes:
| | Is it possible to allow any IP to access the bricklink API? I read you had to
set it to 0.0.0.0. I tried this, but I still get a 401, not allowed response.
The reason is that I work from a cloud host, which changes their IP quite regularly.
This results in me updating the key/ip combination each time.
|
|
|
| Author: | rmfloris | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2022 05:05 | | Subject: | Allow any IP to use the bricklink API | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| Is it possible to allow any IP to access the bricklink API? I read you had to
set it to 0.0.0.0. I tried this, but I still get a 401, not allowed response.
The reason is that I work from a cloud host, which changes their IP quite regularly.
This results in me updating the key/ip combination each time.
|
|
| Author: | rmfloris | | Posted: | Dec 8, 2021 05:53 | | Subject: | Re: Change completed to cancel | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Problem Order | |
|
| Nope, can't change anything on the order anymore. It is all greyed out.
In Problem Order, Brickwilbo writes:
| | In Problem Order, rmfloris writes:
| | I have an order I need to cancel. I have accidently moved the order to 'completed'.
How do I change the status back to any other then completed, so I can cancel
the order and have the items back into my inventory?
|
Can you change the order status back with the Edit Order button?
|
|
|
| Author: | rmfloris | | Posted: | Dec 6, 2021 16:47 | | Subject: | Change completed to cancel | | Viewed: | 87 times | | Topic: | Problem Order | |
|
| I have an order I need to cancel. I have accidently moved the order to 'completed'.
How do I change the status back to any other then completed, so I can cancel
the order and have the items back into my inventory?
|
| Author: | rmfloris | | Posted: | Dec 22, 2019 08:13 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 375-2 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 2 Part 3005 Blue Brick 1 x 1
|
|
|
Netherlands, Utrecht
