Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | jonsogel2fun  | | Posted: | Feb 3, 2024 03:14 | | Subject: | Variances | | Viewed: | 120 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I do not know who makes the decision on part variance they decide to put on Bricklink.
I do not like as a buyer or seller there decisions. Who cares if a part has a
line or not. However head variances are period correct variances. So are torso
ribs. Not as concerned about shapes of holes or number of teeth. However I spent
a lot listing the variances and now more to keep them separate. Plus every time
they move things to a different category because they think they know better
even if it makes no sense. It creates more work for sellers moving there inventory
around and trying to remember were it is now. Just one mans opinion
|
 |
| Author: | avi_gibson | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2024 19:06 | | Subject: | Missing Knuckles' Guardian Mech Inventory? | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
The set released on Jan 1; previously, it had an 'inventory pending'
tag, but has been since moved to N/A. Since there are two prominent minifigures
in this set, can I ask when this set can expect to be inventoried? It is the
only Lego Sonic set that that has not been inventoried yet.
|
|
| Author: | NoGravitasHere | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2024 13:07 | | Subject: | Bionicle is handled incredibly poorly | | Viewed: | 332 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I've contacted BrickLink support multiple times via the Help Desk link, and
been ignored every single time. The current system of silver classification is
laughably bad. There are 9 official Lego silvers/chromes/gunmetals, and you only
recognise 4.5, at best.
I have repeatedly offered you the information you need to fix this issue, and
have not once received even a reply for my efforts. Instead, BrickLink is more
interested in maintaining their poorly-categorised colours, removing accurate
listings (how can I include rubber bands with a set, when said rubber bands are
23 years old and dust?), and ignoring the fella trying to literally hand you
the answer to this issue, and also ruining your database by no longer tracking
part variants. You do realise some of those 'insignificant' changes actually
matter, right?
... Right?
|
|
| Author: | Egcwatch | | Posted: | Feb 2, 2024 07:39 | | Subject: | Variant merge | | Viewed: | 167 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
Question - Will this affect draw numbers? When they combine the variants, will
my draw numbers cease to exist? I will have to find all of my variants and pull
them??? I have thousands of drawers. Nightmare! This is a terrible idea.
Thank you,
Jill
|
|
| Author: | Scrp749 | | Posted: | Feb 1, 2024 13:22 | | Subject: | Help with New Space Set Items | | Viewed: | 139 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I'm back again with more questions about set 60431:
1. I've really combed the catalog and pending items and can't find the
new alien. I can add this cute little guy to the catalog, but have no idea whether
it's a minifig or a part such as animal/land/space. I also haven't found
the head, but can submit that too.
2. The robot shown on page 9 of the second instructions is a counterpart. Should
this be added as a separate counterpart during inventorying? If so, what is it?
A part, or a space exploration minifig, such as cty1447?
|
|
|
|
| Author: | Scrp749 | | Posted: | Jan 31, 2024 16:22 | | Subject: | Alternate Part for 13269? | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Just starting to work on the inventory for set 60431. I have a wedge part that
looks extremely similar to P/N 13269, but is printed with mold # 4365 (C) 2022.
Should a new catalog submission be made or should I include 13269 in the inventory?
Thanks, - Chris
* | | 13269 Wedge 6 x 4 Cutout (Train Roof) with 5 Large Bottom Tubes
Parts: Wedge |
|
|
|
| Author: | oukexergon | | Posted: | Jan 31, 2024 11:46 | | Subject: | Merging Part 46212 functional difference | | Viewed: | 182 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Part 46212, besides being designed for transparency and so cosmetically very
different on any build, has a functional advantage over its side support counterpart
shown here in the Ninjago City instructions. Sure, placed elements are only visible
with transparent colors, but it can be used to conceal elements in solid colors
as well, or attach to tile parts as a loose connection, something the side support
version cannot do.
Please do not merge this part to 2454.
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 31, 2024 05:21 | | Subject: | 6309pb010 | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I have a general question about part numbers. What does the "bp" in the
numbers mean?
Regards
Werner
|
|
| Author: | constructibles | | Posted: | Jan 30, 2024 21:14 | | Subject: | Variants Merge and the API | | Viewed: | 148 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everyone, I’ve been reading up on the multiple threads about the proposed
merge of variants. Setting aside the pros and cons of the change, I have a
question that may have material impact for any stores that are using the API
function. From what I can read it appears that one step in the merge plan is
to actually merge lot numbers together in a sellers inventory. That can create
huge problems for API users, as there is no function to link an inventory lot
ID number to a different inventory number.
My recommendation would be to leave all lot IDs existing and not merge them,
but just change the part number on both lots to the new post-merge item ID number.
So, for example, if a seller had one lot of 3747a and another lot of 3747b, then,
after the merge they would simply have two lots of 3747, and be able to make
the decision to physically combine those, keep them separate with notes, or just
leave the two lots in place.
Can we please get some specific technical information on the proposed actions
within the database and as someone commented previously it may be worthwhile
to send a targeted email to all API users alerting them of the detail of the
change, as some may not be reading the forum.
Thanks. -Jason
|
|
| Author: | weblectricity | | Posted: | Jan 30, 2024 12:31 | | Subject: | Instructions entry? | | Viewed: | 91 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Sorry if this is answered somewhere obviously, but for the life of me I just
can't find it... I've just submitted an inventory (Friends set 42614),
and I'm looking to edit the instructions weight, but can't find where
I can do that.
Help please?
Best,
Peter
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jan 30, 2024 07:47 | | Subject: | Original boxes errors | | Viewed: | 123 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I noticed a few discrepancies when downloading the catalogue data for Original
Boxes & Sets (and there’s no form to change OB):
* For these three sets, the box has a colon in the name:
* For these sets, the sets are in category Town / Classic Town / Coast Guard
/ Harbor, the boxes are in Town / Classic Town / Coast Guard. Same ID: 67 
So maybe an error with the category?
* This box appears twice in the list of boxes:
* There’s an original box for sw158-99 (not an item any more).
|
|
| Author: | WynnSmith | | Posted: | Jan 29, 2024 12:21 | | Subject: | Every "baby" bear should include the word cub | | Viewed: | 107 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| It never occurred to me that a bear cub would not include the word cub, but rather
baby. Can "cub" be added to it's name?
|
|
| Author: | heikoloogi | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2024 07:30 | | Subject: | Adding items to the catalog | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I am sorry to bother you @catmins, but I am wondering, how long it will take
until my new submissions are verified. I really want to sell most of these items,
especially the coin and the bags.
Thanks for your help, I will add more items but need to be able to sell them.
Regards
Heiko
|
| Author: | SimPin | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2024 14:32 | | Subject: | Code 92411 similar to 44728, not founded | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello
I'm identifying some lego parts, but I don't find in the catalog the
p/n 92411.
This part looks like the p/n 44728 but is different by a very slight particolar
(as in the attached picture).
Can the 92411 be catalogued as 44728 or it makes difference?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
| Author: | sgore | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2024 10:00 | | Subject: | Same Books in Different Languages - Help | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi, I'm trying to use the "Same Books in Different Languages" option
to add a turkish version of an exisiting book, but cannot manage to do it. Could
you please someone with experience tell me what to do with this window below
attached picture?
The situation is, the book has it's English and several other language options
already in catalog. What I'm trying to do is adding another language which
is not in the catalog.
Thanks and best regards,
Selçuk Göre
|
|
|
| Author: | RONALDSLEGO | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2024 04:17 | | Subject: | Mold variants merge and BrickStore | | Viewed: | 163 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| For example Part 3747a and 3747b is it correct that I understand that the full
part description of this variants I put in the comments so buyers see the old
item description. With this item I have done it. After 15 February this 2 will
be listed under 3747 if I am correct and BrickLink will do the proposed corrections?
|
|
| Author: | ChrisX2 | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2024 02:58 | | Subject: | Variants merge | | Viewed: | 146 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Please don't do it
As a buyer who likes to complete sets, I want the variant to match the existing
pieces I already have in the set. If the variant is listed as a separate piece
it's easy to find a seller, if its only identified in notes in a merged piece
it will be almost impossible to shift through every listed piece to find the
variant I need.
Buyers will go elsewhere. Sellers will lose out.
This is a huge step backward for bricklink.
Please don't do it
|
| Author: | Fury_ | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2024 22:51 | | Subject: | Listing changes and lack of specifics | | Viewed: | 129 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Please don't change the site! Why wouldn't we want to differentiate and
be specific with our orders? Some of us want to know we're getting a new
piece vs used or vice versa etc etc. c'mon man! What is the reasoning behind
this nonsense decision!
|
| Author: | Amstys | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2024 19:37 | | Subject: | Part number 3004pb123 | | Viewed: | 83 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have a couple minecraft crafting table bricks and the horizontal lines on some
of them are way darker than the others. Like one has dark brown and the other
one has reddish brown. The catalog says they have reddish brown horizontal lines
so I guess there is no distinction between them?
I was hoping maybe someone knew anything about this
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2024 02:57 | | Subject: | Variants Thread - January 26 | | Viewed: | 1980 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello again everyone,
My initial post on this subject earlier this month has garnered almost 700 replies,
which is right about the level of the BrickArms threads a few years ago. 
A New Thread
So I'm starting a new thread with some new information, and hopefully a few
links that will help you navigate through this complex discussion topic.
Here is the original post:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1447090
Here are three Help topics:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2625
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2626
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2629
Here is a list of my replies on this subject:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageList.asp?overTP=Y&q=variants&qS=Y&msgID=&uName=admin_russell&ID=&status=&v=c&max=50
If you don't wish to read all 700 replies in the previous thread, you can
at least look through some of these for answers to most of the questions that
have been raised.
************************************
The Responses
We sent an email out to all active sellers a couple days ago and we expected
a flood of responses in the Forum. As much as it may seem to be an overwhelming
response, we do appreciate all the members who have posted and shared their feelings
about this project. Keep them coming. 
So far I have seen two YouTube videos addressing this issue, and I'll post
in this new thread to respond directly (and completely) to what they are saying.
I will be answering directly several of the more detailed replies over the next
day or two in an effort to clear up any misunderstandings.
************************************
The Research
The following is an example of the some of the research that has been done to
help determine the course of action we are taking.
When it comes to Frosted Bricks, we took a look at the price guide, the inventories
that contained these special bricks, and we studied the nature of the bricks,
at least as far as we could.
What we found was that bricks listed under the normal (umbrella) entries sold
on average for over twice the price, and the volume of sales was 17 times of
bricks listed under the frosted entries. In addition, sellers listing under the
main entries didn’t have to spend the time sorting out their parts. So from a
marketplace standpoint, these frosted entries are simply an inefficiency (see
image below).
In the inventories, there was only spotty information about which sets these
bricks are in. This is likely the main reason for the lower sales volume, because
the BrickLink inventory system drives sales for vintage parts. We started adding
frosted entries to the catalog over 20 years ago, but they are only reflected
in 24 inventories to date.
When it comes to the bricks themselves, there were actually more variants than
what are currently shown on BrickLink. And we’ve never been able to settle on
a reason for these peculiar markings. Some have suggested they are simply the
same patterns one would find on solid color bricks of the same era. Whatever
they are, though, this type of variant is typically found only in sellers’ notes
and not reflected in standalone BrickLink entries.
In fact, it is a peculiar thing that these entries were only for Transparent
versions of the part. We don’t really do that on BrickLink. Normally, all the
colors are placed under one entry.
But perhaps the best reason for removing these entries is the lack of a real
use case for any of our members. For new users, these entries clutter up important
basic parts categories, and if they end up on a wanted list, they can certainly
cause problems.
For the seller who wants to fill out vintage sets, these entries do not solve
their need completely, because there are serious color matching issues with older
transparent parts. It is not “plug and play” with these variants, and truth be
told, it would be easier to obtain the necessary selection of parts by using
the main entries.
For the hard core collector looking for information, BrickLink has very little
to offer in the case of the frosted bricks. We don’t need separate entries to
add representative photos and comparison images of variants, and we were likely
to never complete the “collection” of these entries due to the large number of
different patterns.
In order to preserve what knowledge we have, we plan to release new Help pages
for certain variants covered in this project. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
| Author: | paolocolombo | | Posted: | Jan 26, 2024 01:02 | | Subject: | Set 270-1 Variant | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Good morning everyone!
Does anyone know this variant of the 270-1 set found on BL?
Thanks!
Paolo
|
|
| Author: | ingoheinen | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 17:43 | | Subject: | Dear BrickLinck, Don't destroy datebase | | Viewed: | 194 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Dear Bricklink,
It's a really bad idea to destroy our database. We need the original database
with all the part difference. The database is build over Years and your plan
wil destroy al the efforts what countles members did in in al this Years. I am
a buyer and sometimes i need a specific part. With Your plan it's almost
impossible to buy that specific part. With your simplifacation you wil destroy
years of hard labor and makes things much more difficult.
So please don't do it.
With regards
Ingo Heinen
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 12:21 | | Subject: | LEGO market, I propose an analogy | | Viewed: | 203 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I propose an analogy between LEGO parts and Stamps - where there is basically
the same 2 different needs, approaches and goals.
On one side Collectors, Historians POV
We've to carefully differentiate those:
Type I: without shading on the first circle to the left from number 1 (NBN).
Type II: shading on the first circle to the left from number 1 (ABN and CBN).
Type III: retouching: darker engraving in upper corners (ABN).
Price: up to huge.
Availability: complicated, up to impossible.
In forum: present and shouting 
Number: hundreds to thousands?
On the other side, every day Buyers, Builders, Creators POV
Price: 68 cents.
Availability: quasi infinite.
In forum: zero 
Number: tens of millions (with half a million already on BrickLink, and
millions on PAB)?
BrickLink will of course choose to support the vast majority of buyers.
Just like USPS is selling base stamps for every day usage.
Because it's what the vast majority needs.
BUT BrickLink will ALSO keep on providing it's finest Catalog on Earth to
those who need details of the History of the Brand.
Please Collectors, Historians, rebuilders of Sets from the past - consider the
whole market. And you'll still have the Catalog we all love and use.
So what?
I really and sincerely hope that helps?
|
|
|
| Author: | rickcraine | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 11:29 | | Subject: | Merging piece varian is a BIG PROBLEM | | Viewed: | 297 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hey, I just am trying to draw to everyone's attention the update Bricklink
is rolling out on February first that will cause several types of pieces to be
merged together under specific listings. For example, slopes that have smooth
and rough sides will no longer be considered different pieces. Now, this is
a BIG PROBLEM. When you are MOCing and you need a specific texture for a, lets
say, roof, and you use the wrong texture, it stands out A LOT. I hope everyone
sees what I am getting to here. If sellers are allowed to combine those two VERY
DIFFERENT variants of pieces, I may need to do several orders to get the actual
pieces I want, and it won't be the sellers fault if they send me a mix of
TWO DISTINCT TYPES OF PIECES. I am new to Bricklink, so maybe this has happened
before, but right now, this seems like it could pose a huge problem. I am sure
the Bricklink Devs had good intentions in mind when they decided to merge these
piece variants, but what they said in their letter to the Sellers, quote, "We
consider them (the piece variants) to be relatively unimportant and cumbersome
from the viewpoint of the Bricklink Marketplace" IS NOT TRUE. Specific things
like the textured variants of pieces DO MATTER. Please spread the word and hopefully
the Bricklink Devs will listen to the community.
|
|
| Author: | Dusty_King | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 10:48 | | Subject: | Re: Important proposal regarding catalog vari | | Viewed: | 99 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Please DO NOT go through with the planned consolidation, it would be disastrous
you shouldn't rewrite the history and hard work of unsung heroes of BRICKLINK!
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 10:12 | | Subject: | Variant merge - specific answers needed | | Viewed: | 233 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Regardless of my thoughts toward losing some valuable variants in our Catalog,
I have now read the message twice, and read most of the main Forum thread, and
I still have no idea how technically this is going to work.
You are going to take two active catalog items, 3747b and 3747a for example,
choose a main Image, choose one Image for each of the color thumbnails, choose
1 Price Guide (or does this merge also), and add a new Note explaining the 2
different versions. Is an experienced Catalog Expert going to do this or someone
else? Will the deleted info be archived in case of errors?
Then, you are going to merge the two items in the Catalog.
Seller shop inventory
Seller's shop items will be merged unless they paste a specific string of
text on the entry ahead of time. If not, they will not get to choose which price
is used or any of the other lot data. They will not be given a log of exactly
what was merged or changed.
It's not as if sellers are already prone to blaming BrickLink for errors
in their inventory. Now BrickLink will be actively changing their store listings.
We have no way of testing if this going to work and no way of flagging or logging
errors created.
Set Inventories
All Set Inventories that have these items will change to just one item. Any sets
that have the parts listed as Alternates will ?? Any Match ID's affected
will ?? Links to Change Requests discussing these items will ??
Everything else
All Wanted Lists that have these items listed will have the parts merged? What
if they are in separate projects? Isn't there an issue with Wanted Lists
already that involves problems with duplicate items?
All external links to one (or both) of the item variants will break or ??
All the people who write related software will have to adjust, rewrite, debug,
and ??
To sum up:
There is a reason it took so long to Mark Items for Deletion and then actually
delete them. It's to avoid all this trouble and uncertainty.
What happens 3 months from now when a seller who's been away reopens his
shop and doesn't understand what happened? You simply cannot count on every
single member receiving, reading, and understanding the email message sent out.
Will they receive any Action Items within BrickLink to understand the changes?
I wonder how much Catalog Credit will just vanish on Feb 15th. Credit for images,
items, inventories, ... all gone.
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
| Author: | StarBrick | | Posted: | Jan 25, 2024 02:32 | | Subject: | Proposed Changes - script instead of manual ? | | Viewed: | 94 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| On Feb 15th some merging will occur in the database.
No matter what.
This Wednesday I (we?) received a BL message regarding the upcoming change.
With a link to a Help Page. Nice.
Until I clicked it....
If a seller wants to 'add a short line of text' for each lot affected,
sellers need to enterl more than 4000 numbers to check IF they are in their inventory.
And than manually editing the NOTE field.
This will take every seller hours of entering numbers, checking the results,
editing note-fields en checking for the edits to be correctly made.
Urgent request: can BL please provide a script or simple change page where
this actions can be (partially) automated?
Question for Admin_Russell: what happens exactly with my affected inventory entries
when nothing is changed on the sellers end?
|
|
| Author: | MrPetovan | | Posted: | Jan 21, 2024 11:33 | | Subject: | Alternate items mix-and-match? | | Viewed: | 118 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi everybody,
I understand that alternate lots represent different production runs, but I recently
stumbled on a used set that has the correct amount of a part, albeit both regular
mold and alternate mold parts are featured.
Is this mix-and-match considered valid to sell the set on BrickLink or do I have
to have only parts from the regular or the alternate mold?
Thank you in advance!
|
|
| Author: | Heartbricker | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 23:00 | | Subject: | Change confusing picture for 29085c01 | | Viewed: | 172 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| The main picture is showing two sides of the same buffer but buyers claim they
were tricked by the picture into thinking they were buying a set of two buffers
per entry.
Or at the very least put a disclaimer that they are buying one buffer and the
picture is showing the variation of the part on both its sides.
While I believe the picture was well intended- it is hurting newer buyers (although
the last one making this claim had 36 feedbacks) and will potentially hurt sellers
and site credibility.
Another solution would be to only show the picture of the side of the part that
is impacted by the variation.
Thank you
The Heart Bricker team
|
|
| Author: | TimeWarpDrive | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 22:52 | | Subject: | Helmeted figures should be helmeted | | Viewed: | 162 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Why does sw1259 (sw1287, sh739, sh731, etc) have the hair piece instead of the
helmet? The box and instructions show the character with the helmet. I think
more people who prefer to have the helmet over the hair. A good compromise would
be to have an in-set variant that lists this figure with the helmet for people
who want to buy the helmeted figure.
|
| Author: | david28 | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 16:07 | | Subject: | 1905-Vizir | | Viewed: | 75 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| hi,
i add 15 days ago a requests to add a promotional version off set 1905,
the statut today it's pending,
can you tell me the time for a admin decision ?
thank
|
| Author: | myixjetjet24 | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 09:19 | | Subject: | Flounder version | | Viewed: | 88 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I got 2 version of flounder (little mermaid)(15679pb01) and got different set
of eyes. Is the set 43207 contains the latest version?
|
| Author: | rcarhart | | Posted: | Jan 18, 2024 16:06 | | Subject: | 3626apb05 | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Does anyone know the story behind this item? It clearly exists, but is not attributed
to any sets. How/why would that happen?
|
| Author: | WOLKsite | | Posted: | Jan 18, 2024 07:19 | | Subject: | Part 42042 | | Viewed: | 98 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
Why is this part listed as "42042"? The ID of 42042 (and all the Element
IDs listed on this part) belong the Krana*. Shouldn't the scoop be listed
as "x[number]" since its ID is unknown?
*All 8 shapes of Krana share the same ID, as they were produced in the same mold,
which is how they were randomized.
|
| Author: | TimeWarpDrive | | Posted: | Jan 17, 2024 22:18 | | Subject: | sh010 Variant | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I discovered a second variant of sh010. One uses dark green to outline the details
and the other uses black. Both found in separate copies of the 2012 batcave set.
I've seen more minor variants approved and I think this one is 'major'
enough for a split.
|
|
|
| Author: | Remko100 | | Posted: | Jan 17, 2024 09:38 | | Subject: | elephant1c01 and 1c02 | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
both elephants are the same, but have a different colour AND a different number.
People find and choose one elephant and pick a non-existing colous (light/dark
gray, depending on the elephant). My suggestion would be to consolidate the elephants
into 1 single catalogue-item with two colour variants. If you found elephant
nr. 1c02 it seems now both colors come from the same set. One has to search for
the other elephant to find info on the other set, but you can't know it exists,
because there a two colours offered for sale for each elephant.
Regards,
Remko
Its a Bricky World
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2024 04:50 | | Subject: | 973pb5343c01 | | Viewed: | 112 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| What do we know about this torso that I somehow happen to own but don't ask
me how I got it because I don't know 
|
| Author: | DarylB | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2024 11:20 | | Subject: | Two new stickered parts for catalogue | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I am trying to get 2 new stickered parts added to the catalogue but do not know
how to add a photograph/image, can anyone help please.
|
|
| Author: | Scrp749 | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2024 09:49 | | Subject: | Minecraft Counterparts - Turtles | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I'm in the middle of doing the inventory for set 21254 The Turtle Beach House.
The side of the box identifies the large turtle as a named entity but does not
show/name the three baby turtles (built on page 12 of the instructions).
Set 30432 has all the parts for the large turtle but does not have the turtle
as a counterpart assembly.
Should mineturtle01 be added to both of these inventories?
Should I submit a counterpart assembly for the baby turtle (quantity 3)?
Thanks, - Chris
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 9, 2024 18:34 | | Subject: | Alternate / New number - Cinderella Hair | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I found a Minifigure / Mini Doll hair similar to
[p=bb1323pb01]
in set
It has mold number 100907. It weighs .65g and has more or less the same dimensions
as the current catalog listing. PCC is 6469268.
I don't have the 6416359 one to compare. Could this be a new mold or an
alternate number? It does look very alike. The mold number is visible in the
crevice on the underside.
Thanks!
Jen
|
|
| Author: | paolocolombo | | Posted: | Jan 9, 2024 09:57 | | Subject: | Set 060 - 2 Basic Building Set in Cardboard | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Good morning everyone.
Does anyone have the inventory of set 060-2?
I'm also looking for instructions.....
Paolo
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jan 9, 2024 00:21 | | Subject: | Important proposal regarding catalog variants | | Viewed: | 9872 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everyone,
As a platform, we have decided to take a hard look at some of the mold variants
that we are currently asking you to recognize. For sellers, more variants means
extra sorting and extra work while pulling orders, plus the issues that arise
from variant misunderstandings.
For buyers, excess variants mean that it's harder to assemble a wanted list,
find stores, and ultimately obtain the parts you are looking for.
I have put together a quick Help page to outline these proposed changes:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2625
Notice the date on this is coming up quickly (Feb 1), so I'm not giving a
lot of time for discussion. I'm aiming for about 1 week of discussion and
then we'll give sellers 2 weeks to adjust the descriptions on affected items
if they wish to retain the distinctions.
I plan to construct a full FAQ page with answers to all your questions. This
will serve to inform users about what was done here in February 2024, and also
help point the catalog in the right direction in the future.
To get started, I'll list a few here:
1. This sounds like you're dumbing down the BrickLink catalog to make
it easier for new users. Is that what is going on?
Not really. There are many, many other variants we expect people to sort and
care about. These ones don't really seem to matter much, and some of them
(e.g., the minifigure heads) actually cause problems for the catalog that cannot
be corrected otherwise.
2. What if I really care about a certain variant that is going away? Can I
still buy and sell that variant?
Absolutely! You can add notes to your listings to make them as "determined"
as you wish. Buyers can still search within notes for extra details, or they
can simply observe them as they browse listings.
3. How do I know which exact variants will be merged? I only see one example
in each category.
Please ask in this thread and I can be very specific. Usually we are talking
about a handful of parts and the printed versions.
4. Has a merge like this ever been done before?
Yes, there was a precedent - the Headlight Brick with Slot:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1016584
It was marked for deletion a few years ago and was finally merged last August.
5. Are these the only parts up for consideration, or are there other variants
that will be merged as well?
This is all for now. Based on how well this goes, we may elect to remove other
entries later. However, we will keep all functional variants and important cosmetic
variants.
|
|
| Author: | Leftoverbricks | | Posted: | Jan 8, 2024 10:23 | | Subject: | Catmins: What happened to min094? | | Viewed: | 127 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
Minecraft minifigure min094 is missing in the catalog. We have a continuous range
from min001 until min159. But 094 is not there 
Is there a catalogue admin who knows the story? It must happened somewhere in
2021.
And can we fill up the gap somehow?
For instance with the next variant of the Iron Golem which now counts 4: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=iron%20golem#T=M
Another suggestion is to use min094 for a future variant of Steve (009) or
Alex (017), like when they appear with legs or helmets in a new colour.
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Jan 7, 2024 17:18 | | Subject: | Please remove misleading pics of 926957 etc | | Viewed: | 209 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Please remove VERY misleading pics of:
I'm in heated discussion with a buyer who thinks there's this box around
the CD-ROM (while this picture's the whole Set box).
I've a brand New 8483-1 CD (for sale in shop), I'll try to take pics
for you Catalog people.
It looks like this - don't use this pic, it's not mine:
|
|
|
| Author: | Peteparker | | Posted: | Jan 6, 2024 14:07 | | Subject: | How to resolve a Doctor Octopus inconsistency | | Viewed: | 101 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
I noticed that some sets like the Daily Bugle (76178-1) list the Doc Ock figure
with the arms included, but the one from the Monster Truck set (76174-1) didn't.
Could it be at least included as an alternate to the minifigure alone? It makes
more sense to me for the figure to be offered both with and without the mechanical
arms, but the listings including these are inconsistent.
Thanks for the consideration and any feedback about the situation.
Nathan (Peteparker)
|
|
| Author: | Peteparker | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2024 22:09 | | Subject: | Wrong Legs on Harry - b23hp08 & hp466 | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
I've submitted a new minifigure, hp466 with the correct legs on the Harry
Potter figure that comes with the book, b23hp08. I used my own copy to provide
the images. Since I can't suggest the inventory change until the new minifigure
is approved, I figured here would be the best place to provide proof that a new
minifigure listing is necessary. See the attached images.
Thanks!
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jan 5, 2024 13:55 | | Subject: | What do you think... | | Viewed: | 278 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Just submitted these to be added to the catalog. As far as I can tell, there's
no actual item number to reference, so I submitted the LEGO with "badgeset6"
as item number.
What do you think; did I do it wrong? Is there another, maybe better term to
use as item number?
-Thanks
|
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Jan 4, 2024 15:40 | | Subject: | Two versions of x55 ? | | Viewed: | 140 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have 6 that look like catalogue image but 4 that don’t.
The odd examples do not look like they are worn.
Image one against dark background has the examples in the centre, each end is
the catalogue image version.
The gold quite noticeable on catalogue version but odd examples are transparent.
Note in other images, over light, that the odd ones are transparent in the centre
( image 2 ) and the others ( image 3 ) appear darker around ninja symbol.
Less colour applied or variation ?
One I would have dismissed but 4
Any views ?
Anyone else have these ?
|
|
|
| Author: | b2933 | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2024 06:26 | | Subject: | Set 325 | | Viewed: | 102 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Having two 325-sets in hand, I notice that there are completely different layouted-instructions.
While one is in landscape-style, the other one has portrait-style. Maybe that
should be added to the catalogue-entry 325-3.
I have pictures of both types available but can not upload them here for whatever
reason.
|
|
| Author: | Kenopolis | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2024 02:29 | | Subject: | Stickered part for set 71043 3068bpb1100 | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Set #71043, Hogwarts Castle, is missing one stickered part.
There should be a Tan 2x2 tile with 3 windows, but instead, the 1x2 tile with
3 windows is listed as having 2 in the set.
This is inaccurate.
According to the instructions, book 2, Page 148, step 361, sticker 23 goes on
a 1 2x2 tan tile, and 1 1x2 tile.
I have added the part, as 3068bpb1100, and a picture to go with it.
Please add the part, and connect it to set 71043, and correct the part count
for part # 3069bpb1004 to 1 instead of 2.
Thank you!
|
| Author: | bramski | | Posted: | Jan 1, 2024 06:07 | | Subject: | Add new color to 30464 | | Viewed: | 90 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| This part is available in Tan, also different lots selling in this color.
However it's not listed in the "Known colors" section.
|
| Author: | Brickshopbelgie | | Posted: | Dec 31, 2023 04:39 | | Subject: | Opposite of 85984pb294, can't find anywhere | | Viewed: | 115 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I have this slope 30 1x2x2/3 piece with a sticker. The sticker is the mirror
version of 85984pb294.( upside down) but i can't find anything about it.
Also it can not be that the sticker is placed upside down because then the white
dot would be on the other side.
Please see picture below.
Is there a difference in those 2 or can i list it as 85984pb294?
Thanks
|
|
|
| Author: | brickin9 | | Posted: | Dec 29, 2023 18:46 | | Subject: | Brick 2 x 3 Trans-Clear | | Viewed: | 105 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I was trying to order some of these when I noticed a strange thing.
I think there is a problem identifying which variations of the brick that vendors
have for sale.
Either that or the correct brick has not been identified in the set-inventories.
3002old TC comes in 36 sets and there are 411 available to purchase.
3002 TC comes in 1 set and there are 344 available.
That one set with 3002 TC is 1469, a shell helicopter with only one 3002 TC and
yet this one set accounts for 45% of the 2 x 3 Trans-Clear Bricks on BL. This
just doesn't seem likely to me.
PS
3002 has a couple more variations but I don't think they're relevant.
bhol03 doesn't have a TC colour.
3002f1 doesn't come in any sets apparently.
|
|
| Author: | Henk90 | | Posted: | Dec 29, 2023 11:45 | | Subject: | sw1259 please add Helmet | | Viewed: | 66 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi there
should the Helmet 87610pb20 be added to Fleet Commander SW1259?
From the Mandalorian Fang Fighter vs TIE Interceptor Item No: 75348-1
|
| Author: | CaptRedBeard | | Posted: | Dec 29, 2023 00:06 | | Subject: | Help identifying piece | | Viewed: | 88 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I wasn't able to find this brick in the catalog and was wondering if anyone
knew what it is. It's a yellow 1 x 2 brick but instead of one of the studs
there is a hole. It came in a bin of older bricks that I'm guessing is from
the 1970's or 80's.
|
|
| Author: | Bendix | | Posted: | Dec 20, 2023 02:59 | | Subject: | Scala TOYS "R" US exclusive set | | Viewed: | 150 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| | Do we need a special catalog entry for this exclusive set? |
|
| Author: | Saitobricks.ca | | Posted: | Dec 18, 2023 18:26 | | Subject: | Please add counterparts for 71737 | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi, if any one owns the Ninjago, 71737, X-1 Ninja Charger, than could you upload
the counterparts (AKA stickered parts) to the catalog for this set?
https://www.bricklink.com/SL/71737-1.jpg?0
Thanks!
|
| Author: | frog8998 | | Posted: | Dec 14, 2023 01:33 | | Subject: | Avengers tower - Black widow minifigure | | Viewed: | 110 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Sh851 has been entered as being in 76269 -Avengers tower, but the minifigure
in 76269 has leg printing the same as the Hawkeye minifigure sh925 in the same
set and appears to be a new item
|
| Author: | iprice | | Posted: | Dec 13, 2023 12:43 | | Subject: | 75367 - UCS Venator Piece Count Wrong? | | Viewed: | 137 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| According to the catalog, the UCS Venator (75367) contains 5371 parts. The box
clearly states 5374. Someone's going to have to do a recount/re-inventory
- if someone could just send me the set, I'll do it!
|
| Author: | MTM | | Posted: | Dec 12, 2023 06:15 | | Subject: | Why is DUPLO Storage Bag 5002934 not listed? | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I found a DUPLO Storage Bag 5002934 in my shelf. I try to add it to my inventory
in my shop, but the bag isn't listed either as "storage bag" nor
as set 5002934.
How can I add it?
Michael
|
| Author: | Tracyd | | Posted: | Dec 11, 2023 17:43 | | Subject: | Why does it have RC in the name. | | Viewed: | 112 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
This part predates the RC functionality and is not exclusive to the RC train
line. It seems slightly disingenuous to have it in the title, unless the reason
is to make it easier to search. But it still feels wrong to have RC in the name.
|
|
| Author: | elgvenn2 | | Posted: | Dec 11, 2023 14:35 | | Subject: | 8680 wrong window type? | | Viewed: | 112 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi
A while back i ordered new window frames (for 2493c01) for my 8680 set using
the Bricklink inventory as reference. When i got them i was thinking to switch
the glass over from my discolored variants, however i found out that the windows
i had, has fixed glass in them. The window i have with the set is part 4347.
I also noticed that Rebrickable and brickset use this part in their inventory.
When looking in the instructions, the step where the windows are added does not
describe the glass being added to the frame, thus i think 4347 is the most corect
window here. However i cannot be sure that 2493c01 was never used also. Perhaps
the instruction was kept not describing to insert the glass, or perhaps there
are two versions of the instruction floating around?
I was hoping to get some input from the community before going ahead and requesting
an inventory change request since i'm not really sure what is the most corect
corse of action here.
BR
Hans Olav S.
|
|
| Author: | mzmzmz | | Posted: | Dec 11, 2023 08:55 | | Subject: | items 3754pb17 and BA008pb10 | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
The following 2 items both carry the same sticker (comming from 2 different stickersets),
but the description of these 2 items (both as parts as in inventory) seems to
me as inconsistent - not sure how big the issue is though
- 3754pb17 is called “brick with...(...sticker)"
- BA008pb10 is called “stickered assembly” (and: “white stickered assembly”)
Kind regards,
Menno
|
| Author: | CBak | | Posted: | Dec 10, 2023 08:29 | | Subject: | Should Canadian Mania Magazines be Seperate? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Going through the Bricklink catalog I noticed that some of the cover photos of
Mania Magazines appear to be Canadian editions. I was wondering people's
thoughts if it would be worth differentiating the versions, or is this not a
priority?
|
| Author: | platinum_lego | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2023 20:39 | | Subject: | When is a tree (leaf) not a tree (or leaf)? | | Viewed: | 100 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi all,
More out of curiosity, but does anyone know why this
is in the 'plant, tree' category, when other leaf parts like
and
are in the 'plant' category.
Steve
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2023 18:06 | | Subject: | Image for Cat admins | | Viewed: | 123 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| | Hope this helps. |
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2023 14:35 | | Subject: | Looking to add torch key ring | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Looking to add item below as it does not have the packaging that the other version
has, it has cable tie with 3 cards.
Should I use the Model number ?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
| Author: | CMFanatic | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2023 11:30 | | Subject: | sw1312 | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| When will sw1312 be updated with the set it belongs to and the year it was released?
Wasn't it in a polybag of some sort?
|
| Author: | JoBen | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2023 06:15 | | Subject: | Parts database Excel file | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| | Is there a partsdatabase of Lego parts used in technic sets ? |
| Author: | cart_rudo | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2023 04:29 | | Subject: | same parts, two entries in the catalog? | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi there
some questions about Promotional parts;
what's the difference between part 4066pb513 and 4066pb506? I can't see
any difference.
and what's the difference between 76371pb210 and 76371pb147? There's
also not any little difference to see..
also 76371pb176 and 76371pb110
or 4066pb552 and 4066pb509
and there are many many more entries like them...
regards
cart_rudo
|
|
| Author: | janzenroth | | Posted: | Dec 8, 2023 00:09 | | Subject: | Did this part use to have a different name? | | Viewed: | 119 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I am looking for a part in my inventory:
Brick, Round 1 1/2 x 1 1/2 x 2/3 Dome Top
and I was wondering if this part had been renamed as I cannot seem to find it
in my Brick Round category.
Is there a way to find out a part's naming history. For example, part 6091
used to be a brick modified before it was changed to a slope curved.
Thanks,
Evan
|
| Author: | billamber | | Posted: | Dec 7, 2023 18:02 | | Subject: | missing images? | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi all....Been away for 6 months due to surgery...just started listing a few
items and noticed so many missing images in the catalog? Wasn't like this
before...is there a reason?
thanks! (I really use it a lot to identify torsos, etc.)
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Dec 6, 2023 13:20 | | Subject: | Unlisted version | | Viewed: | 153 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Anyone seen this before ?
Don’t know which set it came from.
Note print below 5972
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Dec 5, 2023 09:45 | | Subject: | Parts list | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I’ve now found this :
* | | 71958c01pb01 (Inv) Boat, Hull Unitary 22 x 8 x 2 1/3 with White Top with Number 327 and Fire Logo on Black and White Stripes Pattern on Both Sides (71958pb01 / 30255)
Parts: Boat |
However it does come apart very easily.
Should this have a parts list of :
30255 white x 1
Plus a new part for the hull, something like 71958pb01 red with printed fire
pattern and 327 x 1
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Dec 5, 2023 09:27 | | Subject: | Is there a note | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I have a 7160pb02 boat hull which is marked 71959, is this noted somewhere ?
Cheers.
* | | 71610pb02 Boat, Hull Unitary 32 x 10 x 1 2/3, Base with Coast Guard Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 6435
Parts: Boat |
|
|
| Author: | metropolis1927 | | Posted: | Dec 5, 2023 04:08 | | Subject: | Define plastic sail size | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hey Lego lovers!
Can size of the sails from set 41716 be determine and added to data base?
Thanks
|
| Author: | jeffnauburn13 | | Posted: | Dec 4, 2023 17:57 | | Subject: | 76057 Inventory Missing last 2 sticker pieces | | Viewed: | 106 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I do not know the item numbers for the 2 pieces in question but they are the
last 2 stickers to be used in the set. On the sticker sheet they are items 9
and 10 and go on Lego piece 6179. Can they please be added to the inventory to
be made available for purchase?
|
|
| Author: | Hurt | | Posted: | Dec 4, 2023 08:56 | | Subject: | Breathing Apparatus (with and w/o Bar Holder) | | Viewed: | 122 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi!
The "Minifigure Breathing Apparatus, Scuba Regulator and Air Tank (Undetermined
Type)" is marked for deletion in the catalog.
There are 2 new versoins:
"without Bar Holder":
"with Bar Holder":
I was able to identify 2 of the 4 I have as "without Bar Holder" (top
and right on my pictures), but what are the other 2? The slot is to narrow to
fit a regular bar, even with force.
In the pictures of bricklink the "with Bar Holder" pictures show that
the "holders" are not that big as the ones in my pictures.
Thanks!
|
|
|
| Author: | Peteparker | | Posted: | Dec 2, 2023 13:10 | | Subject: | Brick Costume Assembly Confusion | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
There is a bit of confusion in the use of the listings of the Brick Costume Assemblies,
and I'm not sure how to fix them. Here is the list of assemblies:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=37191&in=P
The list there has individual listings for each combination of arm and hand color,
and it's not clear if the intent is to have individual listings for each
combination of arm, hand, and costume (brick) color.
Three of the assembly listings, 37191c01, 37191c04, and 37191c05, have lots for
sale in color options that are not identified as Known Colors. This is strong
evidence that the sellers of these combinations do not understand the differences
in the way these items are listed and are selecting the base assembly (37191)
or one as close to what they have as possible, and then choosing a different
costume color with the arm and hand color listed that hasn't been produced.
Lego has not officially created any assembly with differently colored arms than
the costume, and it is considered an illegal building technique to remove the
arms and change that combination, but it is possible to do so.
So how can I help clean up those color selections? Is there a method to reach
out to the sellers with incorrect listings and have their listings corrected?
If that were corrected, would the alternate color details correct itself (there
is price guide information for incorrect colors on 37191c05)?
I'm hoping there's a good way to help correct this little problem, and
make it more clear to sellers in the future how the listings are broken out.
Thanks for any guidance you can provide!
|
|
| Author: | modelmak3r | | Posted: | Dec 2, 2023 08:53 | | Subject: | Pegasus from set 41077 not listed Animal air | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| There are 2 Pegasus builds in set 41077 but they are not listed in animal air
like othe pegasus builds from other sets. Can these be added too?
|
| Author: | WolfyBuilder | | Posted: | Dec 1, 2023 23:04 | | Subject: | TRUCHIMA-1 Picture Inquiry | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
I recently submitted the set TRUCHIMA-1, along with a picture of the set.
However, when I saw that the set had been approved, I noticed that the image
I submitted had been replaced by another.
I would like to know why this was done, and if there is any way my original picture
can be restored to the set's page.
Any information would be appreciated. Thank you.
Kind regards, Wolfy
|
| Author: | here4bricks614 | | Posted: | Dec 1, 2023 23:01 | | Subject: | 40601 Dark Gray? | | Viewed: | 117 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Is this a mistake?
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Nov 30, 2023 20:59 | | Subject: | entering dimensions for a playmat | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| This is about this item ...
* | | 4182737 Plastic Playmat Duplo, with Water/Ice Pattern from Set 3621 Polar Animals (Explore)
Parts: Plastic |
It does not have dimensions in the catalog. I have several in stock. They were
factory packed folded in half (so half the long dimension). Do I enter the folded
or the unfolded length for the X dimension. Note that using the folded X dimension,
will cause the Y dimension to become the large of the two.
thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | David892 | | Posted: | Nov 29, 2023 01:26 | | Subject: | Questioning Trans-Red Color of item 3899 | | Viewed: | 102 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Good evening,
While sorting parts, I came across a Utensil Cup (Mug) 3899 that was trans-red
color.
I looked at the item with a magnifying glass and I came to the conclusion that
this was probably Megablocks of another brand that copies Lego. It looks very
similar to a true 3899 item, but the lip seems different and (of course) no Lego
marking anywhere.
However, I see that this color is referenced in the Bricklink Catalog (not as
known but in the "All" category) and that even 10 sellers offer such
items worldwide.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3899&name=Minifigure,%20Utensil%20Cup&category=%5BMinifigure,%20Utensil%5D#T=C&C=17
My opinion is that this color is not produced by Lego and therefore should be
deleted from the catalog.
Can anybody provide an expertise on my affirmation? Is there something we can
do to prove if I'm right or wrong?
Thanks a lot!
David
|
|
| Author: | Bricksgram | | Posted: | Nov 27, 2023 16:06 | | Subject: | Does the Ninja theme belong to the Castle? | | Viewed: | 147 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I wonder does the Ninja theme belongs to the castle theme? On some sites they
treat them in the same basket, but not on bricklink, so I'm interested? In
general, the these two themes are in some point similar. I like some Ninja sets
from 2000' almost as much as Castle sets.
|
| Author: | karolainen | | Posted: | Nov 26, 2023 13:28 | | Subject: | Oprava | | Viewed: | 93 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| | MISCLASSIFIED PARTS RED AND WHITE TECHNIC PANEL 87080PB060 AND 87080PB061 |
| Author: | LordSkylark | | Posted: | Nov 25, 2023 11:19 | | Subject: | Shadow Leonardo comcon025-1 | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Does anyone have this set or photos that it could be determined if the skateboard
is stickered or printed, and then have the skateboard added to the inventory?
Or should the minifigure be deleted from the set so that the set can be flagged
as "not inventoried" so that people are aware that this set is not (otherwise
it will never show up as part of the "not inventoried" sets. (It always
irked me that this set got approved with an incomplete inventory... And it's
never been fixed to this day, probably because it never shows up in the "not
inventoried" sets.)
|
| Author: | brunocandeias | | Posted: | Nov 25, 2023 02:58 | | Subject: | HELP! | | Viewed: | 170 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
Any help with this part number?
Regards!
|
|
| Author: | reedertwins | | Posted: | Nov 24, 2023 14:37 | | Subject: | Set 8097 Regular part mistake? | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Under the regular parts section of this set 8097, item #3298 is listed as quantity
of 4. This part is not needed to build this set, however you do need item #4210637
quantity 6, which currently listed under alternative parts. I think this needs
to be corrected, unless I’m mistaken.
|
|
| Author: | RockiesGuyLego | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 13:47 | | Subject: | Wrong inventory for a figure in set 850889 | | Viewed: | 86 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| When you look at this set on BrickLink, there is a picture of the actual blister
pack. There is only one figure with the legs 970c00pb0271. All of the other
figures in the pack have Black Hips and Black Legs. However, the inventory for
the figure cas529 show this figure with the legs 970c00pb0271. This figure should
have black hips and black legs. The inventory is incorrect for this figure and
needs to be changed. I have tried to submit the change but don't know how
to fill out the form to get it to accept it. Can anyone help with getting this
change made? I would love to learn how to do this since I have found several
errors in the past as well. Thanks for any help on this. RockesGuy Brick Store.
|
|
|
| Author: | brunocandeias | | Posted: | Nov 21, 2023 04:39 | | Subject: | HELP! | | Viewed: | 110 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello!
I think this helmet has a printing error...
I think is the x164pb09
Can i sell the minifig with this helmet?
Regards!
|
|
|
| Author: | WOLKsite | | Posted: | Nov 20, 2023 14:41 | | Subject: | Length variation of part 23221? | | Viewed: | 75 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| All of my 23221 are noticeably different in length (and longer than what the
name describes). Is this a common issue?
Four of these (all except the shortest one, the ones with the brighter green
rubber bands - I don't believe those are LEGO bands) are from a used copy
of 7690. The other one is from my 2007 copy of set 7691.
Of course, it is very hard to make these not bend so much... The baseplate in
the image is 48x48. The brick separators mark the lengths when straightened outs.
This increased length has pretty significant impact on 7690, putting quite a
lot of stress on the bricks. The shortest one is just short of 33 studs long,
the longest is 40.
LEGO describes these as 252 mm (31.5 studs).
|
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2023 23:23 | | Subject: | Unmark as Unreleased | | Viewed: | 123 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
The catalog guidelines state: "Unreleased items are those for which there
is no proof of existence."
I have attached proof of the existence of this set. At least one actual physical
copy of the set exists.
|
|
| Author: | outofthe60s | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2023 12:23 | | Subject: | Where to find list of part Category changes | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Recently I saw a Bricklink page that had part Category changes by year. If I
remember correctly it showed the part picture along with the old Category and
the new Category. For example: it showed part 6215 as moving from Brick, Modified
to Slope, Curved. It even showed what was planned for 2024. I can't seem
to find the page again. Can someone send me in the right direction? Thanks.
|
| Author: | Volker.1967 | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2023 04:45 | | Subject: | Luminara Unduli no Light up unknown? | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Who can say something about this Luminara without Light up?
When was this edition and why is it not listed on Bricklink?
Thanks
Volker
|
|
| Author: | LocuraHobbies | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2023 15:11 | | Subject: | Color Of The Milky White (Allianz Arena) | | Viewed: | 137 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Any way we can get a deferent color name for the Allianz 3001 bricks? like...
"Satin Milky White" or something? Makes it difficult trying to order
Milky White bricks when you arent sure what you are going to get.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
