Discussion Forum: Messages by crazylegoman (1094)
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: May 25, 2020 22:18
 Subject: Re: Comments during instant Checkout
 Viewed: 40 times
 Topic: Feedback
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Suggestions, tEoS writes:
  I have never seen a feedback, as long as, your most recent neutral. I thought
we were limited to 80 or so characters?

Yeah, what's up with that? I thought all feedback (positive, negative and
neutral) had the same character length limit.

David
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: May 3, 2020 18:59
 Subject: Re: Ants
 Viewed: 53 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog, BigBBricks writes:
  In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
  In Catalog, Adjour writes:
  In Catalog, hpoort writes:
  Except for the coloring, is there any difference between [p=62575cx1] and
 
Part No: 23714  Name: Ant
* 
23714 Ant
Parts: Animal, Land
?

Also, how do we go about numbering in such a case in general? 62575 is the LEGO
design number for the marbled version, 23714 for the plain version. Is the former
really seen as an assembly (cx1)?

I would suggest 62575cx1 renumbered to 23714pb01 and 62575 listed as an alternative
number. Before making such a request, I'd like to be sure about any differences
and guide lines.

And yes, Robert, I know the catalog team has different priorities right now,
but this one just came up and I wonder.


I have both of these. They look different in person. I don't have them in
front of me at the moment but one sits taller and one looks longer.

I am in favor of renaming the newer one (or maybe both) in a way that designates
that one is taller and one is longer.

David

Aren't they different materials? If memory serves the marbled one is a lot
less ridgid that the solid.

I don't have the Ant-Man Final Battle set, so I can't say.

David
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: May 3, 2020 16:14
 Subject: Re: Ants
 Viewed: 55 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog, Adjour writes:
  In Catalog, hpoort writes:
  Except for the coloring, is there any difference between [p=62575cx1] and
 
Part No: 23714  Name: Ant
* 
23714 Ant
Parts: Animal, Land
?

Also, how do we go about numbering in such a case in general? 62575 is the LEGO
design number for the marbled version, 23714 for the plain version. Is the former
really seen as an assembly (cx1)?

I would suggest 62575cx1 renumbered to 23714pb01 and 62575 listed as an alternative
number. Before making such a request, I'd like to be sure about any differences
and guide lines.

And yes, Robert, I know the catalog team has different priorities right now,
but this one just came up and I wonder.


I have both of these. They look different in person. I don't have them in
front of me at the moment but one sits taller and one looks longer.

I am in favor of renaming the newer one (or maybe both) in a way that designates
that one is taller and one is longer.

David
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: Mar 22, 2020 11:55
 Subject: Re: Wheel plate stuck on car chassis piece
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog, randyf writes:
  In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:

  randyf, the part is definitely made up of 3 separate parts (1 of the main chassis,
and 2 of the modified 2X2 plates.) Each of the 3 parts has a molded part number
that you can see on the underside.

What I meant to say was that the part comes as one complete unit in the sets
directly from LEGO and is counted as one part by LEGO. There is no need to assemble
it, and it is not meant to be disassembled. I was rushing through messages before,
so I didn't explain it well enough.

Cheers,
Randy

That makes sense. I did have a strong suspicion that the parts came pre-assembled
in sets, since that chassis is a juniorized part (for young kids), and the precise
force that would be required to put the 2X2 modified plates on the underside
looked like something that would take adult level effort.

Thanks,
David
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: Mar 21, 2020 23:28
 Subject: Re: Wheel plate stuck on car chassis piece
 Viewed: 34 times
 Topic: Catalog
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
  This set review has both the red and LBG holders:

https://youtu.be/cIeqTh0x82g

Good find! It looks like bag #2 comes with the red chassis that already has
the red 2X2 plates with small pins attached.

Thanks,
David

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More