| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Rick_S.  | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:53 | | Subject: | Re: Attack of the Blusers | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, BLUSER13161 writes:
| | In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | bluser numbers assigned already
but just happen to be known by our chosen usernames instead.
|
Yes, your bluser number can be seen by going to your Account Info page. The
second bit of information there is titled User ID. That's your bluser number.
Someday in the distant future, when we're all dead, they'll eject us
from the system and make us blusers, too. Not too fond of the idea, as I'd
rather be remembered as StormChaser, not BLUSER_13161.
Doesn't matter what I want, though.
|
I'm BLUSER 9140 
|
 |
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:41 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Admin_Russell writes:
| | Please do not "+1" or otherwise comment on the AMA questions. If you want to
ask a question that has already been asked, ask it again in your own words as
a reply to the original post.
Thank you!
|
Okay thank you for confirming Russell
|
| Author: | Minifig_Central | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:37 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Can you please reply to my post in relation to site performance issues? I'd
like to at least know they've been acknowledged/started to be worked on.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:35 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Please do not "+1" or otherwise comment on the AMA questions. If you want to
ask a question that has already been asked, ask it again in your own words as
a reply to the original post.
Thank you!
In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
“Please do add your questions in the thread below*. We will update the LEGO FAQ
on an ongoing basis with your most top-of-mind questions, until the closing of
the AMA on 31st January 2020 at 9AM EST.”
|
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 16:25 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
|
As already been noted, people don’t read the FAQ before posting their questions.
Why do you believe they read all the previous questions? (Especially on a slooowwww
BL day, like this, er, month.)
But for some forum junkies, people just read the announcement and ask their question(s).
|
Well the high number of views against each post and the number of subsequent
comments would suggest they are being read and whilst some people are repeating
certain stuff from the FAQ including myself to a certain degree I think its just
because people are looking for a litttle more elaboration on what's previously
been anounced.
|
|
| Author: | Antarctica | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 15:59 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1237-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 4 Part Black {3704 Technic, Axle 2 to 32062 Technic, Axle 2 Notched}
Comments from Submitter:
The notches are visible in the instructions scan at https://lego.fandom.com/wiki/1237_Asimo_Robot?file=1237B.jpg in the left bottom.
The mold change was in 1996/1997, this is the only later set that has 3704 in its inventory.
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 15:56 | | Subject: | Re: Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
|
As already been noted, people don’t read the FAQ before posting their questions.
Why do you believe they read all the previous questions? (Especially on a slooowwww
BL day, like this, er, month.)
But for some forum junkies, people just read the announcement and ask their question(s).
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 14:31 | | Subject: | Lego AMA Should we +1 questions? | | Viewed: | 156 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| With regards to the below part of the announcement Lego says they will update
the FAQ with our ‘MOST’ top-of-mind questions does that mean those questions
that get asked the most will more likely get answered? and in which case if I
have the same question as what someone else has already asked should I just +1
it or would that cause more confusion?
I would assume that all the main questions will remain on the far left and easy
for Lego to spot in fact any staggered +1’s underneath it should actually indicate
to Lego that several people are showing an interest in the same question but
at the same time I don’t know if it’s a good idea or not? Only repeating the
same questions again would seem even more confusing? Any thoughts?
“Please do add your questions in the thread below*. We will update the LEGO FAQ
on an ongoing basis with your most top-of-mind questions, until the closing of
the AMA on 31st January 2020 at 9AM EST.”
|
|
| Author: | HayTanBricks | | Posted: | Jan 28, 2020 06:12 | | Subject: | Re: New Payment Method | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Yes a blank option would be great. While AfterPay or Zippay won’t integrate with
Market place platforms, a blank option will give us the availability to use an
alternative payment solution
In Suggestions, LaygoAdelaide writes:
| | Would it be possible to add another payment method.
Afterpay
Zip Pay
or at least have a blank one so that we can input our own custom method.
|
|
| Author: | Classicsmiley | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2020 20:15 | | Subject: | Re: Piece 33492 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, davebangertgmai writes:
| | I can't seem to find piece 33492.
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
