BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

In Suggestions, AZbrickGUY writes:

Hey all,
Has there ever been a spot for custom minis? Any way we could add
a spot? Mainly MOC out of existing parts that are out there. Not hand made or
painted parts. Thanks.

Yes, you can add them to your store as a custom figure.

I don't understand the system in place, because the only minifigures in the
MOC character category are pad printed. And if you visit the Custom Items,
the actual mini MOCs are still buried by the homebrew plastic listings.

There's probably wide community out there, looking for this. Eurobricks enthusiasts,
for one. There's definitely overlap with BrickLink there. Personally, I keep
posting figgy projects in the forum and people still click on those (thank you),
so maybe we'd see more mini MOCs if there was a proper place for them?

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Oct 18, 2019 04:49

Subject:

Re: Custom minis

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, AZbrickGUY writes:

Hey all,
Has there ever been a spot for custom minis? Any way we could add
a spot? Mainly MOC out of existing parts that are out there. Not hand made or
painted parts. Thanks.

Yes, you can add them to your store as a custom figure.

Author:

cycbuild

Posted:

Oct 18, 2019 00:40

Subject:

Re: Custom minis

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, AZbrickGUY writes:

Hey all,
Has there ever been a spot for custom minis? Any way we could add
a spot? Mainly MOC out of existing parts that are out there. Not hand made or
painted parts. Thanks.

+1

It would be nice to have a distinction between customs and MOCs. Add a minifig
category to the MOC Shop?

Author:

AZbrickGUY

Posted:

Oct 18, 2019 00:20

Subject:

Custom minis

Viewed:

114 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Hey all,
Has there ever been a spot for custom minis? Any way we could add
a spot? Mainly MOC out of existing parts that are out there. Not hand made or
painted parts. Thanks.

Author:

Emporiosa

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 17:56

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

85 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, axaday writes:

They aren't getting added or approved anymore, except in special circumstances.
A SWAT van won't qualify.

I agree with the suggestion. I'd like to see any vehicle that someone submitted
get approved and inventoried and added to the set inventory. But I think the
ones that were added didn't sell really well or for more than their parts,
so Bricklink didn't see it as worth the time.

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

Hello! I'm net1986 from South Korea!
I would like to suggest something today.

First of all I apologize for my poor English grammar, please understand.

This is what I would suggest this time.

"I wish there was function to view information of just part product from the
set, Not whole set. And function to order those just part product."

For example,
1. I want to get only police swat van from set 60008 Museum Break-in.(don't
need any part like figs or Museum)
2. But there is only brick information for whole set(Unnecessary a lot of information
confuses me)
3. It takes a lot of hard work to analyze for only just the swat van.
4. And It's very hard to order each part brick for the van

What I mean is that I wish there was a function to view a only part product(just
swat van of set 60008)and I wish I would order those part in way "easy buy".

I know that the "east buy" function already exists.
It's very helpful for restorers.
But now, It adjust only set product or MOC product as I know.

So, I wish the "easy buy" function is more enhanced(add part product from set)

I hope you guys understand my words.
reply me, thanks.
Best regard,

This already exists, for some sets, via special assemblies.

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catString=961

But still, someone has to go through the manual working out what parts are needed
for each assembly.

I actually added a couple of special assemblies such as the Whomping Willow and
the Ford Anglia, and being one of the one sellers for each, those sold almost
immediately, even after listing them again. Another one I did was the Giant Ant-man
- sold 2 of them instantly after posting them.

But as Randy mentioned, it sounds like a nightmare for them to try to manage
so I can understand why they only did a small test run. It's unfortunate
though, because a site like BL is perfect for people looking for just these parts
of the sets.

Author:

maxx3001

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 12:06

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

In Suggestions, Teup writes:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

Maybe this would have drawbacks of its own, not sure if it's a good idea
but I'm just thinking out loud...

That's why I suggest !!

I think My idea is good for seller who sell incomplete set and good for buyer
who want to collect for just part product from set.

Anyway, thanks for your agree
and I'm very moved for the you guys' reply
(This is my first post of Forum in using foreign language)
Have a nice day

And it was well written and structured, thank you

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 11:18

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, axaday writes:

I agree with the suggestion. I'd like to see any vehicle that someone submitted
get approved and inventoried and added to the set inventory. But I think the
ones that were added didn't sell really well or for more than their parts,
so Bricklink didn't see it as worth the time.

Actually, the reason they are on hold for further additions is due to site limitations
that make it very hard for the inventories of these items to be administered.
The main limitations are two-fold: (1) these inventories cannot have alternates
at present so alternates must be tracked through inventory notes, and (2) these
inventories must be manually kept in sync with set inventories when changes are
made to the set inventories that they are in. You can see that if we rapidly
expanded these additions to the catalog, it would quickly become an administration
nightmare.

Cheers,
Randy

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 11:11

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

[…]
But it means sellers must use common sense when pricing them.

I still don’t understand why it’s “common sense” when it’s anything but common
(the same in French)

Author:

Teup

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 11:06

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

That shouldn't affect the prices of sets sold as complete so there is no
reason to stop selling those. But yes, incomplete sets can be anything from almost
complete to a few bricks. But it means sellers must use common sense when pricing
them.

But isn't there only one single entry for used sets in the price guide, regardless
of completeness?

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 10:59

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

Author:

bje

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 10:45

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

It's awesome!!
Why couldn't I find it, special assembly??
And very thanks for the link and new world!!
have a nice day!!

It doesn't work at all well at the moment. You have to know one exists to
find it. Or you can look through the inventory of every set, and right down the
bottom under counterparts you will find the assembly(ies) if it(they) exists.

Or browse https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=961

Must the item be in hand for it to be added and inventoried?

Author:

net1986

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 10:34

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Teup writes:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

It's probably a lot of catalog work to break sets into separate components,
but I see a huge advantage: It would solve the pricing problem with "incomplete"
sets. Currently people are listing sets for half of its value because minifigs
or other major parts of the set are missing. That messes up the priceguide completely
and is the main reason why I have abandoned selling sets completely. There are
just too many nonsensical listings.
If for starters there would be a separate entry for sets without the minifigs,
and an entry for the minifigs, that'd already help.

Maybe this would have drawbacks of its own, not sure if it's a good idea
but I'm just thinking out loud...

Author:

net1986

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 10:27

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

41 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

It's awesome!!
Why couldn't I find it, special assembly??
And very thanks for the link and new world!!
have a nice day!!

Author:

Teup

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 09:44

Subject:

Re: Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

55 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, net1986 writes:

Author:

net1986

Posted:

Oct 17, 2019 09:29

Subject:

Very necessary suggestion?

Viewed:

210 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

Graham.

Posted:

Oct 10, 2019 15:33

Subject:

Communication difficulties

Viewed:

151 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

The first is folks sending messages directly to my PayPal and BrickLink notifications
email address. Which I don’t check on a regular basis.

Wouldn’t it be better all round if the user email address were hidden? therefore
emails would have to go thru the message system.

Leads to the second. BrickLink notifications are often delayed by two or three
days, then they all come thru together. Which is why I don’t check that mail
box often. Fairly frequently I receive the order placed notification AFTER I
have shipped the order!

I check messages on site, every morning when I first log on.

Also would benefit BrickLink as it would be far more difficult to trade off site,
if anyone were so inclined.

Please give this some consideration, it works well on the other place.

Thanks, Graham

Author:

Give.Me.A.Brick

Posted:

Oct 9, 2019 08:00

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

95 times

Topic:

In Administrative, DadsAFOL writes:

In Administrative, Admiral_Brick writes:

Hello Jaclyn,

one year ago BL changed a wanted list key feature. Are you and the developers
even aware of it?

When clicking on "Wanted List" after entering a store, BL shows me the items
this store offers which are on my wanted list. Before the update, the list only
contained the items from my wanted list which were priced below my max prices.

This changed with the update of the store fronts: Now always *all* items are
being shown. The only difference is, that the "Max price:" information of items
with prices higher than my max prices is being shown in red letters.

Too much information! I do not want to scroll through the bigger part of my wanted
list every time, I simply want to know quickly which items from my wanted list
are available for a good price in a specific store... no chance. I have not used
my wanted list for a year now.

Kind regards,

Matthias

I agree, I had forgotten about this. I think its part of the store display,
not the wanted list functions, but I agree. It is a huge pain to see unfiltered
wanted list matches in each store. Please add the filter options back!
1. Store price
2. Store quantity = wanted list min quantity
3. Both price and quantity match.

Thanks!

Has this issued been sorted out? Or are there any tweaks?

When inside a store, is there way to see only the items on my wanted list *below*
my max price?

Thank you.

Author:

minithings4life

Posted:

Oct 7, 2019 07:54

Subject:

Re: Database for inventory

Viewed:

73 times

Topic:

Brickset is a good way of doing that.

In Suggestions, jakyasar writes:

Hi all

As the number of sets/pieces growing, I need to start cataloging my inventory
to avoid double purchases.

Any recommendations for such program to keep track of inventory is appreciated.

Thank you

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Oct 7, 2019 07:16

Subject:

Re: Database for inventory

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

Hi!

As you're a seller, you can use "Stockrooms" here on bricklink. By default
there is only one Stockroom, but you can enable 3 Stockrooms in the settings
(A, B and C). You could use one of them for your personal collection for example
- that would be the easiest solution without any additional program or website.

Kind regards,
Michael

In Suggestions, jakyasar writes:

Author:

jakyasar

Posted:

Oct 7, 2019 07:10

Subject:

Database for inventory

Viewed:

99 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Sep 30, 2019 09:18

Subject:

Re: Limit Shipping Method to One Customer

Viewed:

64 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, axaday writes:

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

In Suggestions, axaday writes:

I just opened a shipping method that I keep closed to avoid confusion because
it allows an international customer to instant checkout using domestic shipping
rates. It is for international customers who have a friend or forwarding service
in the US, but I keep it closed to avoid accidental or intentional misuse. It
would be handy if I could limit that to a country or to a specific user.

Is it not easier to invoice manually for such situations.

Possibly. I used to get a lot of international orders made and then cancelled
because the shipping is over $20 over 8 ounces. Usually customers are willing
to pay the $13ish shipping for 1-8 oz, but rarely did an order over 9 ounces
go through. I so stopped offering wait for invoice for international orders
and capped the instant checkout at 7 ounces. Perhaps that is too strict and
I should think it over.

Yeah, I'm sure. I've stopped buying from the USA for that reason.

Maybe put a line in your terms about what it will cost for international orders
for a couple of weight bands and turn on quotes (if you haven't already)
to allow international buyers to ask for postage costs if they need to.

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Sep 30, 2019 08:56

Subject:

Re: Limit Shipping Method to One Customer

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:

In Suggestions, axaday writes:

Is it not easier to invoice manually for such situations.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Sep 30, 2019 07:58

Subject:

Re: Limit Shipping Method to One Customer

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, axaday writes:

Is it not easier to invoice manually for such situations.

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Sep 30, 2019 06:10

Subject:

Limit Shipping Method to One Customer

Viewed:

97 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

Brahrp

Posted:

Sep 28, 2019 14:18

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

109 times

Topic:

old much better!

Author:

jaydotjay

Posted:

Sep 28, 2019 08:24

Subject:

Thumbnail Size

Viewed:

70 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Is it possible to customize or change the thumbnail size when searching in the
catalog? I'm not sure if it's a setting I missed, but it would be useful
to when you're overlooking an entire line to find something specific.

Author:

GregSwiss

Posted:

Sep 25, 2019 07:43

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

I actually find the "Have" feature to be very useful, though I would like an
"Ordeded/Purchased" feature too; I've purchased loads of parts multiple times
accidentally, as I'd forgotten I had already ordered them and didn't
check through my current orders properly. If I could mark wanted parts as "Ordered"
it would save me time. money and storage space.

That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.

It does though. If you look in your Wanted list it clearly shows how many you
Want and how many you Have in hand. Now go to a store and select Wanted List
it shows sjhows your Wanted Qty (which is original Wanted minus Have).

As for Have - I don't want it

I just checked and it still doesn't subtract Have from original Want.
Usually I don't want to search for the original Want quantity but for new
Want quantity.

But I can not sort the list in that way that it shows all my incomplete lots
within a wanted list.

Author:

Teup

Posted:

Sep 24, 2019 19:10

Subject:

Re: Search setting: seller location filter

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Nowaker writes:

You might be blocking out a huge part of Bricklink that could have just what you are looking for.

I value predictable shipping prices and fast delivery. I don't know what
to expect when ordering from other countries.

Go for the sellers with Instant Checkout. This is indicated by a lightning bolt
icon behind the store name. All added charges will be calculated realtime so
at checkout you see exactly what you will pay.

Normal sized orders from the NL to the US typically take 4 days to arrive. From
other countries it may be a bit longer, but anyway, a couple of days faster shipping
may not always outweigh the price difference.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Sep 24, 2019 05:13

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.

I just checked and it still doesn't subtract Have from original Want.
Usually I don't want to search for the original Want quantity but for new
Want quantity.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Sep 24, 2019 04:51

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.

If it does now, the Have feature probably has been tweeked.

Author:

iprice

Posted:

Sep 24, 2019 03:46

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Sep 23, 2019 13:06

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, iprice writes:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

That's exactly what the Have feature was supposed to do, but it doesn't
subtract anything from Want.

Author:

iprice

Posted:

Sep 23, 2019 12:58

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Sep 23, 2019 07:24

Subject:

Re: Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, GregSwiss writes:

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

The current Have feature is useless. It's the same as Want.
Easier is to create an Ordered Wantlist and move the items there until they're
received.

Author:

GregSwiss

Posted:

Sep 23, 2019 06:47

Subject:

Sort by in Wanted List

Viewed:

55 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Hello

Would it be possible to implement a new sort by-option in the Wanted List?
What I would like to see is "Missing" what would be the difference between "Wanted"
and "Have".

Cheers
Greg

Author:

Nowaker

Posted:

Sep 23, 2019 00:12

Subject:

Re: Search setting: seller location filter

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

You might be blocking out a huge part of Bricklink that could have just what you are looking for.

I value predictable shipping prices and fast delivery. I don't know what
to expect when ordering from other countries. This is the biggest problem:

Seller will calculate S&H fees and send and invoice with the final price for the order.

Items will be reserved for you, and you will be obligated to purchase them.

There's no way I'm agreeing to pay an unknown amount of S&H when I don't
know what S&H actually is. I also don't want to send custom messages to sellers
and ask for pricing.

I don't want a hands-on experience in buying. I want an Amazon-like experience
where I know exactly how much and when I'm receiving my order. For this reason,
I always want to see US sellers only.

Author:

Bitsnpieces....

Posted:

Sep 22, 2019 01:40

Subject:

Quote System/Cart to be like a Store Cart

Viewed:

90 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Quote system/Cart

Can we get the quote system/cart to be the same as the store cart?

As we all know with the Store cart when an item gets sold or the quantity differs
than you put in your cart, you can adjust the items in your store cart, or delete,
and your store cart is still active, and can remain active until you go through
with the order or empty it completely.

Can we get the quote system/cart to be like the store as well?

Rather than just losing everything in the quote cart when its gets cancelled
by whatever reason, and having to start all over again?

Rob

Author:

hpoort

Posted:

Sep 20, 2019 13:53

Subject:

Re: Layout

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, ihave36paws writes:

How can you change the Classic Layout. If you are going to make changes to things
it would be the new Layout.

We hate the way they removed the (My Order Note) line from under the order.

Now you have to travel way over to the right to see it, unless you have your
screen so small that you can't read it.

Please change it back.

At [My BL] [Settings] [My Order Settings] you can select how to show your order
notes: as icons, on the right or below each line.

Author:

calsbricks

Posted:

Sep 20, 2019 12:54

Subject:

Re: Layout

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, ihave36paws writes:

You can do that yourself here;

That is at the top of your ofrder detail page. Is that what you meant?

Author:

ihave36paws

Posted:

Sep 20, 2019 12:49

Subject:

Layout

Viewed:

110 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

Adjour

Posted:

Sep 18, 2019 11:45

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

78 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Hurt writes:

In Suggestions, Adjour writes:

(Except that one dude in Korea that keeps asking for quotes and then cancelling,
we are on three now I think lol)

Haha

May I suggest to also add gram (beside ounce) to your shipping table for international
shipment. Makes it easier if you don't need to use google to get an overview
of the weights

Hahaha, that is a good suggestion. I forget that not everyone uses "freedom units"

Funny I've never thought of that because I've often had the same frustration
when buying from European sellers, but in reverse.

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Sep 18, 2019 10:31

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

44 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Adjour writes:

(Except that one dude in Korea that keeps asking for quotes and then cancelling,
we are on three now I think lol)

Haha

May I suggest to also add gram (beside ounce) to your shipping table for international
shipment. Makes it easier if you don't need to use google to get an overview
of the weights

Author:

Adjour

Posted:

Sep 18, 2019 10:11

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, kelmgo writes:

I am after a few pieces to complete a few kits and am going from one checkout
to another, then to another and then cancelling the orders (before payment) because
the vendors haven't got the "Request a Quote" provision set up.
Clearly it would save a lot of stuffing around if you know the full cost incl
P&H before hand.
Even better - there should be a little icon or something next to the vendors
name to indicate whether they send quotes or not so you don't have to go
through the checkouts to find out right at the end.
This is what I'm experiencing in Australia

I like this idea.

My store allows for quotes and very few people use it. (Except that one dude
in Korea that keeps asking for quotes and then cancelling, we are on three now
I think lol)

I do get lots of messages from buyers asking for quotes even though I have some
pretty direct shipping tables. So it's obvious they haven't even made
a cart yet.

So all in all I think the quote system is underused or misunderstood by buyers.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Sep 18, 2019 04:22

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, kelmgo writes:

You can always use the Contact Store button and inquire about the shipping costs.

That doesn't necessarily work. There are light but high volume parts (like
some windscreens), so if you tell the seller the weight it can be misleading.

Then there are the sellers that have a shipping table based on weight, but refuse
to allow buyers to see the weight of a cart.

I'd like to see a "allows quotes" icon, or better still force all sellers
to allow quotes (better) or order cancellations (worse).

Author:

Teup

Posted:

Sep 17, 2019 13:18

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, MidwestBrick writes:

In Suggestions, Teup writes:

In Suggestions, kelmgo writes:

Part of what you suggest exists: Stores with a thunderbolt icon have instant
checkout, which means that you see the grand total before you order. There isn't
an icon to distinguish quote sellers from non-quote sellers, however. But even
if there would be such an icon, I'm not sure it would do sellers justice,
as a non quote seller may have a very clear table of shipping costs, which could
be just as good or better than asking a quote.

I disagree and think it is a valid request to include an icon so shoppers know
they can get a quote from that store immediately instead of having to look for
it or go through the check-out phase.

Using IC is impossible to hit on every scenario and even sometimes the IC may
work, but a buyer still wants to use the Quote system because maybe the IC is
charging too much. There is nothing wrong with a buyer double-checking to see
if their order actually fits in a cheaper shipping option than what IC is calculating.

Those are problems of IC.. but a relevant point because it makes the thunderbolt
misleading. Maybe the system should be made such that if an order doesn't
qualify for IC, the seller by definition has to quote.
My IC works properly: It works on every order and the calculations are correct.
It is always possible to make IC work (if nothing else, you could even charge
1 rate for all orders, after all). But I agree it is not always desirable, for
those sellers who have very significant and unpredictable shipping charge fluctuations
because of a complicated postal service. I expect most of them will have no obligations
against quoting, so an obligatory quote alternative should be ok.. that way,
the thunderbolt is not misleading.

Author:

MidwestBrick

Posted:

Sep 17, 2019 12:58

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Teup writes:

In Suggestions, kelmgo writes:

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Sep 17, 2019 12:50

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, kelmgo writes:

You can always use the Contact Store button and inquire about the shipping costs.

Clearly it would save a lot of stuffing around if you know the full cost incl
P&H before hand.
Even better - there should be a little icon or something next to the vendors
name to indicate whether they send quotes or not so you don't have to go
through the checkouts to find out right at the end.
This is what I'm experiencing in Australia

Author:

Teup

Posted:

Sep 17, 2019 12:38

Subject:

Re: Request a Quote

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, kelmgo writes:

Author:

kelmgo

Posted:

Sep 17, 2019 12:33

Subject:

Request a Quote

Viewed:

124 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

Teup

Posted:

Sep 15, 2019 14:24

Subject:

Re: Search setting: seller location filter

Viewed:

57 times

Topic: