| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 25, 2020 17:50 | Subject: | Re: Wow! It seems like just yesterday... | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, amthatkindoforc writes:
| Maybe we could move from 1x1 to 1x2 bricks.
|
Alright. Or the 2x4, considering the popularity of 3001 collecting.
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 23, 2020 16:11 | Subject: | Re: Persistent issues… | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| agulus’s input in this thread has reignited a persistent and nagging thought
of mine: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1176265
It’s a valid point made by member agulus, that has unfortunately been ongoing
as an issue, in the face of contrary input towards the feedback policy.
I’ve brought it up in the past, that a neutral should be just that, neutral,
and not effect your feedback percentage number displayed, up or down.
Beyond the obvious reasons, is the fact that there are many newish buyers that
mistakenly see BL’s neutral, as neutral. Silly people Meanwhile, it continues
to result in an amount of havoc in that arena of BrickLink.
I look forward to reading your honest thoughts
-Cory
|
Worthy of a bump!
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 23, 2020 14:22 | Subject: | Re: Neutral Feedback | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, jamesvickery writes:
| i just wanted it to be brought to peoples attention again so maybe it can be
changed
|
Good
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 23, 2020 14:19 | Subject: | Re: Neutral Feedback | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, jamesvickery writes:
| Can we make neutral feedback not decrease our stores praise percentage. I have
just received a completely unjustified neutral feedback and it really harms my
stores reputation
|
It's been suggested: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1176270
Vote!
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 22, 2020 12:35 | Subject: | Re: Change entry for minifigs, NEW / INcomplete | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Pazzo writes:
| Hi all,
recently some of our parts/sets/minifigs are removed from my inventorie.
Before you would get a notification, but nowadays items are removed without further
notice.
I do understand that it is necessary to list the items correctly, but I do have
a problem with removing minifigs from the inventorie.
For example:
SW0105: Lando Calrissian, Cloud City Outfit (Smooth Hair)
We do have this minifig in stock, it is new, but the cape is missing
We do not have an option to list the minifig as NEW and INcomplete, but the minifig
IS completly new!!
|
I agree, a solution is needed: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1218637
|
Either change the way we can add this to our inventorie (like sets) or let us
list them as new! It would be incorrect if we would list them as USED, as clearly
they are NOT.
just my 2 cents,
be cool and have fun!
Eric
|
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 20, 2020 15:55 | Subject: | Re: Reinstate Auctions! | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Stuart9 writes:
Thanks, Stuart9!
|
In Suggestions, Master_Jedi_Rob writes:
|
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 18, 2020 04:51 | Subject: | Re: Please improve min average lot explanation | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Teup writes:
| Again, can Bricklink please do something about the way the mininum average lot
value is explained to the buyer? I am getting many messages about it and find
myself explaining the same thing over and over. Please improve these descriptions
in the interface. Maybe by including an example, and by changing the terminology.
As is evident from many forum posts as well, many fresh buyers don't even
know what a "lot" is supposed to mean, let alone they will understand the concept
of minimum average lot value.
|
I agree. It's been a reoccurring expressed confusion for some time.
Start with a more concise definition of the term "lot" and it's specific
applications for both buyer and seller on BL.
I also like your idea of suggestions as examples in a popup window. Examples
tend to paint picture in our minds for a more visceral understanding, and why
we use them.
-popsicle
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 17, 2020 17:10 | Subject: | Re: Reinstate Auctions! | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Suggestions, Master_Jedi_Rob writes:
Auctions didn't do resoundingly well for the sellers, but I still welcome
the venue. Voted yes.
|
Thanks, Judith!
btw, my daughter and I were just yesterday, talking about Rhode Island's
fall foliage.
Are you looking forward to it, next month?
Found this photo looking up what this year is projected to be like
|
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 17, 2020 13:54 | Subject: | Re: Reinstate Auctions! | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| In Suggestions, Master_Jedi_Rob writes:
I do too...
I still think it would be a fantastic generator of traffic, commerce and fun!
-popsicle
|
We are going to be looking at the Suggestions topic in the near future and seeing
what can be done. I have reset this suggestion to Open. So if you are inclined,
please vote.
|
Thank you very much, Russell!
Now it's time to start campaigning
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Sep 17, 2020 13:49 | Subject: | Re: Paper bags inside sets from 2021 | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| In Catalog, Stellar writes:
Perhaps CA will see a comeback as the base ingredient for bricks and plates.
We have been on the ABS standard since 1964. CA has it's base origins in
wood pulp and cotton fibers, both renewable.
|
Now this is an interesting thought...
Yeah, maybe. Perhaps a better, updated structure of the cellulose acetate chemical
formula?
-popsicle
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|