| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (568) | [...] It does. However, this item relationship match is not capable of handling complex relationships consisting of all the parts with which an individual part will fit and [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Does this count as a catalog entry? - StormChaser (568) | [...] I don't see any figs in that package. As for whether it would count as a set, you say they were all prepackaged? Were the contents of all of them identical? If [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (568) | [...] Yes, you're right. For some reason I thought those were: (Part 2420) and I was adding in the red plate below. [...] If you look at the existing sticker over assembly [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (568) | [...] Yes, I like it. Thanks! So, my original version: Shows parts that naturally fit together which are designed to work together and which are nearly always used together [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (568) | We have long needed a relationship match that shows items which fit together and which are frequently used together. I have asked for this type of match in the past and have [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (568) | [...] No. It just means that the assembly must include enough parts to be solid and not be held together merely by the sticker. Look at this example: (Part BA47pb02) The [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
