BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, logansbricks writes:

Howdy guys! I was wondering if it is possible to have our picking list separated
into New and Used But still be in order of item number? For example, all the
new would be at the top of the list but be in the correct item number order,
then the used (in correct order) would be after the new. It would be soooo helpful
since the New and Used are obviously in different places in our physical stores.
Yikes, dare I say this BUT, that is how Brickowl does it and it is just much,
much easier to pull.
thanks for lending an ear

sherry

Change the sorting below the order details page

I know what you mean OP. From where I sit, there is no option for "condition,
then number". For myself I would love "condition, remarks, number" .

I also notice that my spreadsheet doesn't sort 123 and 123a in the right
order so I have to take an extra step to make that work.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 22, 2017 10:40

Subject:

Re: separate picking list by New and Used

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, logansbricks writes:

sherry

Change the sorting below the order details page.

Author:

ShipABrick

Posted:

Jun 22, 2017 10:39

Subject:

separate picking list by New and Used

Viewed:

91 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

sherry

Author:

QuarkyBricks

Posted:

Jun 20, 2017 14:37

Subject:

Re: Upgrade Stripe intergration

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

Another reason that this is important is that many online order/shipping management
programs sync with Stripe Relay and not just payments processed through Stripe.
This means that orders paid for with Stripe have to have shipping labels created
manually.

Good suggestion!

Author:

Cob

Posted:

Jun 19, 2017 12:11

Subject:

Upgrade Stripe intergration

Viewed:

88 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

With instant checkout coming in the near future, please upgrade the Stripe integration
to perform validation checks between the buyer address and the credit card records.

Also upgrade Stripe so that API is used versus only submitting the user name.

Thank you,
Jacob

Author:

StephCad

Posted:

Jun 19, 2017 08:44

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

Hello,

If it is possible can you please keep the old version available ? I can't
get used to the new one...

Thank you so much for your work and for this marvellous website !!!

Best Regards,

Stéphanie

Author:

drg7949

Posted:

Jun 18, 2017 18:44

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

58 times

Topic:

I'll pile on, as well...

We appreciate all of the hard work on the new design, but there is certain functionality
that is lacking, or at least less obvious. I always start with the new design,
but find myself going back to the Classic view every time.

Quick example: in the Classic view, if I added part #61190d to my WL, and wanted
to change it to 61190e (or change from one color to another), I could do that
easily by editing the record itself. In the new version, I don't see a way
other than to add the new item and remove the old. Is it that a big deal? No,
but it's indicative.

Please keep the classic view!

Darren

In Administrative, Admin_Jaclyn writes:

Hello Everyone,

In June of last year, we introduced a new Wanted List upgrade. This upgrade came
with a newly-designed buying experience which focused on the necessity to compare
and plan out multiple carts at once, as well as make it easier to manage multiple
lists.

Since BrickLink's Wanted List is a core feature for most users, we currently
provide the classic version for members to use as a backup in case there are
glitches with the new version. This is intended to be a temporary solution.

The classic version of the Wanted List feature will become unavailable on
June 5, 2017. At this point, we have ensured that the new version of the
Wanted List covers all desired functionality (plus more) from the classic version.
If you have any issues with the new version, please let us know as soon as possible.

Thank you for the continued support, bug reports, and helpful feedback as we
continue to roll out important changes.

Sincerely,

Jaclyn
BrickLink Customer Support

Author:

bb69656

Posted:

Jun 18, 2017 10:39

Subject:

Bigger Pictures

Viewed:

96 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Now that everything minifigure is dual sided, the pictures have effectively halved
in size. Also, the description on the page is large, and picture small (in a
store).

Ebay has gone to bigger pictures (free) which tends to prove they work. Can
we allocate more space to pictures?

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:33

Subject:

Re: Select all in want list search buying.

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

What does the current "Status: Already Exists" mean? Where can I find this functionality?

In Suggestions, j7r7o7c7k7 writes:

When you go to buy items in your want lists, it ask you to select the want lists
you want to buy from. Well I have like 60+ lists (one for each set) so I have
to click ever single one each time I want to run a search to find items. But
there is a deselect button there so I can unclick all in one shot, but can we
add a select all button?? A small suggestion, but try clicking 60+ times before
you even start your search lol. Thanks

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:31

Subject:

Re: Select all in want list search buying.

Viewed:

17 times

Topic:

Yes, this needs to be implemented. I do have a separate wanted list for every
set as well.

In Suggestions, j7r7o7c7k7 writes:

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:24

Subject:

Re: Wanted List - Buy - Show Price & Condition

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, HPBrickhead writes:

Hi, when using the BUY NOW feature of the wanted list, it shows me the stores
but not:
a) condition of the item (new / used)
b) what the price is in each store

b) is available if you open a WL (just to look at it), and click “More Options”
and then “Items for Sale: Show” and “Apply” (beware the default sort “by store
name”).

(It’s like in the Old/Classic WL’s feature to show stores. “Buy” works like “By
Shop,” where prices and items weren’t shown either.)

Instead I see a "minimum purchase" total.

So you have to go to each store and check, or to the price guide, which doesn't
make a quick buy that quick.

If you “select” a store, a dialog appears with all the items in the store, their
prices and conditions. You can then cancel or actually select the store.

(You can also just click in the store’s line, it will show what items in your
WLs are available in the store, and in what quantities, in the item list on the
left by outlining the pictures.)

You still have to check the price guide yourself though.

There was a feature that gave a “percentage relative to the price guide,” in
red for overpriced items, in green for better priced items. It was removed. It
didn’t work well though.

Could we change this?

“We?” No. BrickLink? I doubt they would.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:10

Subject:

Re: Wanted List - Buy - Show Price & Condition

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, HPBrickhead writes:

Hi, when using the BUY NOW feature of the wanted list, it shows me the stores
but not:
a) condition of the item (new / used)
b) what the price is in each store

Instead I see a "minimum purchase" total.

So you have to go to each store and check, or to the price guide, which doesn't
make a quick buy that quick.

Could we change this?

Yes please.

This has been mentioned multiple times and should already have been added.
They want us to use the Auto-Finder or Buy Now feature.

Author:

bb69656

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:04

Subject:

Wanted List - Buy - Show Price & Condition

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

shawnxyz

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 12:46

Subject:

Show a total on "Orders" Page?

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

I'd like to know what the sum of all my 15 current orders are - so I'd
like a "total" section on the orders page.

Author:

bb217310

Posted:

Jun 15, 2017 10:32

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

I prefer clasic wanted list.

Thanks. If you can show two options, is beetter.

Author:

bb69656

Posted:

Jun 14, 2017 17:50

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - dec. hip&leg restict.

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Guidelines for adding items to the catalog:", Section 8, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71

"Decorated Minifig Hips and Legs - Submission of entries for the separate component
parts of a printed Minifig, Legs Assembly item is currently discouraged except
under certain circumstances. Those are 1) an administrative judgment that the
minifig involved is significant in some way, and 2) the general design of the
minifig involved is produced in both printed and unprinted legs assembly versions."

Please do this so that all decorated hips and legs may be added and sold individually
on bricklink without restriction.

(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)

Thank you for your consideration,
Andy

I voted yes bc some hips are good for customs but legs too ornate, ie this is
a belt on hips.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 14:21

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, WoutR writes:

Having the images in the catalog is one thing, creating inventories and selling
them is something else.

Agreed. I'm definitely for having and being able to add to the Unreleased
Sets section, so I support that part of the suggestion. I question the wisdom,
however, of adding inventories for unreleased sets.

Author:

WoutR

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 14:15

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, StormChaser writes:

In Suggestions, WoutR writes:

If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets?

I don't believe anyone wants to pretend they were official sets, but the
Unreleased Sets section of the BrickLink catalog is very useful since many of
them have official LEGO set images:

6500-1 Holiday Village
1996
Sets: Town: Classic Town
Unreleased

Having the images in the catalog is one thing, creating inventories and selling
them is something else.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 14:07

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, WoutR writes:

If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets?

I don't believe anyone wants to pretend they were official sets, but the
Unreleased Sets section of the BrickLink catalog is very useful since many of
them have official LEGO set images:

6500-1 Holiday Village
1996
Sets: Town: Classic Town
Unreleased

Author:

WoutR

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 13:58

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

In Suggestions, novabrick writes:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Items that should not be added to the catalog:", Section 1, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71

"Also, do not submit items which have been verified as never released, even if
a picture is available."

There is already a large list of unreleased sets on bricklink. There is no reason
why more should not be allowed to be added, so that bricklink can remain the
most complete Lego database. (Otherwise, what's the point to even having
the current list???)

And there is no reason why people should not be able to buy and sell these sets
even if the boxes and instructions were not officially released (since many of
these sets can be fully made from the released pieces).

(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)

Thank you for your consideration,
Andy

This does exist yet:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N

or am I missing something?

Christian

novabrick-team

Yes, the catalog adminstrators refuse to add more sets to that category when
I have submitted them multiple times. The submission is immediately deleted.

Also, I am not allowed to sell sets in the unreleased category, even if all of
the parts are available and I can make a used set to sell.

If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets? Maybe the only place where they belong is in the MOC
shop.

Or am I missing something here?

Author:

LordSkylark

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 13:25

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, novabrick writes:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

This does exist yet:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N

or am I missing something?

Christian

novabrick-team

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 12:07

Subject:

Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

Are you sure? 4 are used per wing = 8 total.

Pg. 17: four are used for one wing. Then on pg. 35 it shows that you repeat
all the steps from pgs. 16-35 to build the second wing.

In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:

Piece 2420 (2x2 corner plate) in dark gray is in this set 8 times according to
the Bricklnk parts list, but in reality you need 16. Please fix this, so others
who want to bricklink the set don't encounter the same problem I did when
putting everything together

. Thanks!

Author:

M.Boss

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 12:03

Subject:

Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:

. Thanks!

Use the link below for Inventory changes, the suggestions topic is meant for
improving the website.

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChange.asp?itemType=S

M.Boss

Author:

TomVanhaelen

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 11:32

Subject:

Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor

Viewed:

84 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

. Thanks!

Author:

novabrick

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 02:50

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

57 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

This does exist yet:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N

or am I missing something?

Christian

novabrick-team

Author:

LordSkylark

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 18:00

Subject:

Bionicle+Hero Factory+Large Figure Category

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Please combine the catalog categories on one category:

Bionicle
Hero Factory
Large Figure Part
(and even a few bionicles parts that are for some reason stuck in the technic
category when they are used for nothing other than bionicles).

Then, sub-divide that category into several smaller categories such as:
Head, Mask, Torso, Limb, Foot, etc.

There is no reason to have these three categories. Large amounts of a part found
in one category is used by another. For example, some Hero Factory parts are
used in more bionicle figures than Hero Factory. And wading through any of those
three categories even in their current state in order to find something is almost
ridiculous.

(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)

Author:

LordSkylark

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 17:48

Subject:

Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

109 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

LordSkylark

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 17:47

Subject:

Remove catalog policy - dec. hip&leg restict.

Viewed:

85 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

Bionicleseller

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 14:18

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

Please Please Please leave up the old version! I use it all the time and the
new version is nowhere near as useful. It doesn't even work at all! I have
tried to figure out why but I have no idea and I can't imagine other people
who are new to the site would be having an easier time using it either.

I have a suggestion. BrickLink should have all of the users vote on what they
think should be done. It's just my opinion, but I think you guys would be
surprised to see how many people really don't like the new version and want
to stick with the classic version.

Author:

randyipp

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 13:54

Subject:

Re: Keep history of Splash page

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

Some sellers don't have anything listed in the terms and conditions and nothing
listed in thes shipping section. Instead everything is posted in their splash
page. This gives those sellers the ability to change their terms and shipping
rates at anytime without the buyer being able to go back and look at the terms/shipping
when they made their purchase.

The only method to prove what the terms were is to make a screenshot of the splash
page when the purchase is made. Then the burden of proof is on the buyer to
prove that the screenshot was the terms/shipping policy when the purchase was
made.

Please start keeping a history of the splash page. For sellers that externally
host their splash page maybe and automatic daily screenshot can be captured and
retained as the terms/shipping policy for the day.

Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.

Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.

If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.

You should inform those sellers that they should state fees etc on their Terms
page.

All additional fees other than shipping and insurance must be stated here.
Please keep your terms clear and to the point. Your terms are also displayed
to a buyer on checkout prior to placing an order.

Yes this seems like a poor way to deal with shipping/terms when there is no history
retained. Seems to me that none of their terms should be enforceable with the
way they have configured their store.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 13:47

Subject:

Re: Keep history of Splash page

Viewed:

26 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.

Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.

If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 13:38

Subject:

Re: Keep history of Splash page

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

[…]

Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.

Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.

If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.

Sorry, when I say “don’t take… as proof,” I’m thinking “BL admins ought not to
take… as proof.”

If there’s a problem, only the terms page should serve as proof. If the seller
has only given their policies in their splash page, tough luck, the buyer is
right.

Author:

Cob

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 12:33

Subject:

Re: Keep history of Splash page

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.

Some sellers have the terms and shipping policies completely blank. So there
is nothing to rely upon.

If you want I can PM you an example. I don't want to publicly announce the
seller.

Author:

Lkj

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 11:45

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

So glad you haven't dropped the good, old Classic Wanted List. So much better
than the new one! Hope you've changed your minds. Please keep it!

In Administrative, Admin_Jaclyn writes:

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 09:12

Subject:

Re: Keep history of Splash page

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, Cob writes:

Or simply don’t take the splash page as proof of anything and state that only
what’s on the terms page counts.

Author:

Cob

Posted:

Jun 12, 2017 08:48

Subject:

Keep history of Splash page

Viewed:

93 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 10, 2017 05:42

Subject:

Move new pop up login screen

Viewed:

143 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Because the new pop up login screen pops up in the middle of the screen is it
disappears under the also popping up keyboard on my mobile phone.

Please consider moving it to the upper right, where it was before.

Thank you.

In Administrative, C0lsanders_ writes:
One thing I have just noticed while logging in, is the new log in method, no
more drop-down (despite the little arrow remaining) and a new little window pops
up. but takes a good bit longer to load on my computer and/or with my not-so-great
internet. "Old" drop-down was always just about instant. But I can deal with
that.

However, there does not seem to be an equivalent for the previous "go to My BL"
or whatever it said. Requires an extra step now. Can that be added? Just one
small radio button on the dialog box...

Otherwise, great news on attempting to address scammers!

Miles (C0lsanders_)

In Administrative, QA_Sheryl writes:
Hi C0lsanders_,

Sorry I forgot to mention that! We updated the Settings page so that you are
now able to select your default landing page after logging in. There are several
options for you to choose from. Just a reminder for everyone, you can access
this page by hovering over or clicking on My BL and then clicking on Settings.

Thanks,
Sheryl

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 10, 2017 05:38

Subject:

Add more options as landing page

Viewed:

79 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
Please consider adding more landing page options as Forum etc.

Thank you.

In Administrative, QA_Sheryl writes:

Sorry I forgot to mention that! We updated the Settings page so that you are
now able to select your default landing page after logging in. There are several
options for you to choose from. Just a reminder for everyone, you can access
this page by hovering over or clicking on My BL and then clicking on Settings.

Thanks,
Sheryl

Author:

quasar

Posted:

Jun 9, 2017 23:35

Subject:

Re: Option to save search settings for Wanted Lis

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

Please, please, please fix this! Having a default sort order of "newest" makes
it really hard to find a wanted list when I have 20+ lists. I can change it to
"alphabetical", but the next time I go back to the wanted lists page it reverted
back to "newest".

Also, once I've set the sort order, having that flow through to everywhere
that wanted lists are displayed in a list would be super awesome!

Author:

qwertyboy

Posted:

Jun 8, 2017 18:39

Subject:

Re: Paypal payment

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, swoosh_factor writes:

I think it will also lead to an increase in paypal/credit card chargebacks for
things like buyer's remorse and unauthorized account use that may otherwise
have ended up as cancelations or NPB's. I'd much prefer to deal with
the NPB process (for the ~1% of orders in my store) and keep my product in hand
than dealing with the double whammy of shipping items and getting hit with a
chargeback after the fact.

Most of these fears stem from guessing and assuming the worst. On the other site
with automatic checkout we processed close to 500 orders, with zero chargebacks
or buyers remorse. I firmly believe it will bring way more good than bad. And
if you don't want to do it, you can simply not offer it.

Niek.

Author:

swoosh_factor

Posted:

Jun 8, 2017 15:30

Subject:

Re: Paypal payment

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

I'm on the fence about instant checkout. On one hand it will eliminate questions
about shipping costs and NPBs. However, on the other hand our options to refuse
to pay for or disputing an incomplete order (parts not available) will also
be gone. With the number of stores that have inventory errors I feel like instant
checkout is going to lead to other issues. More non-positive fb and retaliatory
fb.

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Jun 8, 2017 12:47

Subject:

Re: Paypal payment

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

Author:

mikmo

Posted:

Jun 8, 2017 12:46

Subject:

Re: Paypal payment

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

Instant check out requires the BL can calculate shipping cost for all different
shipping methods, in all countries, which is very very very difficult. On top
of that, it requires that weight and dimensions for all parts be accurate, which
they currently are not.

Instant checkout is a sweet daydream. But "We are working on it"

Mikael / MikMo

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 8, 2017 12:19

Subject:

Re: Paypal payment

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, EasyBricks writes:

Hello
Maybe this topic was a long time ago, but I would like to ask if you think that
payment via paypal should be immediate after the order is placed. Many of you
had situations where customers canceled orders after a week / two, did not pay,
and you had other people interested in your products and prices. Should not it
be like many other well-known sites that like to buy something immediately pay
for it (via paypal)? What do you think about that?
(Sorry for my not quite good english)
Regards
easybricks

I prefer items in order accuracy over instant payment at checkout.
NPBs aren't that such a big issue for my store.

Author:

bb503266

Posted:

Jun 8, 2017 12:11

Subject:

Paypal payment

Viewed:

109 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

JATB

Posted:

Jun 7, 2017 20:29

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

I am not a fan of the new wanted list. To much effort for such a simple task
of adding a part. I love the classic version and will continue to use it as long
it is available. Don't see why we can't have both or why the new one
exists in the first place. If it ain't broke don't break it.

In Administrative, Admin_Jaclyn writes:

Author:

doc.moose

Posted:

Jun 7, 2017 10:40

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

the new design sucks. stay by the classic version. it is so much better to handle.
PLEASE.

Author:

r_and_kharrison

Posted:

Jun 7, 2017 07:48

Subject:

Include On Hand field in Wanted List Search

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

The wanted list search page here https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/search.page
does not provide an option to use the "on hand" values in that search.

Scenarios:
Show me all items on all wanted lists where I have a value in the on hand field
Show me all the items of a particular nature where I have a value in the on hand
field
Show me all items where I do not have a value on hand
Show me all items where the value on hand is equal to the qty wanted

Author:

r_and_kharrison

Posted:

Jun 7, 2017 00:36

Subject:

Option to save search settings for Wanted Lis

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

The wanted list view at this page https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/list.page?utm_content=subnav
does not remember my search settings and keeps reverting back.

Scenario:
Change the search to by "Completion" and "Down" sort order.
Open a wanted list to review
Hit browser back arrow to return to the page
Reverts to default search settings

Can you please add the ability to save your default search criteria?

Additionally, a filter to only show those with items on hand / not on hand /
not completed / partially completed would be useful

Author:

r_and_kharrison

Posted:

Jun 7, 2017 00:24

Subject:

Option to exclude On-Hand from Auto-fill Min

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]