| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Apr 13, 2024 20:53 | Subject: | Re: It's a whatcha-mac-all-it | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Help | |
| In Help, crazylegoman writes:
| In Help, WildBricks writes:
| Found a few stickered parts from this set:
but of the stickered parts cataloged. So I'd like to add one. The problem
is, I'm not much of a comic person and I have no clue what it's called.
So, you comic gurus out there, what is this thing in the middle of the mech's
chest?
Somehow I don't think catalog admin is going to accept "Tile, Round
3 x 3 with Round Domahickey that I think is the Power Pack".
|
Maybe call it an ARC reactor? I'd have to rewatch the first Ironman movie
to be sure, but I seem to remember that both Tony's and Obadiah's power
sources were ARC reactors.
David
|
Correct; Stane steals Tony's new Arc Reactor to power his own suit (with
Tony having to switch back to his cave reactor for the final battle).
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Mar 16, 2024 03:25 | Subject: | Re: (Cancelled) | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Contests | |
| In Contests, CitralisPills writes:
Citralis is a “male enhancement” supplement. . . What are you trying to say about
us?? 🤔
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Mar 16, 2024 03:23 | Subject: | Re: Calm Crest CBD Gummies Will Help You Reclaim | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| |
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Mar 16, 2024 03:21 | Subject: | Re: Keto IQ Gummies Reviews | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Announce | |
| |
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Mar 15, 2024 22:51 | Subject: | Locked Thread? | Viewed: | 101 times | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| Did the Julius Caesar thread get locked for being political? I thought people
would be over that after almost two millennia!
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Mar 10, 2024 15:25 | Subject: | Re: IWD, come and gone unremarked? | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| In Off Topic, UTLF writes:
| I actually made sure to raise the price of everything in my store by 13% in celebration
of International Women's Day
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Mar 8, 2024 07:26 | Subject: | Re: Warning!!! | Viewed: | 116 times | Topic: | Announce | |
| In Announce, Saitobricks.ca writes:
| In Announce, Nubs_Select writes:
This is getting out of hand.
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Feb 22, 2024 13:26 | Subject: | Re: Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
| I didn't see this as an egregious double-standard, nor a Fat Shaming
|
I thought that it was obvious, but that part was a joke!
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Feb 21, 2024 22:23 | Subject: | Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 133 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why is the round Friends alien in set 42605 not considered a Minifig, while their
slimmer sibling from the City sets (cty1727) is? The instructions do not have
this figure as part of a larger assembly, so there is no reason for this
egregious double-standard!
Please remove parts 3262pb05 (Lime, 1x) and 15469 (Lime, 1x) from the main inventory
of set 42605, and add the alien Minifig entry that I created. I will have a pic
of the Minifig up later.
[P=3262pb05]
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Feb 17, 2024 01:28 | Subject: | Re: Reaction to the R.R. Slugger video | Viewed: | 76 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Set 7171 from 1999 (Mos Espa Podrace):
is one of the celebrated early Star Wars sets and as such we may consider it
to be at the pinnacle of collector interest. In that set is a yellow dome with
a “blocked open stud” which is part no. 30151a:
[p=30151a,3]
The next version of that part by all accounts was introduced around 2010,
[p=30151b]
and by that time, the Mos Espa Podrace had long been retired. So we can say with
reasonable certainty that this set came originally with domes with blocked open
studs. If you see a copy of the set sitting on someone’s shelf and the domes
on Anakin’s podracer have hollow studs (no little Mercedes symbol), that is a
sure sign that the parts, and maybe even the whole set, is not original.
|
We only know this because of complete databases like the BrickLink Catalog.
| Next up is set 6745-1 from 2009 (Propeller Power).
This also has a red 533 on the nose of the plane, but here the inventory system
says it could have either the “b” or “c” variant. Check the change log to see
if you recognize any of the people who added these variants to the set:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChangeItem.asp?itemType=S&itemNo=6745-1&viewDate=Y&viewStatus=1
We’re pretty sure this came with both “b” and “c” types. It didn’t come with
a vented stud, and someone might mistakenly put one on this model if BrickLink
doesn’t educate them about it, right? That is the premise on why we need these
variants in the catalog, correct?
The thing is, how can we tolerate the difference of stud type in this model,
and not in other models where it is historically incorrect? In this plane model
from 2009, both are correct, so what does that say about the mixing of variants
in other models?
|
As you say, it is because other cases are historically inaccurate. To use a Star
Wars example, this is like asking why Imperial officers cannot wear single-line
rank insignias post-Yavin when they had a mix of single-line and double-line
ranks (an increasing number of the latter, over time) before Yavin.
| True collectors know that there actually is no replacement part that will ever
perfectly replace a part that is lost. The only truly correct part is the part
the set originally came with. It’s nice to get as close as possible to a correct
replacement part, but it’s a futile attempt.
|
This is pure cope, and also bull****.
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Feb 2, 2024 01:08 | Subject: | Re: Help with New Space Set Items | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Scrp749 writes:
| Hello,
I'm back again with more questions about set 60431:
1. I've really combed the catalog and pending items and can't find the
new alien. I can add this cute little guy to the catalog, but have no idea whether
it's a minifig or a part such as animal/land/space. I also haven't found
the head, but can submit that too.
|
These little guys are built alongside the Minifigs, so I think that they should
count as such in the Catalog.
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Jan 30, 2024 02:13 | Subject: | Re: Gummy Spam Poll ... Round 2 | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | General | |
| In General, PlanetEarthToys writes:
| as we are all very happy as to the recent hacking incident... , & noticing
the Gummy Spam has IBM Security Directory Integrator components that are designed
for network administrators who are responsible for maintaining user directories
and other resources.
these are not "New BL Members".. they are Network Administrators at some
company.
maybe a simple Poll would be something needed to see what the Community thinks
moving forward.
Poll:
Which option would you prefer as a gummy Solution
A) nothing, gummy Spam is Delicious!
B) require a Forum Pay-To-Play Positive Feedback, similar to the Seller
Requirement
C) require new users to be Verified by some Official Secondary means w/
Bricklink i.e. a payment processor.
D) ban Zero Feedback Members from posting URL Links in the Forum.
E) allow Zero Feedback Members Limited Forum Access that is visible to
Moderators Only and does not post publicly.
F) Restrict New Users from using the Forum Period, placing them in a 'Guest
User' mode until they actually buy/sell something. any questions they have
can be directed straight to either Admin's, Moderators or Veteran BL Members
who volunteer to answer Guest User Questions.
being fair, let's say leave poll open for 2 weeks...
to give occational forum readers a chance to participate, if they want too.
please just give a simple letter vote, no harrassing others for their vote. we
are a Civilized Lego Society.
|
A.
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Jan 28, 2024 02:57 | Subject: | Re: good counterfeits? Or just old? | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | General | |
| In General, crazylegoman writes:
| Those are all legitimate parts. I just don't get the hyper paranoia buyers
have nowadays about counterfeit parts. The forum is replete with posts about
parts that people think might be fake because they don't match 100% with
the parts they have from the past few years. As time goes on LEGO makes new
molds and makes tiny changes on most iterations of parts. I suppose the Chinese
clones are to blame. Sigh...
|
Just wait until variants get merged! 🙄
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Jan 27, 2024 13:26 | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - January 26 | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, Give.Me.A.Brick writes:
| it has variants not catalogued) so buyers that don't care could save some bucks in the process.
|
There are many variants not yet cataloged. I began the process of documenting
them with this list several years ago:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRelCat.asp?relID=24
All variants could be cataloged and documented properly with selectable
variants, which is another reason why this is clearly the correct solution to
the variant problem.
|
+1
|
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Jan 27, 2024 13:25 | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - January 26 | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I am not sure that there is anything I can say that has not already been said;
merging significant part variants makes the Catalog more confusing and less comprehensive
(and will inevitably lead to unpleasant buying/selling experiences). It also
feels like the beginning of the end for BrickLink as a useful database of LEGO
element history.
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Jan 10, 2024 10:13 | Subject: | Re: Grey/Bluish grey. Light and dark | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Help | |
| In Help, lockjaw80 writes:
| Is there an easy way to tell Light Grey/Light Bluish Grey and Dark Grey/Dark
Bluish Grey bricks apart? Is there any lighting options that make it easy? I
am having quite some trouble telling these color variations apart.
Thanks.
|
Good lighting and comparison bricks; also keep in mind that the old greys look
yellowed when compared to their bluish counterparts.
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 18:58 | Subject: | Re: 403 Forbidden | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| Also, the obvious choice is a pic of the Gandalf Minifig! |
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 18:56 | Subject: | Re: 403 Forbidden | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| In Off Topic, macebobo writes:
| Bricklink is having a lot of 403 Forbidden errors recently and the site could
at least show something pleasant or humorous to look at. Here are my entries.
|
Where is Lord Sinister’s hook??
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Nov 8, 2023 13:54 | Subject: | Re: Update on November 3rd incident | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Administrative | |
| Thank you!! I was beginning to go into withdrawals over the lack of access to
the Catalog! 😬
|
Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Nov 8, 2023 13:54 | Subject: | Re: Update on November 3rd incident | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Administrative | |
| Thank you!! I was beginning to go into withdrawals over the lack of access to
the Catalog! 😬
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|