Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | yorbrick  | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 06:32 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Erikmax writes:
| | In Catalog, enig writes:
| | In Catalog, Erikmax writes:
| | I recently bought YELLOW axles 50450 from a dealer on Bricklink offering them
in quantities at a reasonable price.
After arriving I noticed these axles being a bit lighter of colour. Because the
are more colour varieties I wasn't alarmed directly.
But when I looked a bit closer to the axles I also noticed the 'cross'
on the edge of the axle was a bit less sharp. I think normally there is a dimple
at one of the ends- these axes don't have one.
The combination of a quantity offer of this part, the colour difference and the
slightly rougher shape raises some questions.
If it is original: Perfect. If it isn't: How could we stop this? I guess
99% of the customers won't notice.
Or is it simply the end of the premium prices for this sort of parts??
Or place a warning with a clear description of the original?
|
* Do they have similar clutch power to the other axles? This is the first thing
to test. If not, might be an indication that they are indeed fake.
* Newer 32L axles should have ©LEGO and a mould number on them - at one of the
ends. NO mould pip at the (other) end.
* No idea if this also concerns axles, but recently we have been finding a scary
amount of pieces to be manufactured from that new bio-plastic crap. Does the
surface of those axles feel the same, and do they sound the same?
|
Thanks! The white 32 clearly has LEGO, the yellow one doesn't have it. The
material is the same. Clutch power not tested yet. So the question is: Do all
original 32 axles have the LEGO sign. Main difference is the cross the 32 had
slightly undeeper grooves and the cross is between 0,50- 1 mm thicker.
|
Mine don't have the lego sign. Although they are not as fat looking as yours.
Mine are from 2013 #60004.
|
 |
| Author: | Erikmax | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 06:25 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, enig writes:
| | In Catalog, Erikmax writes:
| | I recently bought YELLOW axles 50450 from a dealer on Bricklink offering them
in quantities at a reasonable price.
After arriving I noticed these axles being a bit lighter of colour. Because the
are more colour varieties I wasn't alarmed directly.
But when I looked a bit closer to the axles I also noticed the 'cross'
on the edge of the axle was a bit less sharp. I think normally there is a dimple
at one of the ends- these axes don't have one.
The combination of a quantity offer of this part, the colour difference and the
slightly rougher shape raises some questions.
If it is original: Perfect. If it isn't: How could we stop this? I guess
99% of the customers won't notice.
Or is it simply the end of the premium prices for this sort of parts??
Or place a warning with a clear description of the original?
|
* Do they have similar clutch power to the other axles? This is the first thing
to test. If not, might be an indication that they are indeed fake.
* Newer 32L axles should have ©LEGO and a mould number on them - at one of the
ends. NO mould pip at the (other) end.
* No idea if this also concerns axles, but recently we have been finding a scary
amount of pieces to be manufactured from that new bio-plastic crap. Does the
surface of those axles feel the same, and do they sound the same?
|
Hi
I now also note that the white original LEGO axle has a flat somewhat lower recktangle
place with a dot in the middle on both sides of the end of the axle. The yellow
doesn't have this. But it could be another mold?
|
|
| Author: | Erikmax | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 06:14 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, enig writes:
| | In Catalog, Erikmax writes:
| | I recently bought YELLOW axles 50450 from a dealer on Bricklink offering them
in quantities at a reasonable price.
After arriving I noticed these axles being a bit lighter of colour. Because the
are more colour varieties I wasn't alarmed directly.
But when I looked a bit closer to the axles I also noticed the 'cross'
on the edge of the axle was a bit less sharp. I think normally there is a dimple
at one of the ends- these axes don't have one.
The combination of a quantity offer of this part, the colour difference and the
slightly rougher shape raises some questions.
If it is original: Perfect. If it isn't: How could we stop this? I guess
99% of the customers won't notice.
Or is it simply the end of the premium prices for this sort of parts??
Or place a warning with a clear description of the original?
|
* Do they have similar clutch power to the other axles? This is the first thing
to test. If not, might be an indication that they are indeed fake.
* Newer 32L axles should have ©LEGO and a mould number on them - at one of the
ends. NO mould pip at the (other) end.
* No idea if this also concerns axles, but recently we have been finding a scary
amount of pieces to be manufactured from that new bio-plastic crap. Does the
surface of those axles feel the same, and do they sound the same?
|
Thanks! The white 32 clearly has LEGO, the yellow one doesn't have it. The
material is the same. Clutch power not tested yet. So the question is: Do all
original 32 axles have the LEGO sign. Main difference is the cross the 32 had
slightly undeeper grooves and the cross is between 0,50- 1 mm thicker.
|
|
| Author: | enig | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 05:55 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 66 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Erikmax writes:
| | I recently bought YELLOW axles 50450 from a dealer on Bricklink offering them
in quantities at a reasonable price.
After arriving I noticed these axles being a bit lighter of colour. Because the
are more colour varieties I wasn't alarmed directly.
But when I looked a bit closer to the axles I also noticed the 'cross'
on the edge of the axle was a bit less sharp. I think normally there is a dimple
at one of the ends- these axes don't have one.
The combination of a quantity offer of this part, the colour difference and the
slightly rougher shape raises some questions.
If it is original: Perfect. If it isn't: How could we stop this? I guess
99% of the customers won't notice.
Or is it simply the end of the premium prices for this sort of parts??
Or place a warning with a clear description of the original?
|
* Do they have similar clutch power to the other axles? This is the first thing
to test. If not, might be an indication that they are indeed fake.
* Newer 32L axles should have ©LEGO and a mould number on them - at one of the
ends. NO mould pip at the (other) end.
* No idea if this also concerns axles, but recently we have been finding a scary
amount of pieces to be manufactured from that new bio-plastic crap. Does the
surface of those axles feel the same, and do they sound the same?
|
|
| Author: | Erikmax | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 05:54 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | I have a couple of used, genuine of the 32 long axles.
They do not have dimples on the ends, they are flat ends. They also appear slightly
lighter than flat yellow parts but this might be an effect of the way light bounces
off them as they are a much smaller flat surface area compared to a tile for
example.
|
I sure won't win the photo competition and I hope it is clear.
Left: shorter yellow axle. Middle: the yellow 32 axle. Right: the white 32 axle.
Although the photo is not the best you can see that the yellow 32 has not ther
sharp cross the other axles have.
|
|
|
| Author: | Erikmax | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 05:38 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | I have a couple of used, genuine of the 32 long axles.
They do not have dimples on the ends, they are flat ends. They also appear slightly
lighter than flat yellow parts but this might be an effect of the way light bounces
off them as they are a much smaller flat surface area compared to a tile for
example.
|
Hi
Colour: I did not compare them with yellow parts, but with the hunderds of yellow
AXLES in different lenght and coming from various sources I have in stock.
The dimple in the black or white axles I have is very tiny.
When I compare the cross of the white and black axle 32 with this of the yellow
ones, it is much sharper.I will try to make a photo.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 05:23 | | Subject: | Re: Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 75 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I have a couple of used, genuine of the 32 long axles.
They do not have dimples on the ends, they are flat ends. They also appear slightly
lighter than flat yellow parts but this might be an effect of the way light bounces
off them as they are a much smaller flat surface area compared to a tile for
example.
|
| Author: | tec | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 04:51 | | Subject: | Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I bet #Axaday made a stunning 2000 of those 2100 inputs.
I advance his name for a "Dimensions Savant" post.
|
|
| Author: | Erikmax | | Posted: | Apr 29, 2021 04:50 | | Subject: | Original or coming from Ali? | | Viewed: | 206 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I recently bought YELLOW axles 50450 from a dealer on Bricklink offering them
in quantities at a reasonable price.
After arriving I noticed these axles being a bit lighter of colour. Because the
are more colour varieties I wasn't alarmed directly.
But when I looked a bit closer to the axles I also noticed the 'cross'
on the edge of the axle was a bit less sharp. I think normally there is a dimple
at one of the ends- these axes don't have one.
The combination of a quantity offer of this part, the colour difference and the
slightly rougher shape raises some questions.
If it is original: Perfect. If it isn't: How could we stop this? I guess
99% of the customers won't notice.
Or is it simply the end of the premium prices for this sort of parts??
Or place a warning with a clear description of the original?
|
|
| Author: | Emporiosa | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 20:33 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
Oh my gosh, I love it! The fact that you could easily identify who was who in
that comic is fantastic.
And congratulations Turez!! 
|
| Author: | MrPetovan | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 17:06 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thank you for the link, I wish I could be notified of new comics, so I really
appreciate people linking to it.
In Catalog, Turez writes:
|
| Author: | Emilio_Magnelli | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 15:14 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| It' s a real pleasure to welcome Turez
em
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 15:06 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Thank you all! |
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 08:40 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats Turez!
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 08:06 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Congrats Turez! |
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 06:45 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Welcome, and we hope your involvement will be one of great accomplishment !
Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 05:42 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| A very good selection.
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 05:18 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Congratulations @Turez!
Hope the best for you in your position
Good to see you in the Admins page, even thought seems it was not updated completely.
|
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 04:48 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Nice one, congratulations and thank you.
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 03:56 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Congrats, keep up the good work and contributions!
|
|
| Author: | Brickwilbo | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 02:13 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Congratulations Turez.
|
|
| Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 00:31 | | Subject: | Re: Changes involving the CEP | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes
| | We are sad to inform you that our Catalog Adminstrator StormChaser is no longer
part of the Community Expert Program.
|
Not sure why anyone is surprised about this. There was a big catalog dump that
was largely stormchaser’s baby and it was mostly cancelled at the last minute.
Was he frustrated, probably. Is this the first time he has left BL, no. This
might not be the last we see of stormchaser. He had big ambitions, but it looks
like he wasn’t given the freedom to execute his vision. Maybe BL was right to
not make too many catalog changes at once, but maybe not... Either way, when
you get paid to do a job, it’s important to do your best within the parameters
of that job. I’m just guessing, but I think he was just ahead of his time at
BL. All the best!
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 28, 2021 00:21 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Welcome and thanks for stepping up!
Jen
|
| Author: | atkk | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:57 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats Turez!!
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
|
|
| Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:56 | | Subject: | Re: Looney Tunes Martian without cloth? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | My Martian did not come with the cloth piece. Did this happen to anyone else?
[s=coltun-10]
|
Did you check the packet throughly? Sometimes cloth elements can stick to the
inside of the bag or get caught in a corner.
|
| Author: | MrPetovan | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:52 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Congrats on the nomination! |
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:45 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Congradz Jonas
|
|
| Author: | DPB | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:35 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Congratulations Turez! It can only get better with you onboard!! DPB |
| Author: | jbo210 | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:31 | | Subject: | Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congratulations Turez! Glad to have you on the BL team! Thank you to all the
Admins for keeping BL alive and thriving!
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 21:27 | | Subject: | We have a new Inventories Administrator! | | Viewed: | 289 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Dear BrickLink members,
We have appointed to the Community Expert Program one new member today! His username
is Turez and he will be assuming the role of Inventories Administrator. As with
all other admins in this area, he will be eligible to move up through the ranks
after a period of time:
https://www.bricklink.com/feedback.asp?u=Turez
https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp
Turez comes to us as a well-known and trusted catalog contributor who has a sharp
understanding of LEGO history and catalog related issues. He has contributed
extensively, and his contributions are of a very high quality. You can see some
of his part images here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?pg=1&imgLID=346378&sortBy=N&sortAsc=A&catType=P
We look forward to what he will bring to the team. Please welcome him.
|
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 19:53 | | Subject: | Looney Tunes Martian without cloth? | | Viewed: | 101 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| My Martian did not come with the cloth piece. Did this happen to anyone else?
[s=coltun-10]
|
| Author: | qwertyboy | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 11:45 | | Subject: | Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | That graph shows everything. The tool was needed, and it was needed long before
Instant Checkout should have ever gone live. Better late than never, but the
new tool is obviously a success and will help fill in the data for IC quickly.
|
The tool depicted in that graph was me.
|
Obviously a pretty sharp tool.
Niek.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 11:41 | | Subject: | Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.
|
That graph shows everything. The tool was needed, and it was needed long before
Instant Checkout should have ever gone live. Better late than never, but the
new tool is obviously a success and will help fill in the data for IC quickly.
|
The tool depicted in that graph was me.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 11:39 | | Subject: | Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.
|
That graph shows everything. The tool was needed, and it was needed long before
Instant Checkout should have ever gone live. Better late than never, but the
new tool is obviously a success and will help fill in the data for IC quickly.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 10:03 | | Subject: | Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | We are pleased to announce that a major new feature was deployed to the catalog
today - Packing Dimensions!
|
Today the last bug was fixed for the new Packing Dimensions Project, Phase 1.
Contributors may now use the question mark link on the catalog detail page to
quickly and easily submit a missing Packaging Dimension (see Image 1).
If the question mark isn't working as a link, it's not a bug - just go
to your Catalog Settings page and check the box (see Image 2):
Show Links to Add Weight and Dimensions
...and be sure to save your settings. 
A full 7 months before the April 6 release of this feature, on Sep 6 of last
year I opened a new Forum Topic called Packing Dimensions X, to make it easier
to handle the large backlog of requests that had built up earlier in the year.
When I opened the topic, I actually asked people NOT to contribute except when
necessary:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1220218
As a matter of consideration, please don't add dimensions for parts with
every side under 20mm.
And then on Oct 6, I asked for the following:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1225859
...until we get a tool that goes through the normal approval channels (which
is coming in the next few weeks), please do not submit measurements for an entire
set of [300] decorated parts...
However, now that the tool is ready to use, I would like to officially remove
all restrictions from submitting Packing Dimensions. We are planning to open
up some other forms and give you some handy filters to find missing dimensions
- this will be in Phases 2 and 3. But for now, the paved road is finally open,
so drive on through!
I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.
|
I saw the blue ? before I saw the forum post. That should speed things up.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Apr 27, 2021 00:57 | | Subject: | Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature | | Viewed: | 105 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | We are pleased to announce that a major new feature was deployed to the catalog
today - Packing Dimensions!
|
Today the last bug was fixed for the new Packing Dimensions Project, Phase 1.
Contributors may now use the question mark link on the catalog detail page to
quickly and easily submit a missing Packaging Dimension (see Image 1).
If the question mark isn't working as a link, it's not a bug - just go
to your Catalog Settings page and check the box (see Image 2):
Show Links to Add Weight and Dimensions
...and be sure to save your settings.
A full 7 months before the April 6 release of this feature, on Sep 6 of last
year I opened a new Forum Topic called Packing Dimensions X, to make it easier
to handle the large backlog of requests that had built up earlier in the year.
When I opened the topic, I actually asked people NOT to contribute except when
necessary:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1220218
As a matter of consideration, please don't add dimensions for parts with
every side under 20mm.
And then on Oct 6, I asked for the following:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1225859
...until we get a tool that goes through the normal approval channels (which
is coming in the next few weeks), please do not submit measurements for an entire
set of [300] decorated parts...
However, now that the tool is ready to use, I would like to officially remove
all restrictions from submitting Packing Dimensions. We are planning to open
up some other forms and give you some handy filters to find missing dimensions
- this will be in Phases 2 and 3. But for now, the paved road is finally open,
so drive on through!
I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.
|
|
|
| Author: | steverus | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2021 11:14 | | Subject: | Please add alternative item to 3626bpb0783 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi
Please can you add a hollow stud version of 3626bpb0783. Thank you
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 25, 2021 02:51 | | Subject: | Re: Multipack | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:
| | Part
has a note displaying what sets it is in, however the catalogue states it doesn't
show in any sets. I was thinking of adding them as alternates to the sets but
thought I should get others opinions first. Should I add it as an Alternate,
Counterpart, Regular or Extra?
Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex
|
They are already in the inventory, as regular and extra parts. This is similar
to other parts that come in card boxes to protect them.
|
|
| Author: | Hexy | | Posted: | Apr 24, 2021 19:56 | | Subject: | Multipack | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Part
has a note displaying what sets it is in, however the catalogue states it doesn't
show in any sets. I was thinking of adding them as alternates to the sets but
thought I should get others opinions first. Should I add it as an Alternate,
Counterpart, Regular or Extra?
Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex
|
| Author: | runner.caller | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 23:17 | | Subject: | lol, snarling | | Viewed: | 147 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I've trained myself to search lopsided, and smirk, but this is the first
I've seen "snarling" haha.
|
| Author: | Jabbz | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 09:38 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | | This will be worth more, as it is a nice one that can also be used for variation
and not just curiousity. Did you get it in a set, or in a lot?
|
I got it in a bundle of parts from eBay.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 09:33 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Jabbz writes:
| | In Catalog, 00Mera00 writes:
| | Looks like a misprint to me! put it in a safe box, lock it up and cherish it
forever! it's a nice one
|
WOW!
Are misprints even worth anything on top of the original value? I know some people
like to collect them.
|
This will be worth more, as it is a nice one that can also be used for variation
and not just curiousity. Did you get it in a set, or in a lot? I think one of
the Chinese sellers that do missing print / bad print parts was selling that
one a few years ago. I bought a lot of LOTR parts that were missing paint from
them but didn't really pay too much attention to the SW parts. I remember
that they had a lot of partially printed ewok heads.
|
|
| Author: | Jabbz | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 09:00 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, 00Mera00 writes:
| | Very collectable from what i've seen and most if not all have higher values
because of it, i don't collect them specifically but we've had a few
come through our way and i have them all bagged in a draw, like my little treasure
box, my fave so far is Theoden's armour, the printing is on the back instead
of the front, always nice to get something a little more quirky.
|
I'm not a huge SW fan so I don't think I'll keep it, I think there
are others who will treasure it more than me!
|
| Author: | Jabbz | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 08:59 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
Thanks
|
| Author: | grimsbricksuk | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 08:58 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| https://www.facebook.com/groups/608494213243712/?ref=share
In Catalog, Jabbz writes:
| | In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| | Definitely a misprint & a pretty good one.
There’s a group on Facebook that specialises in misprinted minifigs if you’re
looking to sell it.
|
Could you provide a link or name of that group please? Thanks
|
|
| Author: | 00Mera00 | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 08:57 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Very collectable from what i've seen and most if not all have higher values
because of it, i don't collect them specifically but we've had a few
come through our way and i have them all bagged in a draw, like my little treasure
box, my fave so far is Theoden's armour, the printing is on the back instead
of the front, always nice to get something a little more quirky.
|
| Author: | Jabbz | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 08:52 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| | Definitely a misprint & a pretty good one.
There’s a group on Facebook that specialises in misprinted minifigs if you’re
looking to sell it.
|
Could you provide a link or name of that group please? Thanks
|
|
| Author: | grimsbricksuk | | Posted: | Apr 23, 2021 08:50 | | Subject: | Re: Misprint or am I being silly? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Definitely a misprint & a pretty good one.
There’s a group on Facebook that specialises in misprinted minifigs if you’re
looking to sell it.
In Catalog, Jabbz writes:
| | Hi all,
I recently came across this Jar Jar Binks head (pictured on the right) and I
can't seem to identify it on BL. It is not like any of the three variants
of the mold. I think it could be misprint of 92743pb03 (which is pictured on
the left).
If I am horribly wrong please point me in the right direction! My Star Wars knowledge
is not the best!
Thanks
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
)
)
)
