Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2019 23:55 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray Patio Umbrella Stand #4095 | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Here's a thread on Eurobricks about this train. There's mention of some
sets being packed with the wrong color bars, so maybe that was this piece.
Unfortunately, it was too long ago for me to remember.
https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/53757-santa-fe-super-chief-limited-edition/
In Help, Lego_Friends writes:
| In Help, carolannee writes:
|
| So Bricklink doesn't list them? Only Peeron does? I just realized that after
I typed my last message.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2019 23:44 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray Patio Umbrella Stand #4095 | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| No, they are not these:[p=bb219]
In Help, thewally writes:
| Hi, these are not actual LEGO pieces, they are simply packaging pins to hold
tracks together for shipping. They pin 4 or 6 tracks in a stack.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2019 23:41 | Subject: | Re: Cardboard sleeves in inventories | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| I like the idea of adding and inventorying these boxes (especially the ones w/o
a peek hole), though I wish it could have been done years ago. Still, as they
say, better late than never.
| Wow, people will throw an instant tirade about any new idea we try out. It is
no wonder that the corporate BrickLink employees and developers don't want
to try anything new, either. Everything that is tried receives just whinging
and moaning from the user base. I think I now have a good idea about what drove
Jaclyn away from the site.
In any case, we have heard all of the feedback and will be reversing course on
the inventories. We had planned to make an announcement in a few days concerning
this to ask for feedback on what had been done, but we wanted stuff in place
for users to look at. So this thread was not a complete loss to us, but you did
jump the gun on us, Jonas.
Please bear with us as we work out the kinks.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 18, 2019 21:35 | Subject: | Re: How much does your pet mean to you? | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I can't find any dog pictures on this computer, but they are the same 3 as
my ID pic (just much older).
Here's one for John:
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 29, 2019 00:44 | Subject: | Re: Wanted items in stores | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Already possible:
In Suggestions, Mboe writes:
| Hi BL
Unless this already exits in some form (if it do, please inlighten me as to how
it works!), I suggest a button for “show items on wanted lists” when visiting
stores. Quite often when I’m visting stores, browsing around for additional items,
I stumble upon items marked as “on want list”. It would be a lot easier if it
was possible to just see all items in store that are already on my wanted lists,
instead of having to search through 100’s of pages in different categories...
I am aware of the whole ‘buy wanted items’ auto function, so it’s not that I’m
missing... It’s more when already committed to a store, I wanna stock up and
save on postage.
Thanks for an otherwise excellent site!
Best regards
Martin, Denmark
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 25, 2019 18:28 | Subject: | Re: Either a bonafide brain-fart, or a seizure... | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Sadly, "coming soon" has a different meaning to BL:
In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| Wayne's post and others like it, https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1150409
brings to mind an idea that briefly visited my headspace some time ago:
A type of reverse want list. That is, a way that sellers could peruse the current
want lists to specific buyer's needs, to then as a seller, proactively engage
members like Wayne with offers on items they have on their want list.
Kinda like amping-up the want list and selling process, by getting the sellers
more involved in increasing their sales by actually selling
It's just a rough draft of an idea. Limitations, restriction and other refinements
of the idea, expected.
But hey, BL shot-callers, it speaks directly to upping the sales numbers!
-Cory
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 1, 2019 11:38 | Subject: | Re: 10205 : Parts to be removed from Inventory | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| Unless there was some change to this model via a supplement instruction sheet,
some of the parts in the inventory don't even belong there:
Panel 1x2x3
Slope inv. 75 2x1x3
I also don't see the black tile 1x4 in the build
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:34 | Subject: | Re: 4070a | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 23:52 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10188-1 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| I bought a new and slightly incomplete sealed set. Boxes 2-4 fully sealed plus
some sealed bags from box 1.
Ebay auction #113697990842 (use advanced search to see sold listings)
In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| In Inventories Requests, tEoS writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 19 Part 2362a Light Bluish Gray Panel 1 x 2 x 3 - Solid Studs (Alternate) (match ID 8)
|
Could you please let me know what your source is for this change request?
Thanks,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 27, 2019 08:49 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 10188-1 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 19 Part 2362a Light Bluish Gray Panel 1 x 2 x 3 - Solid Studs (Alternate) (match ID 8)
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 20, 2019 08:48 | Subject: | Re: What do the ! and * symbols mean under image? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| A small asterisk (*) below a thumbnail image indicates that there is a large
image (like the one you see on this page) available when you click on the small
thumbnail.
An exclamation mark (!) below a thumbnail image indicates that there is 3D data
available.
In Inventories, Naughty_UK writes:
| This may be a dumb question but I've looked in the help and can't find
anything. There's also nothing in the hover-over tooltips or any other clues
on the inventories themselves.
When you view a set inventory, each part listed usually has a ! or a * (or both)
underneath the part image thumbnail. Can anyone tell me what they mean? ta.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 2, 2019 16:52 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 60003-1 | Viewed: | 17 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| Read the extended comments for this inventory.
| Comments from Submitter:
Yellow 1x1 round plate open stud is part of this set, not an alternate. It needs to be moved into normal inventory.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 2, 2019 12:28 | Subject: | Re: Old (classic) light gray | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Colors | |
| I'm not sure that it's only the sun light in itself that causes discoloration.
In my old store inventory, I've found a small number of parts that were
fully discolored, yet they were not exposed to direct sun light.
On the other hand, I had the little Filmore VW bus (from Cars) in which certain
colors on one side became discolored.
In Colors, legoman_74 writes:
| Hello,
So I am well aware of the "sun burnt" effect on white, blues, yellows, the old
light grays and among other colors, however I am sorting through quite a bit
of used Lego with the old light grays and I pulled quite a bit of them out believing
they were discolored by the sun. Upon closer inspection, they appear to be quite
uniform in their color, including underneath, just definitely a different shade
than the others and not quite like the "sun burnt" ones. Does anyone else out
there recall issues with Lego having off color batches on old light grays in
the past like they have trouble with now on the new light bluish grays and yellows?
Thanks in advance for everyone's time.
Sincerely,
Ken
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 31, 2019 12:54 | Subject: | Re: Make paperwork optional | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Why is this significant?
I print the order for pulling, so a buyer isn't getting anything extra (more
wasteful).
In Suggestions, cosmicray writes:
| As this has been a controversial topic recently, perhaps we should make it a
buyer select-able option.
Allow the buyer to choose to receive paperwork with the order, or to have the
order shipped without paperwork. The seller would then be obliged to follow the
buyer's selection.
thank you, Nita Rae
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 20, 2019 22:47 | Subject: | Re: Ghost Buy feature from sellers own store | Viewed: | 77 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Not even close. Having an order with a record of the transaction would be easier
and more ideal.
Regardless, it doesn't really matter, as I fought for this feature at least
twice in the past and had little in the way of support. I doubt it will ever
be possible.
The forum is a tough crowd to win over. Add that to the 'new' administration
and you'll see why so many have lost faith that BL will ever reach its potential.
| That seems plenty close enough to pulling like an order to me. Do you have a
tablet?
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 23:43 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I just noticed that these sets require a Target credit card to purchase.
From this point on I will make an extra effort to ensure that I purchase in a
manner that limits the direct benefit to TLC. All these exclusives seem to do
is create a rift in their loyal fan base. They end up solely in the 2nd hand
market at inflated prices.
In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| Sweet Mayhem and Benny will be limited also.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 21:08 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
In Catalog, Dalika writes:
| In Catalog Requests, speshy writes:
| Are those the limited edition brickheadz? Got any pics?
K
|
I saw them and thought they were WM exclusives.
|
In Catalog Requests, starbeanie writes:
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:13 | Subject: | Re: 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Interesting find. I have the "landscape" print version and can confirm that
the opposite side is not the "portrait" print side you've shown.
In Catalog, baylit writes:
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 18, 2019 12:46 | Subject: | Re: Identical minifigs? | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| The torsos look different between these 2 ninjas, plus one is clearly Chinese
plastic.
In Catalog, jodawill writes:
| The inventory for these two minifigures is the exact same. Is there a reason
to have two different catalog items for it? I don't doubt there may be some
differences between the reissue and the original, but the inventory is listed
as them being identical.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 16, 2019 16:51 | Subject: | Re: Lego Movie 2 Minifigure collection | Viewed: | 25 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Do these come out in the USA soon? I need to get the 4 WoZ characters for my
mom. These will go nice next to her Beetles set
In Catalog Requests, Brick2BrickUK writes:
| Lego Movie 2 Minifigure collection as I have a numourous amount to list please
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 14, 2019 17:03 | Subject: | Re: Search nearby stores by postal or zip code | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| FYI: they discarded my suggestion to show zip codes so I wouldn't get your
hopes up.
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1021174
In Suggestions, superchicken77 writes:
| I'd like to be able to search for stores within a specific range (ie 10km,
20km, 50km) from my postal code. Seeing that a seller is in a given province
(in my case) means they could be around the corner or 12 hours way in Thunder
Bay. Being able to search nearby stores would be a fantastic option. It would
be an option to opt into, whereby a store must enable the feature to show up
in nearby store searches. This would allow stores to disable the feature in
case they are uncomfortable with the feature.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 11:06 | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Unfortunately, counterparts don't display on the part-out page. Until that
is changed I think things like this must be left as is.
In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 12, 2019 17:29 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 76103-1 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Dark Bluish Gray {44301 Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End (undetermined type) to 44301b Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End without Bottom Groove}
Comments from Submitter:
Parted out 3 of this set
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 5, 2019 16:21 | Subject: | Re: Overwatch Mercy & Pharah pictures wrong | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Based on many other catalog examples I would say that Mercy should have wings
in the assembly. I'm not sure if Pharah should just have the armor or
include the other pieces. I would like to find some comparable examples, though
all of this is up to an admin in the end.
| Not to mention the angel should have her wings, right?
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 22:51 | Subject: | Re: Overwatch Mercy & Pharah pictures wrong | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| More bad news. I just checked Lego's website for instructions and it appears
that Genji (dual-sword holder?) and Hanzo (quiver) are missing these neckgear
in their pictures here.
Also, Genji appears to have a piece that connects to his helmet.
I don't have this set yet to confirm the contents. I'm going to run
to Walmart to see if they still have some.
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| The picture for this fig is wrong.
|
I'm confused. The figure doesn't have a picture.
Only kidding. I removed the images just now. How and why did these images get
approved?
Well, the catalog (me) is trying to be more responsive than it has in the past.
That means more and better communication with members, quicker item approvals,
and no more long queues of pending items. One of the casualties of pumping out
catalog entries is that some get in which are wrong.
I have to put some trust in members that items are submitted properly, especially
for new figures for which the assembly instructions are not always immediately
available. Sometimes that trust is repaid and sometimes it ain't. I have
a decent memory and submissions from the member who submitted these entries will
be checked carefully in the future.
It's a messier method in some ways, but I believe the benefits to members
outweigh making sure a catalog entry is absolutely perfect in every way before
approval. That's what change requests are for. This is not to say that
I don't check and occasionally reject things, of course. I'm just not
going to hold catalog entries forever, especially not desirable new items which
can easily be corrected. The inventory administrators, as Randy said, also sometimes
catch errors during the inventory process.
Having said all that, it was my fault that I approved these images/figures when
they were incorrect and I apologize for the error. I believe the instructions
were already available when I approved those figures with those images and I
neglected to download and check the set instructions regarding the correct assembly.
As you've noticed, the images are gone now.
| This one is up to the admins. The 1st assembly shown in instructions is the
standard w/ legs. I think this version is a good addition to the catalog, but
it may not fit the catalog policies.
|
There's kinda only one CA for now, and it's me. If the figure does not
match the assembly first shown in the set instructions, then it's off to
deleteland for that figure, which is where this figure has travelled.
Thank you for bringing these issues to my attention.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 22:03 | Subject: | Re: Wanted list in seller store | Viewed: | 25 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Already exists.
In Suggestions, BrickFlipper writes:
| Firstly love the site.
Been a buyer for a few years now.
And I'm starting to use wanted lists.
And while I'm gooding through a store for a particular part, I'll come
across and item listed in one of my Wanted lists.
If I'm at a large store their maybe a few.
It would be nice to have an option / filter to just list parts in your wanted
list(s).
You may decide to get more parts from that sttore than intended.
Regards
Andrew
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 21:58 | Subject: | Overwatch Mercy & Pharah pictures wrong | Viewed: | 126 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
The picture for this fig is wrong. 1st her head sucks in comparison to what's
shown (but not really the point here).
2nd and most importantly, she needs at least the clear neck piece, if not the
full wing assembly
This fig has special shoulder armor that has some studs on the back for the other
pieces.
______
Not a picture issue:
[m=ow014]
This one is up to the admins. The 1st assembly shown in instructions is the
standard w/ legs. I think this version is a good addition to the catalog, but
it may not fit the catalog policies.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 1, 2019 14:43 | Subject: | 2 versions of dino tail end #40379 | Viewed: | 70 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
There are two versions of this part where the small hole by the base varies
in location, mirrored left or right side.
This can be seen in the new carousel where it seems Lego tried to include 24/24
(I got 23/25) of each type, so that the holes wouldn't be visible.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Dec 24, 2018 22:11 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 5985-1 | Viewed: | 18 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4532a White Container, Cupboard 2 x 3 x 2 - Solid Studs (Alternate) (match ID 10)
* Change 1 Part White 4532 Container, Cupboard 2 x 3 x 2 {match ID 0 to 10}
* Change 1 Part White {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 6 Part White {3684 Slope 75 2 x 2 x 3 - Undetermined Stud Type to 3684a Slope 75 2 x 2 x 3 - Hollow Studs}
Comments from Submitter:
I found one sealed bag #5 from this set in my unlisted stock. It only had 2 of the slope 75's so I'm assuming the others were the same style.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 17:50 | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | Viewed: | 78 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| It should be safe to assume that there is an error with the catalog entry for
that fig and there's likely a correct version of the fig in the catalog.
Otherwise, provide some examples.
| But not on all of them they say why.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Nov 9, 2018 11:18 | Subject: | Re: Catalog: Strongly disagree 3830c0 deletion | Viewed: | 67 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I realize that since you've been appointed many things are being accomplished/changed.
However, part of me is uncomfortable that Maggie or Ronald aren't at the
head of these discussions/changes, as if they are being side-stepped in this
process.
They have been performing these duties for a long-time and I think it would go
a long way to create credibility in these decisions, if they were the voice of
the catalog reorganization process.
| Unfortunately, I've been rather busy in the last two weeks since I was appointed.
Until I get around to addressing this issue, part assemblies are kind of up
in the air.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 28, 2018 20:50 | Subject: | Re: This item has already been reserved by member | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| Maybe Gear items need special approval to receive an inventory? Contact the
help desk.
In Inventories, _djm writes:
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 5, 2018 10:57 | Subject: | Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| No, I'm simply stating that the "rocket science" argument is flawed. It
implies that you don't need the intellect of a very scientific person, as
if said person has the capacity to know how to do everything very well.
In Suggestions, Teup writes:
| So, you are saying it is difficult. We're talking about sellers here, people
who decide that they can handle selling Lego. Not every person who signs up on
Bricklink has to understand how to set up shipping methods. But I think it is
only fair that for the small portion of those members who really are serious
enough to get into selling, it should be expected of them that they're able
to handle it. If they're not, they should either ask for help or just use
some other way to sell Lego that they do understand (In fact, I think setting
things up at Brickowl is easier than at BL.)
In Suggestions, tEoS writes:
| I grow tired of reading the old "it's not rocket science" argument, as if
it somehow substantiates a person's claim.
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 5, 2018 07:59 | Subject: | Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! | Viewed: | 67 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I grow tired of reading the old "it's not rocket science" argument, as if
it somehow substantiates a person's claim.
| And I think on the seller's side of the interface, it should also warn that
not all weight/volume/value/country combinations are covered. I think it's
the sellers responsibility to make sure that they have it all covered, it's
not rocket science. But it is true it takes some concentration and staring at
the screen to make sure everything is OK, so an algorythm that checks if there
are no holes sounds like exactly the type of thing we have computers for.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 5, 2018 06:08 | Subject: | Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! | Viewed: | 93 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Instant checkout isn't so simple. You can think you have all bases covered,
but later discover something that prevents a buyer from ordering.
In addition, we have no way to test our setup or see a buyer's cart to troubleshoot
an issue.
I use instant checkout, though I would never recommend, as I'm certain to
have lost orders because of it not functioning quite right.
| A size restriction sounds ridiculous, I never saw that... How can a buyer possibly
anticipate this? There's no way of knowing how big your order is going to
be, nor is it the job of the buyer to be a mathematician even if it was. I think
sellers should have shipping methods ready for all sizes.
But sounds like the lot average problem could actually be fixed by Bricklink
itself. If they flag stores who use it properly, it will solve this frustration
instantly for every store that uses it. And is this lot average indicated in
the listings, in the same way that minimum order is? I really think it should
be.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 4, 2018 09:09 | Subject: | Re: Lego 10214 Tower Bridge 2 types of blue | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Colors | |
| The left one looks like it might be old (solid) med. blue and the right newer
(semi-translucent) med. blue.
I've often wondered if/how light plays a role in how we perceive the color
these (precolored abs pellets vs. dyed (by Lego?) pellets)
In Colors, Brick_Buyers writes:
| Hi, I recently purchased The Tower Bridge and have noticed that the medium blue
4x8 plates are actually 2 different colour. I have shown pictures below that
outline this. The instructions say there are 18 4587271 plates, actually there
are two slightly darker plates. The lighter 16 say 4-35 on the bottom but the
darker 2 say 2-35. Can someone explain this? It is the same with some of the
other medium blue colours in the set as well.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Sep 11, 2018 14:07 | Subject: | Re: sh104 | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Power Man is the name on the set box that includes this minifig. So BL's
name is correct from that point of view.
In Suggestions, fuatecelik writes:
| Minifig sh104 is incorrectly labelled as Power Man (Victor Alvarez). I don't
know where this confusion comes from, but this figure appears in the Ultimate
Spider-Man line that is based on the cartoon series of the same name. This is
what Power Man (Luke Cage) looks like in that cartoon. Victor Alvarez is a different
character that has only appeared in the comics and who has a similar appearance
to Luke in the cartoon. But officially and canonically, this is Luke Cage.
This distinction is important because Luke Cage is a very well known and popular
Marvel character that has appeared in several media including two seasons of
Netflix television, while Victor Alvarez is relatively obscure character that
has not been adapted into other media.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Sep 1, 2018 15:43 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Pending Approval (?) | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| Admins are not real humans, so they have nothing better to do than work on BL
24/7. Duh!
Being a volunteer inventory admin has to be the worst. Not only are you expected
to give your time for free, but also spend $1000's per year on new sets at
MSRP to do inventories.
Oh, and to the OP: 3% fees is the exact same I paid when I started selling here
in 2003. Please find me another company that you can say the same about. Ebay
was 10% the last time I sold something.
| Not sure, 21h13 (9:13pm) in Poland now (in France too), but he might still have
something else to do on a Saturday night
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 28, 2018 13:02 | Subject: | Re: Request update inventory on set 70567 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| I still have 3 from this set that need inventories:
Betsy
Chan
Mystake
I can see about doing these later this week.
In Inventories, axaday writes:
| It surely will be before very many month go by. The set is pretty new.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 28, 2018 11:52 | Subject: | Re: Crappy pictures for similar parts. | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Of course they are different. Did you read the descriptions? That would give
you a clue to the difference.
In Catalog, zux writes:
| Just found out someone has added two parts that need to be distinguished as they
are slightly different but pictures doesn't provide any visual clue. Basically
pictures are useless since there is no difference whatsoever.
Parts in questions:
* | | 44301a Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on End with Bottom Groove Parts: Hinge |
* | | 44301b Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger on End without Bottom Groove Parts: Hinge |
These are slightly better, but difference is barely visible:
[P=44302a]
[P=44302b]
Why there's no picture with both items placed side by side helping in distinguishing
the difference?
How did this slip into catalog?
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 26, 2018 15:21 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 70632-1 | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| I can confirm from my built set that the piece doesn't have a groove, in
case the picture isn't clear enough.
In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| In Inventories Requests, axaday writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Light Bluish Gray {44302 Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End (undetermined type) to 44302b Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End without Bottom Groove}
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 11, 2018 13:35 | Subject: | Improvement to super-lots? Paired items. | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Is there any chance that paired items such as wedges (left and right) would receive
their own entry in the catalog, much like the pair of minifig arms entry?
Example:
Super-lots are a pain to work with and BL buyers don't seem to read listing
notes that items must be purchased with matching side (maybe due to generating
carts from wanted lists).
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 10, 2018 19:01 | Subject: | Fake picture for Lady Iron Dragon / Misako | Viewed: | 115 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The picture for this minifig seems fake or maybe a digitally altered photo from
Lego.
I find it a bit misleading since the head on the actual fig is garbage and certainly
not like the BL minifig photo. My head is such a thin yellow that the black
shows through in most spots.
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 1, 2018 10:56 | Subject: | Re: 42063-40,40th anniversary chassis log in | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I already advised you on your previous post that this isn't a set, it is
a combiner model. There are plenty of other combiner models that have not made
their way into the catalog.
In Suggestions, KMonneron writes:
| could we have a set number and an inventory for the 40th anniversary chassis
Technic set please
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 30, 2018 15:12 | Subject: | Re: 4495, now 4495a and 4495b | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Marked for deletion only means that you can no longer sell under that catalog
entry. Unless a policy changes, this flag will likely take a long time (a decade?)
before inventory runs out and it is able to be deleted.
In Catalog, NelisSolis writes:
| Russell,
will there be (or maybe there is already) some warning for sellers before an
undetermined variant is deleted? If I remember correctly, previously I received
a notification about items marked for deletion, but for the flags I didn't
receive such kind of notification.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 29, 2018 14:03 | Subject: | Re: Harry Potter CMF | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Probably soon after they are released (August 1st).
In Catalog, kassimaja writes:
| Hello
Anyone knows when they will be in the catalog?
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 28, 2018 15:13 | Subject: | Re: Request inventory for Ninjago 70655 | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Inventories | |
| FYI: the set hasn't been released in North America yet, so that eliminates
a good portion of members that do inventories.
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 21, 2018 17:16 | Subject: | Re: Suggestion: Hide Posts From X FB ratings Feat | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Wouldn't it make more sense to have quicker access to the ignore and report
options instead of having to search for them.
Like a button on each message.
| Well, I guess with suggestions there's always the "what if everyone uses
it" scenario to consider, which in this case would mean nobody would help new
members with their questions. I don't think they want that to happen..
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 11, 2018 18:08 | Subject: | Re: Block fresh buyers (0) from my store? | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| The gray question mark icon is a rollover feature.
100 days or 5 fb
| Interetsing, I was not aware of that. What criteria define a "new buyer"? Is
it feedback, sign-up date or a combination of both?
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jun 30, 2018 18:19 | Subject: | Re: Ninja Catalog Error or Misprint? | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I wonder if it's from one of the TrU reissue minifig packs.
In Catalog Identification, nat460 writes:
| I just noticed that my Ninja - Samurai, Red Young has a white headband instead
of the usual gray one. Is this a catalog error or a misprint?
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jun 8, 2018 18:18 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6987-1 | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| Read the notes for this inventory.
In Inventories Requests, L1flafly writes:
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jun 5, 2018 10:21 | Subject: | Re: Personal inventory (non sellers) | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| use Rebrickable
In Suggestions, eduardoraon writes:
| I suggest that non seller's profiles also have the option for inventory.
And an additional functionality could be to be able cross that info with the
sets' list of pieces. This way one could see which other sets could be built
using the pieces one owns.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 10, 2018 13:54 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 41188-1 | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* | | 41188-1 (Inv) Breakout from the Goblin King's Fortress 681 Parts, 4 Minifigures, 2017 Sets: Elves |
* Add 4 Part 4865 Dark Bluish Gray Panel 1 x 2 x 1 (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 4 Part Dark Bluish Gray 4865b Panel 1 x 2 x 1 with Rounded Corners {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
Both of my sets had 2 of each kind
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 16, 2018 17:59 | Subject: | Re: New buyer LOE to tie up inventory for 14 days | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| What piece is it that you still need?
| Likewise as a buyer I think its ridiculous to not be allowed to cancel an order
for 2 weeks if the vendor wont even communicate whether or not they will even
send it! I paid for my items 2/27/18. Altho I have sent several emails. UT I
HAVE STILL YET TO HEAR FROM 1 of my vendors if they are even going to ship my
merchandise. I have received my merchandise from a vendor who was moving his
warehouse and 1 that was form the Netherlands. It's a tiny order & very little
money. But if they didn't want to mess with such a tiny order, they should
have told me! Bricklink chose the vendors, NOT ME! Now I can't build, because
I need a piece I was expecting to get from them. I submitted a problem response
through this system. It's a common piece but I shouldn't have to order
it again or go to a Lego store.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 1, 2018 22:33 | Subject: | Re: Getting Frustrated Now With Bricklink | Viewed: | 99 times | Topic: | Problem | |
| It seems that I don't have a choice of what I offer for PayPal payments,
even though BL says I have a choice between onsite and offsite.
There is an option to select PayPal marketplace.
| It's working fine for me. All I do is select standard "Paypal" as the payment
option (or empty my cart if it's not available), wait for the invoice to
come in, and then log in to Paypal to submit payment. Now, come late April,
it'll be jacked twelve ways from Sunday...
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 2, 2018 19:22 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 7199-1 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| Sorry, but I don't think a misc lot of parts is a good justification for
this change to a verified inventory.
But of course, I don't really have any say.
| Comments from Submitter:
I found exactly two reddish brown 4215b in a large lot of bricks containing set 7199. These panels can only come from this set because there is not a single reddish brown 60581 in the lot, and there is no trace of neither of the sets 5378 and 10144 (the count of 2 would also be a mismatch for these other sets). Because 4215b is the older version, I've switched 60581 to be the alternate.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Dec 23, 2017 13:20 | Subject: | Re: Login problems on ipad | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| BrickLink does not support mobile devices. Some devices may work while other's
don't. Mobile support does not appear to be one of their priorities.
Of course, it worked fine for years prior to the upgrade.
In Suggestions, drclarkjr writes:
| I have a new iPad Pro 10.5” running iOS 11.2.1. I just tried to log in for the
first time (on this device) and could not because the login window kept disappearing
when I tried to enter my password. I was in landscape orientation and the keyboard
was in the way, and when I tried to scroll the page up so I could type in the
password box, the login window would close. I finally made it work by rotating
the iPad to portrait orientation.
That scroll attempt also caused other screwups, like the cursor and entered text
not showing up in the data entry box, but below it.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Nov 18, 2017 13:59 | Subject: | Re: Shopping for Multiple Pieces | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| The wanted list(s). Click the heart shaped "Want" tab in the upper right of
BL.
In Suggestions, ElBarto writes:
| Maybe this already exists, but it might be nifty to be able to search for more
than one part at a time to see which store offers the best price for both. Or
more.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Nov 8, 2017 17:22 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 7471-1 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| This picture shows all 4 on the band holder:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=4249145
The extras section may not have even been thought of when this was released,
let alone considered for rubber bands on a holder.
| If there is one shown to be used in the set instructions (and there is - I checked),
then why are you asking that all 4 be removed from the set inventory?
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 21, 2017 23:38 | Subject: | Re: Clearing should be the same as Paid | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | General | |
| It's for split payment status from order status. See picture (It's actually
a gold color text):
In General, crazylegoman writes:
| I just checked my order received page, and there is no "clearing" status, just
the same 7 options that we've had for a while now.
David
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 17, 2017 14:18 | Subject: | Suggest: create 3 options for wanted lists | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| A recent forum message just reminded me of a concept I thought of awhile ago.
Please consider creating 3 options for wanted list viewing among users.
Private:
Default option. No one else can see your any of your lists.
Limited:
Much like reserving items where you enter a user name. This would allow one
person of your choosing to view a specific list.
Public:
One or all of your lists can be seen by everyone.
I recognize that this isn't the most important upgrade that is needed, however,
a feature such as this has been wanted by many for a long time.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 14, 2017 14:58 | Subject: | Re: Changes when autoselect on wanted lists | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Unfortunately, BL has spent so much effort fixing the website that they've
essentially broken it in my eyes. It seems like every time I'd start a big
project they would change how the wanted list worked or the available features.
In addition, they never provide a manuals or help guides on how to use the updates.
I was in the middle of the Technic Icarus supercar project when I finally had
my fill. I'm no longer an active BL buyer (I'll still buy a little here
and there).
Instead, I now spend my money on ebay for Lego sets.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 14, 2017 10:20 | Subject: | Re: Fix BL login & links | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Thank you for the info.
Something weird about the below subject. The rollover icons themselves can be
clicked on like a regular link in addition to the rolled over options.
| To oversimplify what's actually going on here is this: Those top nav items
are not links. They are "rollover detectors" tied to a script. When your cursor
hovers over one of these areas, it triggers the script which then shows the dropdown
box containing links to pages. As the top nav items are not links, the browser
can't give you the right-click options to open the link in a new window because
the items aren't links. The items in the drop-downs are links, but the top-navs
aren't. Clicking the top nav activates something in the script which then
takes you to a page.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 13, 2017 17:18 | Subject: | Fix BL login & links | Viewed: | 132 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Discarded | |
| 1) Please fix the BL login. Multiple times pretty much every day BL tells me
that my auto-fill password and id are in error.
Sometimes I can switch to a new tab or close the browser and start it again.
Other times, I have to clear my cookies (it took 2 tries of clearing cookies
just now). When I clear my cookies for BL, I also lose all my other site prefilled
info.
None of the above is acceptable for a modern website.
2) Links: why on earth do the upper links (community, my store, my bl, etc) work
when clicked on, but do not when you right-click for a new tab? (Google Chrome)
Please fix this too.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 6, 2017 14:06 | Subject: | Re: Invoice details | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| The order detail page already does.
In Suggestions, recht writes:
| I've been going through my old sets and reviving them for my kids. There
are quite a lot of parts missing, so I've been ordering the missing parts.
When doing this, I need to track what I've already ordered, so it would be
pretty awesome if the invoice/order overview also could show the part number
and color, not only the part descriptions.
Thanks,
Joakim
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Oct 5, 2017 17:03 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 7964-1 | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| Not necessarily. They could have received a mispacked bag with an extra. It
wouldn't be the first time Lego's machines have made an packing error.
I had an extra minifig part in a recent set that wouldn't normally be an
extra.
| This piece is one of a group of parts that comes as a unit. To get an extra one,
you would need to get an extra entire pack:
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Sep 22, 2017 19:09 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 5891-1 | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| I stopped contributing to the site (at the level that I was), due to some frustration
with the new management/ownership, so you have my sympathy.
I'll occasionally submit a weight, but that's about it.
| If BrickLink keeps going at the rate it is going by forcing out its top contributors,
BrickLink won't have much of a community of volunteers left to do anything
for it. The extremely slow rate of new inventories being submitted for approval
to the catalog over the last two years as well as the loss of many major catalog
contributors to other sites is already indicative of this trend.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Sep 13, 2017 16:50 | Subject: | Wanted lists: bring back the lot count | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Implemented | |
| Please "downgrade" from the recent update to the wanted list and give us back
the number of "needed" lots (eg: those where the have field is not fulfilled).
Ideally we should be able to not only see the number of needed lots, but also
the quantity of parts still required for each wanted list.
P.S. If someone were to analyse what functions each feature offers before designing
an upgrade, I'm reasonably confident that there will be less complaints about
missing features.
Measure twice, cut once vs. measure once, cut it too short and have to start
all over.
P.P.S. Tutorials on how to use new features would also help. Maybe info/features
in each upgrade are available that aren't obvious to all of us.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 22, 2017 12:54 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 7962-1 | Viewed: | 17 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| You've been busy lately.
In Inventories Requests, alexand writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4286pb032 Blue Slope 33 3 x 1 with Blue and Gray Panels on Top and Sides and Yellow Markings on Sides Pattern (Stickers) - Set 7962 (Counterpart)
* Add 2 Part 47753pb074 Orange Wedge 4 x 4 No Top Studs with Black Triangle with White Outline on Orange Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 7962 (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 22, 2017 12:52 | Subject: | Re: Addition to new My BL | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Sometimes I wish we had an edit feature.
In Suggestions, tEoS writes:
| The site map on the old My BL page was quite handy and **much** more condensed than
the full site map.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 22, 2017 12:49 | Subject: | Addition to new My BL | Viewed: | 102 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| The site map on the old My BL page was quite handy and must more condensed than
the full site map.
I would like to suggest that it be added to the new page in some form. Maybe
a button that when clicked opens/expands the old map without changing pages,
if possible.
Also, the new page is nice to look at, but it has too much empty space leading
to unnecessary scrolling. Only half of the page is displayed on a 22" monitor
w/o scrolling, whereas before 3/4 of the page was displayed with 100% of the
major info on one.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 21, 2017 12:11 | Subject: | Tracking # column on orders placed | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Please consider adding the option to add another column to the orders placed
page. I suspect that many of us using desktops have room to see the tracking
numbers next to our other selected options.
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2017 21:38 | Subject: | Wanted List: "Required" feature | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Discarded | |
| There's something about the "Required" feature on wanted lists that doesn't
make sense to me. When I select "required" for a particular item, the system
doesn't factor in the quantity.
On my current list I need 2 piece of a rare(ish) part, so I select "required,"
but it still shows results of only 1 piece.
Is this working as intended? I would certainly like to be able to have some
control over quantity.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2017 18:07 | Subject: | Re: Offsite payment no longer possible?? | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I deleted my vote, however, I believe that bank transfers among individuals are
a path to unfair play. This is especially so when sellers charge extra for a
buyer to use a payment method that has some form of recourse against fraud.
This can even happen with honest people that don't intend to cause issues.
A seller gets extremely ill, coma, death, and is unable to ship the goods.
Unfortunately, it happens. I've read of at least 3 deaths, 1 coma, and various
other issues to BL members, since joining.
I will continue to use PayPal for this extra piece of mind that my buyers have
protection should something happen.
| I just feel very uncomfortable with the thought that I got this far with my business,
and the road towards it has collapsed behind me.. the more open this place is
to everyone, the better.. a few percent more scams but a manyfold multiplication
of the market potential.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2017 17:46 | Subject: | Re: Offsite payment no longer possible?? | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| You took what I wrote and applied it to a completely different type of commerce.
My post clearly referred to e-commerce between individuals.
| You're saying bank transfers are not in the spirit of fair e-commerce, but
here e-commerce is absolutely huge to the point that entire brick-and-mortar
shopping centers go empty, and almost all of that goes through bank transfers.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 20, 2017 12:40 | Subject: | Re: Offsite payment no longer possible?? | Viewed: | 88 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Voted no.
In fairness for security of buyers, I would only vote yes if sellers were required
to offer a payment option that allowed recourse at no penalty (fees, etc).
Over the years I have read many forum messages about buyers losing money due
to using IBAN (often in the hundreds of $, euro). Bank transfers don't seem
to be in the spirit of fair e-commerce between individuals. Registered businesses
may be a different story.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 12, 2017 12:46 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 60021-1 | Viewed: | 16 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| No, that is a hose nozzle that is already in the inventory:
In Inventories Requests, ajisan writes:
| See part # 4697b Light Bluish Gray Pneumatic T Piece (T Bar).
It appears in the 60021 instructions (Book 1 of 3, page 4, step 4) but does not
appear in the Lego parts list and of course not in the Bricklink parts list.
I happened to see this part in the Droideka minifigure in set #75092 Naboo Starfighter.
Part # 4697b needs to be added to the parts list for 60021. And perhaps the
nominal part for chainsaw handle could be added to the alternative parts for
60021.
|
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 7, 2017 00:39 | Subject: | Re: Suggestion: Incomplete sets on Price Guide | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Incomplete listings that have sold can be excluded from the results. There's
a checkbox at the top of the price guide data.
In Suggestions, Roxxer writes:
| I've noticed an issue with the price guide. Often times, the price guide
is inaccurate with sets because it doesn't differentiate between complete
and incomplete items sold. Often times sets without figures or just a small piece
of a set is sold that throws the values off.
I think that it would be a good idea to mark sets that are sold as incomplete
on the price guide and for these sales not to reflect the 6 month averages.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Aug 5, 2017 12:52 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Minifig cas102 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| My bad. Good catch though!
In Inventories Requests, Daniel58 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4498 Brown Minifig, Arrow Quiver
Comments from Submitter:
Good afternoon
I think the minifg cas102 (Black Falcon - Light Gray Legs with Black Hips, Dark Gray Chin-Guard) should include quiver, as other similar figures do (eg cas005).
This figure only appears in a set (6057-1) and in the instructions appears with the quiver. Thank you. Regards. Daniel
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 30, 2017 20:24 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set yodachron-1 | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| FYI: All of your changes can be done at once. Just alter the 'number of
entries' field to about how many you expect to do. Think you have about
10, then put 15 in the field to be safe.
In Inventories Requests, jblock writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 6 Part {Red to Black} 2654 Plate, Round 2 x 2 with Rounded Bottom (Boat Stud)
Comments from Submitter:
Instructions pp. 21, 23, 25 show black parts, not red
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 28, 2017 14:31 | Subject: | Re: Make "DOES NOT SHIP" message consistant | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Voted no. You saw the notice and chose to proceed.
In Suggestions, HPBrickhead writes:
| In the forum I may see a red box under a seller's name. I hover over it
and it says
"Seller does not ship to my country"
I go to their store, and the message at the top is "Seller does not ship to me".
I can't help it, the second message hurts my feelings!
Is there any way we can make the messaging consistent with the actual reason
I can't buy in their store? (Country/Person?)
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 25, 2017 21:44 | Subject: | Re: Force buyers to see cart weight | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Wow, that really is a hard option to find. I won't vote on this idea, but
I can't imagine many people finding that tiny text link. The other routes
to it seem to result in a dead page (my bl settings) or broken link (help docs).
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 25, 2017 11:45 | Subject: | Re: Force sellers to show cart weight | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I believe this is the essence of why the feature was made optional years ago.
Voted no.
However, this does not mean it comes without consequence. There have been several
instances where I didn't order from a seller that chose not to display weight.
| of course, you have right. But if a buyer see a weight in his shopping cart,
and that weight is not really correct, how you can explain problem to the person.
He see that weight, and it's correct for his mind.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 20, 2017 20:42 | Subject: | Re: SPAM | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| There is, but they didn't make it super obvious. You have to go to the 'Problem
Center' link on the bottom of the page and click 'Forum.'
| There is no REPORT button to bring it to the attention of admins quickly.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jul 19, 2017 15:12 | Subject: | Re: Employ real support staff | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| "You get what you pay for." Since I've been a BL member I've seen the
cost of living skyrocket, yet BL has kept the fee structure the same. Be careful
what you ask for.
| BL needs a dose of professionalism. If what I've read from the forum over
the last few days is correct, BL is a technology company whose tech is failing
left and right. Clearly 2 employed people are not enough. Tickets to the help
desk are often ignored, forum posts regarding errors and problems are ignored,
issues between buyers and sellers are not always moderated according to BL's
rules, etc. I simply don't believe that BL doesn't earn enough to provide
a genuine and effective increase in the level of customer support being offered.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jun 28, 2017 14:07 | Subject: | Re: "Include Super Lots" - checked by default | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| But not good for buyers due to all the sellers that misuse superlots. Voted
no.
Superlots is a broken concept that needs to be rebuilt. The last time I checked,
they cannot even be put into stockroom.
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jun 13, 2017 12:07 | Subject: | Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Are you sure? 4 are used per wing = 8 total.
Pg. 17: four are used for one wing. Then on pg. 35 it shows that you repeat
all the steps from pgs. 16-35 to build the second wing.
In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:
| Piece 2420 (2x2 corner plate) in dark gray is in this set 8 times according to
the Bricklnk parts list, but in reality you need 16. Please fix this, so others
who want to bricklink the set don't encounter the same problem I did when
putting everything together . Thanks!
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jun 8, 2017 12:47 | Subject: | Re: Paypal payment | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I'm on the fence about instant checkout. On one hand it will eliminate questions
about shipping costs and NPBs. However, on the other hand our options to refuse
to pay for or disputing an incomplete order (parts not available) will also
be gone. With the number of stores that have inventory errors I feel like instant
checkout is going to lead to other issues. More non-positive fb and retaliatory
fb.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 24, 2017 21:44 | Subject: | Re: Tracking Number Link | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| It's a nice feature on other websites and I don't recall it ever being
suggested here. Maybe it will come with the new selling features they've
mentioned some time ago.
In Suggestions, Nikilyn writes:
| A lot of sites let you click on a tracking number and it takes you right to that
carriers tracking page and shows where your item is. Maybe bricklink could have
sellers "choose a carrier" and then put in the tracking number. Bricklink could
turn that tracking number into a link on the order page. Not sure how all the
fancy stuff works but I didn't see this suggested and it would be really
nice to not have to open a new window all the time.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 24, 2017 20:22 | Subject: | Re: Price Guide > Part Out Value | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| That's not the same feature.
| My Store/ Part out/ put in set #, hit submit for edit/ scroll down to minifigs,
click the "delete" button next to each minifig/ Click the "verify items" button.
The minifigs will not be in the part out value shown on the next screen.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 24, 2017 19:14 | Subject: | Re: Price Guide > Part Out Value | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| That sounds like a different function.
| You can currently click the "delete" box on the minifigs before you hit the first
verify button to remove them from the part out value.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 15, 2017 20:41 | Subject: | Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| It means you already have that exact part in that exact color on your list, so
it won't change or consolidate the lot. You need to manually change the
quantity of the part in yellow and delete the non-applicable one.
In Administrative, armock writes:
| And another basic function that does not work.
I tried to change the color of a piece from Not Applicable to yellow. All I
get is a message saying something along the lines of "only one item combination
is allowed per wanted list..."
I can't even figure out what that means.
It would seem that all the bugs are not worked out.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 12, 2017 11:50 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75171-1 | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| I just built the set a couple days ago and can confirm this. I received 7 old
and 1 new style panel 1x2.
In Inventories Requests, randyipp writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 8 Part 4865 Dark Bluish Gray Panel 1 x 2 x 1 (Alternate) (match ID 732882)
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | May 8, 2017 16:08 | Subject: | Re: price overview when buying a wanted list | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Too bad. I have many big projects that I'd like to start, but this is really
a deal breaker. I guess I'll just continue to buy off of ebay for bigger
lots/sets instead.
For me this feature was all about choosing the best overall value when considering
the price over the number of lots on my wanted list I could fulfill. I also
found myself being able to place larger $ orders to maximize shipping costs.
The old way works, however, it takes substantially more time than I wish to give
up just for shopping and probably placing more orders than really needed. I'd
rather be building.
In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| In Suggestions, FirstTimer writes:
| Two Month later ... any decision from bricklink? results of the votes?
|
Status: Discarded
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 7, 2017 15:43 | Subject: | Re: Add Bricklinked/Not original in Sales | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| New sets cannot be listed as complete, if they are missing instructions or stickers
(I cannot remember what I just read about the original box and completeness).
That is already in the guidelines. Whether or not it is enforced is beyond
my knowledge.
| One thing that would help with this is to disallow a set that is missing instructions
from being considered complete. I just looked at the 4 cheapest NEW 10179's
and they are missing instructions, stickers, box. One even has stated that a
reproduction instruction book is included and is listed as Complete.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Apr 3, 2017 14:45 | Subject: | Re: Ban selling custom parts | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Sbricks have no place in the catalog. It doesn't matter how neat they may
be.
| I just requested adding Sbrick and SBrick Plus Bluetooth command devices, they
are not from Lego, but much better ! It all depands, so bricklink should propose
anything convenient, compatible with normal Lego pieces, toxic ones or not convenient
ones are illegal in EJFJ State, not only on bricklink, and no one should waste
anything while considering them! Only the best is legal, bricklink.com is a nice
solution (international reference norm)...
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 29, 2017 22:25 | Subject: | Re: Order Splitting | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Each member could place their order in one unique batch and see if the seller
can fill and bag by batch (best to ask 1st). A bigger order might be worth a
little extra effort from a seller. I know that I would do it if asked.
I don't think there's enough demand for this feature to utilize resources
when much more important things are needed. Voted no.
In Suggestions, inzeos writes:
| Often various members of my local LUG get together and combine orders from a
store under one user. It would be nice to be able to split an order up after
submission to easily so who owes what.
Seller would not need to know or be impacted by the feature.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 14, 2017 18:35 | Subject: | Re: DO AWAY WITH PRICE GUIDE....... | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I have a hard time with bank transfers especially with the addition of % based
fees. Sellers that do this are essentially punishing buyers that want some recourse
should something go wrong with the order or the order is never sent.
Yes, it happens even to sellers that have no intentions of defrauding their buyers.
$@*# happens.
Of course, my understanding of transfers is one sided. Different geography =
different ways of life.
In Suggestions, perrush writes:
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| To me, fees also mean that the seller is bean-counting but didn’t include their
costs in their prices, either to avoid Bricklink fees, to appear less expensive,
or because they like having lots of lines in their invoices (I don’t ).
|
I charge the actual paypal fee too. Not because I like an extra line on my invoice
but because I think it's fair to those buyers paying by bank transfer.
If yu don't charge a paypal fee, it means the fee is in your brick prices.
So if a buyer pays by bank tranfer, he's actually overpaying.
Just my 2 cts. But I know other have a different opinion about it.
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 14, 2017 15:29 | Subject: | Re: price overview when buying a wanted list | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Due to your obscure rants about the value of this feature, I've decided to
remove my yes vote. I'd like the feature back, but I as a long-term member
I refuse to allow your misguided attempts to be a leading factor to its return.
The site is just as functional as it was before the tool was implemented. I've
placed nearly 1500 orders and this feature won't be the cause of me not buying
more.
In Suggestions, TokerSays writes:
| Thanks Yorbrick, may I count on your vote to bring back the average pricing tool?
|
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Mar 13, 2017 22:05 | Subject: | Re: price overview when buying a wanted list | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| This is where I think you are a little confused.
If I as builder decide that I don't need a bag of parts, then I can list
them in my store for whatever price I want. I'm probably less inclined to
factor in costs.
However, if I invest money to obtain a great deal of product, then there's
a set amount I need just to break even. There's generally a substantially
greater cost in being able to offer a vast selection of parts for a buyer to
choose from and that investment must be recouped plus profit for the seller to
continue to operate.
What's happening is the amount of profit has shrunk by a very significant
amount over the past decade that operating a store in not as beneficial.
This will lead to problems buying individual Lego pieces at some point, if the
trend continues.
Example: 10-13 years ago I had no problem buying sets with a part out value of
3-5x what I paid, which allowed room to discount slow moving parts.
Now, I would be lucky to get 2x and that doesn't allow much room for adjustments
when you factor in all costs.
In Suggestions, TokerSays writes:
| I guess that's where I get a little flustered. I wish I could remember where
but I saw that Bricklink started out because one Lego hobbyist had a bunch of
extra pieces that they decided to sell because they didn't need them. Those
hobbyist keep the average price per piece down. They get rid of their extra
pieces, they make a small profit. But its the big stores, whose hobby is to
sell Lego pieces, that are driving prices artificially high. Without the average
pricing tool we allow them to set their own profit margin. If they sold at the
same price as the hobbyist, their profits would be smaller. But it would be
a profit. And I would that if those big stores sold at an average price their
sales would increase. It may not increase enough to make up for the original
lost profit but they would still make a bigger profit than the hobbyist by virtue
of selling more product. I don't think I should pay $1.48 for piece because
the store has the quantity I need and the average price is $0.30. That markup
isn't for the Seller to make a profit, that markup is a blatant overprice.
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|