Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | paolocolombo  | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:37 | | Subject: | Set 8496 counterparts inventory | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Point out that in the inventory set 8496 some counterparts are missing:
- 61070 Lime Technic, Panel Car Mudguard Right with sticker
- 61071 Lime Technic, Panel Car Mudguard Left with sticker
- 61069 (2x) Dark Bluish Gray Technic, Block Engine Block Half / Side Intake
with sticker orange outfun and black rhino
- 61069 (2x) Dark Bluish Gray Technic, Block Engine Panel Half / Side Intake
with green sticker 65
|
 |
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:28 | | Subject: | Re: 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=261
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:27 | | Subject: | Re: 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| | In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
Length and width are measured in studs, but height is measured in brick heights.
These slopes have the same height as 3 bricks stacked on top of each other.
|
And that is why exactly many submitters make that mistake when submitting measurements
of part to the catalog.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:11 | | Subject: | Re: 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
Length and width are measured in studs, but height is measured in brick heights.
These slopes have the same height as 3 bricks stacked on top of each other.
|
|
| Author: | JusTiCe8 | | Posted: | Aug 11, 2019 06:08 | | Subject: | 4460 a/b: wrong height | | Viewed: | 98 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
Looks like this parts:
is taller than described as it is 4 studs high instead of 3 unless there is a
way to measure height I don't know.
Fortunately, there is no 3 studs high slope and I believe any MOCers using the
part just call it by its name and there would be no issue when building.
Strangely, part and all its variants looks like to be also 4 studs
high and not 3 (last pic clearly shows the same aspect ratio as 4460).
By the way 3684 is not marked for deletion yet.
Where was the issue ? "It's not you it's us" or just me ?
Thanks.
|
|
|
| Author: | gloudo | | Posted: | Aug 10, 2019 07:56 | | Subject: | Re: Alternate Item Relations | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, gloudo writes:
| | Hi All,
I'm building a database in MS Access where I want to compare my sets with
a different set to see if I can build the different set with the parts I have.
What I like to know is, is there a downloadable table with related items, so
if I don't have the original inventory item the DB will search the alternative
items to see if there is a match and give me the quantity of the alternate item?
Or is there an other way to relate the alternate item to the original inventory
item?
Thanx
|
Thanx all for the quick replies.
I found a downloadable table on rebrickable. For me that is the most useful solution
for my problem.
|
|
|
| Author: | Soviet | | Posted: | Aug 10, 2019 07:30 | | Subject: | Re: Alternate Item Relations | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, gloudo writes:
| | Hi All,
I'm building a database in MS Access where I want to compare my sets with
a different set to see if I can build the different set with the parts I have.
What I like to know is, is there a downloadable table with related items, so
if I don't have the original inventory item the DB will search the alternative
items to see if there is a match and give me the quantity of the alternate item?
Or is there an other way to relate the alternate item to the original inventory
item?
Thanx
|
Have you heard about Rebrickable.com?
|
|
| Author: | gloudo | | Posted: | Aug 10, 2019 07:22 | | Subject: | Alternate Item Relations | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi All,
I'm building a database in MS Access where I want to compare my sets with
a different set to see if I can build the different set with the parts I have.
What I like to know is, is there a downloadable table with related items, so
if I don't have the original inventory item the DB will search the alternative
items to see if there is a match and give me the quantity of the alternate item?
Or is there an other way to relate the alternate item to the original inventory
item?
Thanx
|
|
| Author: | Hypersync | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 22:54 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, legoman77 writes:
| | In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Try sildenafil. Might help.
John P
|
Wonder how many googled sildenafil. Now I get it... I Think 
|
|
| Author: | Hypersync | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 22:50 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Same here using Chrome Windows 10. Checked it at the work computer with Firefox
and same... No large images on click. I really hope they fix it soon. Really
slow looking up minifig torsos or the figs themselves.
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 18:12 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, calsbricks writes:
| |
Tried it here on w7 ie11 - no problems whatsoever. Sounds like it could be womething
at your end. Which broiwsers have you tried?
|
I get no large (pop up) images on Windows 7 with IE11. The thumbnail images are
no longer live links.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 18:05 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
I have the same bug. It is not just you. Windows 7: Firefox, Chrome, etc. Logged
in, logged out, doesn't matter.
Jen
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 15:16 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, calsbricks writes:
| | In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Tried it here on w7 ie11 - no problems whatsoever. Sounds like it could be womething
at your end. Which broiwsers have you tried?
|
Mozilla Firefox on the laptop, Google Chrome on the other laptop, and I believe
Opera Browser on the computer. This is very very weird.
|
|
| Author: | legoman77 | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 15:01 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Try sildenafil. Might help.
John P
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:49 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, firestar246 writes:
| | So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
Tried it here on w7 ie11 - no problems whatsoever. Sounds like it could be womething
at your end. Which broiwsers have you tried?
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:30 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BrainOfTheBrick writes:
| | It still works for me. Hopefully it's another one of these short-lived bugs
that are becoming more and more frequent.
|
Huh, that's odd... I thought it might be my laptop at first but I tried three
other devices and they all have the same problem. The clicker doesn't change
shape when over the picture and clicking does absolutely nothing.
|
| Author: | BrainOfTheBrick | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:27 | | Subject: | Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| It still works for me. Hopefully it's another one of these short-lived bugs
that are becoming more and more frequent.
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | Aug 9, 2019 14:24 | | Subject: | Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? | | Viewed: | 120 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| So you used to be able to click on the picture of a piece in the catalog, sort
of a quick view. You'd see the years it was made, any sets/minifigures the
piece was in, etc. You all know what I'm talking about. Well, a few days
ago I couldn't do it anymore. I've tried three different devices.
Why would they make such a horrible change for? I rely on that heavily when listing
minifigure parts to make sure I have the correct listing. This is going to make
this job twice as long now.
|
| Author: | SRC | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 19:23 | | Subject: | New Tote Bag (was Re: size and weight) | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
I used the link to enter the size and weight of a new set,
but how does one add an entirely new item? In this case,
the VIP exclusive reversible tote bag # 5005910 ?
SRC
|
|
| Author: | carluiscruz | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 12:26 | | Subject: | Re: 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, carluiscruz writes:
| | Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
this
variant (better picture of minifig color)
|
Many thanks,
As a matter of fact, the minifigure is the one presented as . Now I
can store it in a propoer way, in my collection.
Best regards,
Cruz
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 11:02 | | Subject: | Re: 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, carluiscruz writes:
| | Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
this
variant (better picture of minifig color)
|
|
| Author: | carluiscruz | | Posted: | Aug 5, 2019 10:49 | | Subject: | 973pb0679c01 | | Viewed: | 67 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Good evening,
I just bought a LEGO minifig with the part torso 973pb0679c01. This torso is
not associated here to none complete minifig, with just the information that
is from 1980. The minifig head in my hands have a small ring, possibly indicating
the minifig was part of a keychan. Could anyone provide me more information about
this curious item?
Best regards,
Cruz
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Aug 4, 2019 17:49 | | Subject: | 973pb3600c01 | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
Has anyone actually seen this part in a BAM box with the mitt attached? I have
seen multiple of them in three different stores now, and they do not have the
mitt. They have a single hand and a missing hand. You can add either a mitt or
a hand, staff don't care.
So should this be listed with a mitt, given that this is not how it is supplied?
Or at least have a note about this, as not all the torsos will have mitts.
|
|
| Author: | anathema | | Posted: | Aug 1, 2019 17:42 | | Subject: | 128-2 - colour of winch reel | | Viewed: | 95 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
The instructions show the reel in the winch to be black; the inventory here has
it as red.
Does anyone know for certain which colour the set actually shipped with?
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
