BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Catalog, Brickwilbo writes:

In Catalog, BrickBros20 writes:

Hello!

I know I can check a wanted list against what I currently have listed in my store,
but is there a way to do that same thing in my stores inventory?
Thanks!

~Brick Brothers

On the My Inventory page you can chech Items on my Wantlist between the Search
options on the right.

Checked for each option, but didn´t found it.
Please explain in more details. Thanks.

Author:

BrickBros20

Posted:

Feb 21, 2021 16:57

Subject:

Re: Checking a Wanted List Against an Inventory?

Viewed:

26 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Brickwilbo writes:

In Catalog, BrickBros20 writes:

Hello!

I know I can check a wanted list against what I currently have listed in my store,
but is there a way to do that same thing in my stores inventory?
Thanks!

~Brick Brothers

On the My Inventory page you can chech Items on my Wantlist between the Search
options on the right.

Great, thank you! Is there a way to sort the results for a certain wanted list?

~Brick Brothers

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Feb 21, 2021 16:49

Subject:

Re: Checking a Wanted List Against an Inventory?

Viewed:

20 times

Topic:

In Catalog, BrickBros20 writes:

Hello!

I know I can check a wanted list against what I currently have listed in my store,
but is there a way to do that same thing in my stores inventory?
Thanks!

~Brick Brothers

On the My Inventory page you can chech Items on my Wantlist between the Search
options on the right.

Author:

BrickBros20

Posted:

Feb 21, 2021 16:36

Subject:

Checking a Wanted List Against an Inventory?

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hello!

I know I can check a wanted list against what I currently have listed in my store,
but is there a way to do that same thing in my stores inventory?
Thanks!

~Brick Brothers

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 21, 2021 13:00

Subject:

Re: Mini doll torso shapes

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

There is a lot of work that needs to be done in the Friends area. The heads are
different and the numbering doesn't follow BL conventions, some entries combine
parts that are printed versus dual-molded, and now this. Unfortunately, Friends
is an area that does not get much love from contributors and needs a champion
to get things moving.

But, yes, this should be combined with all the other Friends stuff.

Cheers,
Randy

In Catalog, hpoort writes:

Sorting through my collection of mini doll torso's, I noticed the variety
of body shapes: I found 4 distinct shapes for boy, girl, man and woman. It seems
LDraw does distinguish these 4 shapes, but Bricklink only distinguishes the two
(?) FTFpb000c00 and FTMpb000c00

Could this be a catalog project to renumber the parts and distinguish the shapes
properly? Should we renumber as FTM, FTW, FTB, FTG (Friends Torso Man/Woman/Boy/Girl)?

Man (LDraw 92242):

FTMpb001c01 Torso Mini Doll Man White Shirt Top with Open Collar, Reddish Brown Tie Pattern, Light Nougat Arms with Hands with White Sleeves
Parts: Mini Doll, Torso

shoulder width 10.2 mm, breast thickness 6.6 mm

Woman (LDraw 92243):
[p=FTFpb014c01]
shoulder width 8.8 mm, breast thickness 6.9 mm

Boy (LDraw u9210):
[p=FTMpb002c01]
shoulder width 8.8 mm, breast thickness 5.5 mm

Girl (LDraw 92241):
[p=FTFpb224c01]
shoulder width 8.8 mm, breast thickness 6.0 mm

Author:

hpoort

Posted:

Feb 21, 2021 12:43

Subject:

Mini doll torso shapes

Viewed:

105 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

FTMpb001c01 Torso Mini Doll Man White Shirt Top with Open Collar, Reddish Brown Tie Pattern, Light Nougat Arms with Hands with White Sleeves
Parts: Mini Doll, Torso

Author:

DeLuca

Posted:

Feb 20, 2021 19:23

Subject:

Re: No issue just my warped sence of humor

Viewed:

54 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Wookie305 writes:

So something new posted... But has me wondering. Post snap avengers???

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?S=66593-1#T=S&O={%22ss%22:%22US%22,%22iconly%22:0}

In that case, the inventory should be changed to include Part (36451a) in Trans-Orange.

36451a Rock Faceted with Small Pin (Infinity Stone)
Parts: Rock

Author:

Wookie305

Posted:

Feb 20, 2021 19:16

Subject:

No issue just my warped sence of humor

Viewed:

126 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

So something new posted... But has me wondering. Post snap avengers???

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?S=66593-1#T=S&O={%22ss%22:%22US%22,%22iconly%22:0}

Author:

bje

Posted:

Feb 18, 2021 08:01

Subject:

Re: Bar 4L length

Viewed:

57 times

Topic:

In Catalog, normann1974 writes:

I just noticed one Bar 4L that was clearly shorter (~½ mm) than the other. It
has a LEGO logo on it, so it's genuine. Has anyone else seen this?

/Jan

I have bars with bevelled edges which are shorter than the flat edge bars and
also some bevelled edged bars which are the same length as flat edge bars. There
does not seem to be a consistent difference in variants to be sure if it is a
specific variant that differentiates the length.

Author:

normann1974

Posted:

Feb 18, 2021 07:39

Subject:

Bar 4L length

Viewed:

105 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

I just noticed one Bar 4L that was clearly shorter (~½ mm) than the other. It
has a LEGO logo on it, so it's genuine. Has anyone else seen this?

/Jan

Author:

CPgolfaddict

Posted:

Feb 17, 2021 16:48

Subject:

Re: Misprint / Missed Print

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Looks like the same machine skipped the center stripe in both cases.

In Catalog, infinibrix writes:

In Catalog, CPgolfaddict writes:

It seems clear the one on the left simply skipped part of the printing process
and should not be a new decorated cone.

Although I found multiples with the same error....

Interestingly I think I have a similar style misprint but for a different cockpit:-

47543pb07 Cone Half 8 x 4 x 6 with SW Resistance Bomber Cockpit Pattern
Parts: Cone, Decorated

Unless someone can point me the direction as to what I actually have?

Author:

maxx3001

Posted:

Feb 17, 2021 09:58

Subject:

Re: Misprint / Missed Print

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

In Catalog, starbeanie writes:

That's an example of a misprint that would be worth more. It's useable
still.

In Catalog, maxx3001 writes:

In Catalog, CPgolfaddict writes:

It seems clear the one on the left simply skipped part of the printing process
and should not be a new decorated cone.

Although I found multiples with the same error....

Nice misprint!

Author:

infinibrix

Posted:

Feb 17, 2021 09:20

Subject:

Re: Misprint / Missed Print

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, CPgolfaddict writes:

It seems clear the one on the left simply skipped part of the printing process
and should not be a new decorated cone.

Although I found multiples with the same error....

Interestingly I think I have a similar style misprint but for a different cockpit:-

47543pb07 Cone Half 8 x 4 x 6 with SW Resistance Bomber Cockpit Pattern
Parts: Cone, Decorated

Unless someone can point me the direction as to what I actually have?

Author:

starbeanie

Posted:

Feb 17, 2021 08:38

Subject:

Re: Misprint / Missed Print

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

That's an example of a misprint that would be worth more. It's useable
still.

In Catalog, maxx3001 writes:

In Catalog, CPgolfaddict writes:

It seems clear the one on the left simply skipped part of the printing process
and should not be a new decorated cone.

Although I found multiples with the same error....

Nice misprint!

Author:

maxx3001

Posted:

Feb 17, 2021 03:31

Subject:

Re: Misprint / Missed Print

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

In Catalog, CPgolfaddict writes:

It seems clear the one on the left simply skipped part of the printing process
and should not be a new decorated cone.

Although I found multiples with the same error....

Nice misprint!

Author:

CPgolfaddict

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 21:38

Subject:

Misprint / Missed Print

Viewed:

128 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

It seems clear the one on the left simply skipped part of the printing process
and should not be a new decorated cone.

Although I found multiples with the same error....

Author:

minifigmountain

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 16:56

Subject:

Re: Photos for col334 face mask

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

Thank you. That's a crazy optical illusion it looks exactly like the silver
printing on the mask.

In Catalog, starbeanie writes:

Pic one is light reflection. Compare to the "silver" spots on the upper arms.

In Catalog, steveschow writes:

If you go to col334 - War Machine and look at photo #1 the very bottom of the
mask below the lip has silver on the center section. Almost looks like a sideways
axe head. Photo #2 shows that everything below the lip is just black.

Is one of them correct or are both valid? Does #2 have the silver worn off? I
find it hard to believe an official catalog photo would be approved with a defect.

For the record, my col334 looks like photo #2 and I want to know if that means
it's worn. It is supposedly brand new thus my concern.

Thanks!

Author:

starbeanie

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 13:56

Subject:

Re: Photos for col334 face mask

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

Pic one is light reflection. Compare to the "silver" spots on the upper arms.

In Catalog, steveschow writes:

Author:

minifigmountain

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 13:49

Subject:

Photos for col334 face mask

Viewed:

117 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

BricksThatStick

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 07:53

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

61 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Dear BrickLink members,

A big loss indeed - you'll definitely be missed by me too.

He had a distinctive eye for detail and precise and accurate way of working which
certainly taught me a lot.

Author:

Turez

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 07:17

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

Wow, these are really sad news.
Marek, I hope you are well and thank you very very much for everything you have
done for BrickLink and the catalog. It was mostly your (and Randy's) helpful
and positive attitude which convinced me to become a frequent contributer two
years ago.

Author:

Stellar

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 04:54

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

63 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Dear BrickLink members,

On Friday we heard from Hygrotus, currently our longest serving catalog admin,
that he was relinquishing his position. This is for sure a setback for our team,
as he was an unequalled expert in many areas and was exceptionally diligent and
careful in his work.

We will certainly miss him, and we wish him the best for the future. You can
read his BrickLink story here:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1249971

The CEP admin page is not updated yet with this new information. We hope to finish
that by the end of the week.

As part of the regular course of building the Community Expert catalog admin
program, we were planning to add another admin to the team this Spring (Apr/May).
That continues to be our plan.

A loss for the BL catalog, he made an incredible work.

Hope well for him now!

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 03:31

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

84 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:

A huge thank you from me for all that you, Hygrotus, have done and posted over
the years, you will certainly be missed regarding your contributions.

Marek really brought a lot of value to BrickLink. I enjoyed working with him
and am going to miss that.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 00:19

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

96 times

Topic:

Good luck to him. Hopefully it is happy news that some new opportunity has come
for him, or just spending more time on another or different aspect of the hobby.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 16, 2021 00:05

Subject:

Re: Elastigirl

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Catalog, runner.caller writes:

incr001 (Inv) Elastigirl
Minifigures: The Incredibles: Incredibles 2

Any reason this minifig is only named "Elastigirl" when she's wearing the
Mrs. Incredible outfit?

In the official description of the set, she is only referred to as Elastigirl.
I guess it is a bit like the various Iron Man suits, where they take the name
lego gives and not extra terms.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 23:55

Subject:

Re: Distinctive?

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Dixi78 writes:

Hi,
I'm adding some counterparts (stickered parts) for the set 60183.
One of the items is a slope with Red and White Danger Stripes Thick Pattern.
See attached picture.

I found a similar item from another set in the catalog:

85984pb091L Slope 30 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Red and White Danger Stripes Thick Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 60075
Parts: Slope, Decorated

It's almost the same, the difference is the white dot in de lower left corner.

Should I add 'my' part as a new part or can I consider these items the
same?
And if it's distinctive, what name should I give it?
I'd like to hear your opinion!

It looks like the same part to me, just not quite perfect alignment of the sticker
print when cut.

Author:

BricksThatStick

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 17:33

Subject:

Re: Distinctive?

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Dixi78 writes:

85984pb091L Slope 30 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Red and White Danger Stripes Thick Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 60075
Parts: Slope, Decorated

The sticker looks narrower on yours so they would look odd as a pair of parts
that don't quite match on a set - submit as a new part (with a note in case
its not me that looks to approve it) and we'll discuss it from there if we
need to.

Thanks,
Paul.

Author:

goldknight

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 16:51

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

115 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Maybe he will come back after he catches a few rare bugs!!!!

Author:

Dixi78

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 15:51

Subject:

Distinctive?

Viewed:

105 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

85984pb091L Slope 30 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Red and White Danger Stripes Thick Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 60075
Parts: Slope, Decorated

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 15:25

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

89 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Erkiles writes:

Sorry to hear this. I hope everything is alright with him.

My thoughts, exactly

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 15:08

Subject:

Re: Elastigirl

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Catalog, runner.caller writes:

incr001 (Inv) Elastigirl
Minifigures: The Incredibles: Incredibles 2

Any reason this minifig is only named "Elastigirl" when she's wearing the
Mrs. Incredible outfit?

The reason is that she is found in the set "Elastigirl's Rooftop Pursuit".

I don't remember to what extent she goes by Mrs Incredible. I have no objection
to the name showing both.

Author:

Emporiosa

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 14:50

Subject:

Re: Elastigirl

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Emporiosa writes:

In Catalog, runner.caller writes:

incr001 (Inv) Elastigirl
Minifigures: The Incredibles: Incredibles 2

Any reason this minifig is only named "Elastigirl" when she's wearing the
Mrs. Incredible outfit?

My memory may be off on this, but I think in the movie (as this was in the sequel
I believe), they were talking more about her before her family life when she
was "Elastigirl". I think she became "Mrs. Incredible" after marrying "Mr. Incredible"
later on (as she "retired" from the scene and became a housewife for a while).
In theory, it wouldn't be wrong to include Mrs. Incredible in the name as
well (and would make it easier for someone searching it by that name).

(And for the record; I completely agree with you because of the outfit used here
since it's not her original Elastigirl one. I think both names would be more
fitting).

Author:

Emporiosa

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 14:49

Subject:

Re: Elastigirl

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Catalog, runner.caller writes:

incr001 (Inv) Elastigirl
Minifigures: The Incredibles: Incredibles 2

Any reason this minifig is only named "Elastigirl" when she's wearing the
Mrs. Incredible outfit?

Author:

runner.caller

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 14:43

Subject:

Elastigirl

Viewed:

123 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

incr001 (Inv) Elastigirl
Minifigures: The Incredibles: Incredibles 2

Any reason this minifig is only named "Elastigirl" when she's wearing the
Mrs. Incredible outfit?

Author:

Reki_Lobsheek

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 14:30

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

77 times

Topic:

Sorry to hear this. I hope everything is alright with him.

Erikk

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 14:25

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

This is a huge loss.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 13:55

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

89 times

Topic:

Damn it.

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Author:

Stuart9

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 13:08

Subject:

Re: Some sad news

Viewed:

91 times

Topic:

Sad news indeed.

A huge thank you from me for all that you, Hygrotus, have done and posted over
the years, you will certainly be missed regarding your contributions.

Hope to still see you on the forum.

In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:

Author:

Admin_Russell

Posted:

Feb 15, 2021 12:36

Subject:

Some sad news

Viewed:

456 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

peregrinator

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 19:09

Subject:

Re: Minifigures

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Tiggy2 writes:

Thank you, I'll have a look around to see if I have the quiver...lol. I think
I just sold a couple...of course just when you need them...lol

Cheers

A good bit of the money I spend on BL is to complete minifigures I buy elsewhere

Author:

Tiggy2

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 17:16

Subject:

Re: Minifigures

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

Thank you, I'll have a look around to see if I have the quiver...lol. I think
I just sold a couple...of course just when you need them...lol

Cheers

In Catalog, peregrinator writes:

In Catalog, Tiggy2 writes:

This is my Comments: Excellent Condition, no splits or dents. Missing Quiver/Arrows.

Is it because I don’t have the Quiver? Can I list Minifigures if missing parts?

Yes, that's probably why, and no, you're not supposed to list incomplete
minifigures, at least not as regular catalogue items. You can list them as custom
items or part them out. Of course you can also buy the missing piece(s) and complete
the minifig(s) to list them

Author:

peregrinator

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 14:57

Subject:

Re: Minifigures

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Tiggy2 writes:

This is my Comments: Excellent Condition, no splits or dents. Missing Quiver/Arrows.

Is it because I don’t have the Quiver? Can I list Minifigures if missing parts?

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 14:27

Subject:

Re: part 3245cpb012 catalog information.

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Catalog, joesecc writes:

Hi,

I need some clarification for the part.

3245cpb012 Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder with White 'POLICE' on Blue Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 7498
Parts: Brick, Decorated

The inventory for this set indicates that it exists with the alternate part

3245b Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Axle Holder
Parts: Brick {White}

So, should there be a catalog entry for this part with the police sticker on
it?

Yes, there could be if someone were to add it.

If so how would it be classified? Alternate part/counterpart?

Counterpart.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 14:18

Subject:

Re: Minifigures

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Tiggy2 writes:

Hi

Just wondering why a Minifigure I listed was deleted.

This is what it is...Dragon Knights - Knight 1, Light Gray Legs with Black Hips,
Black Chin-Guard, Quiver

This is my Comments: Excellent Condition, no splits or dents. Missing Quiver/Arrows.

Is it because I don’t have the Quiver? Can I list Minifigures if missing parts?

Thank you

The message would have said it is because it is incomplete.

Author:

BrickenbergNC

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 12:16

Subject:

Re: Minifigures

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Tiggy2 writes:

BrickLink is now enforcing the policy saying minifigures must be complete. You
can list as a custom item or list the individual parts.

Author:

Tiggy2

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 12:09

Subject:

Minifigures

Viewed:

97 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

1974

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 10:05

Subject:

Set 816-1

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

The release year is listed as 1987. However, the instruction is copyrighted in
1986 and it also appears in the large 1986 catalogue

Cheers,

Ole

Author:

joesecc

Posted:

Feb 14, 2021 07:35

Subject:

part 3245cpb012 catalog information.

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hi,

I need some clarification for the part.

3245cpb012 Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Stud Holder with White 'POLICE' on Blue Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 7498
Parts: Brick, Decorated

The inventory for this set indicates that it exists with the alternate part

3245b Brick 1 x 2 x 2 with Inside Axle Holder
Parts: Brick {White}

So, should there be a catalog entry for this part with the police sticker on
it?

If so how would it be classified? Alternate part/counterpart?

Regards,
Joe

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 19:23

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Catalog, axaday writes:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

The new parts will not be accepted into the catalog without images.

Cheers,
Randy

The torso piece might.

That would, yes. But that is an exception and will only be added once the full
torso assembly is added.

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 19:18

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

The new parts will not be accepted into the catalog without images.

Cheers,
Randy

The torso piece might.

Author:

infinibrix

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 19:13

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Catalog, leopard37 writes:

Perhaps the need is there for headgear as well. However I disagree with by theme. I found
again and again that the second you think something is set by LEGO to be used
in one set it will appear in another. Maybe not often with Star Wars but still.

Yes but my thinking was more to do with the theme the part is more commonly associated
with or originates from therefore for instance

30177 Minifigure, Headgear Ninja Wrap
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

I would category this as say Ninja/Ninjago headgear and ignore the fact its used
by Star Wars Dengar

My opinion is to categorize with the real world (helmets, hoods) and than the
theme will work itself out. Thanks for the response.

Yes I agree though for it to work I think it would have to have a crossover of
parts some categoried by theme and others by the style so you'd have stuff
like Stormtooper helmets under star wars headgear and stuff like Batman cowls
under Super heroes headgear but then other items like all these:-

3844 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet Castle with Neck Protector
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

10054 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet Castle with Cheek Protection and Comb (Rohan)
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

90392 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet Spartan Warrior
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

60748 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet Castle with Cheek Protection and Studded Bands (Dwarf)
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

95676 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet Gladiator
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

x1533 Minifigure, Headgear Helmet Viking with Side Holes
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

Not categoried by their theme (Castle, Lord of the Rings, Vikings etc..) but
categoried together as Warrior/Knight type helmets
I mean I would'nt really want to see a single helmets category that consists
of everything from Knight helmets to construction worker helmets to Ironman helemts
if you see my point

That said I would'nt have a problem with a hats category that contained a
little more variation from cowboy hats to basball caps to top hats though a separate
Trade/Occupation category may also be useful for stuff like chef, butcher hats,
construction worker helmets, police hats or even Racing driver helmets?

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 18:32

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

The new parts will not be accepted into the catalog without images.

Cheers,
Randy

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Just realized that, however, the pieces it Is made up of don't exist in the
catalog yet. I will try and add them, but there will be no pictures. If you have
the minifig, I would be very grateful if you would consider uploading some photos

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

In Catalog, calebfishn writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Reaching out to those that have the new drowned Minifigure from Lego Minecraft.
Please contact me, I would like to discuss weights, pictures, dimensions, etc.

min088 (Inv) Drowned Zombie
Minifigures: Minecraft

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

I have a couple. But I have no idea how to weigh or measure the dimensions of
these things. So probably not much help.

I imagine the dimensions and weight are going to be very similar to the other
Minecraft zombies, given the parts, are the same aside from the print.

Author:

Hexy

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 16:31

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

In Catalog, calebfishn writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Reaching out to those that have the new drowned Minifigure from Lego Minecraft.
Please contact me, I would like to discuss weights, pictures, dimensions, etc.

min088 (Inv) Drowned Zombie
Minifigures: Minecraft

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

I have a couple. But I have no idea how to weigh or measure the dimensions of
these things. So probably not much help.

I imagine the dimensions and weight are going to be very similar to the other
Minecraft zombies, given the parts, are the same aside from the print.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 15:28

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

In Catalog, calebfishn writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Reaching out to those that have the new drowned Minifigure from Lego Minecraft.
Please contact me, I would like to discuss weights, pictures, dimensions, etc.

min088 (Inv) Drowned Zombie
Minifigures: Minecraft

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

I have a couple. But I have no idea how to weigh or measure the dimnensions of
these things. So probably not much help.

I imagine the dimensions and weight are going to be very similar to the other
Minecraft zombies, given the parts are the same aside from the print.

Author:

calebfishn

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 14:59

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

73 times

Topic:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Reaching out to those that have the new drowned Minifigure from Lego Minecraft.
Please contact me, I would like to discuss weights, pictures, dimensions, etc.

min088 (Inv) Drowned Zombie
Minifigures: Minecraft

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

I have a couple. But I have no idea how to weigh or measure the dimnensions of
these things. So probably not much help.

Author:

popsicle

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 12:37

Subject:

Re: Why should I...

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Bendix writes:

...upload an item for the catalog - when it is deleted due to unknown reasons?

"Why?" So that as a seller you can list and sell the item, usually at a premium
as being among the first to offer the item.

But I get it... and you're right, a reason should be given, even if only
one-worded.
I'm sure it was just an oversight.

Really cool polybag build, btw!

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 12:35

Subject:

Re: New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

58 times

Topic:

Just buy one.

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Reaching out to those that have the new drowned Minifigure from Lego Minecraft.
Please contact me, I would like to discuss weights, pictures, dimensions, etc.

min088 (Inv) Drowned Zombie
Minifigures: Minecraft

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

Author:

crepundi

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:45

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

Anyway, these parts are all comprised mostly of bars and should stay put.

Thanks!
Jen

Here I would like to suggest to move

2566 Bar 1.2L with Top Stud and 4 Bar Arms Up (Palm Tree Top)
Parts: Bar

to bar as well.
Holding the leafs of a palm tree is only one of its many funktions.

Gisela

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:23

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Catalog, leopard37 writes:

I propose sub categories to thin out the main categories.

This is a good idea and we'd like to move toward it. The problem is that
the main categories list already numbers in the hundreds. We'd prefer to
have submenus before we do a bunch of additional splitting.

Please see this message for more information:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1168807

If you'd like to vote on it, see this message:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1169569

Author:

leopard37

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:18

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

I have also felt that more categories would be beneficial not just for weapons
but other minifigure categories too such as headgear. For instance if your searching
a store to see what Knight/castle style helmets the store has I'm sure it
would be better to be able to do this without having to scroll through lots of
star wars helmets or ninjago wraps etc...
However the problem with categorising by theme is that there are too many crossover
parts like this hood that can be found in almost all the main themes

30381 Minifigure, Headgear Hood
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

That said even just separating all the headgear that is unique to a specific
theme would be a good starting point meaning 'Star Wars Headgear' would
include anything from clone trooper helmets to Rebel Pilot helmets to Vader +
Boba Fett helmets along with caps with imperial insigma etc..
Whilst hoods might be used on Jedi and Sith they are quite generic and would
have to remain under the standard generic headgear category.

When it comes to weapons I would again be inclined to try and organise things
by theme/era i.e primative style weapons such as bows and axes separated from
space type weapons etc... but I think this would also present some problems as
there will always be items that are difficult to find a suitable home for likewise
even when going by your own category suggestions where they are sorted by weapon
type what do you then do with something like a flail? personally I think I would
like to see these located in the same palce as things like swords, axes, bows
etc...

My thought that whatever did not fit distinctly into the sub category would remain
in the general main category. Therefore the flail would remain there. Perhaps
the need is there for headgear as well. However I disagree with by theme. I found
again and again that the second you think something is set by LEGO to be used
in one set it will appear in another. Maybe not often with Star Wars but still.
My opinion is to categorize with the real world (helmets, hoods) and than the
theme will work itself out. Thanks for the response.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:18

Subject:

Re: Why should I...

Viewed:

55 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

We apologize for this error on our part. The deletion was due to circumstances
beyond our control.

Those are contradictory statements, but hopefully you get the general drift.
We didn't intentionally remove your pending submission, but we regret that
it happened nonetheless.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:16

Subject:

Re: Why should I...

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Bendix writes:

...upload an item for the catalog - when it is deleted due to unknown reasons?

We apologize for this error on our part. The deletion was due to circumstances
beyond our control. We typically try to notify submitters when a submission
cannot be approved.

You're welcome to resubmit this item with the image.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:06

Subject:

Re: Why should I...

Viewed:

44 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Bendix writes:

In Catalog, StarBrick writes:

In Catalog, Bendix writes:

...upload an item for the catalog - when it is deleted due to unknown reasons?

Because it's not yet released?

Since two weeks.

Maybe not yet in the USA, where most of the employees work I guess?
I dunno, BL moves in mysterious ways.....

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 11:01

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Stellar writes:

Propose:

I really like that you're interested in discussing the category guidelines,
but I'm a little confused on the changes you'd like to see. It would
be helpful for me if you'd post the current guidelines and then your revised
guidelines so I can understand the differences between them.

Author:

Bendix

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 10:48

Subject:

Re: Why should I...

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StarBrick writes:

In Catalog, Bendix writes:

...upload an item for the catalog - when it is deleted due to unknown reasons?

Because it's not yet released?

Since two weeks.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 10:29

Subject:

Re: Why should I...

Viewed:

55 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Bendix writes:

...upload an item for the catalog - when it is deleted due to unknown reasons?

Because it's not yet released?

Author:

Bendix

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 10:16

Subject:

Why should I...

Viewed:

240 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

...upload an item for the catalog - when it is deleted due to unknown reasons?

Author:

crepundi

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 07:19

Subject:

part 3010p04 entry remark

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hello, I don't know if this is important, but there are two different versions
of this part:

3010p04 Brick 1 x 4 with Black Grille with 15 Vertical Lines Pattern
Parts: Brick, Decorated

one with surface print and one with embossed print (at least in white). Maybe
this could be noted in the catalog entry.
Gisela

Author:

Stellar

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 06:38

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

In Catalog, Stellar writes:

Why is
[27928]
moved to plate, modified
and
[2401]
moved to plate, wedge?

Please see the definitions of those categories on this recently-updated page:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1568

I think the wedge base should be the defining characteristic.

As always, if you or any other member want to offer suggestions for redefining
categories that are an improvement you're welcome to do so.

There are other parts in the wedge, plate category that have modifications apart
from the wedge.

Right, and the list is not complete yet. It won't be complete until March
1st (and subject to review/approval during March).

Plate, modified:

1. No parts with a base thicker than a standard plate.
2. No parts when any side of the base part is curved.
3. No parts when any corner of the base part is rounded.

Plate, Wedge:

1. No parts with a base thicker than a standard plate.
2. At least one side of base part must be fully or partially tapered.
3. No parts with curved sides.
4. No parts with attachments.

Propose:

1. For parts defined as Plate, Modified with at least one side of the base must
be fully or partially tapered.

That way all wedge plates are in the same place, also this does not enlarge the
plate, modified category (168) vs the wedge, plate (55).

In the definitions of subcategories (curved, round, wedge, modified), wouldn't
be better to inherit the caracteristics of the parent? "For parts defined as
Plate/Brick/Slope" ?

Author:

Hexy

Posted:

Feb 13, 2021 04:47

Subject:

New Lego Drowned Minifigure

Viewed:

143 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Reaching out to those that have the new drowned Minifigure from Lego Minecraft.
Please contact me, I would like to discuss weights, pictures, dimensions, etc.

min088 (Inv) Drowned Zombie
Minifigures: Minecraft

Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

Author:

infinibrix

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 19:38

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Catalog, leopard37 writes:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

Alright, this post is more to create discussion, not necessarily must be implemented.

As a seller I find the Minifigure, Utensil and Minifigure, Weapon categories.

I propose sub categories to thin out the main categories. A large portion of
current listings can remain in the main category (like an other or general category
- items that do not meet the definition of the sub category).

Minifigure, Utensil Tool
-anything with tool in the title
-axes

Minifigure, Utensil Kitchenware (could use a better name - best I could come
up with)
-anything you would find in your kitchen, pots, glasses, teapots, etc.

I also believe handlebars, and chairs should move to vehicle.

Minifigure, Weapons, Bladed
-swords, knifes, you know blades...

Minifigure, Weapons, Guns (Projectile is another potential name)
-projectile weapons, bows could also go in here.

Would love to hear what others think of the idea.

Tyson.

30381 Minifigure, Headgear Hood
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear

Author:

infinibrix

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 15:14

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

My solution would be that it is not a figure, but the guidelines say it is for
anyone that wants to change it.

Minifigure = Anything that uses the Standard Torso Assembly design

973c00 (Inv) Torso Plain / (Same Color) Arms / (Same Color) Hands
Parts: Minifigure, Torso Assembly

or if there needs to be more clarity to ensure all those with Pirate Hooked hands
or boxing gloves are also included it must consist of this instead:-

973 Torso Plain
Parts: Minifigure, Torso

Modified Figure = Anything from droids, to brick built Droids, to Skeletons and
stuff like Gollum, Slimer, Unikitty, Scurrier, Scooby etc..

Microfigure = Anything very small consisting of a single or maximum of two parts
such as Baby, Baby Yoda, Palpatine Hologram, Baby Groot, Trophy figures and all
those game figures etc..

I’m sure you will recall that I’ve mentioned this before and so I can assume
that you probably don’t see it as an ideal solution which is fine but let me
know where you see issues and I will try to re-think things whilst taking those
issues into account? However I think any solution will always run into problems
and catalog contradictions and so it may be that there is no one perfect solution?
However a less than perfect solution is always going to be better than a far
from perfect solution which is what we are going to end up with if we bundle
every buildable character into minifigs?

Criticizing those who are actually working to resolve some of these longstanding
issues with the catalog makes you feel good and I get that. I do it too and
for the same reasons: it releases neurochemicals for me.

But until you put in the effort to effect solutions rather than just pointing
out problems, you're behaving in destructive rather than constructive ways.

Criticizing for the sake of criticizing may very well be the way Yorbrick and
a few others get their fix but it’s certainly not the purpose of any of my own
criticisms as I hope you will appreciate that almost anything I critic is always
accompanied with alternative solutions even if others don’t agree with those
solutions and yes whilst I do have a lot to say, I think a lot of that stems
from my previous working background where I've spent much of my working life
at two different companies where I was specifically tasked with implementing
database solutions for cataloguing parts and components both for an Electrical
Transformer company and an IT company so basically exactly what a Bricklink catmin
is tasked with only dealing with different categories and different parts!
Now of coarse that doesn’t mean that I somehow think that makes my own suggestions
superior to anyone else’s and I don’t say all this because I one day crave to
be a catmin... I’m simply here to sell and that is all!
(besides which there are people here with a far wider knowledge of Lego than
myself which is another useful attribute) but because I want the catalog to work
for me and also work for my customers this is the only reason I allow my past
experience to kick in to find fault and offer solutions for what I see as issues
within the current catalog!

However whenever I critic the catalog please don’t ever think that I also critic
the hard work/good intentions of the catmins themselves regardless of whether
or not I share those same ideas and solutions

Author:

leopard37

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 13:06

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

Author:

leopard37

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 12:48

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

~snip

I agree with this suggestion, I was too late the last time around (missed the
discussion completely) and this time I'm too late to suggest.

Great minds and all that.

Tyson.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 12:07

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

My solution would be that it is not a figure, but the guidelines say it is for
anyone that wants to change it.

I should have been more clear. If you disagree with the current situation with
portions of the catalog, please offer concrete suggestions to improve the situation.
This must occur at the level of policy/guidelines.

So, an example of these kinds of suggestions:

1. I think you guys should rewrite the guidelines for minifigs to say
exactly this thing: "Minifigs are defined as (insert content)."

2. Then you guys should delete every item in the catalog that does not
comply with the newly written definition.

Criticizing those who are actually working to resolve some of these longstanding
issues with the catalog makes you feel good and I get that. I do it too and
for the same reasons: it releases neurochemicals for me.

But until you put in the effort to effect solutions rather than just pointing
out problems, you're behaving in destructive rather than constructive ways.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:57

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

How is this type of minifigure to be handled?

You're welcome to offer solutions to the problems you point out.

My solution would be that it is not a figure, but the guidelines say it is for
anyone that wants to change it.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:55

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

How is this type of minifigure to be handled?

You're welcome to offer solutions to the problems you point out.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:48

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

The entire assembly of this set, and all other buildable figures should be moved
into minifigures. These are characters built out of parts like Thomas the Tank
Engine, Cars, etc. As those examples are now minifigures, then surely so are
these characters.

It is not possible to make everyone happy.

As I said here:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1246481

"Ideally, we would hold off on these changes until the inventory system was
corrected and we could move all figures to counterparts. But people have been
asking for these figures to be considered figures for years and years, so I don't
see that it would really hurt anything to do it now."

I get your objections and I agree with them, to some degree. The addition of
the additional Thomas the Tank figures was not part of msSquirrel's original
request.

How is this type of minifigure to be handled?

21148-1 (Inv) Minecraft Steve BigFig with Parrot
159 Parts, 2019
Sets: Minecraft: BigFig Series 1

Presumably the minifigure inventory will contain the parts for the body/head/hair/legs/arms/hands
but exclude the axe, even though it is built into the minifigure's hand before
the figure is completed?

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:43

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

I just find it ridiculous that anyone, but especially a company owned by LEGO
themselves, would refer to a DUPLO train as a minifigure.

I think we get around it by using the slang term minifig.

I first started asking in the fall of 2018 for this issue to be corrected. In
fact, I made a list of all the different types of things BrickLink considers
to be "minifigs":

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2489#FigureTypes

I've not gotten any responses whatsoever to my requests to change the way
we refer to figures. But we really need updates to the way figures are handled
in inventories before we approve more of these kinds of figure assemblies for
catalog addition.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:27

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

I just find it ridiculous that anyone, but especially a company owned by LEGO
themselves, would refer to a DUPLO train as a minifigure. LEGO used to appear
to be so protective and careful with their use of the word minifigure previously
to not apply to things like droids, Unikitty, skeletons, and so on but I guess
if they are supporting these changes then they must be OK with it.

Author:

par016

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:20

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

From the last thread on this. Some discrepancies and categories that don't
make much sense:

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1228547

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1228637

-Pete

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:15

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

In Catalog, Stellar writes:

Why is
[27928]
moved to plate, modified
and
[2401]
moved to plate, wedge?

Please see the definitions of those categories on this recently-updated page:

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=1568

I think the wedge base should be the defining characteristic.

As always, if you or any other member want to offer suggestions for redefining
categories that are an improvement you're welcome to do so.

There are other parts in the wedge, plate category that have modifications apart
from the wedge.

Right, and the list is not complete yet. It won't be complete until March
1st (and subject to review/approval during March).

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 11:09

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 07:25

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

Similarly, nearly all the brickheadz are brick built characters

41585-1 (Inv) Batman
91 Parts, 2017
Sets: BrickHeadz: Super Heroes: The LEGO Batman Movie

so the relevant assemblies should be moved to minifigures.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 07:22

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

Move to minifigure:

spa0009 (Inv) Sparkks - Set 70316
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0010 (Inv) Groot - Set 76020
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0011 (Inv) Ares - Set 76075
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0012 (Inv) Giant-Man - Set 76051
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0013 (Inv) The Sentinel - Set 76022
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0015 (Inv) Sarlacc - Set 6210 - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0016 (Inv) Sarlacc - Set 9496 - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0017 (Inv) Sarlacc - Set 75174 - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0018 (Inv) DLC-13 Mining Droid - Set 9494
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0019 (Inv) Ent / Treebeard - Set 10237
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0020 (Inv) Fenris Wolf - Set 76084 - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0021 (Inv) Abilisk - Set 76081 - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0032 (Inv) Snow Monster, Frozen (Marshmallow) - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0033 (Inv) Giant Stone Warrior - Set 70669
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0034 (Inv) Steppenwolf - Set 76087
Parts: Special Assembly

spa0044 (Inv) Grawp - Set 75967 - Brick Built
Parts: Special Assembly

Author:

infinibrix

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 06:51

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

In Catalog, yorbrick writes:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

4530-1 (Inv) The Hulk
39 Parts, 2012
Sets: Super Heroes: Buildable Figures: Avengers

Reading between the lines here I figure (no pun intended) that you don't
think the current system used by Bricklink to define what makes a minifigure
a minifigure makes a whole lot of sense? Well I don't disagree....

Personally I've always felt that a minifigure should only be defined as minifigure
if the build includes that all important standard Torso design:-

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1192759

It may not be the perfect solution but at least we would then have some kind
of guidelines to follow which will prevent any old buildable character (however
large) from being categoried alongside what most would consider an actual minifigure?

Author:

Stellar

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 06:14

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

Why is

27928 Wedge, Plate 2 x 2 Pentagonal with Center Stud and 1 x 1/2 Raised Tab on Top
Parts: Wedge, Plate

moved to plate, modified

and

2401 Wedge, Plate 10 x 10 with 4 x 4 Cutout and Cut Corner
Parts: Wedge, Plate

moved to plate, wedge?

I think the wedge base should be the defining characteristic.

There are other parts in the wedge, plate category that have modifications apart
from the wedge.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 05:57

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

4530-1 (Inv) The Hulk
39 Parts, 2012
Sets: Super Heroes: Buildable Figures: Avengers

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 12, 2021 05:51

Subject:

Re: Category Changes, Part Two

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Catalog, StormChaser writes:

Okay, we're ready to hear what you want moved.

Now these are minifigures:

tms06 (Inv) Duplo Thomas
Minifigures: DUPLO: DUPLO, Train: Thomas & Friends

Shouldn't these parts and similar

[p=52053]

be moved into a new category: Parts Duplo Minifigure Modified head

Or get rid of the minifigures category completely by renaming it, then have a
minifigures category inside that so that the word minifigures corresponds to
what LEGO and most LEGO fans call minifigures, figures assembled from minifigure
parts.

Author:

jedvii

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 20:29

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

I'm surprised you aren't calling it a Bar 4L with Stud holder on end.

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, peregrinator writes:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Does that mean that others like this

3957 Antenna 4H - Round Top
Parts: Antenna

to 4H?

Yes, I believe so.

It should at least by 1 x 1 x 4 - then the height would be implicit. I don't
think we have this option with the antenna in the OP since that doesn't have
a stud holder - it doesn't have a length and width, only a height.

I would be fine with doing it that way, also.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 17:44

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Catalog, peregrinator writes:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Does that mean that others like this

3957 Antenna 4H - Round Top
Parts: Antenna

to 4H?

Yes, I believe so.

I would be fine with doing it that way, also.

Author:

peregrinator

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 17:43

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Does that mean that others like this

3957 Antenna 4H - Round Top
Parts: Antenna

to 4H?

Yes, I believe so.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 17:41

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Does that mean that others like this

3957 Antenna 4H - Round Top
Parts: Antenna

to 4H?

Yes, I believe so.

Author:

Hexy

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 17:04

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

Does that mean that others like this

3957 Antenna 4H - Round Top
Parts: Antenna

to 4H?

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Ok, thanks. do you think it's worth changing it to an L measurement?

No. Since it is an antenna, it should be measured in brick heights.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 17:01

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

Ok, thanks. do you think it's worth changing it to an L measurement?

No. Since it is an antenna, it should be measured in brick heights.

Author:

Hexy

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 17:00

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Ok, thanks. do you think it's worth changing it to an L measurement?

In Catalog, randyf writes:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

I've noticed that

104 Antenna 6H - No Stud Holder
Parts: Antenna

is the only piece that has 6H. Does anyone know the difference between a 6L and
6H?

6L would mean 6 studs long (~48mm). I assume 6H would mean 6 bricks high? I don't
know, since I have never seen something like this in the catalog.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 16:57

Subject:

Re: 6H or 6L

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Catalog, The_RealRedHex writes:

I've noticed that

104 Antenna 6H - No Stud Holder
Parts: Antenna

is the only piece that has 6H. Does anyone know the difference between a 6L and
6H?
Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

6L would mean 6 studs long (~48mm). I assume 6H would mean 6 bricks high? I don't
know, since I have never seen something like this in the catalog.

Author:

Hexy

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 16:51

Subject:

6H or 6L

Viewed:

98 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

I've noticed that

104 Antenna 6H - No Stud Holder
Parts: Antenna

is the only piece that has 6H. Does anyone know the difference between a 6L and
6H?
Regards,
Theo - The_RealRedHex

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 11:39

Subject:

Re: 4150px33 variant

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Catalog, normann1974 writes:

So maybe the other suggestion, I proposed?

"Does this warrant a split or should a note be added?"

Yes, in this instance the standard procedure for newly-discovered variants of
all kinds can be followed:

1. Submit a comparison photo showing the differences.

2. Request an additional note. This can be done by including a message
to us with the photo submission or, if you'd prefer a more formal approach,
with a discussion forum catalog request.

3. Request that an item relationship be added for the part as an unsplit
part variant.

Author:

normann1974

Posted:

Feb 11, 2021 11:11

Subject:

Re: 4150px33 variant

Viewed:

26 times

Topic: