| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | NelisSolis  | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 16:54 | | Subject: | Re: Remark in PartOut | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, BrickTobi writes:
| | At the moment I have to search very time-consuming for the remarks when distributing
new parts, which are already in my invetory. Currently I always have to jump
into the inventory and take over the remark.
My suggestion would be to transfer the existing remarks already into the corresponding
fields. This function can also be optional (only if I want to transfer the old
remarks).
I would be very happy about this function.
Thanks and greetings
|
I think this is already available in the "consolidation" paragraph of the part-out
page.
|
 |
| Author: | Soviet | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 16:24 | | Subject: | Re: Remark in validation process | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, BrickTobi writes:
| | In Suggestions, Soviet writes:
| | In Suggestions, BrickTobi writes:
| | I miss the remarks by adding a new part to my invetory. if I have the part in
the invetory there is shown the old price but not the old (and new) remarks.
thanks and regards
tobias
|
Did you try this:
|
Thanks for your real
I mean the remark should be shown in this view:
|
I see. Well, the quickest way too see the remark would be to clikc the "view
item" link. It will show you the Remark do you don't have to go and search
for it separately.
|
|
| Author: | BrickTobi | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 16:00 | | Subject: | Re: Remark in validation process | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Soviet writes:
| | In Suggestions, BrickTobi writes:
| | I miss the remarks by adding a new part to my invetory. if I have the part in
the invetory there is shown the old price but not the old (and new) remarks.
thanks and regards
tobias
|
Did you try this:
|
Thanks for your real
I mean the remark should be shown in this view:
|
|
|
| Author: | BrickTobi | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 15:55 | | Subject: | Remark in PartOut | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| At the moment I have to search very time-consuming for the remarks when distributing
new parts, which are already in my invetory. Currently I always have to jump
into the inventory and take over the remark.
My suggestion would be to transfer the existing remarks already into the corresponding
fields. This function can also be optional (only if I want to transfer the old
remarks).
I would be very happy about this function.
Thanks and greetings
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 13:42 | | Subject: | Re: New Relationship - Items Reference Each Other | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, hpoort writes:
| | Nice idea.
Another examples:
and
There should be more of those pattern-set or pattern-minifig relations.
Hans-Peter
|
I have a Bricklist with a lot of those on it:
https://brickset.com/sets/list-21040
It needs some work, but I think most of the examples are covered.
|
|
| Author: | hpoort | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 13:37 | | Subject: | Re: New Relationship - Items Reference Each Other | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Nice idea.
Another examples:
and
There should be more of those pattern-set or pattern-minifig relations.
Hans-Peter
In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| | I would like to propose a new relationship for the catalog. Items that reference
each other. Some examples are below.
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 13:12 | | Subject: | Re: New Relationship - Items Reference Each Other | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| If you are scratching your head on one of those, try:
and
In Suggestions, axaday writes:
| | I would like to propose a new relationship for the catalog. Items that reference
each other. Some examples are below.
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 13:11 | | Subject: | New Relationship - Items Reference Each Other | | Viewed: | 103 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I would like to propose a new relationship for the catalog. Items that reference
each other. Some examples are below.
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
===
and
|
|
| Author: | Teup | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 09:02 | | Subject: | Re: Can we have another order status? | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, edk writes:
| | In Suggestions, Teup writes:
| | In Suggestions, irdroid3 writes:
| | It would be useful to have an Order status to go between "Received" and "Complete"
- something like "Queried" or "Querying" - for when I have started a communication
with the vendor - it's almost complete, but maybe a part missing?
Cheers, Ian
.
|
Yes, this has been suggested several times over the years and it would definitely
have been a useful feature. Also (maybe especially?) for me from a seller's
perspective, because I feel uncomfortable when I've asked the buyer a question
and I am not sure if they are waiting for their order or if they are aware that
I am asking a question first.
I'd call it "awaiting response". Maybe a dual one to make it clear who's
the one who should be responding  But I think just one should've worked
too. Could be connected to the green dot notification in the upper right corner,
to the party who's supposed to respond.
Not assuming Bricklink will change anything, but perhaps we'll see it in
some future under a different management or something like that.
|
Then add.
invoiced
payment pending
payment in the mail
payment iniated
awaiting buyer response
|
Those mostly already exist in the interface - invoiced by the invoice icon, payment
pending by the grand total in regular letters, payment initiated by the grand
total in bold letters (but it's a bit cryptic.. interface could've been
better..).
|
|
| Author: | edk | | Posted: | Sep 11, 2019 08:32 | | Subject: | Re: Can we have another order status? | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Teup writes:
| | In Suggestions, irdroid3 writes:
| | It would be useful to have an Order status to go between "Received" and "Complete"
- something like "Queried" or "Querying" - for when I have started a communication
with the vendor - it's almost complete, but maybe a part missing?
Cheers, Ian
.
|
Yes, this has been suggested several times over the years and it would definitely
have been a useful feature. Also (maybe especially?) for me from a seller's
perspective, because I feel uncomfortable when I've asked the buyer a question
and I am not sure if they are waiting for their order or if they are aware that
I am asking a question first.
I'd call it "awaiting response". Maybe a dual one to make it clear who's
the one who should be responding But I think just one should've worked
too. Could be connected to the green dot notification in the upper right corner,
to the party who's supposed to respond.
Not assuming Bricklink will change anything, but perhaps we'll see it in
some future under a different management or something like that.
|
Then add.
invoiced
payment pending
payment in the mail
payment iniated
awaiting buyer response
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
