Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 22, 2020 12:53 | Subject: | Re: POLL: New Variant for 6641 | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| There is a new variant for
that was just released that has a completely new type of axle hole.
It has Design ID 51149: https://brickset.com/parts/design-51149
The catalog team is considering whether to add this as a new part to the catalog
or just add an alternate item number to 6641.
POLL:
What would you like to see done?
Thanks in advance for your responses!
Cheers,
Randy
|
I allow myselft to supplement this slightly
Screenshot from this review attached
https://youtu.be/81aGlQMQ47g?t=374
but it is pending for inventory of this set
|
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 22, 2020 09:28 | Subject: | Re: Catalog images | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, pcthurman writes:
You seeing instructions entries under that link for those sets and just many
of them missing image for instruction and that is why you don't see images
there.
We currently missing 966(!) images for instructions
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?catType=I&imgLID=0
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 16, 2020 15:36 | Subject: | Re: Wolf Pack minifig inventory | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, wahiggin writes:
| In Inventories, crazylegoman writes:
| In Inventories, wahiggin writes:
| I am not sure if the Wolf Pack minifig #CAS072T inventory is incorrect or if
a new one needs to be added. I am not familiar with this process, so is there
someone that could update it?
Looks like set 6038 has this minifig, but with a red cape.
If any of the inventory specialists would like pictures, feel free to use these.
Wesley
|
The cas072T is a counterpart. The BL inventory lists
as the regular minifig for that set.
David
|
Can this minifig be added to the subtheme Wolfpack? That is why I missed it.
Minifigs: Castle: Wolfpack
|
It is also in Black Knights subtheme
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?M=cas252&in=S
That why it isn't in Wolfpack subtheme as it occur in two subthemes
So only in main Castle theme.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 08:03 | Subject: | Re: Key chain 853992 | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| I just noticed this key chain in the catalog.
The current name is " 2 x 4 Brick - Satin Black Key Chain".
Should that not be "2 x 4 Brick - Chrome Black Key Chain"?
Or am I mistaken here?
|
To be honest, I have no idea.
When submitting the new key chains, I just tried to follow what was said here:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=265187&nID=1186400
There isn't any other part in Satin Black in the catalog yet and I don't
own that Chrome Black Darth Vader to compare the colors.
|
Chrome black is also this container on the outside
look at the note
I think this brick is chrome black
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 1, 2020 19:31 | Subject: | Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, alcedoatthis writes:
| Hello Bricklinkers,
Some minutes ago, I found out that the "Coral" part (49577) is included in the
Plant Section of Bricklink, which is scientifically wrong. Coral is an Animal!
Please check additional information here:
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coral.html
I wrote to customer service of Bricklink explaining this mistake. I hope they
change this part to the Animal Water section!
Best,
Rita
|
Now I understand whole misunderstaning about coral here
You can see in the system in shop listnings
"Coral Plant Thallus, Seaweed"
(image attached)
but in this case part name is only
"Plant Thallus, Seaweed"
and coral is name of color we use
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_(color)
so whole misunderstanding is here that we use coral in the color meaning but
you thought it is "Coral Plant" - Coral as animal.
Yes it looks strange in listnings but Coral as for now on our system is name
of color not animal.
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 1, 2020 18:02 | Subject: | Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Teup writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, alcedoatthis writes:
| Hello Bricklinkers,
Some minutes ago, I found out that the "Coral" part (49577) is included in the
Plant Section of Bricklink, which is scientifically wrong. Coral is an Animal!
Please check additional information here:
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coral.html
I wrote to customer service of Bricklink explaining this mistake. I hope they
change this part to the Animal Water section!
Best,
Rita
|
in my opinion this is seaweed not coral
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaweed
and btw LEEGO offcial name of this part is plant
https://brickset.com/parts/design-49577
PLANT, W/ 3.2 SHAFT, NO. 2
so I think this also prevails towards seaweed than coral.
|
Out of curiousity, if there would be a coral part, would it be put in... Animal?
|
Should be, zoologist tells you
|
By the way, off topic: I think frogs should really be in Animal,Water. They look
too awkward amongst my bag of cats and dogs and his water buddies miss him.
|
and this is a problem they are water and land animals. Of course all amphibians
need to breed in water and their larve need water but then adults of many species
lives only on land, adult toads for example or Salamndra salamandra. Also in
frogs are species more connected to water and less connected to water. For example
our central european Rana temporaria and Rana arvalis most adult live spend on
land and return to water to breed but Rana lessonae or Rana esculenta they prefer
water than land as adult.
|
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 1, 2020 17:07 | Subject: | Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, alcedoatthis writes:
| Hello Bricklinkers,
Some minutes ago, I found out that the "Coral" part (49577) is included in the
Plant Section of Bricklink, which is scientifically wrong. Coral is an Animal!
Please check additional information here:
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coral.html
I wrote to customer service of Bricklink explaining this mistake. I hope they
change this part to the Animal Water section!
Best,
Rita
|
in my opinion this is seaweed not coral
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaweed
and btw LEEGO offcial name of this part is plant
https://brickset.com/parts/design-49577
PLANT, W/ 3.2 SHAFT, NO. 2
so I think this also prevails towards seaweed than coral.
|
p.s. Rhodophyta even maybe
https://seanet.stanford.edu/Rhodophyta
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 1, 2020 16:58 | Subject: | Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section | Viewed: | 88 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, alcedoatthis writes:
| Hello Bricklinkers,
Some minutes ago, I found out that the "Coral" part (49577) is included in the
Plant Section of Bricklink, which is scientifically wrong. Coral is an Animal!
Please check additional information here:
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coral.html
I wrote to customer service of Bricklink explaining this mistake. I hope they
change this part to the Animal Water section!
Best,
Rita
|
in my opinion this is seaweed not coral
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaweed
and btw LEEGO offcial name of this part is plant
https://brickset.com/parts/design-49577
PLANT, W/ 3.2 SHAFT, NO. 2
so I think this also prevails towards seaweed than coral.
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 25, 2020 14:16 | Subject: | Re: Darth Vader Head Mold Variance | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, M.Boss writes:
|
When comparing two Darth Vader figures I had, I discovered a mold variance between
two helmets. The "old" type came likey was made from 1999-2014, while The "new"
type appeared in the 2019 20th Anniversary Clone Scout Walker I think
this new mold was created because in order to create the anniversary figure lego
wanted to use a 1 piece Vader helmet, as opposed to the 2 piece helmets they
switched to a couple of years ago. This mold variation deserves a note in the
catalog entry for the helmet,, or a variant added to the catalog, but I'm
not sure which. If someone wants to take the appropriate action from here, please
go ahead. See the attached image for the differences between the two.
|
I have an original helmet from 1999 and it is fur sure the left variant, so that's
definitly not a new mold. I would also say that most if not all images here show
the left variant:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=30368&in=M
And regarding the reintroduction of the old helmet in set 75261, the designers
said that the old mold was still available:
https://www.brothers-brick.com/2019/04/09/interview-with-lego-star-wars-designers-jens-kronvold-and-kurt-kristiansen-feature/
So I am wondering: Where did you find the right variant and are you sure it is
a genuine LEGO part?
|
I agree with Jonas.
Your "old" mold on right is suspicious. I just take a look on my Vaders from
different years and in all I have left helmet with narrow nose so your "new"
mold. And there is only one diffrence between oldest and newer Vader halmets
from this mold (later on this).
For this post I just took 4 representants from different years.
1) First one is
years 1999-2003
My minfigure on images is from 2002 set.
2) Second one is
years 2009-2016
My minfigure on images is from 2011 set.
3) Third one is
this ony came onluy in 2014 advent calendar.
4) fourth one
the newest one from 2019 anniversary set.
and as you can see all of them have identical narrow nose just like "new one"
from your photo.
The only change is that somwhere in timeline LEGO started to add molded number
on this helmet and LEGO logo. Oldest ones don't have mold number and LEGO
logo. It is visible on images. But with mold number this helmet was already in
2014 advent calendar set and this helmet is identical with 2019 helmet.
btw LEGO has for this part only one mold number and one PCC
https://brickset.com/parts/design-30368
I also check that in this Vader from 2013
helmet is also already with mold number on it. (and it is of course identical
with 2019 one). I couldn't track for now when LEGO have started to molding
part number on this helmet. But beside this only difference oldest helmet without
part number are identical with newer ones with part number.
|
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 24, 2020 18:49 | Subject: | Re: How are stud measurements translated? | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| Hello
I got a quote request from a customer saying that the shipping was too high.
When I looked at the order it looks like the below piece is the issue.
I have shipped this part before with no issues as lettermail.
With Canada post anything thicker than 2cm must be sent as parcel which is much
more expensive.
I am trying to understand how bricklink takes the 2x2x2 and translates that to
shipping dimensions in centimetres or inches.
Also can someone help me to understand how this can be 2x2x2 when one side is
longer than it is wide.
Is one of the measurements stacked bricks?
Thanks for any help
Edward
|
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=261
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 12, 2020 09:49 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sh616 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Hygrotus writes:
| In Inventories Requests, Mirko8710 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 44302a Dark Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End and 9 Teeth with Bottom Groove
Comments from Submitter:
I don't know how to add an alternate part for a minifigure. Another question: how can I add the counterpart of the four slope courved with stickers? Many thanks for all.
|
So this request has been rejected a note to the minfigure has been added.
|
If it had been anyone other than the person who discovered the new piece, I would
think it wasn't really two versions.
|
Inventory of this set was made from Sealed Set Content by Stormchaser and there
are two DBG 44302b so it was logicall that this min figs would have the same
parts even it minfig by itself was inventoried from instruction but luckily
only 4 were used here and two are still in set inventory. So assumpsion was correct
that minfig will have the same variant as one currently in inventory from sealed
set content.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 12, 2020 09:38 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sh616 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Mirko8710 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 44302a Dark Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End and 9 Teeth with Bottom Groove
Comments from Submitter:
I don't know how to add an alternate part for a minifigure. Another question: how can I add the counterpart of the four slope courved with stickers? Many thanks for all.
|
So this request has been rejected a note to the minfigure has been added.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 12, 2020 09:33 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig sh616 | Viewed: | 25 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Mirko8710 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 4 Part 44302a Dark Bluish Gray Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End and 9 Teeth with Bottom Groove
Comments from Submitter:
I don't know how to add an alternate part for a minifigure. Another question: how can I add the counterpart of the four slope courved with stickers? Many thanks for all.
|
Minfigures can't have alternate parts. Only a note can be added that there
are two variants of this part in this minfigure
As for stickered and unsitckered variants of minfigures second entry should be
added.
Example
Sticered minfigures has 's' after number
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 10, 2020 10:43 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Minifig njo577 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Black {15616pb02 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap with Silver Cyborg Eyepiece with One Red Dot on Bottom with Silver Outline Pattern to 15616pb04 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap with Silver Cyborg Eyepiece with One Red Dot on Bottom without Silver Outline Pattern}
Comments from Submitter:
Real photo of this minfig shows this variant. All Legacy Nindroid has this variant of wrap
https://brickset.com/parts/6287392
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1202956
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 10, 2020 10:38 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Minifig njo592 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Black {15616pb01 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap with Silver Cyborg Eyepiece with One Red Dot on Top without Silver Outline Pattern to 15616pb04 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap with Silver Cyborg Eyepiece with One Red Dot on Bottom without Silver Outline Pattern}
Comments from Submitter:
Inventoried this set with wrong variant, correction, variant checked with set on based which this inventory was submitted.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 10, 2020 10:38 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Minifig njo591 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Black {15616pb01 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap with Silver Cyborg Eyepiece with One Red Dot on Top without Silver Outline Pattern to 15616pb04 Minifigure, Headgear Ninjago Wrap with Silver Cyborg Eyepiece with One Red Dot on Bottom without Silver Outline Pattern}
Comments from Submitter:
Inventoried this set with wrong variant, correction, variant checked with set on based which this inventory was submitted.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 9, 2020 17:22 | Subject: | Re: two versions of part 970c00pb0052 | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Tracyd writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | | My guess is that it hasn't been discovered yet that there is a bright green
version, so all the figures with it are being inventoried as having the lime
version.
|
All of the parts of the minifig appear to have bright green print, not lime
|
Which leads me to believe that there are two versions of Buzz and all his parts:
Lime and Bright Green. Which sets each came in I have no idea.
|
The bright green print may have come from the magnet gear set
* | | 852949 (Inv) Magnet Set, Minifigures Toy Story (3) - Woody, Alien, Buzz Lightyear - with 2 x 4 Brick Bases blister pack Gear: Magnet: Toy Story |
Those were made in China, I believe, and could possibly have had poor quality
control.
I have not seen a Buzz with anything but lime print, but all of the ones I have
came from the real Toy Story sets.
|
Weren't the magnet sets all glued when these came out?
|
They started gluing it from 2011, Magnet sets from 2009 and 2010 are not glued.
But there are some sets which have not glued and glued versions.
Evrything is here
http://thebrickblogger.com/2011/06/glued-and-non-glued-lego-magnets/
So in our catalog those from 2011 and later aren't inventoried, inventoried
are those from 2009 and 2010.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 7, 2020 06:05 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 41068-1 | Viewed: | 16 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, mudri writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {1 to 2} Part Reddish Brown 87079pb716 Tile 2 x 4 with Reddish Brown and Gold Zigzag Pattern 1 (Sticker) - Set 41068 (Counterpart)
|
Didn't you read what I wrote here
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1202352
There are two diffrent stickers in this set with this Zigzag number 4 and 7.
They differ.
Request will be rejected.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 7, 2020 05:36 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 41068-1 | Viewed: | 12 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, mudri writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4345pb08 White Container, Box 2 x 2 x 2 with Vintage Clock Pattern (Sticker) - Set 41068 (Counterpart)
|
I repeat Randy's request once again!
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1202268
"If you have a bunch of counterparts to add from the same set, could you please
consolidate them all into one request in the future? Posting one counterpart
per request clogs up the forum unnecessarily and makes our admin screens on the
back end much more disorganized."
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jun 7, 2020 05:34 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 41068-1 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, mudri writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 87079pb716 Reddish Brown Tile 2 x 4 with Reddish Brown and Gold Zigzag Pattern 1 (Sticker) - Set 41068 (Counterpart)
|
There is only one tile with this pattern in this set. Your submitted sticker
nr 4 from sticker sheet
please notice that sticker number 7 differs. Middle gold Zigzag is moved closer
to the edge on sticker 4 and it is more centered on sticker number 7, so triangels
on one of those sticker are smaller. That is why I've name ii 'Pattern
1' and there is a note made for this part that it is number 4 sticker.
Request will be accepted but quantity change to 1.
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|