Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Dino  | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2020 13:52 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, yapke writes:
| | Hello,
It's remarkable quit now, about the Nougat colours! 
With all do of respect and comprehension about the decision to change the name
from Flesh to Nougat...
I didn't follow all those threads and discussions/remark, some were so funny
I couldn't stop laugh about it...
But I assume it has to be one of the most controversial and humorous decision
made by BrickLink or Lego, isn't it?
Anyway, we can presume that most BL members have accepted (or learned to deal
with it) the name change of the colour! 
Now is the question: which colour next ???
Greetings, Yannick
|
Do you know North Korea?
The same is here. Do not say anything against a decision by the Admins!
|
 |
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2020 03:37 | | Subject: | Re: Nougat is the new Flesh | | Viewed: | 129 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, Admin_Russell writes:
| | For those who may have missed this recent change, we have decided to change the
name "Flesh" to another color name in the BrickLink catalog. I'm not going
to get into the reasons why this was done - the purpose here is to inform you
of what the changes were and how they may affect your BrickLink user experience.
The changes are 5 in number:
1. Light Flesh becomes Light Nougat
2. Flesh becomes Nougat
3. Medium Dark Flesh becomes Medium Nougat
4. Dark Flesh becomes Medium Brown
5. Dark Nougat is added to the BrickLink catalog, which is currently included
with BrickLink's Earth Orange.
Changes to the color names in Item Names are forthcoming. No changes to inventories
are necessary except to give Dark Nougat a place in the system.
How this may effect you:
1. If you rely on any of BrickLink's list pages that can be sorted by color
(set inventory, catalog search, catalog item detail page, etc.) some items may
be listed in a different order.
2. If you have your physical parts inventory sorted by color, you may need to
relabel. Dark Flesh is relatively rare, but if you have it, you will need to
change the labels to Medium Brown. That's the tough one, although renaming
it to a type of brown is a big step in the right direction.
3. If you perchance have the type of Earth Orange from the early 2000's,
you should separate out these parts and relist them under Dark Nougat. This color
is retired and quite rare.
Thanks to our BrickLink color enthusiasts for their input. They've given
invaluable advice over the years and we're happy they were willing to give
some advice this time around as well.
|
The first step....
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2020 03:40 | | Subject: | Re: Set 75248 Inventory Awareness | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, foxweasle writes:
| | I thought I would post this Discussion to bring to the members awareness of a
possible misinterpretation of the Inventory list of Set 75248 Star Wars Resistance
A-Wing Starfighter. The inventory is listed correct as I see it. I just opened
a sealed complete set and confirmed the Inventory. The only Item in Question
is Part 15303 Trans-Red Bar 8L with round End (Spring Shooter Dart). In the Instructions
it does show 3 Items are used but only 2 are actually used in the set. At first
I would think the 3rd piece would be considered an extra part, but since all
three are listed in step 101 the last Instruction step. The Inventory should
remain unchanged.
|
All three are listed. But only two were used. There is no place for the third
one.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2020 13:10 | | Subject: | Re: Element 6286835 wrong colour | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, Drudatz writes:
| | In Catalog, Classicsmiley writes:
| | In Catalog, Drudatz writes:
It just hasn't been added to Bricks & Pieces yet. 6286835 is indeed 28870
in black. It comes in the new Bookshop set.
|
I see but the bookstore isnt parted out on BL yet so op has to wait for that
(sadly BL is the worst side speed wise when it comes to adding inventories...)
|
Maybe it will be better if TLG uses its own admins.
|
Our current admins are in the process of becoming the LEGO Group's own admins.
|
OMG
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2020 12:54 | | Subject: | Re: Element 6286835 wrong colour | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Drudatz writes:
| | In Catalog, Classicsmiley writes:
| | In Catalog, Drudatz writes:
It just hasn't been added to Bricks & Pieces yet. 6286835 is indeed 28870
in black. It comes in the new Bookshop set.
|
I see but the bookstore isnt parted out on BL yet so op has to wait for that
(sadly BL is the worst side speed wise when it comes to adding inventories...)
|
Maybe it will be better if TLG uses its own admins.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2020 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: Element 6286835 wrong colour | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, Drudatz writes:
There are many elements in unknown colors.
|
With PCCs?
|
What is PCC?
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2020 11:15 | | Subject: | Re: Element 6286835 wrong colour | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Drudatz writes:
There are many elements in unknown colors.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Dec 26, 2019 08:53 | | Subject: | Re: BRICKS & PIECES availability and price | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Tholwin writes:
| | Hello,
While I favor buying other people's unwanted pieces, I always check the price
of each piece on "BRICKS & PIECES" (Lego website), in an attempt to avoid buying
on bricklink pieces I could get cheaper and brand new from Lego.
This is the reason why I would love to see in bricklink if pieces are available
on "BRICKS & PIECES", and at which price, without having to search.
Best regards
|
When B&P opens a shop here, the prices are included in the price index. If not,
the B&B prices have no business here.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Dec 24, 2019 11:41 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 1881-1 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, 62Bricks writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, 62Bricks writes:
| | Instead, we should look for the simplest possible rule, which is to stick to
the basic elements. Those will not change, they will only increase in number.
We would not need to add any functionality to the present catalog to do this,
we would just have to abandon this fruitless path. All of the information
that is desired - how a set was packaged and all of the individual elements in
it - could be included in set inventories today even with the current site design.
The reason it is not is because the policies currently in place are preventing
it, and the philosophy is to follow the pole star of Lego's shifting practices
rather than the practices of the users of Bricklink.
|
I have rewritten that last sentence for you:
"...the philosophy is to follow the pole star of the LEGO Group's practices
(which seldom ever shift) rather than the personal listing whims of Bricklink
sellers."
|
I disagree. There are numerous examples, and neither you nor I can see the future.
Those little pre-packaged accessory packs are a fairly recent example how Lego
changed its production process
| |
I am wondering now whether you read my "reasons.pdf" document I referred to earlier.
In that document, I argue both sides. I have copied this section below:
Reasons to keep separate:
As an organizational principle, every assembly should be reduced to its basic
elements.
I honestly think if this theory had been practical, it would have
been implemented throughout the inventory system long ago. But the fact is,
it’s not practical, and even a cursory observation will show that we are dealing
with a continuum on BL, not an absolute one way or the other.
For example, to really get down to basic elements, the axles in the early small
wheel assemblies should be listed separately. Yes, the early types did come apart
easily before Lego added little loops to hold the axles in place. And the wheels
DO come off the axles with a little work. So why weren’t these changed along
with removing tires from all the wheels?
And the motorcycles from the eighties are currently not listed separately. Why?
Because this would be pedantic and impractical. They never came disassembled
to begin with, and most buyers and sellers wish to only deal with the *whole*
assembly.
Motors are not broken apart into screws and casings, minifig arms are not
separated from the torso, hinges are not dismantled, nor are winches, claws,
or electrical cables. It’s just the practical thing to do to leave things in
their normal, intended state.
But small wheels [today read: elementary window parts] have somehow been made
an exception of.
|
Lego is a system of parts that are designed to be interchangeable and interlocking
with each other. (How's that for pedantic?)
Describing that system should be our pole star. If it were, then there would
be a bright line on the continuum you describe - are the parts connected using
a "system" connection? Then they should be broken out.
Yes, that would mean motorcycle chassis and wheels (and tires) separately, with
the complete assembly in the counterparts.
I don't understand the shock that seems to cause in people. I think, based
on Rob's comment in his response, it may stem from the desire to have the
part count number on the BL inventory match the one Lego sometimes puts on the
box. But if the parts themselves are our focus, we should stop worrying about
that.
The definition of a "system" connection is all we need to worry about, then.
This is mostly obvious - a screw in a motor casing is not a Lego system connection,
so those parts are not broken out. I think the only refinement needed would be
to include connections that are unique to one particular part form - such as
minifig arms and legs.
The intended use of Lego parts is that they be assembled and reassembled using
a system of interlocking connections. The motorcycle is packaged as one possible
configuration for that particular set, but you can swap the red wheels for clear
ones, the tread tires for smooth ones, or take the wheels off and make a hoverbike.
You can also take the wheels off and attach them to a different type of piece
(the 2x2 plate, a Fabuland trailer). Yes, you can remove a minifig arm from a
torso, but then what else can you attach it to? Only another torso. They are
technically interchangeable with one another, but the type of connection is unique
and not integrated in the system.
So the inventories should reduce assemblies to the point where the parts are
usable within the system. That means taking the 1x1 plates off the sprues and
opening the tool accessory bags. It does not mean prying apart minifig torsos.
The corollary to when to break things down is when to enter them as counterpart
assemblies. Parts that came assembled or attached in the box, but that have
system components which are broken out in the inventory, should be counterpart
assemblies. So should assemblies that are created during the building of the
set which use non-system connections - like stickers on tiles.
It really does not need to be any more complex.
|
+1
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Dec 23, 2019 08:57 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 1881-1 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, 62Bricks writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
...
| |
If things go in the best possible direction, as I sincerely hope they will, then
you will be able to click a button and see inventories however you want. That's
what we need and what I'm hoping to see. Instead of carrying on the forlorn
fight against the direction things have been going for years, perhaps you will
join me in my call to the new owners for additional site functionality that will
make the site truly serve all users equally.
|
I'm all in favor of additional functionality, but changes like this one I
do not think are in aid of that goal.
Let's imagine we can add the option for a user to view an inventory in their
choice of two ways, either "as packaged" (with pre-assembled parts appearing
as single parts, etc.) or as a list of all the individual parts. Then the inventory
will need to support the finest granularity of data, which is the individual
part list.
That level of granularity is now present in the 1881 inventory for the door/doorframe
assembly (but not for the windows, currently) as the parts are displayed both
as individual pieces (in the regular section) and as the assembly that (probably)
came in the package (as a counterpart).
However this proposed change removes that extra information that would be needed
to support the kind of functionality we are wishing for. It deletes the entries
for the individual parts and replaces them with an assembly. If the day comes
that we have the kind of functionality you imagine, this change will have to
be undone. Someone will have to go through and "part out" all the assemblies
so that those who wish can see them listed individually.
The same is true of the 1x1 round plates on a sprue and the pre-packaged accessory
sets. If we want to build a truly powerful database, then we need to be thinking
of something like a periodic table of elements. Then the user can choose to view
the data in any way he wants.
We perhaps have an example in front of us: the Stud.io parts menu. It is grouped
along the BL catalog, but it can be searched and organized into folders by the
user. You can view the contents of a set by importing it.
With future functionality in mind, we should be working toward increasing the
granularity of the data rather than decreasing it. We currently have the capability
to put individual parts in the regular section and assemblies in the counterparts,
but we do not have the converse capability - to display the assembly in the regular
section and the individual parts in a separate section.
So given the current constraints of the catalog, and assuming that we want to
move in the direction of more functionality and not less, the prudent thing to
do would be to put individual parts in the regular section and the assemblies
in the counterparts so we preserve the greatest granularity of data. By not doing
so, we are only creating work that will have to be undone in the future, and
that causes inconsistency and loss of clarity in the present.
|
+1
Remember TLG used the parts until they were used up. So both variants could have
been used in one set number.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Dec 23, 2019 06:32 | | Subject: | Set 9005039 | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi!
Does anyone own the set 9005039? Can he confirm the number of parts?
52 pieces for the clock
24 cards
24 pieces for the watch
Thanks in advance
Werner
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Dec 20, 2019 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: Untrustworthy Bag | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | So there's an item on eBay that is not in the BrickLink catalog: 372862431557
I've attached pictures. The interesting thing is the copyright date on the
packaging (1984) and the item number (198561). That figure didn't first
appear until several years later:
So then I looked around and saw there are a number of items in what looks like
the same packaging with what is almost certainly the same item number. Search
for the item number on BL to find four of them, but there are quite a few more:
Some of them would not have been released in '84. So all of that to say
that the copyright date on this bag is not trustworthy. It appears to be a generic
bag the company liked and used for a number of years.
|
198561 is only the number of the bag.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Oct 25, 2019 11:00 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Gear wufo | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Gear bb1046 Black Watch, Case and Movement with LEGO and Spyrius Droid
Comments from Submitter:
This watch is not in this watch set.
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Sep 1, 2019 17:14 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Gear wufo | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Gear bbw046 Black Watch, Case and Movement with LEGO and Spyrius Droid
Comments from Submitter:
This watch is not in this watch set.
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | May 10, 2019 06:35 | | Subject: | Re: Help identifying grey colour piece | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Colors | |
|
| In Colors, 1stopbricks writes:
| | Can anyone identify the colour of the two pieces (I have 6 of them)? They are
darker than light grey and light bluish grey but lighter than dark grey and dark
bluish grey?
Any help would be great.
Thanks
|
LG = very light grey
? = light grey
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | May 2, 2019 05:23 | | Subject: | Re: Shipping adress Belgium | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, manganschlamm writes:
| | I would just fill something like N/A into that field. Read by anyone as not specified.
|
Das geht nicht. Die Angaben sind vorgegeben.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 17:20 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6690-1 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 4081b Black Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Clip Light - Thick Ring (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Add 4 Part 4085b Black Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Clip Vertical - Type 2 (thin U clip) (Alternate) (match ID 2)
* Change 2 Part Black 4081a Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Clip Light - Thin Ring {match ID 0 to 1}
* Change 4 Part Black 4085a Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Clip Vertical - Type 1 (thin open O clip) {match ID 0 to 2}
Comments from Submitter:
source: Facebook group, pictures follow
|
Pictures taken by owner A. Krieger.
Box was MISB and opened by A. Krieger and stick already 1 sticker on the 1x2
brick then take pictures from other bags and parts.
Box and instructions says 1980. Minifigs are the first torso types (toothless)
and came with the heads on the torso.
Catalog is from 1986 =
but (c) says 1987!!
Stefaan
|
Interesting!
As far as I know, the clips
were first produced in 1985.
|
Hi Reza
It looks like that the Brazilian market started later and brought a few sets
that were no longer available to us on the market. The catalog says it all, no?
Strange about the -b types but the MF's still the old type and what about
the other parts, did some came already with the partnrs on? Or some still with
the moulding pip on side? We have still a lot of questions.
You can follow the posts at the FB group 
Stefaan
|
Hi Stefaan
In the nineties Lego opened its own factory in Brazil. With own timeline, set(s)
...
Werner
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 15:04 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
It does not seem pointless to me. If you want to complete a Ninjago spinner set
from the original era of Ninjago with all original parts, you will want the boat
stud that was made in China with item number 93791 and not item number 2654.
Cheers,
Randy
|
And why do you and others add "alternate" Numbers to parts, without naming the
sets?
Werner
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Dec 30, 2018 11:03 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75210-1 | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4274 Blue Technic, Pin 1/2 (Extra)
Comments from Submitter:
I have this part extra in just opened and build my own new sealed set.
|
Where is the picture as proof?
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Oct 14, 2018 14:43 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 4403-1 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Mortimer writes:
These changes get us to 699 parts, but the part count printed on the set box
is 698 parts. Is there a chance you might have missed one?
|
Look at the invebtory on BL. There are 699 parts.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Oct 1, 2018 18:59 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6494-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 5 Part Brown {2536 Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - Undetermined Type to 2536a Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - Long Indented Connector}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray {2453 Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Undetermined Stud Type to 2453a Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud / Hollow Stud}
* Change 1 Part Light Gray {6538 Technic, Axle Connector 2L (Ridged Undetermined Type) to 6538b Technic, Axle Connector 2L (Ridged with x Hole x Orientation)}
Comments from Submitter:
Pics to follow
|
The Skeleton head comes connected to the torso and the two human have headgear,
heads, and torso connected. That is 5 connections that would explain Lego officially
regarding 510 pieces as 505.
|
LEGO never count the minifigs as one part!
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Oct 1, 2018 18:50 | | Subject: | Re: TimeCruisers Testflug Cassette | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | I just opened up and inside I found a I have no idea
what it is. Should it be in the inventory?
|
In 1996, in Germany, all Time Cruiser sets, except 6491, were sold with one of
the audio tapes 1, 2 or 3.
|
Is it music? Or a story? I don't think I have a cassette player.
|
It's a story for a role play game.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Oct 1, 2018 18:40 | | Subject: | Re: TimeCruisers Testflug Cassette | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | I just opened up and inside I found a I have no idea
what it is. Should it be in the inventory?
|
In 1996, in Germany, all Time Cruiser sets, except 6491, were sold with one of
the audio tapes 1, 2 or 3.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Oct 1, 2018 14:51 | | Subject: | Re: Vintage Globite Lego carry case | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, heman147 writes:
| | Hi there, I recently bought (what looks to be) a very old Lego carry case made
from Globite. I can't find any details on it on the net, and I was hoping
you guys might be able to help me identify it. It looks to be from the 70s or
80s not 100% sure. Thanks
|
This kind of carry cases were sold 1974 in red and blue in Germany. In plaid
~1970 in Italy and Austria.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Aug 29, 2018 14:57 | | Subject: | Re: sw880 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
P.S.
Both have exactly the same number and the same packing.
|
The packing is different since the photo of the included minifig is different
on both boxes.
Randy
| | Second one is in the catalog
but have no photo
|
|
|
So I see 8020356b have more variant of packing one with Stormtrooper and one
with Kylo Ren main artwork, depends probably on year of release
|
Both 2015
|
Also, the EAN- and UPC- codes are the same
|
Thank you.
So we have three with the same number. Three different packing with two different
main artworks and two different minifigs. What a mess
Will you be so kind and will you submit photo for this second watch with sw880
minifig to the catalog?
|
What do you mean with three variants?
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Aug 29, 2018 13:09 | | Subject: | Re: sw880 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
P.S.
Both have exactly the same number and the same packing.
|
The packing is different since the photo of the included minifig is different
on both boxes.
Randy
| | Second one is in the catalog
but have no photo
|
|
|
So I see 8020356b have more variant of packing one with Stormtrooper and one
with Kylo Ren main artwork, depends probably on year of release
|
Both 2015
|
Also, the EAN- and UPC- codes are the same
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Aug 29, 2018 13:03 | | Subject: | Re: sw880 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
P.S.
Both have exactly the same number and the same packing.
|
The packing is different since the photo of the included minifig is different
on both boxes.
Randy
| | Second one is in the catalog
but have no photo
|
|
|
So I see 8020356b have more variant of packing one with Stormtrooper and one
with Kylo Ren main artwork, depends probably on year of release
|
Both 2015
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Aug 29, 2018 12:06 | | Subject: | Re: sw880 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
P.S.
Both have exactly the same number and the same packing.
|
The packing is different since the photo of the included minifig is different
on both boxes.
Randy
| | Second one is in the catalog
but have no photo
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Aug 19, 2018 11:26 | | Subject: | Re: 12V Train 70026 and 73112 difference | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Identification, 62Bricks writes:
| | Can someone educate me on how to tell which one of these I have?
* | | 70026 Electric, Train 12V Remote Control Switch Motor 4 x 8 x 1 2/3 (Undetermined Type)
Parts: Electric, Train
Marked for Deletion |
The one I have has three electric contact holes in the end. The 3D image for
73112 does not show any electric contact holes, but I do not trust the 3D images.
Does 73112 have electric contacts?
|
No, it's the first wireless remote control...
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 15:16 | | Subject: | Re: 4495, now 4495a and 4495b | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Marked for deletion only means that you can no longer sell under that catalog
entry. Unless a policy changes, this flag will likely take a long time (a decade?)
before inventory runs out and it is able to be deleted.
In Catalog, NelisSolis writes:
| | Russell,
will there be (or maybe there is already) some warning for sellers before an
undetermined variant is deleted? If I remember correctly, previously I received
a notification about items marked for deletion, but for the flags I didn't
receive such kind of notification.
|
|
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1099822
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 13:57 | | Subject: | Re: 4495, now 4495a and 4495b | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | All of the changes so far are from sealed sources. We have not started to fill
in the gaps yet.
|
So just to be clear, Elias has checked 273 sets, 3 books, and 14 gear from sealed
sources in a matter of hours?
Randy
|
I believe so. He started in last night about midnight California time.
|
Well, then he must have a very large and wonderfully organized collection to
speed through the changes at the rate he has. Color me jealous.
Randy
|
He only checked the pictures. Nothing else. Onley one set he own.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1099797
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 10:39 | | Subject: | Re: 4495, now 4495a and 4495b | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, qwertyboy writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, qwertyboy writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | And which clown decide to delet the origin entry?
|
I for one would appreciate it if you kept things civilized. Is it really necessary
to start calling names?
Niek.
|
Sometimes, yes.
|
I see this name calling getting to be the norm in Internet conversations. To
me, people resorting to name calling admit defeat.
I thought (rather innocently I fear) that we in the BL forum could show some
restraint and be more civilized and have normal discussions, but it looks like
I am mistaken.
Sad.
Niek.
|
That has nothing to do with the internet. I would call you a clown too when you
are sitting in front of me and you did the same.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 10:37 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 4937-1 | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Red {4495 Flag 4 x 1 Wave Undetermined to 4495a Flag 4 x 1 Wave Left}
Comments from Submitter:
checked my sealed bag = -a type
|
And the other hundrets? Did you checked them too?
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 10:21 | | Subject: | Re: 4495, now 4495a and 4495b | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, qwertyboy writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | And which clown decide to delet the origin entry?
|
I for one would appreciate it if you kept things civilized. Is it really necessary
to start calling names?
Niek.
|
Sometimes, yes.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 09:36 | | Subject: | Re: 4495, now 4495a and 4495b | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, uvt203 writes:
| | In Catalog, runner.caller writes:
| | There is seriously a differentiation now between RH and LH on such an invaluable
part?
What a chore it would be to try to sort and separate them given they look so
similar at first glance. Won't have the time or inventory drawer space to
bother trying to separate these. Guess they will be going in the "do not sell"
pile.
|
I fully agree. However I chose to do the work and spent almost 2 hours going
through all my flags, separate them and relist as A or B. And again the much
too slow update on Brickstock made it impossible to use that handy programme.
And all this for just such an irrelevant mould difference! Please don't come
up with more of these!
/Asger
|
Other users wanted it to be separeted
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1024776
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1090308
|
And which clown decide to delet the origin entry?
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 20, 2018 07:42 | | Subject: | Re: Only for understanding. | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, therobo writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
A Part can have more than one Color Codes for the same color?
Werner
|
Yes, but not two identical codes.
|
Thank you
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 19, 2018 20:04 | | Subject: | Re: Only for understanding. | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
A Part can have more than one Color Codes for the same color?
Werner
|
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 1, 2018 05:59 | | Subject: | Re: Undocumented value pack? | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | mhortar found the item, you get the honor! WOW! That's cool!
|
Member mhortar had ample opportunity to submit the item to the catalog, but did
not. Therefore, I did.
It is not uncommon for members to post undiscovered items in the forum and never
submit them to the catalog. I've taken it upon myself to add some of those
items. Please let me know if you'd prefer the BrickLink catalog be less
comprehensive so that I may scale back my efforts.
|
In this cases I'd prefer the BrickLink catalog be less comprehensive.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jul 1, 2018 04:50 | | Subject: | Re: Undocumented value pack? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | In Catalog, mhortar writes:
| | I've got a set in my collection that I haven't been able to find much
info about. It doesn't appear to be in the BrickLink or Brickset databases.
|
Not in the databases? Why, it's been pending approval here on BrickLink
for 3 minutes!
| | I've included photos of the front and back of the set.
|
It would be nice to have some larger pictures. Please add them here (up to 1600x1200):
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page
Can you also verify the copyright date on the value pack? The year 2000 was
just a guess on my part.
|
mhortar found the item, you get the honor! WOW! That's cool!
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | May 18, 2018 12:58 | | Subject: | Re: Blocking a store | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, wolbar writes:
| | Hi, I have been stopped / blocked by a rather thin skinned seller.
Is there a way I can block the store? I don't want to see the store any longer
or be able to add items from its inventory. I have gone to the store twice now
to add items only to find out I am blocked.
That is annoying me and there should be a way for a buyer to block a seller in
turn.
|
Go "My settings" - "My Search Settings". There you can exclude this stores.
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Mar 16, 2018 15:52 | | Subject: | Re: Stop counting neutral feedback as negative | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | Where is the percentage for buyers? |
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2015 16:51 | | Subject: | automatic logout | | Viewed: | 125 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Discarded | |
|
| Dear Admin,
please remove the automatic logout. It sucks!
Regards
Werner
|
|
Luxembourg
