Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | paolocolombo  | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:37 | | Subject: | Set 8496 counterparts inventory | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Point out that in the inventory set 8496 some counterparts are missing:
- 61070 Lime Technic, Panel Car Mudguard Right with sticker
- 61071 Lime Technic, Panel Car Mudguard Left with sticker
- 61069 (2x) Dark Bluish Gray Technic, Block Engine Block Half / Side Intake
with sticker orange outfun and black rhino
- 61069 (2x) Dark Bluish Gray Technic, Block Engine Panel Half / Side Intake
with green sticker 65
|
 |
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:28 | | Subject: | Re: 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=261
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:27 | | Subject: | Re: 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| | In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
Length and width are measured in studs, but height is measured in brick heights.
These slopes have the same height as 3 bricks stacked on top of each other.
|
And that is why exactly many submitters make that mistake when submitting measurements
of part to the catalog.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:11 | | Subject: | Re: 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
Length and width are measured in studs, but height is measured in brick heights.
These slopes have the same height as 3 bricks stacked on top of each other.
|
|
| Author: | JusTiCe8 | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:08 | | Subject: | 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 98 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
|
|
| Author: | gloudo | | Posted: | Aug 10, 2019 07:56 | | Subject: | Re: Alternate Item Relations | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, gloudo writes:
| | Hi All,
I'm building a database in MS Access where I want to compare my sets with
a different set to see if I can build the different set with the parts I have.
What I like to know is, is there a downloadable table with related items, so
if I don't have the original inventory item the DB will search the alternative
items to see if there is a match and give me the quantity of the alternate item?
Or is there an other way to relate the alternate item to the original inventory
item?
Thanx
|
Thanx all for the quick replies.
I found a downloadable table on rebrickable. For me that is the most useful solution
for my problem.
|
|
|
| Author: | Soviet | | Posted: | Aug 10, 2019 07:30 | | Subject: | Re: Alternate Item Relations | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, gloudo writes:
| | Hi All,
I'm building a database in MS Access where I want to compare my sets with
a different set to see if I can build the different set with the parts I have.
What I like to know is, is there a downloadable table with related items, so
if I don't have the original inventory item the DB will search the alternative
items to see if there is a match and give me the quantity of the alternate item?
Or is there an other way to relate the alternate item to the original inventory
item?
Thanx
|
Have you heard about Rebrickable.com?
|
|
| Author: | gloudo | | Posted: | Aug 10, 2019 07:22 | | Subject: | Alternate Item Relations | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi All,
I'm building a database in MS Access where I want to compare my sets with
a different set to see if I can build the different set with the parts I have.
What I like to know is, is there a downloadable table with related items, so
if I don't have the original inventory item the DB will search the alternative
items to see if there is a match and give me the quantity of the alternate item?
Or is there an other way to relate the alternate item to the original inventory
item?
Thanx
|
|
| Author: | Hypersync | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 22:54 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Try sildenafil. Might help.
John P
|
Wonder how many googled sildenafil. Now I get it... I Think 
|
|
| Author: | Hypersync | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 22:50 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Same here using Chrome Windows 10. Checked it at the work computer with Firefox
and same... No large images on click. I really hope they fix it soon. Really
slow looking up minifig torsos or the figs themselves.
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 18:12 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, calsbricks writes:
| |
Tried it here on w7 ie11 - no problems whatsoever. Sounds like it could be womething
at your end. Which broiwsers have you tried?
|
I get no large (pop up) images on Windows 7 with IE11. The thumbnail images are
no longer live links.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 18:05 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
I have the same bug. It is not just you. Windows 7: Firefox, Chrome, etc. Logged
in, logged out, doesn't matter.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 15:16 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, calsbricks writes:
| | In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Tried it here on w7 ie11 - no problems whatsoever. Sounds like it could be womething
at your end. Which broiwsers have you tried?
|
Mozilla Firefox on the laptop, Google Chrome on the other laptop, and I believe
Opera Browser on the computer. This is very very weird.
|
|
| Author: | legoman77 | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 15:01 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Try sildenafil. Might help.
John P
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:49 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Tried it here on w7 ie11 - no problems whatsoever. Sounds like it could be womething
at your end. Which broiwsers have you tried?
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:30 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BrainOfTheBrick writes:
| | It still works for me. Hopefully it's another one of these short-lived bugs
that are becoming more and more frequent.
|
Huh, that's odd... I thought it might be my laptop at first but I tried three
other devices and they all have the same problem. The clicker doesn't change
shape when over the picture and clicking does absolutely nothing.
|
| Author: | BrainOfTheBrick | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:27 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| It still works for me. Hopefully it's another one of these short-lived bugs
that are becoming more and more frequent.
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:24 | | Subject: | Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 120 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
| Author: | SRC | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 19:23 | | Subject: | New Tote Bag (was Re: size and weight) | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
I used the link to enter the size and weight of a new set,
but how does one add an entirely new item? In this case,
the VIP exclusive reversible tote bag # 5005910 ?
SRC
|
|
| Author: | carluiscruz | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 12:26 | | Subject: | Re: 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, carluiscruz writes:
| | Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
this
variant (better picture of minifig color)
|
Many thanks,
As a matter of fact, the minifigure is the one presented as . Now I
can store it in a propoer way, in my collection.
Best regards,
Cruz
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 11:02 | | Subject: | Re: 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, carluiscruz writes:
| | Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
this
variant (better picture of minifig color)
|
|
| Author: | carluiscruz | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 10:49 | | Subject: | 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Aug 4, 2019 17:49 | | Subject: | 973pb3600c01 | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
Has anyone actually seen this part in a BAM box with the mitt attached? I have
seen multiple of them in three different stores now, and they do not have the
mitt. They have a single hand and a missing hand. You can add either a mitt or
a hand, staff don't care.
So should this be listed with a mitt, given that this is not how it is supplied?
Or at least have a note about this, as not all the torsos will have mitts.
|
|
| Author: | anathema | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 17:42 | | Subject: | 128-2 - colour of winch reel | | Viewed: | 95 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
The instructions show the reel in the winch to be black; the inventory here has
it as red.
Does anyone know for certain which colour the set actually shipped with?
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 12:16 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | […]
It is hard to believe that Lego makes
mistakes, most of us think that they are gods on Mt Olympus. They also contribute
to problems and often in the distant past put whatever they had into sets. The
old set 800 (I think that that is the number) called for a garage and they substituted
something totally different. They had ran out of the correct parts.
|
Considering Greek gods are far from paragons of perfection, subject to their
whims, inconsistent, unreasonable, and uncaring of us, mortals, I’d say “most
of us” are on to something here 
|
|
| Author: | legoman77 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:55 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
Could you have had 497?
|
No, my instructions say 928. But 497 doesn't seem to change anything with
respect to these plates.
/Jan
|
I had a couple of these and I sort of remember a problem like you are writing
about. But my memory is a bit foggy. It is hard to believe that Lego makes
mistakes, most of us think that they are gods on Mt Olympus. They also contribute
to problems and often in the distant past put whatever they had into sets. The
old set 800 (I think that that is the number) called for a garage and they substituted
something totally different. They had ran out of the correct parts.
John P
|
|
| Author: | Brick.Door | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
I had this set as a child and don't recall anything like that. And I built
and un-builthe it 100 times.
Probably the consistency and quality control weren't as high back then. I
expect you just had a copy of the set with a packing error.
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:38 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
Could you have had 497?
|
No, my instructions say 928. But 497 doesn't seem to change anything with
respect to these plates.
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | legoman77 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 11:22 | | Subject: | Re: 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
Could you have had 497?
John P
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 10:58 | | Subject: | 928 wrong plate? | | Viewed: | 117 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| When I got set as a child, I remember clearly it had one plate of wrong
size in it (different from the one shown in the instructions), and from my recollection
it was the plate that held the control patterned slopes (it should be a 4 x 10
plate). The plate in my set was either 2 studs too long or too short, but I don't
remember which. Unfortunately, I switched the plate to a correct one long time
ago, so I can't prove anything about this today.
Does anyone else remember something like this?
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 31, 2019 07:07 | | Subject: | New wire version for set 156-1 | | Viewed: | 79 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
In my sealed version of set the connectors are 'Cross-cut'
and not 'Hollow Pin'
The current wire in inventory is this one:
I know wire are on hold for now (project #15)
A) shall I create a new cross-cut connectors wire for 15 studs and modify inventory
(as alternate)?
B) I create inventory request with:
and
I prefer option (A).
As every wire length for same type of connectors are going to grow or reduce
the same size depending of project #15.
For example: if wire 996ac15blue need to be adjusted +1 studs, new wire on option
(A) will also grow +1 studs
-Fred
|
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 19:42 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 83 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| | In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
I presume you reported the listing? If so then it will get removed
|
What might work faster than reporting it is contacting the seller. Tell them
that you think they made an error in the listing and they should probably fix
it.
For those dishonest sellers who do this on purpose, they're not really helping
themselves. Nobody who wants a new set is actually going to buy one that isn't,
and someone who doesn't mind a used, incomplete set for a better deal is
probably going to hide all new listings. They're basically harming their
own business and are giving themselves a bad name. I'm not going to order
from someone who purposely is dishonest on listings, what else might they be
lying about?
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 15:09 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
I'd bet $2.30 that one is from the 1988 set and the other is from the 1969-1972
sets.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 15:06 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
Pattern is completly different. Add new part.
|
Okay,
Shall I create 2 new parts for "Thick" and "Thin" ?
Actual 649pb10 should be "unterminated"
-Fred
|
Yes, create two specific entries so that the original entry will be able to be
marked for deletion and set to undetermined.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 12:12 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Question for other SW collectors - is it common knowledge that sealed polybags
will sometimes cost much less than the minifigure itself?
|
I've run into friends polybags that are the same way. I always try to keep
sets together for resale, but sometimes I'm shocked that its not worth it
for the tiny sets.
I also just finished a Ninjago set recently where the figure was rare-ish and
more than I wanted to pay and I found a seller who had parted a bunch of that
fig out and was able to buy him in pieces for far less than buying the assembled
fig. Its normally the reverse.
::shrug::
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 12:08 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
FWIW I had a 4 cent part get removed/flagged very recently because I had somehow
hit new on it when listing it (it was bizzare because the rest of the part out
was marked used with comments stating "good for used" or something to that affect).
So there is either a person or an algorithim out there doing something.
|
|
| Author: | BricksThatStick | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 11:57 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
I presume you reported the listing? If so then it will get removed
|
|
| Author: | tpr | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 11:03 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, gogogovro writes:
| | Just a thought... this might not bother you as much if you only concerned yourself
about what your own margin is on the sets you sell instead of going by the 6
mo. average... which (for sets) is never a good idea in my opinion.
I mean, perhaps the seller just parted out the minifig and forgot to change the
condition from new, sealed to new, incomplete. Does he deserve our wrath, no.
A friendly reminder by a fellow brick linker, yes.
It's easy to get self righteous about things like this... but people make
mistakes... I'm assuming this seller is a human not a robot and it is human
to err.
In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
|
|
Maybe
Once a mistake
Two possibly
A lot - definitely not a mistake
Check out his set listings
tpr
| | | |
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
|
|
|
| Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 10:54 | | Subject: | Re: Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Just a thought... this might not bother you as much if you only concerned yourself
about what your own margin is on the sets you sell instead of going by the 6
mo. average... which (for sets) is never a good idea in my opinion.
I mean, perhaps the seller just parted out the minifig and forgot to change the
condition from new, sealed to new, incomplete. Does he deserve our wrath, no.
A friendly reminder by a fellow brick linker, yes.
It's easy to get self righteous about things like this... but people make
mistakes... I'm assuming this seller is a human not a robot and it is human
to err.
In Catalog, tpr writes:
| | Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 10:04 | | Subject: | Re: 21045 Trafalgar Square | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WorcesterWolf writes:
| | When will the parts list be updated?
It is available on Brickset
|
When someone who owns the set decides to submit the inventory to BrickLink.
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | tpr | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 09:58 | | Subject: | Hair pulling - item for sale ......... | | Viewed: | 176 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi
Ever bought a new set, SEALED, but with No Minifig
check out the cheapest new set for sale
Surely this has to stop
tpr
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 09:40 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
Pattern is completly different. Add new part.
|
Okay,
Shall I create 2 new parts for "Thick" and "Thin" ?
Actual 649pb10 should be "unterminated"
-Fred
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 08:46 | | Subject: | Re: New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| | I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
Pattern is completly different. Add new part.
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 08:35 | | Subject: | New version of 649pb10 | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| I found a new version of
As you can see on the picture, the men is not the same on both sign
Should I create a new part, or request to add an additional note ?
It will be difficult to know which part goes on which set.
|
|
| Author: | WorcesterWolf | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 05:28 | | Subject: | 21045 Trafalgar Square | | Viewed: | 85 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| When will the parts list be updated?
It is available on Brickset
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jul 30, 2019 00:08 | | Subject: | Re: Pattern spelt wrong | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, talltim writes:
This struck me as funny as 'spelt' looks like it is spelled wrong to
me.
Had to look it up...
Jen
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
