BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Dear BrickLink members,

We have appointed to the Community Expert Program one new member today! His username
is Turez and he will be assuming the role of Inventories Administrator. As with
all other admins in this area, he will be eligible to move up through the ranks
after a period of time:

https://www.bricklink.com/feedback.asp?u=Turez

https://www.bricklink.com/memberAdmins.asp

Turez comes to us as a well-known and trusted catalog contributor who has a sharp
understanding of LEGO history and catalog related issues. He has contributed
extensively, and his contributions are of a very high quality. You can see some
of his part images here:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?pg=1&imgLID=346378&sortBy=N&sortAsc=A&catType=P

We look forward to what he will bring to the team. Please welcome him.

Congrats, keep up the good work and contributions!

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Apr 28, 2021 02:13

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

47 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Congratulations Turez.

Author:

brickerking

Posted:

Apr 28, 2021 00:31

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

69 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes

We are sad to inform you that our Catalog Adminstrator StormChaser is no longer
part of the Community Expert Program.

Not sure why anyone is surprised about this. There was a big catalog dump that
was largely stormchaser’s baby and it was mostly cancelled at the last minute.
Was he frustrated, probably. Is this the first time he has left BL, no. This
might not be the last we see of stormchaser. He had big ambitions, but it looks
like he wasn’t given the freedom to execute his vision. Maybe BL was right to
not make too many catalog changes at once, but maybe not... Either way, when
you get paid to do a job, it’s important to do your best within the parameters
of that job. I’m just guessing, but I think he was just ahead of his time at
BL. All the best!

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Apr 28, 2021 00:21

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

Welcome and thanks for stepping up!

Jen

Author:

atkk

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:57

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

Congrats Turez!!

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Author:

DeLuca

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:56

Subject:

Re: Looney Tunes Martian without cloth?

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

In Catalog, tEoS writes:

My Martian did not come with the cloth piece. Did this happen to anyone else?

[s=coltun-10]

Did you check the packet throughly? Sometimes cloth elements can stick to the
inside of the bag or get caught in a corner.

Author:

MrPetovan

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:52

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

Congrats on the nomination!

Author:

SezaR

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:45

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Congradz Jonas

Author:

DPB

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:35

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

Congratulations Turez! It can only get better with you onboard!! DPB

Author:

jbo210

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:31

Subject:

Re: We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

Congratulations Turez! Glad to have you on the BL team! Thank you to all the
Admins for keeping BL alive and thriving!

Author:

Admin_Russell

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 21:27

Subject:

We have a new Inventories Administrator!

Viewed:

289 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 19:53

Subject:

Looney Tunes Martian without cloth?

Viewed:

101 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

My Martian did not come with the cloth piece. Did this happen to anyone else?

[s=coltun-10]

Author:

qwertyboy

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 11:45

Subject:

Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

In Catalog, axaday writes:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

That graph shows everything. The tool was needed, and it was needed long before
Instant Checkout should have ever gone live. Better late than never, but the
new tool is obviously a success and will help fill in the data for IC quickly.

The tool depicted in that graph was me.

Obviously a pretty sharp tool.

Niek.

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 11:41

Subject:

Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.

The tool depicted in that graph was me.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 11:39

Subject:

Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 10:03

Subject:

Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

We are pleased to announce that a major new feature was deployed to the catalog
today - Packing Dimensions!

Today the last bug was fixed for the new Packing Dimensions Project, Phase 1.
Contributors may now use the question mark link on the catalog detail page to
quickly and easily submit a missing Packaging Dimension (see Image 1).

271pb05 HO Scale, Accessory Policeman One Hand Left
Parts: HO 1:87 Vehicles

If the question mark isn't working as a link, it's not a bug - just go
to your Catalog Settings page and check the box (see Image 2):

Show Links to Add Weight and Dimensions

...and be sure to save your settings.

A full 7 months before the April 6 release of this feature, on Sep 6 of last
year I opened a new Forum Topic called Packing Dimensions X, to make it easier
to handle the large backlog of requests that had built up earlier in the year.

When I opened the topic, I actually asked people NOT to contribute except when
necessary:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1220218

As a matter of consideration, please don't add dimensions for parts with
every side under 20mm.

And then on Oct 6, I asked for the following:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1225859

...until we get a tool that goes through the normal approval channels (which
is coming in the next few weeks), please do not submit measurements for an entire
set of [300] decorated parts...

However, now that the tool is ready to use, I would like to officially remove
all restrictions from submitting Packing Dimensions. We are planning to open
up some other forms and give you some handy filters to find missing dimensions
- this will be in Phases 2 and 3. But for now, the paved road is finally open,
so drive on through!

I'd also like to include a little chart showing the effect of releasing this
tool (see Image 3). And we still have 4 more days to go in April.

I saw the blue ? before I saw the forum post. That should speed things up.

Author:

Admin_Russell

Posted:

Apr 27, 2021 00:57

Subject:

Re: New Packing Dimensions Feature

Viewed:

105 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

We are pleased to announce that a major new feature was deployed to the catalog
today - Packing Dimensions!

271pb05 HO Scale, Accessory Policeman One Hand Left
Parts: HO 1:87 Vehicles

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Apr 25, 2021 11:32

Subject:

Re: Please add alternative item to 3626bpb0783

Viewed:

22 times

Topic:

In Catalog Requests, steverus writes:

Please can you add a hollow stud version of 3626bpb0783. Thank you

This is a contributor task, not an admin task...

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp?utm_content=subnav

You can add the part yourself here:

https://www.bricklink.com/wantedCatalog.asp?catType=P

and then the image here:

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=P

Then, the admins will review and approve it. Do you have a good image? I can
answer any questions if you run into problems.

Jen

Author:

steverus

Posted:

Apr 25, 2021 11:14

Subject:

Please add alternative item to 3626bpb0783

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hi

Please can you add a hollow stud version of 3626bpb0783. Thank you

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Apr 25, 2021 02:51

Subject:

Re: Multipack

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Part

23229pack (Inv) Rubber Band Extra Small (Square Cross Section), 7 in Bag (Multipack)
Parts: Rubber Band & Belt

has a note displaying what sets it is in, however the catalogue states it doesn't
show in any sets. I was thinking of adding them as alternates to the sets but
thought I should get others opinions first. Should I add it as an Alternate,
Counterpart, Regular or Extra?

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

They are already in the inventory, as regular and extra parts. This is similar
to other parts that come in card boxes to protect them.

Author:

Hexy

Posted:

Apr 24, 2021 19:56

Subject:

Multipack

Viewed:

79 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Part

23229pack (Inv) Rubber Band Extra Small (Square Cross Section), 7 in Bag (Multipack)
Parts: Rubber Band & Belt

Author:

runner.caller

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 23:17

Subject:

lol, snarling

Viewed:

147 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

I've trained myself to search lopsided, and smirk, but this is the first
I've seen "snarling" haha.

3626bpb0584 Minifigure, Head Dual Sided Snarling / Raised Eyebrows Pattern - Blocked Open Stud
Parts: Minifigure, Head

Author:

Jabbz

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 09:38

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

61 times

Topic:

This will be worth more, as it is a nice one that can also be used for variation
and not just curiousity. Did you get it in a set, or in a lot?

I got it in a bundle of parts from eBay.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 09:33

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Jabbz writes:

In Catalog, 00Mera00 writes:

Looks like a misprint to me! put it in a safe box, lock it up and cherish it
forever! it's a nice one

WOW!

Are misprints even worth anything on top of the original value? I know some people
like to collect them.

This will be worth more, as it is a nice one that can also be used for variation
and not just curiousity. Did you get it in a set, or in a lot? I think one of
the Chinese sellers that do missing print / bad print parts was selling that
one a few years ago. I bought a lot of LOTR parts that were missing paint from
them but didn't really pay too much attention to the SW parts. I remember
that they had a lot of partially printed ewok heads.

Author:

Jabbz

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 09:00

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

44 times

Topic:

In Catalog, 00Mera00 writes:

Very collectable from what i've seen and most if not all have higher values
because of it, i don't collect them specifically but we've had a few
come through our way and i have them all bagged in a draw, like my little treasure
box, my fave so far is Theoden's armour, the printing is on the back instead
of the front, always nice to get something a little more quirky.

I'm not a huge SW fan so I don't think I'll keep it, I think there
are others who will treasure it more than me!

Author:

Jabbz

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:59

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/608494213243712/?ref=share

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

Thanks

Author:

grimsbricksuk

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:58

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/608494213243712/?ref=share

In Catalog, Jabbz writes:

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

Definitely a misprint & a pretty good one.
There’s a group on Facebook that specialises in misprinted minifigs if you’re
looking to sell it.

Could you provide a link or name of that group please? Thanks

Author:

00Mera00

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:57

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

41 times

Topic:

Author:

Jabbz

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:52

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

Definitely a misprint & a pretty good one.
There’s a group on Facebook that specialises in misprinted minifigs if you’re
looking to sell it.

Could you provide a link or name of that group please? Thanks

Author:

grimsbricksuk

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:50

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

41 times

Topic:

Definitely a misprint & a pretty good one.
There’s a group on Facebook that specialises in misprinted minifigs if you’re
looking to sell it.

In Catalog, Jabbz writes:

Hi all,

I recently came across this Jar Jar Binks head (pictured on the right) and I
can't seem to identify it on BL. It is not like any of the three variants
of the mold. I think it could be misprint of 92743pb03 (which is pictured on
the left).

If I am horribly wrong please point me in the right direction! My Star Wars knowledge
is not the best!

Thanks

Author:

Jabbz

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:49

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Catalog, 00Mera00 writes:

Looks like a misprint to me! put it in a safe box, lock it up and cherish it
forever! it's a nice one

WOW!

Are misprints even worth anything on top of the original value? I know some people
like to collect them.

Author:

00Mera00

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 08:47

Subject:

Re: Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

47 times

Topic:

Looks like a misprint to me! put it in a safe box, lock it up and cherish it
forever! it's a nice one

Author:

Jabbz

Posted:

Apr 23, 2021 07:33

Subject:

Misprint or am I being silly?

Viewed:

225 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

BricksThatStick

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 13:12

Subject:

Re: Sw1144 yoda

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

What was wrong with sw1144?

Poe Dameron started out life as sw1144 - then was changed to sw0737a which caused
the problem:

In the meantime yoda was approved as sw1144 but we shouldn't reuse numbers
as it causes other problems.

So sw1144 now does to be left unused which is why yoda was moved.

You can view its history here:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?viewYear=&viewMonth=&viewGeDate=&q=Sw1144&viewStatus=A&itemType=&viewAction=*

Author:

grimsbricksuk

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 12:17

Subject:

Re: Sw1144 yoda

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Ooops yes I’d forgotten about sw1146 pending as Blue Milk Luke, ok my bad.
But why was Yoda changed to sw1147, surely sw1144 was perfectly fine?

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

I’d like to know why they changed it to sw1147? What was wrong with sw1144?
Poe (sw0737a) is now sw1145 but what happened sw1146?

Minifig No: sw1146 Name: Clone Trooper Commander (Phase 1) - Bright Light Orange Arms, Nougat Head

sw1146 (Inv) Clone Trooper Commander (Phase 1) - Bright Light Orange Arms, Nougat Head
Minifigures: Star Wars: Star Wars Episode 2

is still pending because it hasn't been officially released. The LEGO Star
Wars game has been delayed once again until later this year.

And you were the one who submitted it to the catalog, so you should know, right?

Author:

grimsbricksuk

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 12:15

Subject:

Re: sw1145 Poe & sw1147 Yoda

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

Ok so I had sw1146 pending as Blue Milk Luke (totally forgotten about), which
I’ve now deleted as it’s never going to be released at this rate.
Still need no idea why the two figs changed codes though?

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

What happened to Star Wars minifig codes sw1144 & sw1146? Are we just skipping
numbers now, as neither of them exist!
I don’t get why Yoda was changed from sw1144 to sw1145 for no apparent reason?

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 11:53

Subject:

Re: Sw1144 yoda

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

I’d like to know why they changed it to sw1147? What was wrong with sw1144?
Poe (sw0737a) is now sw1145 but what happened sw1146?

sw1146 (Inv) Clone Trooper Commander (Phase 1) - Bright Light Orange Arms, Nougat Head
Minifigures: Star Wars: Star Wars Episode 2

is still pending because it hasn't been officially released. The LEGO Star
Wars game has been delayed once again until later this year.

And you were the one who submitted it to the catalog, so you should know, right?

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 11:48

Subject:

Re: Sw1144 yoda

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:

I’d like to know why they changed it to sw1147? What was wrong with sw1144?
Poe (sw0737a) is now sw1145 but what happened sw1146?

sw1146 (Inv) Clone Trooper Commander (Phase 1) - Bright Light Orange Arms, Nougat Head
Minifigures: Star Wars: Star Wars Episode 2

is still pending because it hasn't been officially released. The LEGO Star
Wars game has been delayed once again until later this year.

Author:

grimsbricksuk

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 11:44

Subject:

sw1145 Poe & sw1147 Yoda

Viewed:

61 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

What happened to Star Wars minifig codes sw1144 & sw1146? Are we just skipping
numbers now, as neither of them exist!
I don’t get why Yoda was changed from sw1144 to sw1145 for no apparent reason?

Author:

grimsbricksuk

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 11:18

Subject:

Re: Sw1144 yoda

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

I’d like to know why they changed it to sw1147? What was wrong with sw1144?
Poe (sw0737a) is now sw1145 but what happened sw1146?

In Catalog, goldknight writes:

This yoda is from the atlas book that I just received. The yoda is in a clamshell
in front of the book with a camera, walking stick, map, and backpack. The yoda
was assembled already. My question is that I see the picture of sw1144 with the
backpack on but it was not assembled that way on the clamshell—do we need another
picture of yoda without backpack or just let it be?

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 10:46

Subject:

Re: Brown (Old) 3957

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Catalog, calsbricks writes:

We have 2 of these in stock and were about to submit a photo (none in catalogue)
when we saw that whilst it is listed as a known colour it is not shown in any
sets. I thought that was not the policy - if not in set not a known colour???

Clarification, please.

3957 Antenna 4H - Round Top
Parts: Antenna

Brown isn’t in the Known Colours column for me.
It’s in the Price Guide Information column though, maybe you’re mistaking the
two?

Author:

calsbricks

Posted:

Apr 22, 2021 10:40

Subject:

Brown (Old) 3957

Viewed:

75 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 19:12

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

96 times

Topic:

I am a curious person. I am curious about this and think it is natural to be.
I am also often frustrated by obituaries that almost never tell what happened.
No, we don't DESERVE all the details, but I totally understand why people
would be curious.

I have enjoyed many collaborations with Stormchaser. He knows how I feel about
him. Whether on staff or not in the future, I hope he will continue to contribute.
If his life has changed and he doesn't have the time, maybe he will return
later. If his feelings have been hurt and he needs some time or never wants
to come back, I understand that. There is still a lot of work to do on the catalog,
but at the end of the day none of us do it unless it is fun. Some day I will
quit. Not soon, I think. Meanwhile there are some ugly old renders and some
some undetermined coconut trees, so I'm going back to work.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 18:33

Subject:

Re: Inventory for gear 40315

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

In Catalog, normann1974 writes:

How do I recreate the image for the instructions? I can't find any upload
form for gear instructions. This image should be used.

/Jan

Submit it to the instructions entry for 40315-99. This is a special trick that
was created for gear sets that had instructions. Hopefully, all of these will
be sets come October so we won't have to worry about this anymore.

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 18:29

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

81 times

Topic:

In Catalog, popsicle writes:

In Catalog, jennnifer writes:

In Catalog, Heartbricker writes:

StormChaser deserves our gratitude and not our lust to satisfy our own selfish
need to know 'why?'

He has my gratitude. What I also feel is a sense of responsibility as a member
of this community to seek reassurance that he was treated fairly.

Jen

Seems disingenuous, your expression of concern. He’s a big boy, that I don’t
believe was without compensation.

I appreciate Robert and his efforts as much as any others here, and before most:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1178543

He’s quit the catalog team before though: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1178543

He’s also gone to the extent of quitting BL altogether, unregistering vowing
publicly never to return: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1123830

Only to be reinstated by that evil BL office (admin) you seem incessant in denigrating.

-popsicle

Ouch! You got me there: I harbor no good feelings toward the BL office. However,
I do generally admire your positivity and wish I had more of it. I used to look
on the better side of things and now I don't.

There's too many things that could be better if they chose to make them better.
This rankles me. I do try to be supportive and kind when I see genuine effort.
I help newbies, I support our admin, I contribute. So, I am incessant in wanting
things to be better. You're right. 'Denigrating' implies that I am
lashing out without cause. Is that fair?

I don't feel good about what happened. I think we are worse off. If I came
across as disingenuous, that was not my intent.
Take care,
Jen

Author:

popsicle

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 16:57

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

140 times

Topic:

In Catalog, jennnifer writes:

In Catalog, Heartbricker writes:

StormChaser deserves our gratitude and not our lust to satisfy our own selfish
need to know 'why?'

He has my gratitude. What I also feel is a sense of responsibility as a member
of this community to seek reassurance that he was treated fairly.

Jen

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 15:54

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

80 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Heartbricker writes:

StormChaser deserves our gratitude and not our lust to satisfy our own selfish
need to know 'why?'

He has my gratitude. What I also feel is a sense of responsibility as a member
of this community to seek reassurance that he was treated fairly.

Jen

Author:

TheBrickGuys

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 15:16

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

71 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Heartbricker writes:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Dear community,

We are sad to inform you that our Catalog Adminstrator StormChaser is no longer
part of the Community Expert Program. We will be updating the Community Admin
page soon.

StormChaser has positively influenced the catalog in many ways, and his passion
for documentation and organization are legendary. We are planning to move ahead
with initiatives he has set in motion and keep alive his vision for a better
catalog.

We must also mention that this is a difficult time for the catalog team, as they
have lost two very experienced admins since the beginning of the year. In the
coming weeks we will announce some plans for the future.

The BrickLink Team

We hope he continues to be a part of the community and want to express our deepest
gratitude for his help personally to us as users and broadly to the community
here on BL.
We can't imagine what a thankless 'job' it is to volunteer for the
betterment of a community and be constantly criticized by users who can't
deal with changes even though those changes have only upgraded and elevated the
catalog.
StormChaser deserves our gratitude and not our lust to satisfy our own selfish
need to know 'why?'

VERY WELL SAID.

Author:

TheBrickGuys

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 15:15

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

67 times

Topic:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

I very much doubt we are going to get one. The BrickLink office's lack of
transparency is well-documented. Personally, I think it stinks.

There are two different types of transparency here though - transparency about
decisions concerning the catalogue and transparency about decisions concerning
employment (whether paid for or not).

They should clearly be transparent about decisions connected to the catalogue.
However, they should not be transparent about why someone is no longer doing
something they used to do. It could be a whole range of things, from wanting
payment for voluntary work, a difference of opinion over part movements or definitions,
things moving at the wrong speed, through to more personal reasons such as someone
deciding they cannot do it for employment or medical or family reasons or just
that they have done it long enough and want a break. Unless the person involved
wants to tell us, then I don't think we need to know the reasons. I don't
see that as a lack of transparency, just privacy.

Author:

MrPetovan

Posted:

Apr 21, 2021 14:16

Subject:

Re: Changes involving the CEP

Viewed:

65 times

Topic: