BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:

In Suggestions, logansbricks writes:

Howdy guys! I was wondering if it is possible to have our picking list separated
into New and Used But still be in order of item number? For example, all the
new would be at the top of the list but be in the correct item number order,
then the used (in correct order) would be after the new. It would be soooo helpful
since the New and Used are obviously in different places in our physical stores.
Yikes, dare I say this BUT, that is how Brickowl does it and it is just much,
much easier to pull.
thanks for lending an ear

sherry

Change the sorting below the order details page

I know what you mean OP. From where I sit, there is no option for "condition,
then number". For myself I would love "condition, remarks, number" .

I also notice that my spreadsheet doesn't sort 123 and 123a in the right
order so I have to take an extra step to make that work.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 22, 2017 10:40

Subject:

Re: separate picking list by New and Used

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, logansbricks writes:

sherry

Change the sorting below the order details page.

Author:

ShipABrick

Posted:

Jun 22, 2017 10:39

Subject:

separate picking list by New and Used

Viewed:

91 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

sherry

Author:

QuarkyBricks

Posted:

Jun 20, 2017 14:37

Subject:

Re: Upgrade Stripe intergration

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

Another reason that this is important is that many online order/shipping management
programs sync with Stripe Relay and not just payments processed through Stripe.
This means that orders paid for with Stripe have to have shipping labels created
manually.

Good suggestion!

Author:

Cob

Posted:

Jun 19, 2017 12:11

Subject:

Upgrade Stripe intergration

Viewed:

88 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

With instant checkout coming in the near future, please upgrade the Stripe integration
to perform validation checks between the buyer address and the credit card records.

Also upgrade Stripe so that API is used versus only submitting the user name.

Thank you,
Jacob

Author:

StephCad

Posted:

Jun 19, 2017 08:44

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

Hello,

If it is possible can you please keep the old version available ? I can't
get used to the new one...

Thank you so much for your work and for this marvellous website !!!

Best Regards,

Stéphanie

Author:

drg7949

Posted:

Jun 18, 2017 18:44

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

58 times

Topic:

I'll pile on, as well...

We appreciate all of the hard work on the new design, but there is certain functionality
that is lacking, or at least less obvious. I always start with the new design,
but find myself going back to the Classic view every time.

Quick example: in the Classic view, if I added part #61190d to my WL, and wanted
to change it to 61190e (or change from one color to another), I could do that
easily by editing the record itself. In the new version, I don't see a way
other than to add the new item and remove the old. Is it that a big deal? No,
but it's indicative.

Please keep the classic view!

Darren

In Administrative, Admin_Jaclyn writes:

Hello Everyone,

In June of last year, we introduced a new Wanted List upgrade. This upgrade came
with a newly-designed buying experience which focused on the necessity to compare
and plan out multiple carts at once, as well as make it easier to manage multiple
lists.

Since BrickLink's Wanted List is a core feature for most users, we currently
provide the classic version for members to use as a backup in case there are
glitches with the new version. This is intended to be a temporary solution.

The classic version of the Wanted List feature will become unavailable on
June 5, 2017. At this point, we have ensured that the new version of the
Wanted List covers all desired functionality (plus more) from the classic version.
If you have any issues with the new version, please let us know as soon as possible.

Thank you for the continued support, bug reports, and helpful feedback as we
continue to roll out important changes.

Sincerely,

Jaclyn
BrickLink Customer Support

Author:

bb69656

Posted:

Jun 18, 2017 10:39

Subject:

Bigger Pictures

Viewed:

96 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Now that everything minifigure is dual sided, the pictures have effectively halved
in size. Also, the description on the page is large, and picture small (in a
store).

Ebay has gone to bigger pictures (free) which tends to prove they work. Can
we allocate more space to pictures?

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:33

Subject:

Re: Select all in want list search buying.

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

What does the current "Status: Already Exists" mean? Where can I find this functionality?

In Suggestions, j7r7o7c7k7 writes:

When you go to buy items in your want lists, it ask you to select the want lists
you want to buy from. Well I have like 60+ lists (one for each set) so I have
to click ever single one each time I want to run a search to find items. But
there is a deselect button there so I can unclick all in one shot, but can we
add a select all button?? A small suggestion, but try clicking 60+ times before
you even start your search lol. Thanks

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:31

Subject:

Re: Select all in want list search buying.

Viewed:

17 times

Topic:

Yes, this needs to be implemented. I do have a separate wanted list for every
set as well.

In Suggestions, j7r7o7c7k7 writes:

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:24

Subject:

Re: Wanted List - Buy - Show Price & Condition

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, HPBrickhead writes:

Hi, when using the BUY NOW feature of the wanted list, it shows me the stores
but not:
a) condition of the item (new / used)
b) what the price is in each store

b) is available if you open a WL (just to look at it), and click “More Options”
and then “Items for Sale: Show” and “Apply” (beware the default sort “by store
name”).

(It’s like in the Old/Classic WL’s feature to show stores. “Buy” works like “By
Shop,” where prices and items weren’t shown either.)

Instead I see a "minimum purchase" total.

So you have to go to each store and check, or to the price guide, which doesn't
make a quick buy that quick.

If you “select” a store, a dialog appears with all the items in the store, their
prices and conditions. You can then cancel or actually select the store.

(You can also just click in the store’s line, it will show what items in your
WLs are available in the store, and in what quantities, in the item list on the
left by outlining the pictures.)

You still have to check the price guide yourself though.

There was a feature that gave a “percentage relative to the price guide,” in
red for overpriced items, in green for better priced items. It was removed. It
didn’t work well though.

Could we change this?

“We?” No. BrickLink? I doubt they would.

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:10

Subject:

Re: Wanted List - Buy - Show Price & Condition

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, HPBrickhead writes:

Hi, when using the BUY NOW feature of the wanted list, it shows me the stores
but not:
a) condition of the item (new / used)
b) what the price is in each store

Instead I see a "minimum purchase" total.

So you have to go to each store and check, or to the price guide, which doesn't
make a quick buy that quick.

Could we change this?

Yes please.

This has been mentioned multiple times and should already have been added.
They want us to use the Auto-Finder or Buy Now feature.

Author:

bb69656

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 15:04

Subject:

Wanted List - Buy - Show Price & Condition

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Author:

shawnxyz

Posted:

Jun 16, 2017 12:46

Subject:

Show a total on "Orders" Page?

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

I'd like to know what the sum of all my 15 current orders are - so I'd
like a "total" section on the orders page.

Author:

bb217310

Posted:

Jun 15, 2017 10:32

Subject:

Re: Classic Wanted List Unavailable on June 5th

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

I prefer clasic wanted list.

Thanks. If you can show two options, is beetter.

Author:

bb69656

Posted:

Jun 14, 2017 17:50

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - dec. hip&leg restict.

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Guidelines for adding items to the catalog:", Section 8, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71

"Decorated Minifig Hips and Legs - Submission of entries for the separate component
parts of a printed Minifig, Legs Assembly item is currently discouraged except
under certain circumstances. Those are 1) an administrative judgment that the
minifig involved is significant in some way, and 2) the general design of the
minifig involved is produced in both printed and unprinted legs assembly versions."

Please do this so that all decorated hips and legs may be added and sold individually
on bricklink without restriction.

(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)

Thank you for your consideration,
Andy

I voted yes bc some hips are good for customs but legs too ornate, ie this is
a belt on hips.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 14:21

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, WoutR writes:

Having the images in the catalog is one thing, creating inventories and selling
them is something else.

Agreed. I'm definitely for having and being able to add to the Unreleased
Sets section, so I support that part of the suggestion. I question the wisdom,
however, of adding inventories for unreleased sets.

Author:

WoutR

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 14:15

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, StormChaser writes:

In Suggestions, WoutR writes:

If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets?

I don't believe anyone wants to pretend they were official sets, but the
Unreleased Sets section of the BrickLink catalog is very useful since many of
them have official LEGO set images:

6500-1 Holiday Village
1996
Sets: Town: Classic Town
Unreleased

Having the images in the catalog is one thing, creating inventories and selling
them is something else.

Author:

StormChaser

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 14:07

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, WoutR writes:

If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets?

I don't believe anyone wants to pretend they were official sets, but the
Unreleased Sets section of the BrickLink catalog is very useful since many of
them have official LEGO set images:

6500-1 Holiday Village
1996
Sets: Town: Classic Town
Unreleased

Author:

WoutR

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 13:58

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

In Suggestions, novabrick writes:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

Please revise the catalog policy by removing this restriction to the catalog
from:
"Items that should not be added to the catalog:", Section 1, on this page:
http://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=71

"Also, do not submit items which have been verified as never released, even if
a picture is available."

There is already a large list of unreleased sets on bricklink. There is no reason
why more should not be allowed to be added, so that bricklink can remain the
most complete Lego database. (Otherwise, what's the point to even having
the current list???)

And there is no reason why people should not be able to buy and sell these sets
even if the boxes and instructions were not officially released (since many of
these sets can be fully made from the released pieces).

(NOTE: This is not a catalog request, or anything of the sort -- this is
a post which is to be voted on by the community and for the head administration
to see in the SUGGESTIONS for them to possibly implement.)

Thank you for your consideration,
Andy

This does exist yet:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N

or am I missing something?

Christian

novabrick-team

Yes, the catalog adminstrators refuse to add more sets to that category when
I have submitted them multiple times. The submission is immediately deleted.

Also, I am not allowed to sell sets in the unreleased category, even if all of
the parts are available and I can make a used set to sell.

If LEGO decided that the sets are not good enough to sell, why should we pretend
they were official sets? Maybe the only place where they belong is in the MOC
shop.

Or am I missing something here?

Author:

LordSkylark

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 13:25

Subject:

Re: Remove catalog policy - unreleased set restr.

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, novabrick writes:

In Suggestions, LordSkylark writes:

This does exist yet:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?itemStatus=N

or am I missing something?

Christian

novabrick-team

Author:

tEoS

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 12:07

Subject:

Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

Are you sure? 4 are used per wing = 8 total.

Pg. 17: four are used for one wing. Then on pg. 35 it shows that you repeat
all the steps from pgs. 16-35 to build the second wing.

In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:

Piece 2420 (2x2 corner plate) in dark gray is in this set 8 times according to
the Bricklnk parts list, but in reality you need 16. Please fix this, so others
who want to bricklink the set don't encounter the same problem I did when
putting everything together

. Thanks!

Author:

M.Boss

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 12:03

Subject:

Re: Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, TomVanhaelen writes:

. Thanks!

Use the link below for Inventory changes, the suggestions topic is meant for
improving the website.

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChange.asp?itemType=S

M.Boss

Author:

TomVanhaelen

Posted:

Jun 13, 2017 11:32

Subject:

Parts list error for 7181 UCS TIE Interceptor

Viewed:

84 times

Topic: