Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 22, 2021 14:26 | Subject: | Re: "Technical Problem" - No Checkout possible! | Viewed: | 94 times | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
| In Technical Issues, Toemmes writes:
| Hello everyone,
I'm trying to check out an order since yesterday evening (MESZ, GMT+1, Germany).
I always get the message "Technical Problem". I've shut off my add-blocker,
i've deleted the whole card and tried again - no effect at all!
Does anybody know this and have a hint for me?
Thx a lot!
Thomas
|
Have a gander, Thomas: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1315035
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 22, 2021 12:14 | Subject: | Re: Lost packages: is this coincidence or... ??? | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Buying | |
| In Buying, Leftoverbricks writes:
| Over the past four months (July-October) I placed 48 orders from which 10 outside
my own country. From those 10 orders, 2 orders were lost in the mail. That is
20% of orders lost!
Both had tracking, both last scans were somewhere at the customs in Amsterdam,
then nothing after that.
One was from Thailand, the other one from Germany (which shouldn't have make
it to the customs anyway since Germany is EU).
The sellers and I did everything possible so far to connect with the shipping
companies and Postnl, but to no avail. (I like to emphasize that I had no problems
with the sellers involved in the transactions, they were great!)
Packages get lost every time but 20% as in my case is exceptional.
It's getting stranger however.
Both orders were for VERY VERY VERY rare parts. Parts that seldom appear in a
shop because they were only in one set.
To prove this I include two screenshots from the price guide which show the rareness
of the parts I've ordered. The blue dot is me. As you can see the parts are
indeed very rare and pricey. None of the two are available in any shop in the
world.
I'm not paranoid (at least I hope I'm not) but the very coincidence of
ordering two very rare parts on BL that both were lost at Amsterdam customs makes
me think that there's more going on here.
Martin
|
For efficacious answers/opinions, more frame of reference would be great, i.e.
specific timelines? Unless what you're really asking is to be psychoanalyze
But no, you’re not overly paranoid. That’s how our mind fundamentally processes
thought. How we reason through concepts such as the "coincidence" which is especially
difficult for our minds to accept.
That you posted about it shows that much, imho.
really enjoy your posts, btw.
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 22, 2021 10:36 | Subject: | Re: Orders not going through???? | Viewed: | 78 times | Topic: | Announce | |
| In Announce, George_Lucy writes:
| Trying to buy but keep getting technical error warning not sure what is going on.
|
Got the same yesterday with a few attempts to spread funds around.
Which in retrospect is unfortunate for the selling-members I was to bolster,
though just as well for me.
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 22:15 | Subject: | Re: Just curious... | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| I'm contemplating the listing of our older stock. Considering the volume,
I'm delving back into BL SW catalog some, digging around. Doing so, I've
stumbled across what seems to be a few anomalies, or not? Just don't know
anymore
For example: why was the Star Wars #1 (Sith Minifigure Pack) of all of the Star
Wars Minifigure Packs of that year (#1 thru #4) assigned the non-specific, generic
subcategory that is Star Wars Other?
I’m sure there’s an obvious and valid reason that just eludes me right now, as
per usual
Thanks in advance
-popsicle
|
It's because that MF pack is the only one where the MF's span different
movies. The other packs have sets of 3 who appear in the same movie.
David
|
Thanks, David.
That doesn't quite jive, though. If it's movie assignments for the cataloging,
two of the sets are assigned to the subcategory Star Wars Episode 4/5/6
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=S&catString=65.258
|
Okay, I think I understand the logic now. Thanks.
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 21:43 | Subject: | Re: Just curious... | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| I'm contemplating the listing of our older stock. Considering the volume,
I'm delving back into BL SW catalog some, digging around. Doing so, I've
stumbled across what seems to be a few anomalies, or not? Just don't know
anymore
For example: why was the Star Wars #1 (Sith Minifigure Pack) of all of the Star
Wars Minifigure Packs of that year (#1 thru #4) assigned the non-specific, generic
subcategory that is Star Wars Other?
I’m sure there’s an obvious and valid reason that just eludes me right now, as
per usual
Thanks in advance
-popsicle
|
It's because that MF pack is the only one where the MF's span different
movies. The other packs have sets of 3 who appear in the same movie.
David
|
Thanks, David.
That doesn't quite jive, though. If it's movie assignments for the cataloging,
two of the sets are assigned to the subcategory Star Wars Episode 4/5/6
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=S&catString=65.258
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 21, 2021 10:50 | Subject: | Re: Profile, nickname | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Technical Issues | |
| In Technical Issues, sonntagskindlei writes:
| Hello! Connected logical bugs:
- When registering for a new account, the length of the user name isn't limited,
in my case I entered sonntagskindlein
- Later, in my profile I saw it has been truncated to sonntagskindlei, which
is 15 letters (???) and it wouldn't let me add the "n" again, so I wanted
to change it to the next shorter version sonntagskind, but didn't enter my
password, so the system refused the change
- After I typed the shorter name again plus entered my password, it refused the
change again saying I could only change the name once in 30 days.
|
That is something that needs addressing, imho. The truncated name is not what
you applied for and should be perceived as a failed application or unsuccessful
username change. The terms of service do not specify username change attempts
within the 30 day period.
Years ago, there existed another issue with username applications, in that unused
or formerly registered usernames (including names never really used, if applied
for and then changed before settling on another) All would remain within the
system, seemingly in perpetuity. In a sense as active usernames never to be allowed
reuse by anyone again.
Don’t know if it’s still the case (been "popsicle" for 10 years now) or even
if it was initially by design. I always viewed it as a glitch, though.
-popsicle (hopefully)
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 20, 2021 14:15 | Subject: | Re: How do you make minifigure sit? | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Help | |
| In Help, Mr_Rofl writes:
| Be careful with witty remarks or you'll end up in the comic again.
|
Really?
A sad and pathetic way to live one's life, concerned about such things. Wouldn't
you say?
|
In Help, popsicle writes:
| With a treat?
Now if you were to make them to roll over and play dead, that would be impressive
In case it's an earnest question: The "standard" minifig, being absent knees,
can only sit straight-legged. Some not having hips, are unable to even do that.
They can only "roll over and play dead"
Either way, it's a fun question!
-popsicle
|
|
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 20, 2021 11:32 | Subject: | Re: Minifig Entries - How long is too long? | Viewed: | 191 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Seems reasonable to me. I've shared the same thoughts (minus any concern
of competition, that is) that TLG should invest more towards this effort. Investment
in some manner, either personnel that will facilitate correct set-inventory uploads
in a timely manner, or at least hand over the needed proprietary info to folks
here (paid or volunteers) ahead of the set's global-availability. To be uploaded
and made ready for sales sooner rather than later, on what is a LEGO owned site.
Not to mention, any benefits the simple knowledge of it being "the official"
inventory, would bring to the site more broadly.
-popsicle
In Catalog, infinibrix writes:
| I know people are gonna say it comes down to people contributing but at this
stage should'nt Lego themselves be having a more active role in providing
the required catalog entries and less reliant on a handful of contributors. Even
popular Star Wars sets from way back in June are still awaiting minifig entries?:-
Meanwhile Brickowl added entries for these minifigures months ago and so if you
can't buy or sell the parts here you have to do so elsewhere thereby falling
into the hands of the main competitor site!
Surely Bricklink (the now official Lego marketplace) should'nt be trailing
behind Brickowl is this regards?
|
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 20, 2021 01:48 | Subject: | Re: How do you make minifigure sit? | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Help | |
| In Help, popsicle writes:
| With a treat?
Now if you were to make them to roll over and play dead, that would be impressive
In case it's an earnest question: The "standard" minifig, being absent knees,
can only sit straight-legged. Some not having hips, are unable to even do that.
They can only "roll over and play dead"
Either way, it's a fun question!
-popsicle
|
I'm a bit slow. I just realized your question may be in reference to Studio.
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Nov 19, 2021 17:26 | Subject: | Re: How do you make minifigure sit? | Viewed: | 79 times | Topic: | Help | |
| With a treat?
Now if you were to make them to roll over and play dead, that would be impressive
In case it's an earnest question: The "standard" minifig, being absent knees,
can only sit straight-legged. Some not having hips, are unable to even do that.
They can only "roll over and play dead"
Either way, it's a fun question!
-popsicle
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|