Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 26, 2018 15:15 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Gear 8020332 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Redhawk_Kevin writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 8 Gear Black {bbw001 Watch, Link without rectangular holes (makes slightly shorter band) to bbw083 Watch, Link without rectangular holes, Oval-Shaped}
* Change 6 Gear Flat Silver {bbw001 Watch, Link without rectangular holes (makes slightly shorter band) to bbw083 Watch, Link without rectangular holes, Oval-Shaped}
* Change 4 Gear Red {bbw001 Watch, Link without rectangular holes (makes slightly shorter band) to bbw083 Watch, Link without rectangular holes, Oval-Shaped}
* Change 2 Gear Trans-Red {bbw001 Watch, Link without rectangular holes (makes slightly shorter band) to bbw083 Watch, Link without rectangular holes, Oval-Shaped}
Comments from Submitter:
Updated with new watch link variant.
|
Thanks for the quick work on these!
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 23, 2018 18:59 | Subject: | Re: White brick with holes? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Identification, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog Identification, normann1974 writes:
| In Catalog Identification, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog Identification, normann1974 writes:
| I found this in my spare parts. Which part is it? It seems not to neither
or .
|
Why not 3709c?
|
Because 3709c is made from two parts (notice the line in the picture),
|
Well, I know 3709a is split, but the pictures of 3709c are just bad renders,
so I wasn’t sure 3709c was split too.
|
It was.
| | and it doesn't exist in white.
|
No. The catalogue doesn’t know it exists. It doesn’t know a set where the part
would have appeared, or of one such part sold in the last 6 montths.
Now, as it’s not split, but (as shown on another of your posts) it has a bottom,
maybe it’s a prototype?
|
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 17, 2018 11:03 | Subject: | Re: Seeking Opinions on Part Assemblies in Invs | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mockingbird writes:
| In Catalog, mockingbird writes:
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
|
The catalog entries would likely remain for any parts removed from inventories
and could still be used for buying and selling just as they are now.
|
|
Yes, please
| | The second route we could go is to include all of the existing part assemblies
in the catalog in inventories. That opens the door to many more part assemblies
being added to the catalog and to inventories. My concern with that approach
is that eventually you fill up inventories (and the catalog) with part assemblies
- especially when you consider stickered/printed assemblies, assembly color variations,
and part variant assemblies.
|
|
For assemblies the color combinations and part variants are indeed a difficult
issue. Can't think of an easy solution for that. Something like a 'not
applicable' color and then add a comment to describe the colors (or variants)?
This would work for selling the parts, but I don't know if the comment field
is available in inventories.
Why not create a new option in inventories? Something like 'assembled parts
and pairs' This would include the wheel/tyre combination, the assembled hinges,
stickers over assembly, etc.
|
Something like this would be my preference also.
This section could work exactly like the current counterparts, but under a different
category heading and with a different definition. All the current exceptions
to the counterparts could go in this category.
| This would NOT include full assemblies of subsets (like a train wagon or a car).
These go in the 'special assembly' (or subset) option .
Keep the counterparts option for the stickered parts, strings, hoses as per your
new definition.
And because of the many options in inventories that would be available then.
Make it possible to hide certain of these options when viewing or printing the
inventory.
|
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 16, 2018 16:12 | Subject: | Re: sw880 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Redhawk_Kevin writes:
| There is actually a much larger assortment of watch variants. This may be too
detailed for Bricklink?
I have been supplying a large number of inventories for Star Wars watches recently,
but there are many variants that I have not tried to sort out for the catalog.
I did add the inventory for this watch today.
- Kevin
In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| What do you mean with three variants?
|
I allowed myself to compile your photo with third variant "older" artwork box
(like in first one) but with sw880.
All three have the same number.
|
|
Could you check the watch links?
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=241893
[g=bbw001]
[g=bbw083]
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 13, 2018 10:46 | Subject: | Re: Return the Catalog tab | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, JulieK writes:
| Please put it back.
It was the perfect word to describe where it took users.
|
I came to BrickLink for the catalog first, and started to buy later.
The catalog is not just a tool we use for selling, it is a hugely important way
to draw people to the site. I know that it has been gone for a long time, but
I would still love to have a separate catalog tab back.
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 12, 2018 16:43 | Subject: | Replying to messages in the NEWS topic | Viewed: | 76 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Every time we reply to a topic in the NEWS section of the forum, we get the error
message:
"Oops! There was a problem processing your request:
1. Topic was not selected."
Please make it possible to reply to the NEWS section without this error.
Possible solutions include:
- allow replies in the NEWS section,
- select one topic by default (instead of asking users to pick one at random,
usually Announce and/or Administrative are used)
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 11, 2018 14:28 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig atl011 | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, WhiteVanMan writes:
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| In Inventories Requests, WhiteVanMan writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 1 Part 6041 Pearl Light Gray Propeller 3 Blade 3 Diameter
* Add 1 Part 6041 Flat Silver Propeller 3 Blade 3 Diameter
Comments from Submitter:
I've got 2 of the sets that this minifig comes from, and both were sealed, and I found that this propellor is actually in the newer colour of Flat Silver more than Pearl Light Grey, hence this change request. (I can't change the set's inventory to reflect this as well)
|
Here's the thing with PLG/flat silver parts: the catalog's really a mess
right now regarding those colors. It needs to be fixed, but right now the issue
is on hold. Sorry, but we're not going to be changing any PLG to flat silver
or flat silver to PLG for the time being.
|
OK
Then why not find out WHEN the newer style of Flat Silver that the LEGO group
uses first came in, and then state that all of the sets from THAT time will have
that style colour, so that we shall know WHICH colour is correct for a particular
part?
|
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126975831@N07/15206357186/
The color was introduced in 2010. But parts were made in the old color earlier
than that, and LEGO would have used any old stock before making the parts in
the new color. As a result, both the old and new color could be correct here.
| It's well known that there are 2 distinct colours for the Flat silver that
we are aware of, and it can be done in the same way as the Light Grey/Light Bluish
Grey saga came about over 10 years ago....
How can it not be resolved?
Paul
|
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 11, 2018 07:40 | Subject: | Re: Difference between mold types | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, randyf writes:
| In Help, WoutR writes:
| In Help, mfav writes:
| It's very subtle, this difference.
|
Nice image!
Are the clips on the other side different also?
|
No.
|
Thanks. The name suggests a difference like
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 11, 2018 07:34 | Subject: | Re: Difference between mold types | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, mfav writes:
| It's very subtle, this difference.
|
Nice image!
Are the clips on the other side different also?
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Sep 10, 2018 06:58 | Subject: | Re: 3001old mold variations | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, patpendlego writes:
I can't believe how difficult it is to find number 31 on your list
I do have all the others, your list was very helpful when I started my collection.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|