Discussion Forum: Marketplace
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: shawnxyz View Messages Posted By shawnxyz
 Posted: Sep 24, 2016 04:51
 Subject: Re: Need to be able to set default search setting
 Viewed: 24 times
 Topic: Feedback
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
  Yes please ... Because for us the first results are usually US based ... with
ridiculous postage.

Har har Really, is there a way to set the defaults for the search? Min part
#s would help too.
 Author: yorbrick View Messages Posted By yorbrick
 Posted: Sep 16, 2016 17:18
 Subject: Re: Need to be able to set default search setting
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: Feedback
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Feedback, shawnxyz writes:
  On pages like this http://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3005&name=Brick%201%20x%201&category=%5BBrick%5D#T=S&C=12&O={"color":12,"ss":"US","cond":"N","rpp":"500"}

I should be able to set my default search settings - actually it'd be best
if it just remembered my current settings, then I could tweak them for my next
search.

Most specifically, it should remember that I'd like results for the US (or
maybe North America). Instead I have to hit that button every time 'cause
the first results are usually Europe with ridiculous shipping.

Yes please ... Because for us the first results are usually US based ... with
ridiculous postage.
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: Sep 5, 2016 17:39
 Subject: Re: Pay Your Fees Now! (please?)
 Viewed: 75 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
I totally agree. I've always thought that it was worded rudely.

David
 Author: HeinousJones View Messages Posted By HeinousJones
 Posted: Jun 30, 2016 14:32
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 43 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, par016 writes:
  In General, par016 writes:
  In General, HeinousJones writes:
  In General, par016 writes:
  In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

You mean the "See items in order on wanted list" which would bring up all the
wanted list items in your order and then you could delete them if you wanted?

-Pete

Because that can be switched on and off in your settings and can be accessed
on your orders page. See this post: http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=993808

-Pete

Thank you for your help, and thank you for having the vintage pieces I needed
to recreate my police boat from 1978. I thought I had dealt with you in the past.
I did have to turn that function on in my settings. It still doesn't do
what I expect it to. I got a chance last night to try it out. I think I'm
throwing an extreme situation at this new BUY function, and my expectations are
way too high. I'm trying to build 5 of the 7 Speed Racer vehicles. I have
them on 4 separate wanted lists. 300+ pieces in 86 lots, with identical lots
on several of them. This is what I had to go through to adjust everything....
Followed the link provided after purchase to the "Search Wanted List" page...
Manually adjusted several quantities (took notes on the partial quantities before
i placed the order). Broke the list into four pages. 100 items per page option
would have come in handy. Had to make sure I saved each individual page.
Then.. apply each of the four wanted lists (will only apply ONE list or ALL,
no option for multiple... check boxes would be handy here). Or at least I thought
so. It doesn't work correctly. I had one list selected, and it showed entries
for ALL of my wanted lists. Not just the ones present in this order. That caught
me by surprise. That wasn't very common (3 lots), but it could have been
very irritating on those future projects. After catching that, and thinking I
had a grasp on this, I realize that I had hit the delete button and had failed
to "un-check" the partial qty lots that I had just adjusted. Went back and fixed
that..
It just seems to me like all the information is there, and it's not being
used efficiently. The quantity’s that I ordered are there. I don't understand
why I can't be done with fewer steps. Not gonna mess with a "have" function.
Have and % of completion are useless to me and will surely irritate me even more.
I don't need Bricklink to keep track of what i have. If I need 20 of something,
and I buy 15 from a vendor, all I need is for the WANT qty to change to 5. I
think that’s pretty simple. I spent a couple of hours last night trying to figure
this out. I feel like I'm spending an extensive amount of time doing something
that BrickLink should be able to do in seconds. That means less time to shop
and spend money.
I do admit, this is the most complicated order I've ever made. I think my
high hopes and expectations for the BUY function coaxed me into it. It wouldn't
be this difficult if I had chosen to purchase ONLY full quantities, AND not had
so many identical lots scattered throughout several wanted lists. Then it would
work pretty similar to old version and I wouldn't be whining.
 Author: WoutR View Messages Posted By WoutR
 Posted: Jun 28, 2016 15:34
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 24 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, Classicsmiley writes:
  In General, HeinousJones writes:
  In General, par016 writes:
  In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

Now, you have the option of applying an order to a wanted list. On the new Wanted
List page, select the wanted list in question, and then click the Apply Order
button at the top of the list.


The "Apply Order" button seems to assume that I only order for one wanted list
at a time. Also, for some reason is does not seem to work always but I have not
tested that more.

At the same time the "Items in order on wanted list" has gained a bug and gives
incomplete results.
 Author: Classicsmiley View Messages Posted By Classicsmiley
 Posted: Jun 28, 2016 14:57
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, HeinousJones writes:
  In General, par016 writes:
  In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

Now, you have the option of applying an order to a wanted list. On the new Wanted
List page, select the wanted list in question, and then click the Apply Order
button at the top of the list.
 Author: par016 View Messages Posted By par016
 Posted: Jun 28, 2016 14:48
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 21 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, par016 writes:
  In General, HeinousJones writes:
  In General, par016 writes:
  In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

You mean the "See items in order on wanted list" which would bring up all the
wanted list items in your order and then you could delete them if you wanted?

-Pete

Because that can be switched on and off in your settings and can be accessed
on your orders page. See this post: http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=993808

-Pete
 Author: par016 View Messages Posted By par016
 Posted: Jun 28, 2016 14:46
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 32 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, HeinousJones writes:
  In General, par016 writes:
  In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.

You mean the "See items in order on wanted list" which would bring up all the
wanted list items in your order and then you could delete them if you wanted?

-Pete
 Author: HeinousJones View Messages Posted By HeinousJones
 Posted: Jun 28, 2016 14:14
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 44 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, par016 writes:
  In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete

It most certainly did. After completing a purchase, there was a button to "Remove
items from Wanted List". Worked like a charm. I used it (literally) hundreds
of times.
 Author: par016 View Messages Posted By par016
 Posted: Jun 24, 2016 17:58
 Subject: Re: BUY function woes
 Viewed: 51 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Suggestions, HeinousJones writes:
  Just used the new "BUY" feature. I was so happy with it at first... until I realized
it didn't subtract the ordered quantities from my wanted list. Just the option
of going in and doing it manually. What's the use? I has made WAY more work
than it has saved. VERY misleading.

It didn't do it for you on the old BrickLink so I am not sure how it is "WAY
more work." With the new "have" feature, which BrickLink is still fixing a few
bugs on, it's actually WAY easier to keep track of everything.

Pete
 Author: CPgolfaddict View Messages Posted By CPgolfaddict
 Posted: Jan 22, 2016 18:15
 Subject: Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped
 Viewed: 29 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
My understanding is that eCheck can happen when the buyer chooses to pay with
funds in their bank account, or the PayPal account doesn't have enough cash
in it.

So far after a couple of onsite payments both were normal, no eChecks. Had
eCheck's in the past from non-onsite payments. So unless there is some
other bug...it seems fine to me.

In Problem, qwertyboy writes:
  In Problem, therobo writes:
  In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:
  Complete/Packed shows in "orders not yet shipped" just like Complete/Ready....
the issue is the one in between. Complete/Paid (Payments status/order status)
does not show in "orders not yet shipped"

Converting this reply to the "Problem" topic.

IMO it does not make sense at all to use the "Paid" status if payment and order
status is separated. Whoever programmed this PayPal (Onsite) feature either was
not familiar with the separation (and its triggering the action items) or desperately
looked for a solution to block order additions after payment is done. An elegant
solution would be to block order additions if the payment status was set by the
system to "Complete" after payment, regardless of order status. But this
may have required more programming work.

I don't want to stir the pot too much, but some people have seen that onsite
payments result in people apparently paying with eCheck. If that bug (if it _is_
a bug) is still there, having the system flip the payment status to "complete"
would not be appropriate for those eCheck payments. In those cases it should
go to "clearing" or somesuch.

Maybe the developer knew this and explicitly avoided "complete" to force the
seller to decide it is complete. Just shooting in the dark here (as most of us
do when it comes to figuring out how new features are meant to work).

Niek.
 Author: qwertyboy View Messages Posted By qwertyboy
 Posted: Jan 22, 2016 16:45
 Subject: Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped
 Viewed: 30 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Problem, therobo writes:
  In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:
  Complete/Packed shows in "orders not yet shipped" just like Complete/Ready....
the issue is the one in between. Complete/Paid (Payments status/order status)
does not show in "orders not yet shipped"

Converting this reply to the "Problem" topic.

IMO it does not make sense at all to use the "Paid" status if payment and order
status is separated. Whoever programmed this PayPal (Onsite) feature either was
not familiar with the separation (and its triggering the action items) or desperately
looked for a solution to block order additions after payment is done. An elegant
solution would be to block order additions if the payment status was set by the
system to "Complete" after payment, regardless of order status. But this
may have required more programming work.

I don't want to stir the pot too much, but some people have seen that onsite
payments result in people apparently paying with eCheck. If that bug (if it _is_
a bug) is still there, having the system flip the payment status to "complete"
would not be appropriate for those eCheck payments. In those cases it should
go to "clearing" or somesuch.

Maybe the developer knew this and explicitly avoided "complete" to force the
seller to decide it is complete. Just shooting in the dark here (as most of us
do when it comes to figuring out how new features are meant to work).

Niek.
 Author: therobo View Messages Posted By therobo
 Posted: Jan 22, 2016 16:03
 Subject: Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped
 Viewed: 24 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Problem, CPgolfaddict writes:
  Complete/Packed shows in "orders not yet shipped" just like Complete/Ready....
the issue is the one in between. Complete/Paid (Payments status/order status)
does not show in "orders not yet shipped"

Converting this reply to the "Problem" topic.

IMO it does not make sense at all to use the "Paid" status if payment and order
status is separated. Whoever programmed this PayPal (Onsite) feature either was
not familiar with the separation (and its triggering the action items) or desperately
looked for a solution to block order additions after payment is done. An elegant
solution would be to block order additions if the payment status was set by the
system to "Complete" after payment, regardless of order status. But this
may have required more programming work.

  

In Suggestions, therobo writes:
  
It seems like a bug.
I would not set the order status from "Paid" to "Ready" as this opens the order
for additions. What happens if you set it to "Packed" instead?
 Author: CPgolfaddict View Messages Posted By CPgolfaddict
 Posted: Jan 22, 2016 15:33
 Subject: Re: Add Complete/Paid order to Not Yet Shipped
 Viewed: 19 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
Complete/Packed shows in "orders not yet shipped" just like Complete/Ready....
the issue is the one in between. Complete/Paid (Payments status/order status)
does not show in "orders not yet shipped"

Converting this reply to the "Problem" topic.


In Suggestions, therobo writes:
  
It seems like a bug.
I would not set the order status from "Paid" to "Ready" as this opens the order
for additions. What happens if you set it to "Packed" instead?
 Author: Jan_K View Messages Posted By Jan_K
 Posted: Jan 2, 2016 06:47
 Subject: Re: Technical issue: Wanted list data missing
 Viewed: 45 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, viejos writes:
  In General, Jan_K writes:

  
  The wanted list information seems to display incorrectly for many sets - and
for a while already. See this example:
 
Set No: 4000012  Name: Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
* 
4000012-1 Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
2012
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Inside Tour
http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/catalogitem.page?S=4000012-1

  Right-click on the blue BUY button on the top right and you will see the old
catalog page. For the set you mentioned, it looks like the image below. You can
see it is on 105 wanted lists. There are many glitches with the new page, but
fortunately this does not mean the back end is broken.

Hi Russell,

thanks for that hint - I wasn't aware of this workaround!

Jan
 Author: viejos View Messages Posted By viejos
 Posted: Jan 2, 2016 06:24
 Subject: Re: Technical issue: Wanted list data missing
 Viewed: 36 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, Jan_K writes:
  Dear Admins,

as mentioned as a sidenote in this post already:
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=958268

The wanted list information seems to display incorrectly for many sets - and
for a while already. See this example:
 
Set No: 4000012  Name: Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
* 
4000012-1 Inside Tour (LIT) Exclusive 2012 Edition - Piper Airplane
2012
Sets: LEGO Brand: LEGO Inside Tour
http://alpha.bricklink.com/pages/clone/catalogitem.page?S=4000012-1

This item is included in my wanted list (and very likely in a few others as well),
but this is not being displayed correctly - both the missing number in "My Wanted
List (1)" and the completely missing "On xx Wanted Lists" information seem to
be a technical issue here.

When browsing my own wanted lists, I see a correlation between this effect and
database entries without any price guide information and current listing for
sale - so maybe it's just a similar glitch like the "action item missing
on start page" issue where a certain condition was needed to display these correctly.

for a few parts, I see the ""On xx Wanted Lists" entry, but not the "(1)" in
"My Wanted List (1)" - see attached example images.
(Yes, all four of these items ARE included in a wanted list of mine!)

Please have a look into this.

Thanks!
Jan

Right-click on the blue BUY button on the top right and you will see the old
catalog page. For the set you mentioned, it looks like the image below. You can
see it is on 105 wanted lists. There are many glitches with the new page, but
fortunately this does not mean the back end is broken.

Russell
 
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: Dec 8, 2015 22:54
 Subject: Re: Please remove cancelled spam posts
 Viewed: 75 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
I totally agree.

David
 Author: kidsncritters View Messages Posted By kidsncritters
 Posted: Aug 22, 2015 18:46
 Subject: Re: Changes to catalog part view are terrible.
 Viewed: 36 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
I was wondering what all the fuss was about - then I looked on the part detail
page...

NO TABS at the bottom!

I thought it was a great idea to have the tabs there!
 Author: tEoS View Messages Posted By tEoS
 Posted: Aug 8, 2015 09:58
 Subject: Re: BL needs to set time frame for shipping order
 Viewed: 54 times
 Topic: Selling
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
You may want to change this to a suggestion.

In Selling, TheBrickStore writes:
  Hi BL community:

After careful and deliberate consideration, I honestly believe BrickLink needs
to establish a timeframe for shipping of an order from the date/time the order
was placed with a seller. The site seems to be moving in a "carte blanche" way
for sellers. Sellers who take weeks/months to ship orders should be banned quite
honestly. Those few sellers are NOT a GOOD commodity for this site. New buyers
just don't understand and experienced buyers like myself are becoming more
and more alarmed over these long long shipping practices by a few sellers. Sure
you can avoid them once you know who they are but why give any seller more than
seven business days to get an order in the mail???? I just don't get it.
What other company takes a month plus to ship an order????

So if BrickLink is not willing to establish shipping rules for sellers (seem
to have all kinds of rules in place for buyers concerning payments) then at least
allow a buyer to be able to cancel a contract if seller has NOT shipped within
seven business days. Personally I think seven business days is too long but
it is a start.

Yes I understand that some sellers here are hobbyists and do not run a store
as a business but it is strange that most if not all hobbyists send out their
orders within seven business days.

I am not suggesting at this time that we punish any seller for failing to ship
within seven business days, I am just giving the buyer the right to cancel an
order/contract if the order is not shipped within seven business days of payment.

Sellers under this new rule would not be able to state in their terms that shipping
time is longer than seven business days.

Thanks

TheBrickStore
 Author: viejos View Messages Posted By viejos
 Posted: Sep 19, 2014 22:50
 Subject: Re: BrickLink China店铺微博推广活动诚邀您的加入
 Viewed: 68 times
 Topic: Announce
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In 中文, cs_china writes:
  尊敬的卖家您好,

BrickLink(以下简称BL)的中文页BrickLink China(以下简称BLC)已经推出1个月了。感谢大家一直以来对BLC的期待和鼓励。

访问BrickLink China:http://www.bricklink.com/china/

我们开设了BLC的新浪官方微博平台:BricklinkChina,欢迎您关注我们。
我们的微博地址:http://weibo.com/u/2833298890

BrickLink China店铺微博推广活动:
如果您在店铺的Splash和Store Terms页中加入中文的店铺指南和介绍,并允许发货到中国大陆、香港、台湾、澳门和新加坡,我们会定期在微博平台免费推送您的BL店铺,让更多的中文用户看到您的商店。

我们还将在近期开设支付宝等其他中国大陆第三方支付平台交易方式,方便中国大陆地区买家的购买。

希望您能经常在讨论区的中文分区发布新的主题帖。让更多的中文用户加入到BLC的讨论中来。中文区暂不设有分区和主题,大家可以直接发布自己的讨论帖。

如果您对BL有任何宝贵意见和建议,请随时回复本帖告知我们。

BrickLink China工作团队期待您的回复!


——BrickLink China团队
客户服务与支持

显然,我们有一个新的讨论主持人,cs_china。欢迎登机!
http://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
 Author: bagelboybugle View Messages Posted By bagelboybugle
 Posted: Sep 17, 2014 14:59
 Subject: Re: BrickLink China店鋪微博推廣活動誠邀您的加入
 Viewed: 83 times
 Topic: Problem
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
In Problem, ToddMyers writes:
  Reported cs_china as a fraud account. If this were a legit account, it should
be listed as "BrickLink Administrator" (as is done with other legitimate cs accounts).

I agree and there are no announcements on the issue so this thread can be unlocked
by cs team later if it is genuine

Gareth
 Author: Brettj666 View Messages Posted By Brettj666
 Posted: Sep 16, 2014 22:54
 Subject: Re: 测试
 Viewed: 91 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In General, ToddMyers writes:
  In 中文, cs_china writes:
  In 中文, cs_china writes:
  测试用帖,请勿回复。

回复测试。

Anyone know if this is a genuine BrickLink CS account? Wondering if I should
report it under the problem tab.

I think a real one would be labelled admin
 Author: TakeAbricK View Messages Posted By TakeAbricK
 Posted: Aug 25, 2014 08:37
 Subject: Re: 中文版论坛区终于建成了~
 Viewed: 237 times
 Topic: Buying
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Buying, brasletty writes:
  In 中文, kaitoukiddo writes:
  In 中文, daiyuan writes:
  大家快来吐槽~

这个必须顶!!

Welcom to the forum .

dont chance de topik
 Author: Speciale View Messages Posted By Speciale
 Posted: Aug 25, 2014 08:33
 Subject: Re: 中文版论坛区终于建成了~
 Viewed: 492 times
 Topic: Buying
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In 中文, kaitoukiddo writes:
  In 中文, daiyuan writes:
  大家快来吐槽~

这个必须顶!!

Welcom to the forum .
 Author: crazylegoman View Messages Posted By crazylegoman
 Posted: May 29, 2014 10:29
 Subject: Re: Sort by best price at Min Qty.
 Viewed: 25 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
That's a good idea. I always wondered why that function wasn't built
into the search before.

David

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More