Discussion Forum: Messages by Admin_Russell
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 31, 2022 07:53
 Subject: Re: Main page and catalog / inventory not loading
 Viewed: 100 times
 Topic: Technical Issues
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Technical Issues, BRIXONATOR writes:
  Inventory is not loading (Austria), keep getting "404 not found" everytime
I want to open a catalog item or my own inventary. Also on Main Page is the same
issue... anyone else?
Martin aka BRIXONATOR


Thank you. This has been reported.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 28, 2022 11:30
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 5856-1
 Viewed: 38 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Inventories Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
  In Inventories Requests, here4bricks614 writes:
  In Inventories Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
  In Inventories Requests, here4bricks614 writes:
  Please make changes to the following inventory:
 
Set No: 5856  Name: Paprika and the Mischievous Monkey
* 
5856-1 (Inv) Paprika and the Mischievous Monkey
46 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2003
Sets: Belville: Golden Land

* Change 1 Part {Light Pink to Pink} belvskirt01 Belville, Clothes Skirt Long, Sheer with Jewel

Comments from Submitter:
Now that the first TLG 17 Rose ID has been moved to the Light Pink color, it may be time to at least consider moving the rest of these “Light Pink” parts out of the BL color. It is known that whatever BL Light Pink correlates to, doesn’t actually exist. It’s much better than actually deleting it.

Which 'first move' do you mean? There was a move to Light Pink.
There are only 3 items in Light Pink in the catalog. Which ones should be moved
out of the BL color. I really don't understand what you are writing here.

And did you check that this Belville Skirt actually is Pink?

Diana

Now that the color box has been changed, I believe it is a good idea to finish
moving the existing parts out of BL Light Pink. It's another case of Rust
containing parts that were once thought to be their own color, but nothing actually
correlates to these. The necklaces have been moved in and out of Light Pink for
quite some time and the only ones in Light Salmon have been found. What BL eventually
wants Light Pink to correlate to was last used in 1994/1995 (this one needs some
strong evidence for an exit year).

The necklaces have only been found in Light Salmon.
The skirt from 2003 can't be Rose because it hadn't been used for a part
for a long time. Pink is the closest color.
The 2007 skirt doesn't really match anything. A lot of cloth parts from this
era tend to be color 0.

I hope to handle this request this weekend, together with the remaining Light
Pink parts. I have both skirts, several necklaces and a sealed
 
Set No: 5413  Name: Beauty Set
* 
5413-1 (Inv) Beauty Set
19 Parts, 1999
Sets: Service Packs: Scala

I still would like to know about this color Light Pink that in your opinion stands
for TLG 17 Rose though. You are also saying: What BL eventually wants Light Pink
to correlate to was last used in 1994/1995. Are you talking about that same 'TLG
17 Rose' here? And if so, which part(s) were produced in TLG 17 back in 1994/1995?
Do you also have a PCC?

For the only parts in Light Pink that are in the catalog now, start in 1999 and
you want all of them to be moved from Light Pink.

So I still don't understand your very first comments with this request:
"Now that the first TLG 17 Rose ID has been moved to the Light Pink color, it
may be time to at least consider moving the rest of these “Light Pink” parts
out of the BL color. It is known that whatever BL Light Pink correlates to, doesn’t
actually exist. It’s much better than actually deleting it."

TLG 17 Rose has been moved to BL Light Pink, although there's no proof any
part ever came in TLG 17, but there is proof it only came in 1994/1995??

 
Part No: x11  Name: Scala, Clothes Necklace
* 
x11 Scala, Clothes Necklace
Parts: Scala, Figure Accessory {Light Pink}
doesn't exactly match Light Salmon and both
 
Part No: 50939  Name: Belville Cloth Bed Veil - Medium, with Sparkly Stars Pattern
* 
50939 Belville Cloth Bed Veil - Medium, with Sparkly Stars Pattern
Parts: Belville {Light Pink}
and
 
Part No: belvskirt01  Name: Belville, Clothes Skirt Long, Sheer with Jewel
* 
belvskirt01 Belville, Clothes Skirt Long, Sheer with Jewel
Parts: Belville, Figure Accessory {Light Pink}
don't exactly match Pink

This could be caused by the material/fabrics, but it does explain the confusion
about the color Light Pink. And not having an actual Light Pink (TLG 17) part
to compare it with it's understandable that a lot of people see these as
Light Pink.

I will add images to this threat this weekend and give my opinion about the colors
of these three parts.

Diana

Rose is sometimes called "Paradisa Pink" because it was first introdueced in
the Paradisa line.

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1197248
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 27, 2022 10:26
 Subject: Re: Why in the world is this a slope curved?
 Viewed: 64 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
  In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
  
 
Part No: 1762  Name: Slope, Curved 33 2 x 2 Double / Inverted
* 
1762 Slope, Curved 33 2 x 2 Double / Inverted
Parts: Slope, Curved {Bright Light Orange}

It's obviously just a slope, I see no curved part from the picture that would
make me even consider it as part of the slope curved category.

It looks like a double wide one of these, which is in slope.

 
Part No: 3049c  Name: Slope 45 2 x 1 Double / Inverted with Bottom Stud Holder
* 
3049c Slope 45 2 x 1 Double / Inverted with Bottom Stud Holder
Parts: Slope {Blue}

Can we use your photo as an alternate image?
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 21, 2022 17:10
 Subject: Re: Bricklink ID Pictures - Remastered
 Viewed: 137 times
 Topic: Off Topic
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Off Topic, utlf writes:
  In Off Topic, TheCuteGiraffe writes:
  Yo!

I dont know why anyone has said this but jeez, they look awesome!

Nice job bro, love the bonus 2x4 in silver and gold. They look amazing.

Epic Job!!

Thanks a lot! I appreciate it

I've decided to use one for a while.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 20, 2022 15:54
 Subject: Re: Copyright
 Viewed: 101 times
 Topic: Help
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Help, Cartersbricks writes:
  I am looking to have some cards made to include with my orders. I was wondering
if there is any copyright issues with the cards having the lego logo?

You may not use the LEGO logo on such cards or on your storefront. Also, your
BrickLink ID card pic must not use the LEGO logo.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 14, 2022 18:22
 Subject: Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 76405-1
 Viewed: 31 times
 Topic: Inventories Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
  
  No one is working on these. You may do these if you would like to.

Probably too much work for me at this point.

  At first glance, I don't see why not, but I will get back to you about these.
We would need to add them to a *lot* of inventories.

I you give go-ahead, I could create them, but I will not be making updates for
all sets that contain them, only this set.

/Jan

These have been blocked from the catalog before simply because of the slippery
slope argument, i.e. where do we draw the line on assemblies that aren't
allowed. If the glass in some of these windows is especially hard to remove,
that would be useful information.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Oct 7, 2022 19:55
 Subject: Re: Has anyone seen this before?
 Viewed: 93 times
 Topic: Catalog Identification
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Identification, popsicle writes:
  In Catalog Identification, popsicle writes:
  In Catalog Identification, gnelson147 writes:
  Cleaning out my deceased parents house and I found this in the actic. Just thought
it was cool because it's Halloween and then I saw the bottom.

Not in the catalog, yet Surprising number of "mug" listings, though.

If you'd like to add your mug to the catalog, here's a catalog-ready
pic file: https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=G&catString=175

I guess after confirming it's authentic LEGO. Seems from some inputs in the
thread here, it may not be?

It is not a product from the LEGO Group.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Sep 30, 2022 09:59
 Subject: Re: Ignored by helpdesk for over 30 days
 Viewed: 245 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
In General, Loonbricks writes:
  In General, jbroman writes:
  In General, Loonbricks writes:
  Hello,

is there anyone that can help me in how to proceed here?

I have multiple outstanding NSS, every one of these is fixed, and for each one
I already opened tickets but not even one of these tickets have been answered
by support?

I have been waiting now since 28th of august, and my store has been closed because
of this. I am really getting into financial problems if i can not reopen soon
but i have no idea what steps to take here.

Is there anyone here please that can help? What more can i Do?

my emails won't get responses, my tickets won't get responses, i feel
that there are no options anymore..

thanks in advance.

gr.
kevin

First, did you register on the help desk site.
It is separate from the normal BrickLink login and requires its own login registration.

Second, If you settled the NSS, did you ask the affected buyer to cancel them.
Wouldn’t this be the easiest way to get rid of the NSS?


I did last week. It has been 7 days on there now (I did not know of it before)

The nss were completed during my holiday. Buyers were not responsive / are not
able to remove it anymore.

I have personally taken this ticket and will respond to you after a brief meeting
with our other administrators.

Since we are handling this issue privately, this thread will be locked.
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Sep 2, 2022 12:57
 Subject: Re: Free Lion Knights' Castle Box
 Viewed: 75 times
 Topic: LEGO products
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In LEGO, SomeRandomUser writes:
  I sold the set and now I have the empty box just sitting in my garage taking
up space. I'd hate to crush it and recycle it and it's not worth selling
to me so if anyone's wanting it and they're either near the Oak Park
LEGO Store or planning a trip there, private message me and I can greet you at
the store and give it to you.

The box is on 9 wanted lists. If you list if for sale, they could be notified:

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?O=10305-1
 Author: Admin_Russell View Messages Posted By Admin_Russell
 Posted: Aug 31, 2022 13:26
 Subject: Re: Please confirm and add Alternate number
 Viewed: 46 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
  Hello,

I found an 8x8 plate in set
 
Set No: 10970  Name: Fire Station & Helicopter
* 
10970-1 (Inv) Fire Station & Helicopter
115 Parts, 2 Minifigures, 2022
Sets: DUPLO: DUPLO, Town: Fire

It is molded 93517 and has a new code: 6404744 in the set data. It weighs 53g.

The instruction booklet still shows it as 6343498:
 
Part No: 51262  Name: Duplo, Plate 8 x 8
* 
51262 Duplo, Plate 8 x 8
Parts: DUPLO, Plate

I don't have an older part in hand to verify if this might be a new mold.
If someone could please confirm that there are no major differences between the
existing entry and what I found, then please add the Alternate number to it.

Thanks!
Jen

For Duplo parts we are hard pressed to make a disctinction between molds unless
there is a very significant functional impact. I will go ahead and add the new
number.

Can we use your image?

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More