Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Mistress_Lisa | Posted: | Mar 13, 2019 13:10 | Subject: | Help adding stickered parts please? | Viewed: | 76 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I have several stickered parts that I would like to add to the catalog. It has
been ages that I have done this, so I forget how to do it. Is it adding or changing
to the catalog? Is it a change or addition to the item or the inventory? In other
words, I am not even sure where to start any more! Anyone have a link and some
advice, please?
Lisa
|
Author: | Cob | Posted: | Mar 13, 2019 00:06 | Subject: | Ninjago Minifigs in Other | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why are the Ninjago minifigures listed in Other?
Example
Within BrickStock they are listed in both Ninjago and in (Other).
The title on the minifig says "Minifigs: Ninjago: (Other)"
|
Author: | Hurt | Posted: | Mar 11, 2019 19:44 | Subject: | How to check: Sticker-Parts already submitted | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi everyone,
how can I check if the stickered counterparts for a set are already submitted,
but pending?
I have the stickered parts for this set here on my desk:
Should I add them to the catalog or are they already submitted but approval is
pending? Thanks!
|
Author: | Hurt | Posted: | Mar 11, 2019 16:58 | Subject: | What color of round plate on Light-Up Vader? | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi everyone,
can anyone tell me what color the 1 x 1 round plate on the lightsaber of the
Light-Up Darth Vader has?
Looks like flat silver to me - or light bluish gray? Maybe this information can
be added to the already existing note about the 1 x 1 round plate?
Thanks!
|
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Mar 10, 2019 15:57 | Subject: | Factory assembled 4624 version (glued?) | Viewed: | 141 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I've just sorted out all my spare wheel/tire parts today. Most of the 4624
assemblies (wheel/tire) could easily be disassembled, but I've noticed that
some (10-20% of the ones I found, which amouts to about 50 pieces) are more difficult
(I must use excessive force and a tool, e.g. a pen). A few even seem impossible
to disassemble. Could all these be the factory pre-assembled wheels?
Looking closer through a magnifying glass, some wheels look either deformed/melted
or there's possibly some white glue spilling out. I don't believe they
were glued by a previous owner because I have only seen very few glued parts
in lots I've bought, and there are too many wheels that show this.
So two questions arise:
1) Are the (factory) pre-assembled wheels harder to disassemble than the later
ones that were not pre-assembled?
2) Could any of the pre-assembled parts (e.g. early versions) be glued or melted
together?
/Jan
|
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Mar 7, 2019 16:47 | Subject: | Update requested | Viewed: | 138 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| So, what is the status of the new Catalog Admin search? Things are backing up... |
|
Author: | bb1176220 | Posted: | Mar 7, 2019 12:08 | Subject: | How should i name this set? | Viewed: | 236 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Last question about it, i hope.
I want to add this set to the catalog, but how should i number/name it? There
is no set number to be found.
|
|
Author: | bb1176220 | Posted: | Mar 6, 2019 09:40 | Subject: | Part nr. 170900 | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I acquired in the meantime the 'mystery' set i posted about in this subforum,
and it had on the poster several stickers with this typenumber. I googled it,
but nothing came up.
|
|
Author: | _nstbodensee_ | Posted: | Mar 4, 2019 18:25 | Subject: | My contributions,approval pending for months | Viewed: | 130 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,when will my contributions 11 new items pending,and 21 new images pending
be approved? Best regards
|
Author: | bb1176220 | Posted: | Mar 3, 2019 16:03 | Subject: | What is the ID of this set? | Viewed: | 194 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Does anybody knows the ID of this set? It is a 3pack of sets 6815, 6854 and 6899.
They are boxed in a bigger box with a poster inside. Can't find it in the
bricklink indexes.
|
|
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Mar 3, 2019 11:41 | Subject: | Minifig dimensions being defaulted ? | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| When any minifig is picked and added to a shopping cart, is the checkout system
supplying a default dimension, or is it trying to do it strictly on weight and
ignoring the dimensions ?
Measuring a random fig (with no wig/hat or other tools) with a caliper yielded
the following numbers …
40.9 mm high(Y)
10.0 mm deep(Z) at head
25.0 mm wide(X) at hands
If the system is supplying no numbers, are those viable ?
My concern is that IC will continue to fill a small box (or letter envelope)
with figs, but ignore the fact that the box has exceeded its dimensional capacity
(because it doesn't know the dimensions of the figs).
Nita Rae
|
|
Author: | IndoorJungle | Posted: | Mar 2, 2019 18:25 | Subject: | New set to add: 66583-1 | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Noticed that there's a set out there that hasn't been added to the catalog
yet.
It's a combo pack, but arrives in its own white set packaging with a special
item number. According to the box, it is set # 66583-1
It includes:
Item can be viewed on Amazon here:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07C8LDN5J/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Hope it'll get added soon!
|
|
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Mar 1, 2019 19:23 | Subject: | Length of hoses in set 8051 | Viewed: | 74 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi
In set
the hoses are 11L in sealed sets. But the instructions require the builder to
cut 1L off them (see page 39), so that they are 10L. So when selling a used set,
including 10L hoses should be okay. Also, two 1L hoses could be added to make
the set 100% complete. But at this point, the inventory only states 11L hoses
are valid contents of this set.
How should this situation be handled? Should 10L hoses be added as alternates
or counterparts? And should the 1L hoses be added as extras?
/Jan
|
|
Author: | mfav | Posted: | Mar 1, 2019 13:32 | Subject: | 48729 variations (3 not 2) | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| So, this. |
|
Author: | Bendix | Posted: | Mar 1, 2019 10:52 | Subject: | How to list? | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| How and where to list keychain figures with logo on the back, please? These figures
are leftovers from production and never had a chain.
Thanks in advance
Beryll
|
|
Author: | JLRSextra | Posted: | Feb 27, 2019 09:18 | Subject: | Last Request today - Pin and Paddle | Viewed: | 107 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello All,
Thank you all for your amazing quick replies to my queries this morning. Great
BrickLink community!
These have a pin with a split semi-circle paddle(?) on the other side. Is this
LEGO?
|
|
Author: | JLRSextra | Posted: | Feb 27, 2019 09:12 | Subject: | Minifig Katana - is this Lego | Viewed: | 141 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello All,
I have a dark gray sword, looks like a Katana. But the only one's listed
have an Octoganol or Square guard. This is definitely a round guard only. Is
this LEGO?
|
|
Author: | JLRSextra | Posted: | Feb 27, 2019 09:01 | Subject: | Please help id part | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello All,
Can you please let me know what this is. Bionicle? Hero Factory? Technic?
Thank you.
|
|
Author: | JLRSextra | Posted: | Feb 27, 2019 08:37 | Subject: | Please help id Brick 2x3 axle and button | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Please help identify this one Brick, Modified 2x3 with axle hole and yellow button.
Light Bluish Gray with Dark Bluish Gray bottom. J8 in one of the bottom stud
wells.
|
|
Author: | JETTY | Posted: | Feb 26, 2019 08:38 | Subject: | Unknown Lego part, 2 x 2 curved Top? | Viewed: | 170 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Sorting through a lot from a former LEGO employer I fount these unknown parts,
I cant seem to find them in the catalog, guess they are test bricks?
The other ones are 30165 in unusual colors, now for sale in my shop
|
|
Author: | bb1237701 | Posted: | Feb 25, 2019 15:55 | Subject: | Window Identification please | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I can't seem to find the number for this window, 4x2, 2x2, with shutter slots
and stop ridge in yellow:
|
|
Author: | chetzler | Posted: | Feb 23, 2019 18:12 | Subject: | New Dark Orange Drumstick? | Viewed: | 131 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I just parted out 5 of
One had the standard drumstick
The other four contained a longer version, but it was not
I'm pretty sure I can make out a part number of 42876. It is noticeably
longer than 33057, the molding pip is in a different location, and the grip is
smooth rather than textured. Can anyone else confirm the existence of this part
(see image, 33057 is on the right)?
|
|
|
Author: | snapper212 | Posted: | Feb 23, 2019 17:20 | Subject: | search box repeated problem | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi, might be a stupid question, but I have had a long running problem with the
search box.
Is it just me, maybe a browser issue? I am using Chrome.
Just now I typed in 4032(2x2 round plate) and it would not bring it up.Tried
it 3 times. Yet when I checked the catalogue manually that is the correct number.
I can go to google to search Lego and 98% of the time just a single search shows
me what I want on the first try.
Thanks.
|
Author: | Bartholomew1976 | Posted: | Feb 20, 2019 07:00 | Subject: | Lego Discovery Center Fabrik Promo Brick 2014 | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello
is it possible that this brick is not listed ? i only find the 2015 2016 and
2012 Version.
|
|
Author: | Bartholomew1976 | Posted: | Feb 20, 2019 06:59 | Subject: | Lego Discovery Center Fabrik Promo Brick 2014 | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello
is it possible that this brick is not listed ? i only find the 2015 2016 and
2012 Version.
|
|
Author: | kulturbaronen | Posted: | Feb 19, 2019 13:44 | Subject: | Why is Finch Dallow sw1005 from 2017? | Viewed: | 106 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why is the rare Star Wars minifigure Finch Dallow (sw1005) registered under 2017?
I know the original LEGO set (Resistance Bomber) was released in 2017, but the
re-release of the set - which included the new Finch Dallow minifig - is from
late 2018.
Or am I wrong?
|
Author: | yoavheskia | Posted: | Feb 18, 2019 16:51 | Subject: | part 981 Arm, Left | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| This part appears in 59 different colors. Why it's not in the top of the
list of Catalog Statistics Parts Appearing in Sets in Most Colors?
|
Author: | JRBricks | Posted: | Feb 18, 2019 16:11 | Subject: | 120V AC Adapter Help | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have several of these adapters from Mindstorm sets from several years ago but
they aren’t listed. It’s element 45541, which I don’t see anything for. I’d like
to list these but not sure if I should make a custom entry. Any help would be
greatly appreciated! Thanks
|
|
Author: | JulieK | Posted: | Feb 17, 2019 12:39 | Subject: | CMF 18 individual figure entries | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Before I waste anybody's time with a request...is there a reason why the
individual figs from the CMF 18 series do not include "Minifigure only Entry"
in their titles?
I'd be happy to submit the requests, but, like I said, I don't want to
waste anybody's time having to deny/close out the requests
Thanks!
|
Author: | legoman007 | Posted: | Feb 15, 2019 13:47 | Subject: | 3703 Technic, Brick 1 x 16 with Holes | Viewed: | 82 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi all,
please add the color brown to the item 3703.
I have some of them and can't see it in the available colors.
Thanks, Martin
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 23:40 | Subject: | Baby body grip capabilities | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| In the first LEGO Movie 2 preview ( https://youtu.be/XvHSlHhh1gk?t=31 ) the sewer
babies are all holding weapons and the like. Anyway, I was planning on making
my own Apocalypseburg display, and of course, I want to have some sewer babies.
My question is: Is there such a thing as a baby body that has hands that can
grip minifig scale items (3.2mm diameter)?
Thanks,
David
|
Author: | elclair | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 16:10 | Subject: | Identify old Lego piece | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hey all.
I bought a crate of used Lego and found a few of these pieces I can't identify
(or seem to find in the bricklink Catalog) It's a hollow brick with "Lego"
printed in the studs.(no reference number)
|
|
|
Author: | Brick.Door | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 12:46 | Subject: | Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets | Viewed: | 194 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| There are no plans to do so, but I hope that once the regular sales period is
finished Bricklink allows the inventory of these sets to be added to the catalog
so people can add them to a want list and buy the parts they need to build them.
Since they use mostly common parts, I think many AFOLs would prefer to build
them with the parts in their own collection, and just buy any ones they are missing.
Not only would this generate revenue for Bricklink by increased sales, it would
be an olive branch to the sellers who have been completely excluded from this
promotion.
Bricklink has done so much to build the AFOL community and it has become a verb
within our vocabulary (much like Google has in the general population). It would
be a sad irony if the sets created by Bricklink to celebrate AFOLs cannot be
Bricklinked by AFOLs.
|
|
Author: | brikomania | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 06:29 | Subject: | Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 331 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
|
Author: | stecre | Posted: | Feb 10, 2019 12:41 | Subject: | Minifigure, Utensil Tool Screwdriver - Narrow | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why is this part so expensive in DBG??
|
Author: | SteinchendeaIer | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 02:25 | Subject: | Problem with new Sticker Items | Viewed: | 121 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everybody,
I have created a part with stickers that are not yet in my catalog and a new
minifigure that is currently available in Germany directly in the store to buy
Nothing has been released so far, so I wanted to ask if I did something wrong?
greeting
Florian
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 17:34 | Subject: | Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 206 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
Author: | baylit | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 21:54 | Subject: | 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 67 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
|
Author: | Crafteewon | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 21:43 | Subject: | NJO399 and NJO410 | Viewed: | 70 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| NJO399 and NJO 410.
Just wondering if these should be moved to the ninjago minifigure category instead
of the junior category.
Just thinking someone looking for Ninjago wouldn’t look under Junior to find
them.
Also if someone can tell me how to list them so the link and photo appears it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Edward
|
Author: | bb1328448 | Posted: | Feb 5, 2019 17:06 | Subject: | Remix Emmet Blind Bag ID Number? | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi, so my son’s name is Emmett and I got him the first LEGO Movie Emmet and am
trying to find him the second Emmet for LEGO Movie 2. Does anyone know the identification
number for the blind bag Remix Emmet? Someone said it was 41S8, but that was
Scare Crow...
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Feb 5, 2019 11:34 | Subject: | Questions about Unikitty / Counterparts | Viewed: | 93 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I noticed that some of the sets from TLM and TLM2 that have Unikitty with alternate
face pieces have her listed as a Counterpart and others do not.
Just wondering if I could get the pending minifigs approved so that these are
all consistent.
Thanks!
COMCON040-1
tlm080: Cheerykitty (Cheery Kitty)
tlm081: Cutesykitty (Cutesy Kitty)
70818 - Double Decker Couch
tlm093: Unikitty - Puzzled, Sitting
tlm097: Unikitty - Unikitty - Eyes Watering, Sitting - Waiting for Approval
COMCON057-1
tlm101: Rage Kitty
tlm102: Angry Kitty
70822 - Unikitty's Sweetest Friends EVER!
tlm126: Unikitty - Lopsided Smile
tlm168: Unikitty - Eyes Closed, Smile with Tongue Out - Waiting for Approval
70831 - Emmet's Dream House/Rescue Rocket!
tlm147: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Sleeping
tlm146: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Frowning - Waiting for Approva
|
|
Author: | moreshelfspace | Posted: | Feb 3, 2019 02:33 | Subject: | Standardize name for belt with ammunition | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Some torsos have "ammunition belt" in their description and others "bandolier".
My personal vote is "ammunition belt". It makes it difficult to find a torso
in the catalog when you don't know the character or theme.
For example: "Torso Pharaoh's Quest Tan Waistcoat, White Shirt, Bandolier
and Silver Buckle Pattern (Jake Raines) / Tan Arms / Yellow Hands" (973pb0781c01)
"Torso Monster Fighters with Ammunition Belt Pattern / Dark Tan Arms / Yellow
Hands" (973pb1113c01)
These two items are similar-looking.
|
|
Author: | whitesidewjw | Posted: | Feb 2, 2019 08:20 | Subject: | Method for naming prototype parts | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have several prototype parts in my store. In fact I am thinking that I will
specialize in these types of parts. Is it possible to have a part type called
prototype? These are molded parts made by Lego that were never released in ant
set or any color.
|
Author: | jodawill | Posted: | Feb 1, 2019 10:20 | Subject: | Did the Lego Pirates books come in paperback? | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| When I look up these Lego Pirates books on Amazon, they're mostly listed
as paperbacks. Does anyone know if they were actually ever printed in paperback,
or are those Amazon listings wrong? Bricklink only shows them as being printed
in hardcover.
|
|
Author: | Edwin073 | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 14:28 | Subject: | Discount on only used parts? | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello all,
I have a question. Hope you can help me.
I would like to give all my used parts a 20% discount. How can I only select
my used parts so I can put in the discount? If I use the search option I will
get everything what's used in my inventory included my sets, instructions,
minifigures etc...
I only want my parts on discount. Do I have to do this for every parts individually
now or is there a other way?
Thanks.
Edwin
|
Author: | MarshMan80 | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 14:11 | Subject: | Lego Movie 2 set 71023 Mini Figures | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello again, its Thursday now and I'm just wondering when this will be entered
or available for us to use so me can get or product listed.
|
Author: | JulieK | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 11:49 | Subject: | Name tweaks for 64251 and 93575 | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please consider tweaking the names for 64251 and 93575 in order to make identifying
them a little easier.
Please add "3 fingers" to
Please add "4 fingers" to
Then maybe rearrange the pictures so that the images showing the fingers shows
up while browsing the catalog.
Thanks!
|
Author: | runner.caller | Posted: | Jan 30, 2019 14:41 | Subject: | Special Assembly for Hulk Buster | Viewed: | 99 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Can anyone add special Assemblies?
I'd like one added to sell the Hulkbuster suit (76104) vs breaking it down
for parts, but the one I acquired was in a used lot so I don't know for sure
if it's complete.
I guess I could find online instructions and enter in everything for him that
way.
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 11:39 | Subject: | Minifig Inventory for 70831? | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I've been uploading new parts for 70831 the past couple days, and I'm
just about ready to do a full inventory on the set, I'm just waiting for
3 minifigs that I've tried to add to be approved: tlm145, tlm146, tlm147.
I know that they're in line numerically behind other figs that will be approved
once the Apocalypseburg (7084) is approved, can I get an admin to approve them
so I can inventory them and get them added to 70831?
Thanks!
|
Author: | MarshMan80 | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 07:49 | Subject: | The LEGO movie 2 CFM | Viewed: | 102 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Anyone know when the new LEGO movie 2 CFM figures will be added to the catalogue?
I have some that I’m waiting to upload.
Thanks
|
Author: | mroppoli | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 07:27 | Subject: | Hair image incorrect | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| 92256 black image incorrect |
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jan 28, 2019 21:18 | Subject: | What Color is 25269pb002 Watermelon | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
A new CMF comes with a watermelon slice that is dark pink. Is that what this
one is? It looks like red to me in this pic.
|
Author: | brickiteasy | Posted: | Jan 27, 2019 11:42 | Subject: | Adding gear : clay key chain, 853686 | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello
Please add a key chain : Clay, Nexo Knights, item 853686
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Jan 25, 2019 10:44 | Subject: | Alternate Item Number (Spiky Unikitty Tail) | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I created the reference 42859pb01 originally (from the SDCC Unikitty from last
year) and now that 70831 is out, the instructions list it as 6253956.
There are a couple other items from that SDCC set that now have alternate numbers
as well. Is there a way I can fix the rest of them? I wasn't sure how to
do it. Thanks!
|
Author: | betabinarybrick | Posted: | Jan 24, 2019 21:10 | Subject: | set 10221-1 - SDD UCS - correct dimensions? | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I do not think the completed dimensions for this set are correct.
Super Star Destroyer - UCS
Item No: 10221-1
Lego Super Star Destroyer - UCS
Item Info
Year Released: 2011
Weight: 6965g
???
Size: 58 x 48.5 x 18.5 cm
???
The box itself say the length alone is 124.4 cm (49 inches)
I think maybe a correction is needed?
Thank you.
BetaBinaryBrick
|
|
|
Author: | kuschelig | Posted: | Jan 24, 2019 13:19 | Subject: | Set weight variance | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Apologies in advance if this is the wrong forum to post this in. I did a search
for 'set weight' in the forums and couldn't find anything addressing
this question.
How are the weight of sets derived? Does a submitter weigh the sealed set on
a scale and enter weight or is it automatically calculated by the inventory submitted?
I've purchased sealed sets 2nd hand over the years and they never seem to
weigh what is listed on BL. I've read recent posts about sellers finding
sealed sets purchased in stores as "new" only to find their contents were replaced.
I decided to check several sealed sets in our inventory, some purchased at chain
stores, others purchased at LEGO stores or SAH, and NONE of them match what was
listed on BL. On smaller sets they have been as close as +/- 2 grams off, but
on mid-size sets (200-400 pieces), I've seen them off up to +/- 30 grams
This has happened with two different scales, so not sure it is an issue with
an inaccurate scale especially considering the sets we are weighing aren't
always lighter than what is listed on BL, but sometime higher too. I also listed
a boat weight that BL shows as 49.69 grams and our scale wavers between 49 &
50 grams, so it seems to be accurate.
Could the package weight be different depending on country? (an inventory is
submitted by someone in EU and their packaging weighs less??)
I want to list some of these 2nd hand sets that appear to be sealed as "new-sealed"
but don't feel comfortable at the moment given these discrepancies between
what we show as weight and what BL says is the weight.
|
|
Author: | FreeStorm | Posted: | Jan 24, 2019 03:07 | Subject: | Missing rules for special parts dimensions | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I was looking to define some missing parts dimensions.
With standard bricks, it's easy, but how do we define dimensions when parts
are not standard?
Maybe I miss something, but I didn't find the rules there:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=261
For example:
The size is [2 x 4 x 2] or [2 x Y x 2] ?
The size is [2 x 5 x 2] or [2 x 4 x 2] ?
The size is [2 x 6] or [2 x 4] ?
[p=bb73]
The size is [4 x 4] or [Y x Y x Y] ?
PS: I put "Y" in my examples, because I don't have the parts in front of
me.
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | Jan 24, 2019 02:47 | Subject: | A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 211 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Today we added a somewhat historic entry to the BrickLink catalog:
At first it looks like a normal Duplo plate, but it's not:
The first Duplo plates and tiles were based on the regular Lego plate/brick ratio
of 3:1 (that is, it takes 3 plates stacked on each other to reach the height
of a single Lego brick).
Somewhere around 1992, these "thin" plates and tiles were abandoned for the "thick"
type, which have a 2:1 ratio. These are what we find in modern Duplo sets.
What prompted the change? It could have been the advent of the 6309 printed tile:
Here are some other early "thin" Duplo parts:
* | | 3808 Duplo Tile, Modified 2 x 4 x 1/3 (Thin) Half Circle with 2 Studs Parts: DUPLO |
* | | 4121 Duplo Tile, Modified 2 x 4 x 1/3 (Thin) with 4 Center Studs Parts: DUPLO |
and maybe even this:
|
|
Author: | slave2lego | Posted: | Jan 24, 2019 02:14 | Subject: | 2019 speed champion inventories delay? | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi, just wondering if there is a delay in the inventories for 75890, 75893 and
75894 being uploaded? Hopefully I’m not just being impatient, but seems to be
longer than normal?
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Jan 22, 2019 11:29 | Subject: | Difference between sw0993 & sw0530 | Viewed: | 99 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| What is the difference between these two?
[m=sw0993]
Thanks
|
Author: | runner.caller | Posted: | Jan 22, 2019 01:48 | Subject: | sw695 is now sw0695 | Viewed: | 122 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Happened to notice this was changed between the time I downloaded my inventory
and the time that I tried to upload new parts. Weird.
|
Author: | mylego4all | Posted: | Jan 21, 2019 09:45 | Subject: | Catalog: Sets: Ninjago: 30534-1 Ninja Workout | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
This item was entered in by Hygrotus added this item to the catalog on Dec 25,
2018, and is still PENDING APPROVAL.
Do you know how long it takes for approval. I have some of these I would like
to put up for sale.
Thanks
|
Author: | jodawill | Posted: | Jan 18, 2019 12:28 | Subject: | Identical minifigs? | Viewed: | 95 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The inventory for these two minifigures is the exact same. Is there a reason
to have two different catalog items for it? I don't doubt there may be some
differences between the reissue and the original, but the inventory is listed
as them being identical.
|
Author: | bb45205 | Posted: | Jan 17, 2019 15:02 | Subject: | Question for processing | Viewed: | 109 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
in certain Lego bricks, single row, e.g. No .: 3004, 3009, 3010 etc. are there
in the inner "pins" which made of solid material and which with hole - is a distinction
here or is this neglected in the item description?
Would appreciate an answer very much
greetings
pitterdrei
|
|
Author: | brickskipper | Posted: | Jan 17, 2019 14:51 | Subject: | downloading Item Relationships | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| As I keep my inventory in a custom database which uses the BL parts and categories
as core data, I was wondering if there is a way to download the "Item Relationships"
as a CSV file.
Currently I am working on a way to complete MOCs from my existing inventory.
This means I load a "wanted list" for the MOC into my system and then I get an
output of which of my lots match the items on that list. As my inventory is carefully
maintained reflecting all part variants I only get the exact same part into my
list. For my MOCs I do often not care which part I am using.
E.g. if I have some on my wanted list, it would be nice to show also
the I might have in my inventory.
To implement this functionality I would like to use the BL Item Relationship
"Similar Parts with Different Molds".
Unfortunately I cannot find a way to download this information as raw data.
Any Idea other than entering these manually?
Thank you very much!
Jan
|
|
Author: | legoworld.nl | Posted: | Jan 17, 2019 08:50 | Subject: | Decorated tiles | Viewed: | 118 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello.
What is the difference between 2431pb159 and 2431pb477?
Regards, Jo Thewissen.
|
Author: | bb1029202 | Posted: | Jan 16, 2019 11:21 | Subject: | Lego Movie 2 Minifigure collection | Viewed: | 108 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Lego Movie 2 Minifigure collection as I have a numourous amount to list please |
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Jan 15, 2019 18:02 | Subject: | Updated Item No for Unikitty/TLM2 Sets? | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hey! I'm fairly new to this, I inventoried the Apocalypseburg Unikitty (comcon057-1)
and noticed that there were pieces from that set that now have official item
numbers (since they're in sets like 70831)
So, I'm wondering if I should update them? Below is a list of the items that
have updated Item Numbers that I've found (Source: manual for 70831)
• 3623pb018 (1x3 plate above Unikitty's face) is 6253938
• 4490pb13 (1x3 brick arch body) is 6253946
• 42859pb01 (spiky Unikitty tail) is 6253956
I'm now noticing that these item numbers all begin with "62539".... is this
something that I should udpate? I fear that if i don't, there will be double
listings for the above items.
Thanks!
|
|
Author: | mcmit | Posted: | Jan 14, 2019 23:01 | Subject: | Cancel change requests. | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please ignore /cancel my change requests to 10865 and 10895
I entered the wrong set number the first time and I made a error on the width
of 10895 details, regardless of that the details already submitted for 10895
correspond closely with the ones I entered.
|
|
Author: | chetzler | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 16:54 | Subject: | Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | Viewed: | 109 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
The price guide doesn't help much: the average prices seem too low for a
set of 12 and too high for a single fig. Judging by the individual prices it
appears that some sellers are treating this entry as a single random fig and
others are treating it as a a set of 12.
Am I better off creating a super lot if I want to sell a complete set of 12?
|
|
Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 10:06 | Subject: | Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | Viewed: | 106 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
Author: | DarylB | Posted: | Jan 12, 2019 12:34 | Subject: | New items not in the catalogue | Viewed: | 119 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please could you tell me how to add new items to the catalogue, in particular
how to allocate a 'pb' number to the part number for parts that are printed
or stickered. Thank you. Regards Daryl.
|
Author: | BigBBricks | Posted: | Jan 10, 2019 19:19 | Subject: | Please approve 30572-1 | Viewed: | 85 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please approve 30572-1, it is currently on sale and image is available. |
Author: | 0to60 | Posted: | Jan 10, 2019 09:36 | Subject: | Board game die complete assembly | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Is there a way to list 64776 Board Game Die as a complete assembly with all 6
tiles rather than list 7 items separately?
Thanks
|
|
Author: | runner.caller | Posted: | Jan 9, 2019 11:33 | Subject: | Minifig Complete with Alternate head? | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
Let's say a minifig is inventoried with a b-blocked style head.
Would a minifig assembly be considered complete if it has the alternate head
c-hollow style given that the this style head is technically only an alternate
part for the set inventory that the minifig came in and not the minifig itself.
Some minifig entries have a note saying something like: "This minifigure has
been found with both the 'b' and 'c' style head."
I would consider it complete, but I could see an OCD collector expecting the
'correct' head style per the BL figure assembly. Even if 'correct'
is just arbitrarily which ever style was found by the first user when adding
to the catalog.
Obviously, this only applies to figures produced during the great transition
period.
|
|
Author: | mfav | Posted: | Jan 7, 2019 20:04 | Subject: | Catalog Guidelines: Minifig Heads | Viewed: | 96 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I would like to suggest the following catalog guidelines for minifig head part
3626.
issues
1. Need to distinguish between 1-sided print and 2-sided print
2. Need to distinguish between things with faces and things without faces.
- 2.1 Need to distinguish between things with 1 face and things with 2 faces.
3. Need to distinguish between things that are heads and things that are not
heads.
4. Want to note stud type.
5. Need to note identifying attributes.
methodology
1. Fixed values: 1-sided print, 2-sided print.
- Might consider another value (top-print) for things like Avatar heads which
are printed around the stud. Or maybe not necessary and could be noted in attributes.
Anyway, fixed values here to aid search.
2. Fixed values: single-faced, dual-faced, no-face.
3. Fixed values: head, pattern
- I expect some shrieking about the pattern attribute, but if all decorated pieces
are separated from plain pieces at the category level, the need for "pattern"
as an identifier becomes moot. Thus "pattern" can be used to distinguish between
a "head" and a "not-head".
4. Existing scheme (blocked open, hollow, solid) seems satisfactory
5. Attributes should be considered by their side count and face count and presented
consistently. For any single-sided piece a straight description is fine. For
faces, I'd recommend a top-down scheme for consistency: hair, eyebrows, eyes,
mouth, scars/marks, whiskers. For two-sided, single-faced heads I'd start
with the character name if it exists, followed by Front, followed by Back. For
two-faced heads I'd start with the character name if it exists, followed
by side1 attributes, separate with a slash, side2 attributes. Color values would
precede attributes in "readable English" fashion, thus "brown hair" and not "hair,
brown".
Complete naming convention would be sequenced as follows: Attributes, Sides,
Faces, Type, Stud. This sequencing allows for the unique traits to
appear first, which is likely preferable to having those listed last for a number
of reasons.
2-side, 1-face Example:
Green Goblin. Front: Balaclava, Heavy brown eyebrows, black eyes white highlight,
smirk, dimples, cleft chin. Back: three black scalloped lines blue highlight.
2-sided print, single-faced head, blocked open stud.
2-side, 2-face Example:
Robot. Silver eyebrows, Lime eyes white highlight, clenched teeth, scuffs, rivets
/ Silver eyebrows, lime eyes white highlight, closed mouth, scuffs, rivets. 2-sided
print, dual-faced head, hollow stud.
Note 1: I have a personal prejudice against labelling every head that is not
"human" as "alien". I'd prefer to see additional terms such as "robot" and
perhaps "animal" where appropriate; these terms would also facilitate search.
Note 2: It would facilitate consistent data entry to have a part-specific data
entry form available on the site. The form would include any fixed values as
popup or radio selectors, generous fields for entry of attributes, and an image
or images with callouts to provide visual assistance and reference for the contributor.
Guidelines for data entry should be included on the form itself and not require
leaving the form to locate guideline information elsewhere.
Visualization attached.
|
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jan 6, 2019 20:23 | Subject: | New Part Category | Viewed: | 135 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Today I added a new category: Wheel, Accessory.
I moved 31 parts from Wheel to the new category.
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Jan 6, 2019 06:33 | Subject: | Part 35442 and 35449 name - flower or gear? | Viewed: | 74 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Parts 35442 and 35449 were just added to the catalog. They are currently named
"Plate, Modified [size] with [amount] Flower Petals".
[p=35449]
If you look at how these parts are used, then they are actually gear wheels.
Should the name not be "Plate, Modified [size] with [amount] Gear Tooth"?
See https://youtu.be/o0I6SgQSMMQ?t=282
|
|
Author: | mfav | Posted: | Jan 4, 2019 11:26 | Subject: | Admin Russell, WTH images 2 | Viewed: | 221 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Happy New Year.
This image discrepancy thing does appear throughout the catalog.
It looks like any time there was a condition where the large image contributor
and the small image contributor were not the same, the large image contributor's
large image has slotted into the small image contributor's small image gallery.
At least one of mine is in Randy's gallery, a number of other people's
images are in Jen's gallery...it goes on.
I have a suspicion there's some other related gremlin somewhere in the works,
but I can't fathom it other than to note that sometimes the large images
are also somehow awry.
Example:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?id=66490#T=C&C=10
The dbg image accessed via the popup is mine, and credited to me.
The gray image accessed via the popup is NOT mine, and credited to me...or at
least appears to be...or cannot be determined.
Sometimes
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page
(with no color specified for the part) on entering the page, the large image
space is empty, other times it's populated with (I guess) a default image.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=41855#T=C
I see a default (medium blue?) image, and at the bottom of the page I get a credit
for a large image. The red image here is mine, this blue one is not.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=30358#T=C&C=2
This one defaults with a small white straked image (no color selected), I get
credit for the large image.
I thought the attribution dynamically changed on this page when you changed the
selected color of the piece from the popdown, but right now I can't find
where that's happening...but it may be effected with some pieces and not
others. In any event, the behavior on this page is inconsistent and seems to
have something to do with whether or not there's a "default" small image...which
is probably a misnomer. For example, as far as I can tell there are no "small"
images for
* | | 650 Hinge Coupling Nylon - Two Connected 2 x 2 Plates Parts: Hinge |
Can't figure out how to back-trace any of these pictures to their creators...
...hmm...guessing that the large image attribution is for whatever image occupies
that second vertical thumbnail position there...
Some of this might just be a UI problem where something isn't coded properly,
and with the 53588pb01 I doubt there is a gray version at all, just a dbg (this
was hashed about in the forum not too long ago).
Anyway, I've spent about as much time as I care to looking at this issue.
All I really know is something or things has gone wrong somewhere, and I suggest
you want to sort it out before any more images get put into the system and possibly
mispositioned.
Also, I don't want to be wrongly credited for someone else's contribution.
That's just not right.
You and the StormChaser may want to consider holding off adding any new images
until you can sort out what's going on.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 21:58 | Subject: | Overwatch Mercy & Pharah pictures wrong | Viewed: | 126 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
The picture for this fig is wrong. 1st her head sucks in comparison to what's
shown (but not really the point here).
2nd and most importantly, she needs at least the clear neck piece, if not the
full wing assembly
This fig has special shoulder armor that has some studs on the back for the other
pieces.
______
Not a picture issue:
[m=ow014]
This one is up to the admins. The 1st assembly shown in instructions is the
standard w/ legs. I think this version is a good addition to the catalog, but
it may not fit the catalog policies.
|
|
Author: | yoavheskia | Posted: | Jan 3, 2019 16:46 | Subject: | part 4073: catalog statisics mistake | Viewed: | 91 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| i counted only 51 known colors, not 52 as mentioned in catalog statisics. |
|
Author: | mfav | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 16:33 | Subject: | Admin Russell, what's with the images? | Viewed: | 252 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I'm noticing my "large" images for these items are showing up as being credited
to other contributors.
Kevin1990
- 970c00pb099
- 970c34pb01
swrbricks
- 970c10pb01
- 970c09pb01
- 970c11pb04
jennnifer
- 970c69pb01
- 970c00pb075
- 970c00pb195
Nikilyn
- 970c00pb337
hazelsden
- 970c86pb02
www_mybricks_de
- 970c00 (red)
And I'm credited for these "small" images which aren't mine...and no
idea whose they are.
air023
atl017
gen052
gen053
stu002
cty057
sw016
aqu011
lea005
sw049
twn029
pln100
pln003
pln050
pln057
pln058
pm012
soc034
(I thought the whole "small image" thing was kaput some time last year...no?)
If this is human error, that's one thing. If there are systemic issues or
database corruption or something else going on, then it probably should be looked
into before it gets worse.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Jan 1, 2019 14:43 | Subject: | 2 versions of dino tail end #40379 | Viewed: | 70 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
There are two versions of this part where the small hole by the base varies
in location, mirrored left or right side.
This can be seen in the new carousel where it seems Lego tried to include 24/24
(I got 23/25) of each type, so that the holes wouldn't be visible.
|
|
Author: | LordInTheNorth | Posted: | Jan 1, 2019 14:24 | Subject: | Issue with New Minifig sw988 | Viewed: | 105 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| This minifig is listed wrong in the catalog. The out side parts of the 3 minifigs
in set 75226 are all the same but one has a belt ... and other differences are
...
sw988 - a - normal storm trooper head (male) with belt part ... like in batman
sets (but black)
sw988 - b - sunken eyes no belt. (outside same as others minus the belt)
sw988 - c - mad face no belt. (outside same as others minus the belt)
Not sure what needs to happen but ... that minifig should be changed.
|
|
Author: | FreeStorm | Posted: | Dec 31, 2018 13:11 | Subject: | Different size for Watches parts bbw002 | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello,
I own the 2017 version of 9005008 (in 24-Hour format)
While I'm looking for size and weight of parts it look that my parts for
the Watch are not the same weight and size as catalog items.
For example:
bbw001
Mine: 1.8 x 1.0 x 0.41 for 0.2g
Catalog: 2.25 x 1.25 for 0.33g
bbw002:
Mine: 1.8 x 1.7 x 0.4 for 0.3g
Catalog: 2.25 x 2.25 cm for 0.51g
it look like my Watch from 2017 is smaller than watch from 2013
I'm pretty sure for the size of my parts, I'm using an electronic caliper
And a balance accurate to 0.1 g
What do you think?
|
|
Author: | phyllisw8 | Posted: | Dec 30, 2018 23:27 | Subject: | 93273pb089 deletion | Viewed: | 70 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I just added a more complete and correct entry of this part as 93273pb090. 93273pb089
is currently pending approval and should either be deleted or my submitted information
from 93273pb090 be transferred to the entry.
|
|
Author: | bje | Posted: | Dec 27, 2018 09:02 | Subject: | Please approve Sets 75223-1 and 75224-1 | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
Please approve, have them both in hand
TIA
|
Author: | waltzking | Posted: | Dec 27, 2018 00:56 | Subject: | Please approve 30529-1 (In Hand) | Viewed: | 76 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Have this item in hand and would like to see it approved soon. If anything needs
done to complete the entry and help it get approved let me know how I can help
or supply info.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?S=30529-1
Thanks!
Jonathan
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Dec 26, 2018 22:59 | Subject: | Duplo Sheep Expert? | Viewed: | 101 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Are [p=dupsheepnew] and the same mold? It looks like it as far
as I can tell.
|
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | Dec 25, 2018 04:48 | Subject: | Please approve new sets | Viewed: | 134 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| According to the newsletter of a Dutch webshop the following new sets are now
available. Please approve them.
LEGO® Friends
41354
41355
41356
41357
41358
41359
41360
41361
41363
41364
41365
41366
41367
41368
41369
41383
LEGO® Technic
42088
42089
42090
42091
42092
42093
42094
42095
42096
LEGO® City
60206
60207
60208
60209
60210
60212
60213
60214
60215
60216
60218
60219
60220
60221
60222
60223
60239
60240
LEGO® DE LEGO FILM 2™
70820
70821
70822
70823
70824
70825
70826
70827
70828
70829
70830
70831
70832
70836
70841
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Dec 23, 2018 20:09 | Subject: | New Relationship Catalog Project Underway | Viewed: | 155 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| We have long needed a relationship match that shows items which fit together
and which are frequently used together. I have asked for this type of match
in the past and have gotten nowhere.
Instead, these kinds of matches were added as paired parts even though they did
not fit the spirit or definition of that match (and the sentence "Exceptions
to these definitions are determined at administrative discretion." was added
to the Item Relationships definitions page). Some examples of items currently
matched as paired parts:
* | | 44225 Technic Rotation Joint Disk with Large Pin and 3L Liftarm Thick Parts: Technic |
* | | 44224 Technic Rotation Joint Disk with Large Pin Hole and 3L Liftarm Thick Parts: Technic |
In my ongoing struggle to make the world a better place, generally speaking,
by addressing first-world problems of the lowest magnitude, we now have a new
relationship match:
Parts that Fit Together
Shows parts that naturally fit together which are designed to work together
and which are nearly always used together as a single unit.
If anyone sees where this definition could be improved, then please let me know.
Otherwise, start sending me some new item relationships and let's see how
well this works. I've added a few to get us started and here is one of them
so you can see how it looks:
See the project on the catalog roadmap:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
See the new relationship match added and defined today:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRel.asp
|
|
Author: | Gaston.La.Brick | Posted: | Dec 23, 2018 16:34 | Subject: | BA43pb02 marked for deletion? | Viewed: | 121 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
I was sorting through a lot of Lego and came across an assembled item (with a
sticker holding it together). I was happy to find it in the catalog: BA43pb02
However, it seems marked for deletion. And it doesn't seem to be included
in any set.
Could you give me more info about this item and the reason it is marked for deletion?
I would believe it was a custom item, until I found it in a lot myself... What
are the odds, right?
|
|
Author: | hard | Posted: | Dec 22, 2018 17:53 | Subject: | Alternate Head njo320 Nya | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Tried to do a Inventory Change Request, couldn't make heads or tails of it,
so posting.
Parted out a 70618 Destiny Bounty. Njo320 Nya did not have the head 3626cpb1888
but the head 3626cpb1905. Which is the same as the head of njo355 Nya, from 70607
Ninjago City Chase, which I don't own.
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Dec 21, 2018 15:49 | Subject: | 3299miB | Viewed: | 93 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Is part 3299miB really a Minitalia part?
It looks like a LEGO System part with split tubes from the 1970s.
|
|
Author: | Necrotron | Posted: | Dec 20, 2018 02:20 | Subject: | Extra Parts classification change? | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I've seen a post in the eurobricks forum which a states that the extra parts
section here on bricklink is changing. Please do not make this change. Extra
parts in sets can vary during production, and will sometimes vary from region
to region. These extra parts do not represent a complete set, nor are those pieces
required to complete a set. If you feel the need to somehow show a difference
between a complete model and a "complete as shipped" set, maybe you should add
a tic box option for that in listings for those few who only consider a set complete
if it has the parts exactly the same as the few people who verified the inventory
of the set they received.
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|